That's a gross simplification of the entire situation. They're annoying...because they're being hypocrites and threatening to walk out and spread clan secrets, something that effects the livelihood and survivability of the clan, just so that they don't have to...share jutsu, which help the clan and its people survive.
Spreading clan secrets is already, in this setting, a killable offense. And they're all but saying they want to.
Gross oversimplification or not, it fits.
Also, killing ninja for spreading clan secrets
legally is not punishable by death. Clans who suspect that their members might defect commit murders with plausible deniability and the Hokage hasn't cared up until now.
We are. We're in the update like not disputing her words acting like we do care about everyone the same, but it's false, and she's right. We don't hold everyone to the same level of importance. If we were more upfront about it, maybe it would lessen this lashing out.
No, we aren't. Point to anything where we said or communicated that we felt that her sister was as important to us as to her. Failing to dispute an accusation is not admitting to it.
And, again, in my plan (currently winning) we say to Mari and Kei that we,
personally, don't grieve the loss of her sister the way she did, in the same way she didn't grieve Akane like us. This is fine! We mourned them both as dead clanmates, but we're going to mourn Akane in a bunch of other ways, too.
And she's not reasonable at all because a clan head doesn't need to take time to introduce himself to literally everyone, especially people with no known grievances, and especially when the clan head is also wearing like three different hats (sealmaster, war room strategist, etc.)
Our clan is tiny and spending an hour with each new member isn't unreasonable, especially given that the adoptions were such a big deal. More to the point, Hazo might be wearing three hats, but his days are five times as long.
You're right that we don't need to, but it seems pretty rude not to, and Hazo generally tries not to be rude, especially to his subordinates. Being adopted into a clan isn't like getting hired: it's being made part of someone's family. We credibly neglected our siblings. Nieces and nephews? Cousins? Whatever.
To the clan mostly, because of rank which is just...how things work. Contributors are more important. "Us" is Hazou.
Contributors to what? In what sense are they more important? How are you measuring importance?
You literally said here what I said. That Akane was more important.
No, I said that she was more useful in a military capacity. If you think 'useful in a military capacity' is a synonym for 'important', then I don't have much to say, other than to point out that you're objectively incorrect and that I'd appreciate it if you started using words in manners which align with their conventional definitions.
You pretty much just made up a bunch of stuff. I said to let them know that yes, Akane is more important to us, and yes so is Noburi and Mari. How that turned to 0 compassion, empathy, and support boggles the mind.
No, I didn't make a bunch of stuff up: I slightly rephrased things you said.
No,
you said that. Literally. See below:
Then we should disappear Mio for the audacity.
What you literally said is that you suggest we take a certain course of action ("we should") which is to murder Mio ("disappear Mio") for lashing out, due to unprocessed grief and trauma ("the audacity").
Just now. I suggested that since she had the audacity to basically tell us she's going to leave and spread clan secrets, while yelling at us, and flinging serious accusations at us, we should thus dispose of her as is the norms of this setting.
"We should take the actions that Hiashi Hyuga and Hagoromo Ritsuo would take" does not a compelling argument make.
Do you think Ino would do that, or approve of it? Akane? Hiruzen? Tsunade? Any characters who have been portrayed as being morally upstanding?
'she accused us of stuff, we should murder her' is advocating for either disproportionate punishment or punishment before the crime,
both of which are
- things that Asuma would disapprove of
- things that would prove her right re: our abusing her
- things that are probably against the letter of Leaf's laws. We know Leaf operates under the presumption of innocence
Which is a thing you seem to be forgetting. The context of my posts are according to the setting of the story/quest we're reading. You're the only one trying to bring parallels to real life.
Yes, and even within this setting, we try to act in alignment with our principles - which include compassion for pretty damn near everyone no matter how irredeemable they may seem. That's the entire point of the quest - to make a better world, which is in line with our modern moral sensibilities.
You're defending the indefensible. This is something you do not infrequently. Plenty of people have commented on it.
If the things you suggest are frequently radically different from what you'd suggest someone do in real life, you should start being clear about that: I suspect you'd find people friendlier and more willing to engage with you.
For example, if in this case, you recognize that we're dealing with a traumatized teenager who is lashing out because her only living family member died and she's fixed on us as the target for her misplaced grief because it seems safe for her to do so, because she views us as a safe enough person to be angry around, probably because she's seen us be kind and understanding to people like her, and if this were real life, you'd suggest getting her in therapy and supporting her so she can work through her shit, say that.
Bluntly suggesting we murder her for no greater crime than being angry and
perhaps implying she'll take action which indirectly threatens us (it doesn't actually hurt us that badly if our jutsu get out; at any rate, you were all for sharing jutsu in your post) and stating that she's worth less than other characters makes you sound pretty monstrous. That is indeed how what you wrote reads, and it's in keeping with what I'd generally expect you to say. If that isn't reflective of who you are and what you believe, making attempts to communicate who you are and what you believe might be an idea.