Voting is open for the next 9 hours, 52 minutes
Nah, just joking around. Honestly, how bad could it be?
...

Word Count: 383
[X] Action Plan: That Very Same Day

Before Lunch:

  • Talk to Keiko
    • Hazou is considerate and respectful of Keiko's feelings on this issue.
    • Keiko is right: we need to stop digging. We are in a better position now and don't have to rely on bloodmoney.
      • It was Hazou's idea to trade for Skytowers afterall, so the blame rests largely with him.
      • Her description was worse than we imagined.
      • Thank her for bringing the issue forward.
    • We want to bring the issue of the Pangolins up to Jiraiya at dinner(See below: Pangolins)
      • Remember: last time we had an issue with them his insight was sufficient to solve it quickly and to our satisfaction.
    • Offer emotional support to Keiko as needed.

Afternoon:
  • Train with Team Gai.
    • Socialize
    • Check in on Neji
    • Gai-sensei runs us ragged, in the name of YOUTH!

Evening/Dinner:

  • Talk with Jiraiya
    • Pangolins
      • Goals:
        • Primary:Stop the Pangolins from committing more genocide and slavery.
        • Secondary: Slow them down.
      • Expansionist tendencies are a problem.
        • They are anathema to our ideals, and why we joined Leaf
        • Encourages backlash of anti-Pangolin alliance coming for Keiko.
        • Shatters OPSEC on Skytowers.
        • Politically destabilizing
      • Analyze the situation
        • Is this likely one or two zealots in Pangolin High Command?
        • How much of this is Pantsaa?
        • Is this normal for summon clans?
          • What do the Toads think? (Especially about the Condor situation).
      • Solutions:
        • Leverage: We supply Skytowers.
        • Direct influence from Keiko as a prominent figure in their society.
        • Pressure from the Toads?
    • Training
      • We were promised "some tricks", we'd like to discuss possibilities within the next day.
      • Ask if Jiraiya could train us.
        • Help us do (or design) some Training from Hell?
      • Shadow Clones
        • We suspect the Shadow Clones transfer memories (Itachi vs Naruto).
        • Can we learn this, and use it for better training over the break?
        • Noburi's bloodline and recharging gives effectively massive chakra reserves.
    • Finances (Include Mari)
      • Ask for summary of financial situation
      • Check in on seal licenses: did the Merchant council approve Hazou and Kagome?
      • Tournament betting with Mist Yakuza?
        • Should we do a handful of missions to get more seed money for this?
Misc.(Off Screen)

  • Hazou and Kagome research Casino seals
  • Hazou gives Jiraiya an organized packet of seal blanks for every seal he's ever seen (with any supporting background info).
  • Hazou makes explosive tags and storage seals
 
Errrrr...it is? I don't mean to seem like we're bait-and-switching, but we did not even discuss canonizing in the PM thread, and I know that at least one QM said [EDIT: in QM chat] he would prefer not to canonize it. Am I forgetting / misunderstanding something?
That was what I had asked in thread when you said to go for it, and I asked before posting if it was signed off as canonical; that's why it was an interlude, and why I pmed you with it / waited before posting, unlike a normal Omake.

I figured it was something like the last interlude I wrote, albeit without the in universe "story" explanation of the same; something that is canon complaint and gives some insight, signed off by the qms, into how the world / characters work; obviously not a major source of OOC info, so if "Shin" was actually Zabuza in a henge, this interlude would be a facade he puts up, or maybe he's a perfect occulomens.
 
[X] Action Plan: That Very Same Day, but different and more concise

On the one hand, sure, it's a pretty simple idea; still, it seems like a somewhat antisocial way to fight the Nara in public - we don't want to inspire imitators. Should at least double-check it with Jiraiya for OPSEC concerns.

We should definitely not show off any anti-leaf counters in the tournament.

Didn't say anything about actually using them. Just their mere existence should be sufficient to push Shika into acausal trade. He agrees to not use shadow manipulation techniques against us if we agree to not publically use an effective counter.

In a real fight, this would be a non-issue, and the only reason we have to hold back is that he is an ally from the same village.
 
Nah, just joking around. Honestly, how bad could it be?


Here's a suggestion for showing rather than telling on this front:
"CCnJ: Hazou is glad she brought this up and wants to make progress on it. He understands that she may not want to talk about it right now, but has some ideas for when she is. Regardless, he's here for her if she needs support."
This seems to me like a pretty considerate way to open the conversation?

Edit: and then we can cut the emotional support bullet point below, ofc.
 
That was what I had asked in thread when you said to go for it, and I asked before posting if it was signed off as canonical; that's why it was an interlude, and why I pmed you with it / waited before posting, unlike a normal Omake.
I did literally say in the second-to-latest PM that I would threadmark it as an omake, in those words.

There's clearly been some miscommunication. Let's jump back into the PM thread.
 
Edited plan training from Hell. Added @MMKII Pangolin section. Cut talk with Hana. Cut inviting ISC to game night. Only inviting team Gai and clanless ninja

Current plan

Put together an outline will be updating based on discussion


[X] Action plan: Training from Hell

  • Jiraiya
    • Give hima copy of every seal we've seen.
    • Tell him about Shadow clone proposal
    • Find out what our training schedule will be like
  • Check on seal license
  • Research casino seals
  • Game night
    • Prepare to have a game night for the end of the week
    • Invite Team Gai and other clanless ninja
  • Train with Team Gai.
    • Socialize
    • Check in on Neji
      • Good cop bad cop with Hazō and Kei
    • Gai-sensei runs us ragged, in the name of YOUTH!
  • Evening/Dinner: Pangolins
    • Try to get Jiraiya on board
    • Primary goal: avoid genocide and slavery
    • Secondary goal: slow them down
    • Expansionist tendencies are an issue
      • They are anathema to our ideals, and why we joined Leaf
      • They are encouraging organized backlash
    • OPSEC issues around Skytowers
    • Politically destabilizing
    • Analyse the situation
      • Is this likely one or two zealots in Pangolin High Command?
      • How much of this is Pantsaa?
    • Is this normal? Toads' opinion would help.
  • Solutions
    • Political influence from Toads?
    • Bargain with skytower supply?
    • Direct influence from Keiko as a prominent figure?
 
Last edited:
Because its 11am as of the end of the last update?

And we're starting with the Keiko thing
..Mmmmaybe we could have the morning training be done retroactively? I mean, we did ask Gai if we could do training, and there's no way he wouldn't be starting early morning...

@eaglejarl @Velorien @OliWhail Would we be allowed to retroactively train with Gai in the early morning of the 22nd (several hours before the end of the last Chapter)?
 
..Mmmmaybe we could have the morning training be done retroactively? I mean, we did ask Gai if we could do training, and there's no way he wouldn't be starting early morning...
If we get the go ahead then I don't mind adding it in.

But like, the springtime of youth is always ready to explode, yknow?
 
This.

Though honestly, I still don't tend to vote before the last few hours of time because of... past experiences with panic-induced plan modification at the last second. ("Willing to go pretty damn far.")
I honestly would prefer (if at all possible) to never modify a plan in the last ~6 hours or so of the deadline.
 
("Willing to go pretty damn far.")

I honestly would prefer (if at all possible) to never modify a plan in the last ~6 hours or so of the deadline.

This was in a younger time, before we'd had experiences that taught us that lesson, thankfully nonlethally.

I'd like to pose an alternate hypothesis, which is that this particular edit being made in proximity to a deadline was not in fact the cause of the error, so much as a failure in judgement and lack of critical review.

"But Vecht, if you make edits close to the deadline then people have less of an opportunity to review them!"

...Okay, so review the edits thoroughly, get impartial feedback, and then make the modification only if it makes sense to do so. This may preclude making edits closer to deadlines, but you still aren't avoiding the edits because of the deadlines.

"But people are tired and more likely to make mistakes when staying up late!"

...Okay, so don't make edits or suggestions when you are impaired or otherwise mentally compromised. This may preclude making edits or suggestions closer to deadlines, but you still aren't avoiding the edits or suggestions because of the deadlines.

"But there are flaws or inadequacies in the leading plan!"

...Okay, so vote in a minimally risky fallback plan and take the hit to xp and effectiveness of action. If the situation is high-stakes enough to be a cause for concern, then counterfactually have made your plan much sooner and/or update on collective competency with regard to the planning fallacy.

Logically, there is not a distinction between a one hour interval ending thirty six hours before the plan deadline, and a one hour interval ending five minutes before the deadline (assuming no further action is taken afterwards). The timing itself is not cause for excessive paranoia, which is itself a far greater harm.

E: "But I didn't see it / didn't get to vote for or against it!"

Okay, but it got enough votes to win anyway, or didn't. What's the problem, again?
 
Last edited:
Okay, but it got enough votes to win anyway. What's the problem, again?
Ignoring most of your post to comment on this part in specific: It's hard to say you voted for a plan so much as a planmaker if something is changed two hours before the vote's over while 90% of the hivemind's asleep.
 
Ignoring most of your post to comment on this part in specific: It's hard to say you voted for a plan so much as a planmaker if something is changed two hours before the vote's over while 90% of the hivemind's asleep.

...Okay, so don't make substantial edits without getting the buy-in of the people who voted for the plan.
 
Voting is open for the next 9 hours, 52 minutes
Back
Top