RWBY Thread III: Time To Say Goodbye

Stop: So gotta few things that need to be said real quick.
so gotta few things that need to be said real quick.
We get a lot of reports from this thread. A lot of it is just a series of people yelling at each other over arguments that have been rehashed hundreds of times since the end of the recent Volume. And I get that the last Volume - and RWBY in general, really - has some controversial moments that people will want to discuss, argue about, debate, etc.

That's fine. We're not going to stop people from doing that, because that's literally what the point of the thread is. However, there's just a point where it gets to be a bit too much, and arguments about whether or not Ironwood was morally justified in his actions in the recent Volume, or if RWBY and her team were in the right for withholding information from Ironwood out of distrust, or whatever flavor of argument of the day descend into insulting other posters, expressing a demeaning attitude towards other's opinions, and just being overall unpleasant. That tends to happen a lot in this thread. We want it to stop happening in this thread.

So! As of now the thread is in a higher state of moderation. What that means is that any future infractions will result in a weeklong boot from the thread, and repeated offenders will likely be permanently removed. So please, everyone endeavor to actually respect the other's arguments, and even if you strongly disagree with them please stay civil and mindful when it comes to responding to others.

In addition, users should refrain from talking about off-site users in the thread. Bear in mind that this does not mean that you cannot continue to post tumblr posts, for example, that add onto the discussion in the thread, with the caveat that it's related to RWBY of course. But any objections to offsite users in the thread should be handled via PM, or they'll be treated as thread violations and infracted as such.
 
Last edited:
I agree with some aspects but not others, I felt Blake started out strong during her initial paranoia and sadness and her interactions with her parents were great but yeah otherwise kind of a flawed arc. As to Sun though I don't feel he was out of character at all in this, but the portrayal of his actions as positives does grate on me. As to the slapping though, context matters, Jac has full power over Weiss, he is manipulative, domineering and blatantly abusive (Especially in the manga) and he slapped her for mouthing off to him, nothing more. Blake's slaps were delivered in high emotional state situations where Sun had been scaring her and invading her privacy and putting her and others in danger by playing around or breaking stuff in her house. Context matters.

I think that the very beginning of Blake's arc was okay, but it immediately decayed as soon as Sun was on screen. They almost immediately started arguing and fighting when people's lives were at risk. The only instance where that's happened before is when Weiss and Ruby initially became partners. The difference is that's shown immediately to be dysfunctional and not the way to create a true partnership, Weiss had to put aside her own arrogance and then lose the chip on her shoulder before she could work with Ruby.

I also agree that Sun isn't out of character, per say, but his presence does reveal an underlying weakness in RWBY's narrative that's been present for a while. I've elaborated on it here, but TL;DR, RT mixes a lot of funny moments in with violence and deadly serious situations. Combined with liberal use of Deus Ex Machina in earlier volumes and that's what ended up causing people to feel so betrayed once volume 3 rolls around. The difference, is that all of those instances of mixing comedy with violence or ignoring the consequences have stopped occurring except for Sun and Blake. No one else laughs or jokes, or succumbs to infighting when they're dealing with danger. It's the exception that proves the rule, the lesson RT almost learned.

As for Blake slapping Sun, I will never be comfortable with someone hitting a romantic partner being treated as comedy. If I had to say whether Jacques hitting Weiss or Blake hitting Sun was worse, then I would be forced to go with the former. That still doesn't make Blake's behaviour all right or humerous. The complaint is more about the themes and cultural memes being conveyed here. On a meta level, it's more egregious to me because it's not treated as a problem in-setting. Think about the message it's sending. As for Sun's stalking Blake, similar situation. It's the same kind of complaint as the ones leveled against Twilight, just not as insanely unhealthy and co-dependent. If Blake had talked to Sun instead of throwing him to the ground and slapping him after the Grimm dragon fight, I'd support her narrative a lot more. Sun is creepy and this isn't the first time he's stalked Blake, he was hanging outside her window in Vol 2. Wow, that happened in Twilight too, didn't it? As it sits, it just looks like a massively dysfunctional relationship. Everything that I see bad in the relationships that teenagers get themselves into is rewritten here a hundredfold.

I've always thought that reducing potentially abusive behaviours to comedy has poisoned people's attitudes. Not only does it make people more likely to be victimized, but it results in the normalization of abusive behaviour as not that big of a deal, potentially even desirable in a partner. To be honest, I see this most, but not exclusively, among teens. They learn so many stupid ideas from media glamourizing relationships and behaviours they really shouldn't. If RT was making a point about how toxic media influences how people develop in relationships, something that pointed out things weren't okay, I'd be happy. The problem is, we're not going to get that. Instead, we'll get another normalized comedic interpretation of abuse and dysfunctional relationships. We're going to get another Twilight-lite where stalking isn't presented as a problem. We're going to get another narrative that send another nasty message and drips more poison into people's ears.

Not working in social services I only have people I know to act as a frame of reference (Along with some personal research) and I felt he worked fairly well. The idea you suggest is a solid one, though I also feel it would, A, place more fault on Weiss for something out of her control and B, would be misunderstood by fans given Jac has so many defenders. Plus I felt the slap worked because he did it so obviously because she refuted him, and was so calm about it, this is something he's done before and will do again if given the chance.

I went back and rewatched all of the Jacques scenes. Part of what was throwing me off was that, at times, especially in his first scene, Jacques seemed to know exactly what buttons to push on Weiss. At other times, especially later on, he seemed to ignore that and double down on coercion. The positive reinforcement causing gaslighting is a key component of abuse because it makes the victim doubt the veracity and severity of when their abuser doubles down on an emotional attack.

The main disconnect I'm seeing is that Jacques never uses the carrot with Weiss after she meets him again for the first time. In that meeting he's willing to tolerate her questioning and even subtly snubbing him, but in ever single instance after that, he has to be in control 100% of the time. Weiss goes from being able to question him, to roll her eyes to his face, to being able to do absolutely nothing without his express approval beforehand. I feel that RT went too far in the other direction after the first scene.

In large part, I bet that's because they noticed that Jacques had defenders as soon as they started scripting out the earlier parts of the script and running it by other people as the first step of idiot proofreading. Kerry and Miles very understandably didn't want to write any story where a child abuser could in any way be deemed as sympathetic, so they removed all instances of positive reinforcement after Jacques introductory scene to confirm he's a bad guy. The problem is twofold, for me. First, it really weakens their narrative. Second, it creates a disconnect between early Jacques and later Jacques.

Abuse is bad. This really doesn't bear repeating, but it is very important to note since it greatly alters the perception of people when the subject comes up. Therefore, the common social conception is that someone who uses abuse is a bad person. Unfortunately, society takes this to mean that abusers are all bad, especially child abusers. What could be worse than someone abusing a helpless child? The problem is, this, very paradoxically, makes people likely to minimize child abuse. Given the immense power parents wield over their children, only people who've been involved with the parents, who have some type of relationship with them is going to notice it. Grandparents, aunts, uncles, neighbours, friends, those are the type of people who have the most opportunity to notice abuse. They're the ones that meet up with the abuser, come into their home, see the kids, etc.

Yet, teachers and doctors report to CAS far more often than close family members do. Why? The difference is, aside from any training, teachers and doctors are totally willing to accept that a parent can be a bad person since they rarely actually meet them. Family and friends do not. They'll minimize or gloss over what they see because they don't see a bad person when they look at the abuser. They'll see that fantastic baseball player, the person who makes wonderful brownies, the handy mechanic, etc, etc.

I think that giving Jacques defenders among the fandom isn't actually a problem and could serve a more compelling point when RT does pull the carpet out from under them and flat out say that Jacques is actually Jackass, the abusive dick. This is what goes on, right now in real life. I think one of the biggest hurdles any social worker would bring up is the perception that abusers are bad, irredeemable monsters. They deserve time in prison, yes, but society currently pictures them like faceless flesh eating monsters instead of the person that comes with a smile, a flower in hand and poison in the other.
 
No one's defending anything. You're the one attacking people. Chill out.

Oh, and before you start on me? My sibling's gay. You'll get no defense of homophobia from me.
I didn't attack anyone and how is deriding a whole community of already marginalised people as "immoral" not attacking people?

Start on you? I didn't call the last person homophobic, don't put words in my mouth.


I think that the very beginning of Blake's arc was okay, but it immediately decayed as soon as Sun was on screen. They almost immediately started arguing and fighting when people's lives were at risk. The only instance where that's happened before is when Weiss and Ruby initially became partners. The difference is that's shown immediately to be dysfunctional and not the way to create a true partnership, Weiss had to put aside her own arrogance and then lose the chip on her shoulder before she could work with Ruby.

I also agree that Sun isn't out of character, per say, but his presence does reveal an underlying weakness in RWBY's narrative that's been present for a while. I've elaborated on it here, but TL;DR, RT mixes a lot of funny moments in with violence and deadly serious situations. Combined with liberal use of Deus Ex Machina in earlier volumes and that's what ended up causing people to feel so betrayed once volume 3 rolls around. The difference, is that all of those instances of mixing comedy with violence or ignoring the consequences have stopped occurring except for Sun and Blake. No one else laughs or jokes, or succumbs to infighting when they're dealing with danger. It's the exception that proves the rule, the lesson RT almost learned.
I can definitely see your points there and largely agree with them, though I blame Sun for that more than I do Blake given how he kept playing around during the fight while she was trying to take it seriously but being frustrated by his presence.

I think I get what you're saying here.

RT has utilised comedy in nominally serious battles in the past, (Sun ditching out on the Paladin fight never being addressed or called out) but capped that in V3, except for battles involving him creating a broken tone. Is that in the ballpark?

As for Blake slapping Sun, I will never be comfortable with someone hitting a romantic partner being treated as comedy. If I had to say whether Jacques hitting Weiss or Blake hitting Sun was worse, then I would be forced to go with the former. That still doesn't make Blake's behaviour all right or humerous. The complaint is more about the themes and cultural memes being conveyed here. On a meta level, it's more egregious to me because it's not treated as a problem in-setting. Think about the message it's sending. As for Sun's stalking Blake, similar situation. It's the same kind of complaint as the ones leveled against Twilight, just not as insanely unhealthy and co-dependent. If Blake had talked to Sun instead of throwing him to the ground and slapping him after the Grimm dragon fight, I'd support her narrative a lot more. Sun is creepy and this isn't the first time he's stalked Blake, he was hanging outside her window in Vol 2. Wow, that happened in Twilight too, didn't it? As it sits, it just looks like a massively dysfunctional relationship. Everything that I see bad in the relationships that teenagers get themselves into is rewritten here a hundredfold.

I've always thought that reducing potentially abusive behaviours to comedy has poisoned people's attitudes. Not only does it make people more likely to be victimized, but it results in the normalization of abusive behaviour as not that big of a deal, potentially even desirable in a partner. To be honest, I see this most, but not exclusively, among teens. They learn so many stupid ideas from media glamourizing relationships and behaviours they really shouldn't. If RT was making a point about how toxic media influences how people develop in relationships, something that pointed out things weren't okay, I'd be happy. The problem is, we're not going to get that. Instead, we'll get another normalized comedic interpretation of abuse and dysfunctional relationships. We're going to get another Twilight-lite where stalking isn't presented as a problem. We're going to get another narrative that send another nasty message and drips more poison into people's ears.
Not sure they're actually dating to be honest, though I grasp your intent. If it helps I think the slapping when he was spying on her was being treated not as a joke, the slow motion one was definitely but we have Ruby punching Yang in the face so... But the second round seemed more tied up in how heated the situation was and not played for laughs. I by in large agree with what you're saying, interesting comparison and insights.

I went back and rewatched all of the Jacques scenes. Part of what was throwing me off was that, at times, especially in his first scene, Jacques seemed to know exactly what buttons to push on Weiss. At other times, especially later on, he seemed to ignore that and double down on coercion. The positive reinforcement causing gaslighting is a key component of abuse because it makes the victim doubt the veracity and severity of when their abuser doubles down on an emotional attack.

The main disconnect I'm seeing is that Jacques never uses the carrot with Weiss after she meets him again for the first time. In that meeting he's willing to tolerate her questioning and even subtly snubbing him, but in ever single instance after that, he has to be in control 100% of the time. Weiss goes from being able to question him, to roll her eyes to his face, to being able to do absolutely nothing without his express approval beforehand. I feel that RT went too far in the other direction after the first scene.
While I do see your point, I also feel its plausible that Jac is simply not as competent at this as he'd like to be. Keep in mind he's failed to keep a hold of Winter or Weiss, both of whom loath him seemingly and his own wife is drunk most of the time. That is to say, Jac may be able to push buttons when he;s had time to prepare but that doesn't mean he's good at adapting and the like.

I think a big difference is they were in public later, he's willing to play games in private cos his ego isn't as on the line, but in public things are different so he's more controlling and less patient cos he doesn't have the time to try and mind games Weiss.

Plus keep in mind Weiss has referenced him having a temper before and based on the manga he is not as subtle as one might think. Or, if nothing else, Weiss can see through him with ease.

In large part, I bet that's because they noticed that Jacques had defenders as soon as they started scripting out the earlier parts of the script and running it by other people as the first step of idiot proofreading. Kerry and Miles very understandably didn't want to write any story where a child abuser could in any way be deemed as sympathetic, so they removed all instances of positive reinforcement after Jacques introductory scene to confirm he's a bad guy. The problem is twofold, for me. First, it really weakens their narrative. Second, it creates a disconnect between early Jacques and later Jacques.
I'm not so sure they'd have noticed that myself, but I can't really comment on what goes on in the writing rooms.

Abuse is bad. This really doesn't bear repeating, but it is very important to note since it greatly alters the perception of people when the subject comes up. Therefore, the common social conception is that someone who uses abuse is a bad person. Unfortunately, society takes this to mean that abusers are all bad, especially child abusers. What could be worse than someone abusing a helpless child? The problem is, this, very paradoxically, makes people likely to minimize child abuse. Given the immense power parents wield over their children, only people who've been involved with the parents, who have some type of relationship with them is going to notice it. Grandparents, aunts, uncles, neighbours, friends, those are the type of people who have the most opportunity to notice abuse. They're the ones that meet up with the abuser, come into their home, see the kids, etc.

Yet, teachers and doctors report to CAS far more often than close family members do. Why? The difference is, aside from any training, teachers and doctors are totally willing to accept that a parent can be a bad person since they rarely actually meet them. Family and friends do not. They'll minimize or gloss over what they see because they don't see a bad person when they look at the abuser. They'll see that fantastic baseball player, the person who makes wonderful brownies, the handy mechanic, etc, etc.
You raise fair and insightful points here, not gonna disagree with you on how people have perception bias.

I think that giving Jacques defenders among the fandom isn't actually a problem and could serve a more compelling point when RT does pull the carpet out from under them and flat out say that Jacques is actually Jackass, the abusive dick. This is what goes on, right now in real life. I think one of the biggest hurdles any social worker would bring up is the perception that abusers are bad, irredeemable monsters. They deserve time in prison, yes, but society currently pictures them like faceless flesh eating monsters instead of the person that comes with a smile, a flower in hand and poison in the other.
I am not so sure I agree here, for reference many people's response to Adam being shown off as the blatantly abusive creep he is was to claim he was suffering character derailment and if people are, and do, defend Jac as he is now being more subtle about it might not help either. Its an extremely complicated issue I agree though, abuse is terrible but can subtle and done by someone with charisma or who is so normal its hard for someone to grasp what they are truly and so people struggle with understanding forms of abuse that aren't blatant or that they can't pin on the victim so they can move on.
 
On the Jacques points above. His actions in both discriminating against faunus and abusing his children are horrible. I don't think any of his 'supporters' are arguing that he is justified in those regards. But any complexity as a character that we were hinted at wasn't shown in the season. I want to see Jacques have desires, goals, and motivations, but as he was portrayed in V4, they all felt flat. I'd rather seem him try to father Weiss, even if he's off the mark in his approach. We see a little bit of that in E7, but I wanted more out of him than what we got.

Another thing. Just because someone has a temper doesn't mean they can't be subtle. It's very likely that Jacques would lash out at anything that displeased him when he returned home, because he's supposed to be in charge of his household, and everything needs to be just right. Even if that means raising his voice to get it done.
 
RT has utilised comedy in nominally serious battles in the past, (Sun ditching out on the Paladin fight never being addressed or called out) but capped that in V3, except for battles involving him creating a broken tone. Is that in the ballpark?

Yes.

While I do see your point, I also feel its plausible that Jac is simply not as competent at this as he'd like to be. Keep in mind he's failed to keep a hold of Winter or Weiss, both of whom loath him seemingly and his own wife is drunk most of the time. That is to say, Jac may be able to push buttons when he;s had time to prepare but that doesn't mean he's good at adapting and the like.

I think a big difference is they were in public later, he's willing to play games in private cos his ego isn't as on the line, but in public things are different so he's more controlling and less patient cos he doesn't have the time to try and mind games Weiss.

Plus keep in mind Weiss has referenced him having a temper before and based on the manga he is not as subtle as one might think. Or, if nothing else, Weiss can see through him with ease.

Jacques managed to convince Nicholas to give him the company. He also managed to either control his wife enough that she didn't simply divorce him, or he managed to convince Nicholas to set up the inheritance in such a way that his wife couldn't simply get rid of him. Normally, since Jacques' wife is Nicholas' only apparent heir, all of the company would go to her with perhaps some going to Jacques as the CEO or stuff that's already been sold to shareholders. There's no reason to really give Jacques full, formal control as long as his wife's content to let him manage it. Given that Nicholas almost certainly kept 50%+1 shares to himself and they wouldn't have been divided among his descendants on his death, it makes you wonder why Jacques' wife still keeps him. The only thing that I can think of is that she just doesn't give a shit about her children or anyone else as long as Jacques keeps her well supplied with liquor. Or Jacques can be somewhat persuasive.

Even setting aside that, Jacques is (presumably) a CEO. High level corporate executives tend to be really good with social skills. Knowing who to suck up to, who to undermine, who to sell out, who to backstab, all of that is very important on the corporate ladder. None of that even touches on how CEOs are required to deal with high society, engage in negotiations, or basically be in charge of a tank of sharks. They have to deal with the bucket of crabs below them, constantly trying to claw their way to the top as well as other people external to the company seeking to undermine them. Looking like a moron is just as damaging for a CEO as being a moron. It's not a forgiving environment, much less for someone like Jacques who's made a lot of enemies with shady practices and casually running others out of business.

Jacques shouldn't be forcing his control on Weiss in public because it's public. It's extremely risky to do anything in public since people are inclined to notice things. Even if there's nothing truly abusive that occurs, all it takes is one person getting your name and reporting a concern to have CAS look into it. In fact, if CAS has a report, they often must look into it. Imagine all of the gossip and rumour that stalks high society, people would love to get some hint of discord in the Schnee family. Jacques has to know that his actions could really cost him and the company so it's an enormous risk to treat any of his children worse in public. Much less obviously treat Weiss worse than he does Whitley.

Weiss is actually a pretty bad judge of character and she tends towards impulsive action. Everything from instantly judging Ruby, to instantly judging Sun, to instantly judging Penny, to hating Blake after the WF reveal, to instantly forgiving her... and that's just in the 1st volume! In volume 4, Weiss didn't really understand her brother at all and seemed to fall into every line her father fed her. She was constantly surprised, happy, pleased, sad, resigned; her emotions rollarcoastered during her initial scene with Jacques. It was only after Jacques tripled down on the coercion that she clued in and started to consistently resist him. Weiss isn't nearly as calm or perceptive as she would like to think.

I'm not so sure they'd have noticed that myself, but I can't really comment on what goes on in the writing rooms.

Shockingly, I actually know this. RT has all of their writers submit finalized drafts to a central production manager in order to get them approved. It was covered in one of the RT life videoes I watched out of morbid curiosity. I can't speak to Kerry's or Miles' personal revision habits, but I always talk to a rock and explain every word I'm writing before ever offering up something for beta reading. I bet the two of them work together on writing and consult RT's other writers as well.

I am not so sure I agree here, for reference many people's response to Adam being shown off as the blatantly abusive creep he is was to claim he was suffering character derailment and if people are, and do, defend Jac as he is now being more subtle about it might not help either. Its an extremely complicated issue I agree though, abuse is terrible but can subtle and done by someone with charisma or who is so normal its hard for someone to grasp what they are truly and so people struggle with understanding forms of abuse that aren't blatant or that they can't pin on the victim so they can move on.

If this is your take away, then you're conceding the culture war to those types of people and allowing this issue to fester. To be honest, I wouldn't even really care about those people. It's not the ones that loudly proclaim Jacques or Adam did no wrong that you're trying to convince. The audience are the people that you're trying to convince. For every person who's uninvolved in a debate or doesn't have a strong opinion, for every one of them that you convert, you've weakened the previous cultural hegemony. Most people just go with the view that's echoed the loudest. Being the tallest nail that gets hammered down is supremely uncomfortable. Most people try to fit in and go with the majority opinion. By not engaging with the other, toxic, view, you concede to them the chance to convince everyone in the audience. Challenging the majority, fighting where others can see you, is the only way that you'll build support for any cause or cultural change. The publicity is actually super important. It doesn't matter if you stand up when no one can see you.
 
Cool, just wanted to make sure and yeah I totally agree with you. The fact Sun is the only character seemingly to act on Pre V3 tone very much put him at odds with the rest of the show and cast which made such actions quite grating I feel and the fact it never really seemed to get addressed exacerbates the matter.

Jacques managed to convince Nicholas to give him the company. He also managed to either control his wife enough that she didn't simply divorce him, or he managed to convince Nicholas to set up the inheritance in such a way that his wife couldn't simply get rid of him. Normally, since Jacques' wife is Nicholas' only apparent heir, all of the company would go to her with perhaps some going to Jacques as the CEO or stuff that's already been sold to shareholders. There's no reason to really give Jacques full, formal control as long as his wife's content to let him manage it. Given that Nicholas almost certainly kept 50%+1 shares to himself and they wouldn't have been divided among his descendants on his death, it makes you wonder why Jacques' wife still keeps him. The only thing that I can think of is that she just doesn't give a shit about her children or anyone else as long as Jacques keeps her well supplied with liquor. Or Jacques can be somewhat persuasive.
This dips into head canon territory but based on 'Willows's' old outfit int he portrait and the fact her father apparently didn't consider her a viable heir for some reason, I tend to think she was aiming to be a Huntress or a Specialist. Once Nicholas died or Jac was in charge though he began isolating Willow and basically bribing medical professionals to make claims about her mental and emotional stability, reliability, ETC to weaken her reputation and hold on the company while he move his allies into key positions all while still acting supportive to her. Basically, its what he planned to do with Weiss, blaming trauma real or otherwise and using it as an excuse to take away power and Willow trusted him and so didn't realise until it was too late, and she basically became a prisoner of her own name, fearful to leave or incapable of it.

Even setting aside that, Jacques is (presumably) a CEO. High level corporate executives tend to be really good with social skills. Knowing who to suck up to, who to undermine, who to sell out, who to backstab, all of that is very important on the corporate ladder. None of that even touches on how CEOs are required to deal with high society, engage in negotiations, or basically be in charge of a tank of sharks. They have to deal with the bucket of crabs below them, constantly trying to claw their way to the top as well as other people external to the company seeking to undermine them. Looking like a moron is just as damaging for a CEO as being a moron. It's not a forgiving environment, much less for someone like Jacques who's made a lot of enemies with shady practices and casually running others out of business.
This is not something I wholly agree with, I hate to reference RL stuff, but while coming from wealth the current president of the USA is not particularly good at the whole 'social graces' thing, or very self controlled and Jac is extremely competent in persona compared to him. Plus he could also have just hired well, Qrow notes that he relies on a PR team and is presumably relying also on his connections to the Atlas military and the previous good name to protect him from criticism along with simply being too big too fight, crowding dissenting voices. Plus he seemed pretty good at the party for the most part I feel.

Jacques shouldn't be forcing his control on Weiss in public because it's public. It's extremely risky to do anything in public since people are inclined to notice things. Even if there's nothing truly abusive that occurs, all it takes is one person getting your name and reporting a concern to have CAS look into it. In fact, if CAS has a report, they often must look into it. Imagine all of the gossip and rumour that stalks high society, people would love to get some hint of discord in the Schnee family. Jacques has to know that his actions could really cost him and the company so it's an enormous risk to treat any of his children worse in public. Much less obviously treat Weiss worse than he does Whitley.
We don't know the specifics of Remnant or Atlas's child protective services but based on some stuff I've heard from former police officers the system is not nearly so perfect, especially when powerful individuals are concerned.

Weiss is actually a pretty bad judge of character and she tends towards impulsive action. Everything from instantly judging Ruby, to instantly judging Sun, to instantly judging Penny, to hating Blake after the WF reveal, to instantly forgiving her... and that's just in the 1st volume! In volume 4, Weiss didn't really understand her brother at all and seemed to fall into every line her father fed her. She was constantly surprised, happy, pleased, sad, resigned; her emotions rollarcoastered during her initial scene with Jacques. It was only after Jacques tripled down on the coercion that she clued in and started to consistently resist him. Weiss isn't nearly as calm or perceptive as she would like to think.
She fell for her fathers tricks when she was a child and desperately sought his approval and had to be woken up by Winter; after that point she's seemingly been able to see through him very easily. I don't see how Weiss fell into her fathers lines, when he was pressuring her she asked if "people wanted it" or did "he" want it, showing she saw the power-play for what it was. Her positive emotions seemed a mix of put on, or happy that something positive was happening for Beacon even if she didn't like the source or his motives.

Shockingly, I actually know this. RT has all of their writers submit finalized drafts to a central production manager in order to get them approved. It was covered in one of the RT life videoes I watched out of morbid curiosity. I can't speak to Kerry's or Miles' personal revision habits, but I always talk to a rock and explain every word I'm writing before ever offering up something for beta reading. I bet the two of them work together on writing and consult RT's other writers as well.
Interesting to know, thanks. Though as you said, beyond that we don't know the specifics of their rewriting process, I've seen some critics note that they apparently don't reach out much in terms of feedback or reviews, though I can't vouch for accuracy on that front and their responses to fans always seemed mixed, sometimes things get noted or addressed, some don't, which makes sense, but still leaves a lot of mystery and guesswork for outsiders.

If this is your take away, then you're conceding the culture war to those types of people and allowing this issue to fester. To be honest, I wouldn't even really care about those people. It's not the ones that loudly proclaim Jacques or Adam did no wrong that you're trying to convince. The audience are the people that you're trying to convince. For every person who's uninvolved in a debate or doesn't have a strong opinion, for every one of them that you convert, you've weakened the previous cultural hegemony. Most people just go with the view that's echoed the loudest. Being the tallest nail that gets hammered down is supremely uncomfortable. Most people try to fit in and go with the majority opinion. By not engaging with the other, toxic, view, you concede to them the chance to convince everyone in the audience. Challenging the majority, fighting where others can see you, is the only way that you'll build support for any cause or cultural change. The publicity is actually super important. It doesn't matter if you stand up when no one can see you.
I am honestly a little lost by what you're getting at here, sorry, for reference I've argued against those who defend Jac or say Adam was character assassinated whenever I see them.
 
Something in this review of Breath of the Wild jumped out at me. Well, a lot of it did, for better or for worse, but there's one bit that matches well with RWBY, so I'm going to be focusing on that.

"There's something very wrong with the story, tone, and world in this game...Hyrule is now a post-apocalyptic fantasy setting. In reality, though, it's anything but that...the many villages in the game are prospering, without exception, all of them. Even with the Divine Beasts stirring up trouble, no one seems worried. Monsters rarely attack anyone, the Gorons are continuing to expand their mining industry, there's a construction company, a quiet fishing village that doesn't need a wall or any natural barriers to keep out monsters. There's no strife, no famine. The monsters are all content to mind their business and don't attack any of these settlements..."
These points parallel with a lot of issues I have with RWBY's worldbuilding. Obviously, they aren't quite so severe, but (especially in the first couple of Volumes) they're still there. The Kingdoms are prospering, science and culture and industry flourish, and the only serious issues are internal ones (human-faunus relations and organized crime, for instance). Grimm are never seen to attack anyone who doesn't go out looking for them (aside from a couple of times when humans egg them on and hand them Vale on a silver platter), nor are such attacks even mentioned until Volume 4. But Volume 4 has its own problems. We finally get to see the world outside of Vale...and it's full of farms, villages, and towns which usually make those in BotW look fortified. (Side note: The settlements we've seen that are most fortified, like Mountain Glenn and that place Ren is from, seem to be the most likely to be destroyed. Isn't that weird?)

The very fact that Volume 4 tried to bring these problems forward has its own issues. It tries to make the world look dangerous, without addressing or perhaps even being conscious of how safe it looked before. If Remnant always seemed safe, that would be fine. If Remnant always seemed dangerous, that would be fine. If RWBY tried at some point to explain why it seemed to be safe when it wasn't, that might be fine (it depends on the implementation). But unless I've missed something, none of these are the case. RT want Remnant to be a world full of danger and imminent destruction, but also full of advanced and advancing technology, but also where some wacky schoolchild hijinks can be had. It's certainly possible to write a world like this, but only if you can integrate these disparate and often conflicting elements together properly. Either that integration utterly failed or it wasn't even attempted. Which is a shame; there's a lot of great stories to be told in worlds where such elements are mixed together. Strike out the advancing technology bit and you've got Steven Universe. Add it back in and take the hijinks out of school and you get Legend of Korra. Put in an adventure game and dial back the danger and you get Monkey Island or something; replace silliness with idealism and hope and you might end up with something like Worm. (Which does have idealism and hope, even if they're hidden under layers of danger and tension.) But if you don't integrate them properly, you end up with an interesting opening that begins to fall apart over time.
 
(Side note: The settlements we've seen that are most fortified, like Mountain Glenn and that place Ren is from, seem to be the most likely to be destroyed. Isn't that weird?)
If you'd actually paid attention to earlier RWBY discussions you would have noticed people pointing out that when the average Beowolf can jump more than 20 meters into the air and the second most common Grimm type is a bird then walls are not going to do jack shit to protect people unless they're like a hundred meters tall. Considering the incredible strength of the Grimm the walls would also need to be incredibly thick to have any hope of withstanding a horde of Grimm slamming into it, hell a single giant Nevermore or a Deathstalker could casually smash straight through the walls of the average medieval castle. A village actually becomes less defensible with walls since it becomes harder for people to escape, walls just end up becoming a cage that traps people inside. That's why natural defenses are so important, a wall won't stop the Grimm but a cliff can at least slow them down.
 
Let's assume all of this is true. Does that mean fortifications are pointless? No, you'd just need different fortifications. At the bare minimum, you'd want places for everyone to hide and some kind of early-warning system, and maybe some sort of elevated firing positions. I'm sure I could come up with a better plan if Volume 4 didn't keep saying "Grimm have always been able to do this". But that shouldn't be a problem for people in-universe.
(Also, if fortifications are pointless, why do people in-universe talk about the importance of natural defenses and stuff? And why did people build defenses around some settlements if they're completely useless?)
 
[Video] RWBY Chibi S2 Trailer + (Official) RWBY x Crusaders Quest Collaboration
Let's assume all of this is true. Does that mean fortifications are pointless? No, you'd just need different fortifications. At the bare minimum, you'd want places for everyone to hide and some kind of early-warning system, and maybe some sort of elevated firing positions. I'm sure I could come up with a better plan if Volume 4 didn't keep saying "Grimm have always been able to do this". But that shouldn't be a problem for people in-universe.
(Also, if fortifications are pointless, why do people in-universe talk about the importance of natural defenses and stuff? And why did people build defenses around some settlements if they're completely useless?)
They do have those things though. In Kuroyuri Ren's mom talks about going to the shelter but gets shot down because the Nuckelavee was so dangerous that the only way to be safe was to be somewhere it wasn't. And I didn't say fortifications were useless, I said walls were useless. Specifically the kinds of walls that small towns and villages out in the frontier can afford to build. Note that the actual Kingdoms are stated to have walls. But those are massive Kingdoms with megacities and several large cities under their direct control, they can afford to build fuckhuge walls that can actually deter the Grimm. And even then the walls are in addition to the massive mountain ranges that already provide natural barriers for the Kingdoms.



Not to say that the portrayal of settlements in Volume 4 was perfect. These turret guns should have had actual models in the show. One normal version placed at key positions in every intact settlement and one wrecked version in every ruined settlement.



Also I'm not sure where you're getting the idea that Grimm have only been wrecking shit in Volume 4. Even back in Volume 2 we had the world's largest tomb in Mt Glenn and the Kingdoms World of Remnant episode stated that villages outside the Kingdoms had a tendency to vanish overnight in a extremely ominous tone of voice while the Grimm WoR describes how one Grimm attack on a village can lead to more attacks which leads to more attacks until the defenders are overwhelmed and the population is slaughtered.
 
I'll admit that I haven't seen the tail end of Volume 4, nor V4's WoR segments, but the stuff I saw in Volume 4 looked pretty suspiciously undefended.

Also I'm not sure where you're getting the idea that Grimm have only been wrecking shit in Volume 4. Even back in Volume 2 we had the world's largest tomb in Mt Glenn and the Kingdoms World of Remnant episode stated that villages outside the Kingdoms had a tendency to vanish overnight in a extremely ominous tone of voice while the Grimm WoR describes how one Grimm attack on a village can lead to more attacks which leads to more attacks until the defenders are overwhelmed and the population is slaughtered.
See, the World of Remnant bit is sort of the problem. Up until Volume 4, we were told that Grimm were super-dangerous, but the only evidence we had was that Mountain Glenn somehow fell and that people kept insisting that they were. Yet mentions of Grimm attacks which did literally anything to humanity were almost non-existent, heavily outweighed by mentions of attacks from other people. Combined with how incapable the Grimm were of actually doing anything to even half-baked Huntsmen, this gave the impression that Grimm weren't actually that bad.
But apparently that was just a failure of show-don't-tell, not anything relevant to the actual worldbuilding.
 
I'll admit that I haven't seen the tail end of Volume 4, nor V4's WoR segments, but the stuff I saw in Volume 4 looked pretty suspiciously undefended.


See, the World of Remnant bit is sort of the problem. Up until Volume 4, we were told that Grimm were super-dangerous, but the only evidence we had was that Mountain Glenn somehow fell and that people kept insisting that they were. Yet mentions of Grimm attacks which did literally anything to humanity were almost non-existent, heavily outweighed by mentions of attacks from other people. Combined with how incapable the Grimm were of actually doing anything to even half-baked Huntsmen, this gave the impression that Grimm weren't actually that bad.
But apparently that was just a failure of show-don't-tell, not anything relevant to the actual worldbuilding.
We don't actually get to see said shelter but since they never went to it that would have been a rather pointless use of the budget. Now while I admit that they should have at least added some static defense guns like they had on the boat its not like they're shown to be completely helpless either. There's a large blacksmith shop in the first village in the volume that seems to get plenty of business and the village also has a Dust shop that sells guns and ammo. Meanwhile in Kuroyuri we see a weapons salesman in the middle of town and its apparently normal to sell toy weapons to kids, implying that teaching them how to fight is completely normal. The Nuckelavee's lair is also filled to the brim with weapons that have gotten stuck in it or its kept as trophies over the years, showing that while nobody has been able to kill the damn thing its not like its gone unopposed.

That said I admit that a couple of generic guard NPC designs could have gone a long way to making the villages feel more like authentic frontier settlements. We know they must have some defenses since the first village held of a Petra Gigas for weeks but it would be nice to see it instead of just implying it.
 
Wait... so RWBY Chibi is getting a plot now? I mean, I'm totally up for it because having something to offload the giggles into works just fine, and I'm totally up for a Rose family 'girl' band (with added Dadlarity) and whatever craziness Jaune is getting up to, but that's really kind of surprising. Just.... what kind of mad madness doth speak enchanting tales that bewilder and bewitch the mind here? It's not supposed to have a canon!
 
I'll admit that I haven't seen the tail end of Volume 4, nor V4's WoR segments, but the stuff I saw in Volume 4 looked pretty suspiciously undefended.


See, the World of Remnant bit is sort of the problem. Up until Volume 4, we were told that Grimm were super-dangerous, but the only evidence we had was that Mountain Glenn somehow fell and that people kept insisting that they were. Yet mentions of Grimm attacks which did literally anything to humanity were almost non-existent, heavily outweighed by mentions of attacks from other people. Combined with how incapable the Grimm were of actually doing anything to even half-baked Huntsmen, this gave the impression that Grimm weren't actually that bad.
But apparently that was just a failure of show-don't-tell, not anything relevant to the actual worldbuilding.

(bolded for effect)

Here's the thing: We spend the entirety of Volumes 1-3 within the confines of the city of Vale, which by all probability is the second-best-defended place on the entire planet (likely Atlas is ahead of it due to the kingdom's greater militarism). As Ozpin trumpets and the WoR's explain, Remnant is currently, at the start of the show, in probably it's longest age of peace, where within the great cities at least, there is security. Moreover, for the entirety of those volumes, the only time we have encounters between Grimm and humans/faunus, the humans and faunus are trained hunters. Everybody in the Beacon cast except for Ruby (skipped two grades) and Jaune (faked his way in) has already graduated from first-level combat schools. There's no reason for individual Grimm, small packs of Beowolves or the like to be threats to the on-screen cast who encounters them.

By contrast, we're shown Mountain Glenn to see the aftermath of what happens when Grimm get into contact with the general population. And we're shown the Goliaths, Grimm of such power that Oobleck specifically avoids a fight when Ruby's raring to go, to indicate that there's worse out there.

However, there was one huge failure of visual storytelling: V2E12. As I've been complaining for years, this episode failed completely to convey the shock and horror of a Grimm attack on the general population. In the wrap-up scene when the girls are watching the sunset, we're told about people being hurt and property damage occurring, but we saw almost none of it on-screen. The story we're told is of a shocking attack that ohmygoditcouldhavebeensomuchworse if the Atlesian military hadn't bailed the city out, but we aren't shown that story. If we'd actually gotten to see the Grimm attacking civilians (even if we didn't see on-screen deaths but rather fades to black, etc.), buildings getting smashed down, burning rubble in the city, etc., etc., all those things they didn't have the money and time to show us--and if Team CFVY hadn't had such a completely spotlight-stealing appearance--it would have gone a long way towards slotting the Grimm into their proper threat level long before Volume 4.
 
[Discussion] Chibi Season 2, Episode 1: Director Ozpin
Well then...

It looks like Penny has overcome her habit of hiccuping when she lies. But in return she seems to have become even worse at actually telling the lies. All in all she's still the worst liar ever. At least she's not a robot, she's just a normal meat person like the rest of us. :D
 
Probably a bit late to join the discussion, but whatever.

Volume Four... was meh, for the most part. It's pretty much a filler season to me, covering the stuff that generally should have happened in between season. All of the trauma and pain from Volume Three is dealt with and moved past so they can get back to the main storyline It had to happen, but for the most part, it wasn't done particularly well.

-Yang... pretty much got over her maiming either too quickly or not quick enough. Too quickly because we really don't see her dealing with the injury and emotional trauma of the wound. Not quickly enough because Ironwood lost half his body, and could still kick plenty of ass. She goes from a damaged girl to being able to laugh at jokes about her injuries. Yes, there was probably a lot of time and effort involved in it, but we don't see any of it. Good to see some Father/Daughter interactions, but there really wasn't anything interesting going on there.

-Weiss pretty much just mastered her semblance and broke away from her father. She already unlocked the next stage of her semblance in V3, and was dealing with being cut off from the Schnee support even before Winter told her she would have to make her decision about where she was standing. Showing it here just dragged the process out longer than necessary.

-Blake was probably the only one who really got much character development that wasn't already set up in Volume Three, mainly because it's introducing Menagerie and her family, former leaders of the White Fang. She goes from running away from her problems to facing them head on with support from the people who care about her. Yeah, that's been covered before, but considering the trauma of her past coming back to haunt her, it kind of bears repeating, and really shouldn't be an issue anymore, once she patches things up with the rest of the team.

-Jaune... also got past his trauma and weakness really easily. I was expecting him to have some issues with Pyrrha's death, and act similar to Ren did with Kuroyuri. I liked that he used Pyrrha's gear to upgrade his own capabilities, carrying her with him, but I feel that should have been the emotional climax of his arc rather than being the first thing he did in the season. The transition between carrying the guilt at his weakness in V3 to using it to make him stronger would have had a much better impact than Ren and Nora's backstory.

-Speaking of which, I enjoyed hearing their backstory, and think they did an acceptable job of it. Explains a bit more about their characters, and some of their personality traits in previous seasons. Downside is their character arc is completed, so they'll go right back to being supporting characters next season probably.



Part of the issue was having five (ish) different story lines. We were following Ruby, Weiss, Blake, Yang, and a little bit of Oscar, Jaune, Cinder/Salem, and Ren/Nora. The season was about three and a half hours long, which only gives each storyline about 40 minutes of coverage? Maybe less? It's certainly doable, but it's hard to do well, and it shows.



Nuckelavee was probably the biggest disappointment for me. The way it was presented, I thought it was going to be a sentient Grimm, one who walked around, wiping out towns, and collecting trophies of its fallen foes. At the able to think and strategize. Not in the same league as Salem, but intelligent enough that it would ignore most of the fighters to focus on eliminating them one at a time, instead of getting blindsided by them. I was really hoping that it would reinforce how dangerous the Elder Grimm could be, but instead, it was killed off by four half trained hunters.

Grimm really don't seem to be much of a threat without either overwhelming power or numerical superiority, and even with those, they're readily handled for the most part. They really need to up the threat level of them if we're going to take them seriously, and I think adding in intelligent Grimm would probably be a good way to accomplish it.



As for the tone suddenly being darker and more serious... it was bound to happen. Volume Two kicked off with Ozpin saying let them be children for awhile longer. They were kids who thought that there were clear lines between good and evil, and that the good guys always win. Volume Two ended with that impression, thanks in part to Atlas being present so they could contain the incursion before it got too bad. In Volume Three, the bad guys use this failure to get their man on he inside so they can hijack the robot soldiers for their own purposes.

I think it works well. Volume Three is about shattering the childish illusions that things will always work out, and now they have to adjust to living in the real world. Could be handled better, but from a broad perspective, I like the arc, and want to see where it goes from here.



I'll probably end up buying the season, but I think I'm going to wait until I can get Volume Five as well. It's probably good as part of the series, but on its own... yeah...



Thought on the abuse conversation: Does slapping really count as abuse to Hunters/Aura Users? Reason I'm asking is because we've seen people get clobbered by giant robots and still get back up to fight some more. Does a slap really have the same connotations it does in the real world in that context, or does it become less of a thing?
 
Thought on the abuse conversation: Does slapping really count as abuse to Hunters/Aura Users? Reason I'm asking is because we've seen people get clobbered by giant robots and still get back up to fight some more. Does a slap really have the same connotations it does in the real world in that context, or does it become less of a thing?
Is this in regards to Sun & Blake or Weiss and Jac?

Regardless of the physical difference in power between them, Weiss was certainly pained, scared and deeply upset by it meaning that even if she could punt Jac through a wall his actions are still damaging and abusive and show someone with great power and authority of someone's life abusing that position and lashing out which is abusive. The Sun & Blake situation is a bit more awkward cos the first one was seemingly played for comedy and Sun, while bothered was seemingly more annoyed by it than scared or hurt, however that doesn't mean that Blake wasn't lashing out physically because she was upset, however she was upset because Sun was invading her privacy and damaging her house and given her experiences with Adam someone pushing their presence on her is likely a very sensitive issue while Jac was just lashing out cos Weiss sassed him.

End result, I feel its abuse regardless but the context makes Jac's significantly worse, especially given he clearly has a history of treating his children like garbage.
 
Meant it as mainly a general question, but probably oriented towards Sun and Blake. Sun and Blake are equals, while Jacque is clearly in a position of power over Weiss. Even if he can't physically hurt her because of Aura, he's asserting his ability to control her life over her, because if she does anything against it, he can make her suffer in one form or another.
 
Yeah, "abuse" depends on the relationship and emotional ties. Blake slapping Sun is wrong (except in anime-comedy-land), and IRL it would qualify as assault, but it's not abuse in the domestic-violence sense. There's nothing about their relationship that would make Sun not say, "Hey, you know what? I didn't deserve that, and I'm sick of putting up with your issues. Seeya." She has no actual or psychological hold on him. Calling Blake an "abuser" falls into the same category as calling Jaune a "stalker" because he asked Weiss out three times over a four-month period (and took no for an answer each time); it's reaching for castigating buzzwords to paint something as the Worst Thing Ever instead of evaluating mildly negative behavior on its own merits.
 
Yeah, "abuse" depends on the relationship and emotional ties. Blake slapping Sun is wrong (except in anime-comedy-land), and IRL it would qualify as assault, but it's not abuse in the domestic-violence sense. There's nothing about their relationship that would make Sun not say, "Hey, you know what? I didn't deserve that, and I'm sick of putting up with your issues. Seeya." She has no actual or psychological hold on him. Calling Blake an "abuser" falls into the same category as calling Jaune a "stalker" because he asked Weiss out three times over a four-month period (and took no for an answer each time); it's reaching for castigating buzzwords to paint something as the Worst Thing Ever instead of evaluating mildly negative behavior on its own merits.
Technically I think "battery" is the legal term for actually hitting someone while "assault" is legally defined as being about threatening to hit someone.
 
Because it's funny. Obviously.


That reminds me, how many people think Penny's coming back because you can put robots back together?
 
Back
Top