- Location
- The Deep Blue Sea
Hmm. Hopefully that doesn't come up this chapter then.IIRC, Leaf Ninja Academy, at least according to Akane, doesn't paint the enemy as evil demons, but recognized that they are people just like them.
Hmm. Hopefully that doesn't come up this chapter then.IIRC, Leaf Ninja Academy, at least according to Akane, doesn't paint the enemy as evil demons, but recognized that they are people just like them.
At a guess, the colors are a reference to Umineko, and the types of truth; Red is something that is known to be true, and blue something that is believed to be true. I agree that it's hard to see, but it isn't just a meaningless addition.Could you please go easy on (i.e., not use unless really necessary) colors and bolding? It's alternately eye-searing and hard to read against the black background of my chosen theme.
And yet, still unnecessary. Also, for those of us unfamiliar with Umineko it adds nothing and is still irritating. Words could have conveyed the extra meaning perfectly well.At a guess, the colors are a reference to Umineko, and the types of truth; Red is something that is known to be true, and blue something that is believed to be true. I agree that it's hard to see, but it isn't just a meaningless addition.
I don't follow, I can't see how this is responding to my question of our goals. I am unable to form a response to accurately describe my confusion.This would be a bad thing, because civilization instability and whatnot. I'm only for murdering someone to get chakra blades if, according to our values, they are better off dead.
Imagine a missing-nin who resides within Wind (or Earth or Lightning), near the border of Fire. He attacks caravans going to Fire unless they're from his host country. He's powerful enough that this is doing nonnegligible economic damage to Fire, but not quite enough for them to risk an international incident going after him. Likewise, his host country isn't quite ready to get up the nonnegligible manpower to dispatch of him because of the economic damage he's doing to an enemy. Thus, a stable equilibrium where we have a missing-nin that's not causing quite enough trouble for any country to want to dispatch of (even if he has chakra blades which would be a valuable addition to their armory), and our missing-nin is going to be careful to not tip the balance to a point where it becomes worth it for a nation to have him offed. I think we all agree he's better dead than alive. Also, the only thing keeping Fire from offing him (international incident) isn't holding us back, so it makes sense for us to have at him.
This is a very specific story. Some elements follow from others, but requires a missing-nin with chakra blades (rare) who decides, among a lot of alternatives, on this one very specific way of playing the balance of powers to not get killed. It is absolutely a very long shot that a ninja within these parameters exists. But, seeing as it's an equilibrium that keeps a missing-nin from getting himself killed, worth a few percentage points of probability mass.
(I might be misunderstanding how much freedom hunter-nin have with international borders. I also have faith in bureaucracy to maintain that We Have No Missing-Nin At Our Border So Any Hunter-Nin Will Be Viewed As An Act Of Aggression.)
In general, as a hivemind, we're capable of generating a bunch of parallel possibilities. It is in our interest to generate oodles of low-probability, high-reward alternatives that are cheap to check and see what sticks.
I don't follow, I can't see how this is responding to my question of our goals. I am unable to form a response to accurately describe my confusion.
We aren't going to get chakra blades without quite some effort, yes. They are, however, sufficiently awesome that it's worth looking into seeing if there's, say, a baddy with chakra blades who Leaf agrees is better off dead. Seems a reasonable thing-to-do if there's nothing obvious to do when we leave Leaf (eg Jiraiya gives us another assignment under pain of pain).
Didn't we want to make the world a better place where wanton murder because someone else has a shiny is not the default action?
"I was actually confused about the question, last time, I mean, you said the answer yourself". Also, in general it's very wordy. It might read better if compressed?I didn't answer because, given that not a minute beforehand you had said the answer almost explicitly
I think this sounds quite dangerous, actually. Less likely to start Shinobi War Four, more likely to turn any extraction attempt into a really impressive ambush. Like, 'Hana' is both stuffed with explosives and fanatically loyal to Mist (mind control seals?), four of the Seven Swordsmen are ready to interrupt us, and Yagura himself is ready to drop whatever he's doing and unleash his bijuu as soon as the extraction party shows up.
- Momma Kurosawa: in the event that we are not getting her out, can we attempt to get a message to her, even just "your son is alive and loves you"?
There's also the Sokkyō Clan, who are, uh, potentially a world ending threat. Hmm. @Velorien, I assume Grey Goo Chakra Monsters aren't especially worse than the regular sort?Our disagreement here is that I believe the increased probability to not be marginal, but rather, significant. As evidenced by the last time a bloodline was suggested (and only time this happened outside of character creation) a QM swiftly made the bloodline canon and gave it to a clan of hunter-nin, with the implication that they would now be tracking us. Later, Oliwhail(?) accidentally canonised that said clan of hunter-nin was from Hot Springs, and that yes, they are almost certainly tracking us.
(Also note that this is the only time, to our knowledge, that non-canon bloodlines other than Mori, Kurosawa, or Wakahisa have appeared in the story.)
I realise that one data-point is not a trend, but given what happened, I am not keen to encourage more bloodline ideas being posted in-thread.
The Kotsuzui Clan's Blood Release. Also, theoretically, the Sokkyō Clan's One Hit Wonders.
(3) suggesting that, as a hivemind, we throw a bunch of low-probability, high-reward alternatives that cost little to check at the wall to see what sticks.
I would still rather try to recruit that person rather than kill them to cooperate with us on it correcting for all the war that goes on in the world.
Me too.
Actually, what are everyone's thoughts about recruiting? The benefit is a power ramp, the cost is a larger back-target. At what point does the latter outweigh the former? Is this something that's already been discussed, but the discussion is buried where no man may find it?
We could also ask if, similar to the scroll, there was a legend of ninja with chakra weapons lost at sea. I have faith in the hivemind to munchkin up seabed-searching setup more effective than anything in the Elemental Nations.
If it was I missed it.Is this something that's already been discussed, but the discussion is buried where no man may find it?
Fair enough. It was a response that ignored the context of your post, and I apologize for it. I don't know why I wrote it.
I don't think that it would be substantial, at least for the target audience of this quest.It's not much more confusing, but it is more confusing. The loss in the number of voters due to higher barrier of entry is not worth it.
I don't want to go back and look up the exact numbers, but, generally, it's something that can happen any time there is a close vote. The Arikada (sp.?) arc generally had only one viable plan in play, but VHitM arc had several intelligent, well-intentioned disagreements, IIRC.That doesn't happen often (I can't think of an example off-hand, but that might just be me), and approval voting takes care of it most of the time.
Well, the Against vote addresses that problem. The Ratings->Ranks->Condorcet proposal was in response to someone's criticism of the Against proposal.Yes, you lose some granularity in the decision making, but making things more complicated doesn't seem like a good trade to me. Especially since this wouldn't help against the youthsuit problem, which is the main worry here.
I think that what happened was that I clicked Reply moments after you posted, and then spent a lot of time writing the response.That was me forgetting what Condorcet voting actually meant. I guess I posted the edit too late for you to see?
From the point of view of ranked ballot methods, a negative rating for Plan L is just an expression of preference that every plan with a positive rating and every plan which the voter did not actively rate (giving it the default rating of 0) is preferred over Plan L. In other words, it's mathematically indistinguishable from rating all other plans, say, +0.5, and rating Plan L +0.4.I was pretty sure I finished that sentence. What was suppose to be there was the following.
This is for a system where people could cast negative votes in addition to the positives. That is, not the method you were pushing for earlier where [/] is just used as a shorthand to vote all the other plans.
Perhaps we need to disambiguate what's changed and what's not changed under the proposal. The underlying expression of preferences (with the voter expressing Approval or Lack of Approval for each proposed plan) and the algorithm for picking the winner (plan with most Approvals wins) are unchanged, because adding the same constant to every vote total does not change the outcome.Perhaps I've misunderstood and thats why I'm replying slightly out of order, I thought you said that you could either give a nega vote or you could vote normally.
This sentence is stupid and upsets me.
The proposal is a change to the current approval voting system by adding additional options. If it where not a change then there would be nothing different.
Although it doesn't change the parts that are already in existence it will change the system as a whole.
Perhaps; but many more people have read that much on their mobile phones.This is not really the best argument here because of the nature of the community on this thread.
Nobodys ever tapped out a thousand odd words of action plan on a mobile phone.
Fair enough.I oppose this. I need voting to close at a specific time so I can schedule writing. The thread needs voting to close at a specific time so that they can manage expectations and general life.
She smiled wistfully. "That's actually the first class you take at the Academy," she said. "'Realities of Ninja Life'. They emphasize the fact that ninja have an average life expectancy of eight years and that very few live to retire. That you will see friends die. That you will kill, and that the people you kill will be no different from yourself—not evil, not monsters, just young ninja from a different village."
Holy crap. Good job Leaf.Konohagakure is so nice that they humanize their enemies early on, but that's not enough.
I'd actually argue we should be pushing to make things accessible to people who aren't the target audience, since more people getting involved is fun and more people being rationalist-adjacent is probably a net positive thing. (I'm not arguing against implementing your proposal, it seems like an elegant way to say NOOOO, but 'the target audience for rational fiction understands it' doesn't seem like a great supporting point given how weird we are on average )
Why is this even on your scale, FPtP should be buried in the depths of hell
*Waves hand for like the third time* I have definitely typed out multi-kiloword plans and omake on mobile
Ideally we would make combat so reliant on seal tech that the ability to use chakra was almost unimportant.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
In general, I'm for it, assuming pros outweigh the cons. Here's the things I'd weigh on choosing to add a member to our group:
Why is this even on your scale, FPtP should be buried in the depths of hell
In all honesty, the best way to change things would probably be to become so powerful we can unilaterally enforce peace,
Jiraiya sighed. "Kid, didn't we talk about this? Wasn't this, like, the first thing I ever said to you? 'No taking over the world'—it seems like such a simple rule. Seriously, the first thing."