@eaglejarl did you ever officially close the vote btw..? :p

I'm for it, assuming pros outweigh the cons.
How very specific of you :D

So, the speech outlined doesn't cover a few rather important things. First is the possibility that the world could enter the current equilibrium without completely devaluing their enemies... You can't just get rid of the hate without changing anything else, it'll be back full force inside a year.
Have tried to add these points.
 
I'd actually argue we should be pushing to make things accessible to people who aren't the target audience, since more people getting involved is fun and more people being rationalist-adjacent is probably a net positive thing. (I'm not arguing against implementing your proposal, it seems like an elegant way to say NOOOO, but 'the target audience for rational fiction understands it' doesn't seem like a great supporting point given how weird we are on average :p)
Good point.
Why is this even on your scale, FPtP should be buried in the depths of hell :mad:
FPtP was the original voting mechanism for this Quest, and we switched to Approval Voting back in January. (I'm pretty sure I was the one who had proposed the switch. :cool:)
*Waves hand for like the third time* I have definitely typed out multi-kiloword plans and omake on mobile :D
I know, but I didn't want to distract from the point that Against voting option is mainly for the readers, not the writers, of plans. Perhaps I shouldn't have done that, and I apologize.
 
Thanks for letting us have the time to improve @OliWhail's plan, although I do not know how much the plan changed.
As far as the actual plan, the real additions were clarifying our suggestion to Keiko and de-stressing. There was a lot of cleanup of stuff in the reward questions and utopia answer contingencies, but those will probably not come into play until at least next update.
 
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

We really don't.

If we decide to spread immortality tech to everyone as soon as we invent it then the only option is for Hazou and Co. to rule as benevolent dictators, ever expanding democracies just don't work. (See Athens, Rome etc.)

If we decide to NOT spread immortality tech outside of Hazou and Co. (which is definitely the worst option) then it would probably be best if we just brainwash everyone into believing in communism and communist ideals (put others ahead of yourself, greed is bad, all efforts should be done for the good of the community etc.) and then just slowly fade into the background and watch over earth as protectors.

If we don't discover immortality tech then just do the same as directly above.

I meant more compared to everything else that's actually been done, as opposed to theoretical alternatives. Less terrible, not actually good. Also, your brainwashing suggestions are so morally horrific that I somewhat doubt your seriousness.

Careful. It can lead to something like WW1 or WW2 in our timeline.

This is a very important point. That's actually why I mentioned one central government taking over, as opposed to one Village simply being more powerful than the rest. I consider the latter option to be a recipe for eventual world war. So is the former, actually, but it would likely postpone it. The idea of one village suddenly taking over is also predicated on that village having military superiority of such an overwhelming degree that there will barely be any fighting, which would also be very difficult to achieve. The idea of the Village we uplift taking over suddenly and forming one government was an idea put forth to postpone the world war for a few decades, giving us the opportunity to head it off at the pass, rather than something I thought would permanently prevent it. Civil wars are totally a thing. In addition, a world where total war is more of a thing, but humanity isn't slowly being destroyed would likely be preferable to the current world.

There is the possibility of sealcraft nukes or other existential risks, which I completely failed to take into account.

Jiraiya told you not to do that, you fool

The ideas were actually more along the lines of:
  1. Becoming so stupidly personally powerful we could simply say, "If someone starts a war, we'll have to get involved to stop it. You don't want that. Also, the whole scorch squads thing is going to have to stop," and expect the world to just go, "Well, I guess that stuff's off the table, then."
  2. Help Leaf become so absurdly powerful that it can enforce peace, most likely via sealtech. Suggest it may be a good idea for it to take over the world and establish one central government in order to avoid the problem of the other villages catching up, where presumably we would have enough power to prevent things from going Stalinist.
So really, it would be more like, "Well, you said we couldn't take over the world. What if you did that instead?"
 
Last edited:
Also, your brainwashing suggestions are so morally horrific that I somewhat doubt your seriousness.
Eh, you're inevitably brainwashed by any society that you live in, so you might as well brainwash people with actually good ideals.

EDIT:
Besides the answer above, brainwashing people with the appropriate ideals is still very morally justifiable. Freedom of thought, expression, religion, travel, etc. are only valued because they give you happiness so as soon as those rights (in this case thought) begin to hurt the end goal of making you happy you must restrict those rights to preserve happiness. So really your squeamishness (which is probably only there because our hyper-capitilized world focuses so much on praising the "individual") to do a necessary "evil" would be the only morally wrong action
 
Last edited:
Preach it, brother. We might not have The Orange Disaster if we weren't using FPTP.

Huh, when I first read this my brain immediately thought of Agent Orange rather than the recent election.

Anyone want to speculate on ways to improve the current American voting system (or voting in general)? There are of course systems that would be better, but how could those be implemented in practice?

I'm rather curious if this thread could use its experience to something productive in our world (naturally we would make a new thread for this as it would derail MfD too much if people took it seriously).
 
Huh, when I first read this my brain immediately thought of Agent Orange rather than the recent election.
Amusingly, when I read the above my brain initially went to Agent Orange, because it didn't interpret Agent Orange as a "beast".

Anyone want to speculate on ways to improve the current American voting system (or voting in general)? There are of course systems that would be better, but how could those be implemented in practice?
Changing elections at the Federal level would require a Constitutional amendment, but states are free to do it however they want. One solution would be to have the states use Condorcet-compliant voting.

Splitting the state's delegates based on the results of the vote is also an option that could be explored. (As opposed to 'winner takes all delegates'.)
 
Amusingly, when I read the above my brain initially went to Agent Orange, because it didn't interpret Agent Orange as a "beast".


Changing elections at the Federal level would require a Constitutional amendment, but states are free to do it however they want. One solution would be to have the states use Condorcet-compliant voting.

Splitting the state's delegates based on the results of the vote is also an option that could be explored. (As opposed to 'winner takes all delegates'.)
I like the Constitutional Amendment idea. How do we make that happen?
EDIT: Also, does no one want to comment on my horrifying water nintaijutsu? :sad:
 
Last edited:
I think people are hoping it just slips past the QM's eyes :D
But think about it; Mari-sensei has Water element, and is already proficient in Taijutsu. It could be a great addition to her arsenal.
(Did we ever find out what her reward from Jiraiya was last time? It wasn't (entirely) carnal, if that's what you're thinking.)
 
Last edited:
Changing elections at the Federal level would require a Constitutional amendment, but states are free to do it however they want. One solution would be to have the states use Condorcet-compliant voting.

Splitting the state's delegates based on the results of the vote is also an option that could be explored. (As opposed to 'winner takes all delegates'.)

Right, but I'm more interested in how such a solution could be implemented, not what it should be. To clarify: for any proposed solution how do you plan to win over enough voters to ratify it? How do you spread the message and argue your position?

Everyone I've spoken to hates First Past the Post, but it is simple enough for the average voter to understand.
 
Right, but I'm more interested in how such a solution could be implemented, not what it should be. To clarify: for any proposed solution how do you plan to win over enough voters to ratify it? How do you spread the message and argue your position?

Everyone I've spoken to hates First Past the Post, but it is simple enough for the average voter to understand.

So is Approval. And it's game theoretically better than IRV. It's worst case is at least as good as or better than any other voting system's worst case, even if there are others with somewhat better best-case outcomes.
 
So is Approval. And it's game theoretically better than IRV. It's worst case is at least as good as or better than any other voting system's worst case, even if there are others with somewhat better best-case outcomes.

But how do you convince enough people to enact it into law? No member of the established main parties wants this since it makes elections harder for them; they can't just demonize their opponent like they can with FPtP. The idea is good for the average voter but someone needs to fight for it in legislature to ever make it happen. How do you spread the message?
 
But how do you convince enough people to enact it into law? No member of the established main parties wants this since it makes elections harder for them; they can't just demonize their opponent like they can with FPtP. The idea is good for the average voter but someone needs to fight for it in legislature to ever make it happen. How do you spread the message?
Maine just passed IRV for many of its state-level offices. We'll see how that goes. (I myself prefer Condorcet > AV > IRV > FPtP, but I'll take what I can get.)
 
Last edited:
The idea is good for the average voter but someone needs to fight for it in legislature to ever make it happen. How do you spread the message?
Or you can fight for it on the ballot, appealing directly to voters who are clearly signalling their desire to change the system at this point. Go around getting signatures and explaining the reasoning behind why approval voting will help break up the bullshit.
 
I like the Constitutional Amendment idea. How do we make that happen?

Article V of the Constitution said:
The Congress, whenever two thirds of both houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose amendments to this Constitution, or, on the application of the legislatures of two thirds of the several states, shall call a convention for proposing amendments, which, in either case, shall be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the legislatures of three fourths of the several states, or by conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other mode of ratification may be proposed by the Congress; provided that no amendment which may be made prior to the year one thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any manner affect the first and fourth clauses in the ninth section of the first article; and that no state, without its consent, shall be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senate.

Explication.
 
With the recent decanonised update, I decided to check out what (the hell) was happening over here -- I usually only read the Story-Only Thread. I didn't realise how weird the voting system is. I guess that explains why Hazou is such a fucking weirdo all the time.

Seventeen, I don't know that you were properly greeted: welcome to the thread! There's been at least some positives to all the drama if we've picked up a new participant. (Or do you intend to go back to just reading?)
 
@eaglejarl:

It's probably worth noting on the story-only thread that people have three reading options now:
  1. Story-Only Thread: Just the story and interludes
  2. Reader Mode on the Main Thread: Story, interludes, and non-canon omake by participants.
  3. Normal Mode on the Main Thread: Everything including discussion and voting.
E: Personally, I think 2 is the best balance of time spent vs enjoyable content. Our omake get across a surprisingly large amount of the thread's thought processes without having to wade through posts.
 
Last edited:
Found Art: Not a Penguin



Edit: This is now my headcanon for how first contact between pangolin summons and canary summons went.

Edit 2: Aha, found the original source.
 
Last edited:
Sweet freedom!

Now I can apologize personally for any offense my earlier comments gave. I went too far in my anger, and fomented aggression in the thread when, at worst, I should have done as OliWhail did and just taken a few-hours break to cooldown.
 
Back
Top