- Location
- [REDACTED]
RE: Firelog Macerators.
I'm just throwing stuff at the wall here, but do you think we could treat the firelog macerator as some number, N, of very small single point explosions spaced equally throughout the unsealing zone of the macerator? We'd have to look at the mass of wood in the macerator and the volume of the macerators unsealing zone so that we can have an idea of the air-fuel ratio. We would also need to estimate the number of embers or whatever that are hot enough to catch the nearby dust on fire.
I think that last part depends largely on the construction of the actual fire before it was sealed. With smaller logs and careful construction, you could probably get the interior of the individual pieces of wood to be quite hot, reducing the temperature difference between the embers and the wood dust. Additionally, fires that have been blazing for longer will have the wood at an even higher temperature, and more embers to boot. However, that means less overall fuel.
I'm just throwing stuff at the wall here, but do you think we could treat the firelog macerator as some number, N, of very small single point explosions spaced equally throughout the unsealing zone of the macerator? We'd have to look at the mass of wood in the macerator and the volume of the macerators unsealing zone so that we can have an idea of the air-fuel ratio. We would also need to estimate the number of embers or whatever that are hot enough to catch the nearby dust on fire.
I think that last part depends largely on the construction of the actual fire before it was sealed. With smaller logs and careful construction, you could probably get the interior of the individual pieces of wood to be quite hot, reducing the temperature difference between the embers and the wood dust. Additionally, fires that have been blazing for longer will have the wood at an even higher temperature, and more embers to boot. However, that means less overall fuel.