Modern economic theory uses a buttload of real and functional analysis. You need calculus to do anything.

I did some research into that question. I admit that I am wrong in that respect.

Good maths is one of things you need for economics. If they have good maths then they're therefore more likely to have economics.

OK, let supposes they have good math. It doesn't mean that they have economic theory as we understand it.
 
I would not be surprised at all if Leaf's trade is not bottlenecked by transit costs as much as it is by the fact that the vast majority of people are just farming enough food to survive with a tiny surplus that in large aggregate can feed small cities with craftsmen.

I think we should at least be prepared for the answer of "This plan would have merit if there was more stuff to trade but here and now the benefits are marginal at best."
 
I must disagree on that point. The major problem exposed in the last update update was completely predicated on the realities of international trade. If it is going to effect national politics, it is by definition important. Also, Adam Smith style trade based wealth growth was practiced and predicated well in advance of the industrial revolution.
 
I must disagree on that point. The major problem exposed in the last update update was completely predicated on the realities of international trade. If it is going to effect national politics, it is by definition important. Also, Adam Smith style trade based wealth growth was practiced and predicated well in advance of the industrial revolution.

This might just be because economics isn't my field of study but wasn't Smith A) A contemporary of the industrial revolution and B) responding to mercantilism, which is very much not a trade heavy economic system?

Also could you expand upon what you mean that the problems in the last update are predicated upon international trade existing
 
I must disagree on that point. The major problem exposed in the last update update was completely predicated on the realities of international trade. If it is going to effect national politics, it is by definition important. Also, Adam Smith style trade based wealth growth was practiced and predicated well in advance of the industrial revolution.

Trade in bulk goods is likely to be done via boats on major rivers and ocean. The rest is in luxuries or things that have high enough value to be traded.

And given how good boats already are at transporting goods, I do not necessarily see why storage seals would have much effect.

This might just be because economics isn't my field of study but wasn't Smith A) A contemporary of the industrial revolution and B) responding to mercantilism, which is very much not a trade heavy economic system?

Classical economic developed during the industrial revolution, so you're right in that respect. The problem is that @MadScientist asserts they would know anything that sophisticated in a medieval society.

Mercantilism is absolutely based on trade, but it is based on protectionism and high tariff, which poses a barrier to World Peace and the development of interdependence among the Elemental Nations.
 
Trade in bulk goods is likely to be done via boats on major rivers and ocean. The rest is in luxuries or things that have high enough value to be traded.

And given how good boats already are at transporting goods, I do not necessarily see why storage seals would have much effect.



Classical economic developed during the industrial revolution, so you're right in that respect. The problem is that @MadScientist asserts they would know anything that sophisticated in a medieval society.

Mercantilism is absolutely based on trade, but it is based on protectionism and high tariff, which poses a barrier to World Peace and the development of interdependence among the Elemental Nations.

When I said not based on trade I meant international trade, not internal trade. My bad
 
Not if you're not trying to model anything.
For anything to get done IRL you need:
1) A pile of math
2) A pile of processing power
3) A pile of relevant and accurate data

Perhaps a handful of individuals (by that I mean literally 4-5 max) in the EN have access to the above in any meaningful way, to the extent they could actually model something accurately. So its a moot point.

I must disagree on that point. The major problem exposed in the last update update was completely predicated on the realities of international trade. If it is going to effect national politics, it is by definition important. Also, Adam Smith style trade based wealth growth was practiced and predicated well in advance of the industrial revolution.
Pretty much this.

I would not be surprised at all if Leaf's trade is not bottlenecked by transit costs as much as it is by the fact that the vast majority of people are just farming enough food to survive with a tiny surplus that in large aggregate can feed small cities with craftsmen.

I think we should at least be prepared for the answer of "This plan would have merit if there was more stuff to trade but here and now the benefits are marginal at best."
This is nothing that we can't solve with standard Uplift ideas on the same level of difficulty as "Go around Fire and start throwing up walls to stop the hamlets from being overrun by chakra beasts." We can till and fertilize their soil (with the corpses of said chakra beasts) while we're at it.
 
Well, they do advocate accumulation of favorable balance of trade and the maximization of as much export as possible, but this is in the pursuit of autonomy, which is not as conducive to world peace.

Hmm, I was about to say something along the lines of "globalization doesn't lead to peace, it just doesn't lead to war" but then I realized that the political and territorial situation in the EN is vastly different to what happened in the real world. Do we have any idea if there are other continents?
 
Hmm, I was about to say something along the lines of "globalization doesn't lead to peace, it just doesn't lead to war" but then I realized that the political and territorial situation in the EN is vastly different to what happened in the real world. Do we have any idea if there are other continents?

If other continent exists, they are completely irrelevant for our purpose. While greater trade doesn't necessarily lead to peace, it provides a greater disincentive for wars. Other steps, to be determined, must be taken.
 
If other continent exists, they are completely irrelevant for our purpose. While greater trade doesn't necessarily lead to peace, it provides a greater disincentive for wars. Other steps, to be determined, must be taken.

I meant more along the lines that the EN are in a situation where they are all roughly equal in power, which means that if a liberalized economy happens there will still be losers and winners within each country, but it wont be like in the real world where the Global South has been fucked over by colonialism and then neo-colonialism.

I also consider the presence of other continents necessary for our discussion of trade because intercontinental colonial empires was a main factor in promoting a mercantile system.

No clue. Everyone that tries to leave gets disappeared IIRC

Disappeared as in they die at sea or as in they get killed for attempting to leave?
 
All of this rather seems to me to be the equivalent of having a hammer and therefore assuming your problems are nails.

Maybe they're nails, maybe they aren't, but there's no need to get there by theorycrafting when you can go out and investigate first.
 
All of this rather seems to me to be the equivalent of having a hammer and therefore assuming your problems are nails.

Maybe they're nails, maybe they aren't, but there's no need to get there by theorycrafting when you can go out and investigate first.
JIRAIYA: The problem is screws, actually.

HAZOU: Ah, okay.

HIVEMIND: We'll have all-purpose screwdrivers in a month designed for you to build, don't worry kid.

More seriously, do you think that its beneficial to just question him for some specifics of the situation when we can propose a potential solution and get specifics on the situation if the solution doesn't work for some reason? They take the same amount of time to get anywhere, and the latter is obviously more advantageous for us (it could work, gets J thinking about large storage scrolls at least).
 
JIRAIYA: The problem is screws, actually.

HAZOU: Ah, okay.

HIVEMIND: We'll have all-purpose screwdrivers in a month designed for you to build, don't worry kid.

More seriously, do you think that its beneficial to just question him for some specifics of the situation when we can propose a potential solution and get specifics on the situation if the solution doesn't work for some reason? They take the same amount of time to get anywhere, and the latter is obviously more advantageous for us (it could work, gets J thinking about large storage scrolls at least).

From a narrative perspective, packaging discussion and solution makes sense in order to ensure conservation of words in a story update.

From real world perspective, if you want to solve a problem first go out and talk to people about what their problems actually are. Not even talking to Jiraiya; what the fuck does he know? I mean, weeks or months talking to actual merchants, gathering facts, finding out how trade actually works and what their needs really are. User focused design. Maybe the problem isn't storage but something else that could be better solved with an entirely different branch of sealing tech.

It may be necessary from a quest limitations perspective to do it the first way, but it's the same sort of approach that leads Silicon Valley to reinvent buses.
 
Last edited:
Disappeared as in they die at sea or as in they get killed for attempting to leave?
  1. No one who has left the Elemental Nations seeking new land has ever come back to talk about it.
  2. Kagome says that Hidden Depths kills anyone who tries.
Personally, Skywalkers and Skytowers make such an expedition much more viable than it otherwise would be, since Hidden Depths presumably cant get us in the sky even if they do exist, and if we have enough food, water, paper, and ink stored we can keep going a very long ways if we need to.

Still not something to try when we're needed at home, but an option nonetheless.
 
  1. No one who has left the Elemental Nations seeking new land has ever come back to talk about it.
  2. Kagome says that Hidden Depths kills anyone who tries.
Personally, Skywalkers and Skytowers make such an expedition much more viable than it otherwise would be, since Hidden Depths presumably cant get us in the sky even if they do exist, and if we have enough food, water, paper, and ink stored we can keep going a very long ways if we need to.

Still not something to try when we're needed at home, but an option nonetheless.

We probably want to do incremental expeditions, establishes waystations and rest stops, learn how to navigate and whatnot.

And oh, figure out the size of the world.
 
And oh, figure out the size of the world.
If IRL history is any indication, we should already have a pretty good guess about the size of the world just from some dude a thousand years ago measuring shadows on the south and north end of the continent. Figuring out that the world is round and approximately how big it is is old stuff.
 
This might just be because economics isn't my field of study but wasn't Smith A) A contemporary of the industrial revolution and B) responding to mercantilism, which is very much not a trade heavy economic system?

Also could you expand upon what you mean that the problems in the last update are predicated upon international trade existing

No worries.
A.
The Wealth of Nations was published March 9, 1776, so I would say that the industrial revolution was just getting going. Most of what he talks about is english style specialization of labor rather than mechanization.

B.
His conclusions opposed their policies, but that was not the only reason he wrote it.

Last:
"Moving on from that, let's look at major disaster number three: A World War is almost inevitable at this point. Mist has control of Hot Springs, meaning that they have a stranglehold on trade for Cloud and Frost. Those two can either do all their trade by ship—risky, since the winds and currents along their shores are unpredictable and full of nasties—or they can pay whatever tariffs Mist chooses to set. Back when Mist had Yagura, Zabuza, and Mei to back them up, it was too risky for anyone to go for a military solution against them. Unfortunately, Naruto broke Zabuza's neck, I punched a hole through Mei's chest, and Yagura got taken who knows where.
 
Those two can either do all their trade by ship—risky, since the winds and currents along their shores are unpredictable and full of nasties—or they can pay whatever tariffs Mist chooses to set. Back when Mist had Yagura, Zabuza, and Mei to back them up, it was too risky for anyone to go for a military solution against them.
They do all their trade by ship. Hmm..

We should just be able to ferry all of their trade over the ocean through to ports in Iron (by ship or by ninja). From there, everything can proceed on foot. Or we set up some sort of trade depot in Iron.

Between Cloud and Leaf (lets let Rock in on it as well) there should be enough force to back up this arrangement. We can probably cut nearby minor villages in on it too.

Could serve as a Ninja UN prototype too....
 
They do all their trade by ship. Hmm..

We should just be able to ferry all of their trade over the ocean through to ports in Iron (by ship or by ninja). From there, everything can proceed on foot. Or we set up some sort of trade depot in Iron.

Between Cloud and Leaf (lets let Rock in on it as well) there should be enough force to back up this arrangement. We can probably cut nearby minor villages in on it too.

Could serve as a Ninja UN prototype too....
Ninja UN sounds great to me.
 
He would almost immediately become as good at Taijutsu as us. If he isn't already.
Then again training with someone who always becomes as good as you immediately would be about the most effective way to train Taijutsu that I can think of.

Edit: Besides of course having a cheating eye of our own.
 
Last edited:
So... other things we need to ask Jiraiya about now that we're back: Oversized storage seals, and if they're an OPSEC risk. If not, well...

Things they can be used for:
  • Throwing a bus at punching speed
  • Creating a wall as a supplemental action
  • Throwing a bus at Kei-throwing-speed
  • Throwing an arena-sized net at Kei-throwing speed
    • Actually we should do this one regardless, nets work well with PMYF too.
Lots of other things, too.

Storage seals are great.
e:
My concern is only that it requires too much QM judgement, therefore providing a source of player frustration. ("Hey, this thing that we don't like happened and you didn't call in our token to prevent it!")
Require the plan to say "If necessary, use a planning point", then. (or just use a [PP] tag on relevant sections, maybe?)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top