- Location
- Yes.
Something something Kani Clan something something grumbling in Keiko
Something something genjutsu something something screaming in false reality...Hazou did see a Dragon though. He described the iridescent scales and everything
Something something Kani Clan something something grumbling in Keiko
Something something genjutsu something something screaming in false reality...Hazou did see a Dragon though. He described the iridescent scales and everything
They are, yes. They split off years ago for reasons that I'm sure @faflec can source faster than I can given that my brain is cheese and his is connected to a host of pantemporal self-instances.
Cat
Stealth, powerful combatants, great at night. Huge territory in the middle of the continent. They call themselves the 'Feline' Clan, but only call them that to their face. Everyone else calls them Cats. The Leopards broke off a few generations ago, apparently over some weird ideology thing that I never really understood, but all other cats are here. Total jackasses. Loners, work poorly or not at all in groups, think they're above everyone to a degree that makes the pangolins look cuddly. Vicious. Vaguely psychopathic. Fuck 'em.
If you're talking about Hazou, he murdered the pedophile by punching his head off. That's a single murder.Actually, yes. In the case of the Cold Stone Killers incident, all the civilians got killed by the same ninjutsu. In the case of the Sunset Racer, the entire ship got scuttled at once.
What happened to the Shark Summoners? Am I having a brain fart?
It's only murder if it's illegal. That was a legal execution.If you're talking about Hazou, he murdered the pedophile by punching his head off. That's a single murder.
Kisame is a missing-nin, last I checked.What happened to the Shark Summoners? Am I having a brain fart?
Yeah and killing civilians on a mission isn't murder either, it's collateral damage.What happened to the Shark Summoners? Am I having a brain fart?
It's only murder if it's illegal. That was a legal execution.
In court, a jury determines whether or not something is considered to be a "false statement." In this case, they would do so in a heartbeat. Any reasonable observer would understand your statement to mean that no civilians were killed.He didn't murder a single civilian. If I had meant to say "he didn't murder any civilians" then I would have said that.
I never lie to y'all, but sometimes I'm very precise with my wording. (Also, sometimes I'm wrong or forgetful, but this wasn't one of those times.)
Oh, sure. It was absolutely misleading, no argument. That was the point. I do the "literal genie" because I find it fun and history suggests that at least some of the players enjoy trying to see through my weasel words. I do, however, stick to a pretty clear set of rules:In court, a jury determines whether or not something is considered to be a "false statement." In this case, they would do so in a heartbeat. Any reasonable observer would understand your statement to mean that no civilians were killed.
It was also a fraudulent statement. From the 7th Circuit pattern criminal jury instructions for 18 USC 1001, "A statement or representation is fraudulent if it is made with intent to deceive."
Additionally, since you just admitted that you knew it was false when you made it, it would be considered perjury. If you had made that statement in court, it would be considered both false and fraudulent and you would have perjured yourself.
Clear Communication Technique:
I'm worried this might come across stronger than I mean it to over text, so this seems like a perfect opportunity to use our favorite Talk no Jutsu to make sure there are no hard feelings. I am by no means saying that we should evaluate your words under a strict legal framework and I apologize if it comes off as such. I am a little peeved about the statement, but "peeved" is about as far as it goes. This post is supposed to be a light-hearted chastisement at worst, not a serious reprimand. I am using the legal system here because it is expressly designed to evaluate and label statements like the one you made. Hence, it was perfect for showing exactly why your statement and subsequent defense are utter BS.
Anyhow, looking forward to the next update! I really enjoy this story and am having a great time with the current world-ending calamity we're facing.
Story posts are written from a character's point of view and are subject to the usual sorts of error that you see in any fiction -- the character misses something, misunderstands something, etc. I don't recall using an unreliable narrator in this quest but I don't rule it out.What is an official QM announcement? One that is in a story post?
With no war declared it's murder. And piracy due to being on the sea I guess.Yeah and killing civilians on a mission isn't murder either, it's collateral damage.
Most ninja will agree that it is impossible for a ninja to murder a civilian. Most civilians will agree lest they be used as a test case.With no war declared it's murder. And piracy due to being on the sea I guess.
Can you cite something specific? No worries if not - I'll go through the discussion eventually.After seeing the post-chapter discussion, I think Asuma already ruled out us sending Hidan to get the Scroll for us, so we should probably nix that line.
I'll implement that.Holy symbol line should imo go more like 'Ask for holy symbol back, in case Hidan wants to see it next time'. Having the rationale there is important, and I don't see a need for it to be conditional on talks going well, since it's a simple way to reduce the amount of ways the next meeting could go wrong.
Do you have any more topics of discussion? I don't.Talking about Itachi should imo be attempted only in the context of a decently exhaustive list of things we could ask Hidan for, rather than as a specific point we want to draw attention to. That way, if Asuma immediately goes 'yeah no no way am I letting you and him get in contact again' it's just another item crossed off the list and we might not get seen as more of a traitor for suggesting it.
Overall I feel this section needs a bit more room allocated to it, if only to provide an actual list of ideas to nestle the 'inform Itachi' option into.
Are you serious or is it a joke?Most ninja will agree that it is impossible for a ninja to murder a civilian. Most civilians will agree lest they be used as a test case.
To clarify, a ninja killing a civilian is not murder. Civilians do not have a right to life; indeed, the concept is anachronistic.Are you serious or is it a joke?
Because I would understand it if Leaf ninja claim they never kill Fire civies. But ninja in general being paid to kill civies around the world shouldn't even be an open secret, right? Like, in most hidden villages someone could literally just hire an assassination mission as if they were ordering a steak, no?
Killing the king's livestock is illegal. Killing the Hokage's civilians is illegal, but neither of those crimes is murder. Seems about the right analogy to me.Are you serious or is it a joke?
Because I would understand it if Leaf ninja claim they never kill Fire civies. But ninja in general being paid to kill civies around the world shouldn't even be an open secret, right? Like, in most hidden villages someone could literally just hire an assassination mission as if they were ordering a steak, no?
Just out of curiosity, where do civilian members of a ninja clan fit into this?To clarify, a ninja killing a civilian is not murder. Civilians do not have a right to life; indeed, the concept is anachronistic.
I thought that they do in Fire, at least on paper. Or does that only apply to the capital?To clarify, a ninja killing a civilian is not murder. Civilians do not have a right to life; indeed, the concept is anachronistic.
This can be taken out, per Vel's announcement that Isan has already claimed them.
Same here
Sadly, we gave them to the Nara already
Your livestock analogy pretty much covers it. Killing someone else's civilians without permission is both an insult and an instance of material harm, and generally, compensation would be expected.Just out of curiosity, where do civilian members of a ninja clan fit into this?
Can we ask Asuma if Leaf has any intelligence on how the Isan attack went? Can we also ask for deniable assets to start gathering intelligence on the Rock base?Asuma
- Tone: we wish to avoid treason.
- Check Asuma understands why Hidan supports us.
- We can make requests, but they must further Uplift. We can't bluff him, so we must believe it'll help.
- If Hidan reaches out, can we ask for the Spider scroll?
- If you become convinced the Dragons are real, can we brief Itachi via Hidan?
- If Hidan talk goes well, ask for holy symbol.
"Miss it? Pardon me, but I seem to remember a treetop proposal, only for the notion to immediately be rejected by Keiko --the only person with religious authority that either of us would deign to listen to."
It's on the list of edits to make.This can be taken out, per Vel's announcement that Isan has already claimed them.
Sadly, we gave them to the Nara already
I'm going to assume you mean the Rock attack. Asking if we're cleared to know about that (i.e. before asking 'how did that go' ask 'can we know') seems smart.Can we ask Asuma if Leaf has any intelligence on how the Isan attack went? Can we also ask for deniable assets to start gathering intelligence on the Rock base?
Very beefy plan, but I kinda think it's worth the XP penalty to be explicit to Asuma about what it actually is Hazou wants. This conversation may be better saved for later but I thought I might as well post it now so it can be refined down the line if necessary.
[X] Action Plan: The Machinations of Hazou's Mind, Revealed
Word Count: 460OOF
- Ami
- Explain Dragonwar Crisis. Hopefully the Condor Scout will inform the others, but that could take weeks.
- Keiko's on a classified mission, but we can get messages and gifts to her, if you'd like us to forward some.
- What's Ami's take on the Bank Run? Can't afford to owe Ami favors currently, so if it costs us she can be mysterious about it, we trust her.
- How is Ami doing? Been up to anything interesting?
- Asuma
- Asuma feels he cannot trust Hazou's motives. Hazou wants to elucidate these so Asuma can fully understand his actions.
- Hazou won't be deceptive about who he is. He's seen how this destroys a person.
- If there's anything Asuma doesn't understand, please ask, now or later, so there's no doubt.
- Leaf is more than a means to an end, it's home to people Hazou loves and respects. A stronger Leaf means they're better protected, Asuma included. Their wellbeing is itself a goal, not just a means to an end.
- Hazou wants a warless world he's not unique, Jiraiya felt similarly, among other ninja, probably including Asuma. Hazou doesn't know how to achieve this yet. He isn't completely naive. Presently, kindness from Leaf would be taken advantage of something he loathes.
- Hazou wants clanless recognized. He essentially grew up clanless, and lack of support more than undermined Mist's strength, it dehumanized clanless.
- Asuma thanked Hazou for good ideas regarding clanless; they're more than ideas to Hazou. Even if he doesn't completely agree/understand, Asuma's proven he'll engage Hazou's ideology seriously.
- Only other authority who did this was Jiraiya, and Hazou respects both immensely for it.
- Hazou wants civilian lives considered worthwhile. The task feels herculean, but seeing Leaf begin embracing clanless makes Hazou hopeful. Skyslider team is run by civilians, one of the most important Goketsu is civilian, and Hazou can be frustrated that they aren't seen as people sometimes. However, he believes he'll be taken seriously when the discussion crops up, which is itself very important to Hazou.
- Asuma's paranoid side seemed to think Hazou benefited from disaster, but it's more accurate to say Hazou has experienced failure so often that he's nearly mastered damage control. (Humor): This conversation notwithstanding.
- Intentionally hurting innocent lives for personal gain is antithetical to the world he wants to build. It's more than hypocrisy, it actively sets his goals back to use those methods.
- Hazou does want Goketsu to prosper, if only to promote his beliefs, much like other clans. However, he doesn't want it to come at the expense of Leaf.
- Thank Asuma for hearing Hazou out. Asuma doesn't have to be so considerate, and the fact that he is matters