Thank you,
@faflec, for reminding me of the idea, and you,
@OliWhail, for conceiving of it to begin with.
[x] Ami Plan: When in Doubt, Go Meta
Word count: <400
Humour index: 30%
- (After Ami, follow this plan.)
- Ask Ami to optimize your approach to the next topic, ensuring it works even given that she helped optimize it.
- Spend the favour token, if necessary.
- If Ami refuses, try Door-in-the-Face, then Pragmatic, then Adversarial.
- Avoid mentioning IN and Asuma's inability to control Orochimaru.
- Subject: Suppose there was news that might induce anger and counterproductive desires in Ami. How should you convey it to minimize such outcomes?
- Approaches:
- Door-in-the-Face: Start by conveying the situation's emotional truth and the sanctions taken to avoid its recurrence.
- Conceit: Lead with the emotional impact so Ami knows what to expect, preparing her to process it constructively. Then frame it as already "settled", requiring no further action.
- Con: Might prime her to view it in the worst light.
- (Clarification: "Sanctions" mean Kei cutting ties with Mari. "Emotional truth" is Kei feeling that Mari sacrificed her for Hazou.)
- Foot-in-the-Door: Chronological description that ends by focusing on the sanctions, vividly describing their effect.
- Conceit: Provide Ami the experience of righteous justice and catharsis vicariously — no need for active action.
- Con: Ami might consider the sanctions insufficient — bad combination with ending on an emotional high.
- Factual: Recount the events objectively, without opining.
- Conceit: Trusting Ami to act fairly and constructively.
- Con: Ami's "fairness" might disagree with yours.
- Empathetic: Draw parallels between the situation and some of Ami's actions.
- Con: Ami might disagree with the parallels, or refuse to care about so-called "hypocrisy".
- (Clarification: Hazou might be to Mari what Kei is to Ami. Also, Ami invented the FGP and lets Kichi manipulate people into it, all to escape Oro.)
- Pragmatic: Detail how counterproductive acting on the initial desires would be. Pivot to discussing constructive responses.
- Cons: Ami might consider the counterproductive actions necessary.
- Bargaining: Present your best-light interpretation of the situation.
- Con: You expect Ami to disagree.
- (Clarification: Mari did her best to save everyone, and it did work. Also: Oro might've learned of Snowflake independently later; this way, you at least had forewarning.)
- Adversarial: Promise to take sanctions against Ami should she act on her desires, and/or ask to stay her hand, for a favour.
- Con: Damages your relationship with Ami/indebts you.
- (Clarification: "Sanctions" might range from refusing to cooperate with her projects to actively obstructing them to withholding FOOM to broadly damaging her in-Leaf position.)
- Distracting: Stage a novel major crisis, leaving everyone too preoccupied for (this) drama.
@Velorien, does that meta-approach sound particularly entertaining to you?