Emstar
The Shining One
- Location
- Trapped in an extradimensional rift.
- Pronouns
- She/They
Probably 2 at maximum. Unless they're simple,
Probably 2 at maximum. Unless they're simple,
The funny point is that if I updated the timeline and faflec told me I was wrong, I would assume I was in fact wrong. I would check, but my default assumption would be that I had in fact erred.
They give dates every once in a while, it's usually at the top of a scene (like in A Family Dies). You can extrapolate from there.But where does he get the data from? I've never noticed in story any consistent mentioning of dates--in fact, I can hardly recall the characters ever saying anything like "That'll be on the 5th of May" or "Today is July 16." So where does @faflec get the data with which to correct the timeline?
Start from the dates that are in the timeline, then keep track of events. If one scene centers around dinner and the next centers around breakfast, the date has probably incremented by 1.But where does he get the data from? I've never noticed in story any consistent mentioning of dates--in fact, I can hardly recall the characters ever saying anything like "That'll be on the 5th of May" or "Today is July 16." So where does @faflec get the data with which to correct the timeline?
@Velorien, should each Action Plan use all 3 slots (describe the whole day) XOR if we put only 2 slots in plan the chapter will end there and we will be able to use last slot of the day for the next update?
You're free to do either one although, as always, we might not get all the way through a plan.@Velorien, should each Action Plan use all 3 slots (describe the whole day) XOR if we put only 2 slots in plan the chapter will end there and we will be able to use last slot of the day for the next update?
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding your view here, but unless I'm mistaken you're pushing for spreading out the price between us and ISC at which point... the price is the same for the women whether they're spread out between four clans or one.
Ahh, okay. I disagree regarding your conclusions there -- I think that the Uchiha is worth way more than what it costs to us, and the Hagoromo especially so since all they're asking for is money.The price may be similar for them, but it's much smaller for us, the Goketsu Clan. I do think everyone involved will be happier in the more spread-out arrangement, for reasons I've already laid out. My main reason for opposing the deal, though, is that I don't think the added value of controlling the Uchiha vote is worth all the trouble accepting will cause for us. Like, it's not close.
If it's a completely binary take-it-or-leave-it situation, with the hat on the line, I will reevaluate. But if the possibility of our allied clans taking some of the burden - both here and of the Hagoromo debt - is on the table, then I'd much rather explore that option first.
As far as what the Uchiha are costing us... yeah, it's a pretty big deal. But it also allows a very large degree of control over Konoha politics in the future. Even if the kage vote wasn't a thing at all I'd be inclined to take it because of that. Being able to push through education reform (get Tsunade's backing with a med-nin track), improve conditions for civilians, push for uplift on a national scale rather than just till'n'fills, offering the Uchiha's votes to other people in exchange for favors...
I don't think it is a very large degree of control. Moreover I think they can hardly give us less control. In the next 3 years we will have 36 to 64 votes in Council and Uchiha deal allows to control 1/17 of the votes for 5 of those votes. This is pocket change in terms of political power. You yourself already names 4 votes in quoted post. Add one more and that's it for next 3 years.
Additionally, because every marker is only 1/17 of total Council votes we can still lose a vote even thriwing marker into the play.
And if that's not enough, Uchiha can always abstain instead of voting as we told them.
I think we need to drop the deal completely and find a more reasonable Clan to work with, because these terms give us insultingly low political control over Leaf.
I do agree that the girls would probably be more safe at Gouketsu compound than anywhere else, though.
The amount of markers is mostly irrelevant. We need only make sure that whatever we do benefits them in some way and they'll vote along their best interests after we give them the power point presentation.
This is about getting a foot in the door.
It is true that the deal's wording basically guarantees that we can't use it for anything truly important or contentious. Best case would be votes which we care deeply about, but which Hyuuga will oppose on principle, without caring much for the issue at hand. I'm not optimistic enough to expect a lot of those, though.
On a separate note, the Sharingan clause is plainly unacceptable as is. Putting aside the remote possibility of Hazou himself developing it, what if Hazou marries in the future, and his heir wins the lottery? There's no way we can give them up for adoption.
Personally, I suspect we can use it to get +1-3 summon scrolls, if we so desire.It is true that the deal's wording basically guarantees that we can't use it for anything truly important or contentious. Best case would be votes which we care deeply about, but which Hyuuga will oppose on principle, without caring much for the issue at hand. I'm not optimistic enough to expect a lot of those, though.
On a separate note, the Sharingan clause is plainly unacceptable as is. Putting aside the remote possibility of Hazou himself developing it, what if Hazou marries in the future, and his heir wins the lottery? There's no way we can give them up for adoption.
Honestly I completely disagree with this assessment. We are the driving force in Leaf politics. If Uchiha try to defect from the spirit of the deal we will just destroy them utterlyIt is true that the deal's wording basically guarantees that we can't use it for anything truly important or contentious. Best case would be votes which we care deeply about, but which Hyuuga will oppose on principle, without caring much for the issue at hand. I'm not optimistic enough to expect a lot of those, though.
It is true that the deal's wording basically guarantees that we can't use it for anything truly important or contentious. Best case would be votes which we care deeply about, but which Hyuuga will oppose on principle, without caring much for the issue at hand. I'm not optimistic enough to expect a lot of those, though.
Honestly I completely disagree with this assessment. We are the driving force in Leaf politics. If Uchiha try to defect from the spirit of the deal we will just destroy them utterly
I disagree, even if they abstain over voting in our favor it still gives us a higher level of control that most clans don't get outside of power blocks or political manipulation. It was a big enough deal that many people were considering rebuilding the uzumaki as a sister clan just to have a second vote on the council. Not to mention completely dropping this deal without any thought on our part will just alienate the Uchiha and likely push them to vote for Hyuga rather than abstain, which would be very bad for us.I don't think it is a very large degree of control. Moreover I think they can hardly give us less control. In the next 3 years we will have 36 to 64 votes in Council and Uchiha deal allows to control 1/17 of the votes for 5 of those votes. This is pocket change in terms of political power. You yourself already names 4 votes in quoted post. Add one more and that's it for next 3 years.
Additionally, because every marker is only 1/17 of total Council votes we can still lose a vote even throwing a marker into the play.
And if that's not enough, Uchiha can always abstain instead of voting as we told them.
I think we need to drop the deal completely and find a more reasonable Clan to work with, because these terms give us insultingly low political control over Leaf.
I do agree that the girls would probably be more safe at Gouketsu compound than anywhere else, though.
I'm all for forging bonds with the uchiha, I just think this deal is a poor one. Any anything based around "but we'll just boss them around", I feel, has to clear the bar of "why do we even need this particular deal then?"
I'm all for forging bonds with the uchiha, I just think this deal is a poor one. Any anything based around "but we'll just boss them around", I feel, has to clear the bar of "why do we even need this particular deal then?"
I think we need to drop the deal completely and find a more reasonable Clan to work with, because these terms give us insultingly low political control over Leaf.
I'm tired of having this discussion. We are the dominant clan militarily. We are on top economically. We are the driver politically. Let's not act like we are weak when we are one of the 2-3 most dominant clansOneiros, I feel that you are maybe doing the thing where we overstate how good we are, or how strong our position. Jiraiya was a driving force, we're establishing ourselves as competent actors. We haven't even met with our allies to talk strategy yet. Assuming we can crush a clan with more people and more history that us, without it tanking us, just because they're afraid of the Hyuga (which is 100% fair) doesn't seem to assume the other parties involved are competent rational actors. At least that's my opinion.
It is true that the deal's wording basically guarantees that we can't use it for anything truly important or contentious. Best case would be votes which we care deeply about, but which Hyuuga will oppose on principle, without caring much for the issue at hand. I'm not optimistic enough to expect a lot of those, though.
On a separate note, the Sharingan clause is plainly unacceptable as is. Putting aside the remote possibility of Hazou himself developing it, what if Hazou marries in the future, and his heir wins the lottery? There's no way we can give them up for adoption.