- Location
- UK
- Pronouns
- He/Him
Lack of doom upon ye mortal souls!
Update delayed.
Update delayed.
The beauty of being Ami is that nobody can tell whether what you're making is a mistake, something that looks like a mistake but is actually part of a greater unseen plan, and/or something done purely to mess with people.Here's a random thought from someone too busy this past week to read any of the thread, about modelling smart and competent people.
I assume that the way the QMs model, say, Ami, is that they look at an event, and ask themselves: Would Ami have predicted this ahead of time? They look at a particular political strategy employed by someone: Would Ami have thought of this and accounted for it. I don't think there's a better way of doing it while keeping spoon consumption at realistic levels.
The thought I had was that a way to improve this, is to assign some difficulty to the task, and roll for it, preferably with the remote possibility of a natural 1. That might seem like it would lead to unrealistic outcomes - surely Ami wouldn't miss something fairly obvious - but I think this perception simply doesn't account for the size of the problem space. Ami is undoubtedly doing a great many things, juggling a lot of spinning plates, trying to model tons of visible and invisible actors, and generally keeping very busy. She has a spoon limit as well and will start making mistakes as she runs out. Nobody is above conservation of energy.
This thought was brought to you by having to deal with the heavy fallout of a very smart and competent person with a spotless track record making an obvious and critical mistake, simply because they took on too many responsibilities and ran out of spoons to cover it all.