Jello_Raptor
(Confirmed Jelly)
- Location
- Left of Center
@Kiba, @Roomba, @others:
A quick meta note: I tend to find it annoying when we reject general ideas about sealing early in the brainstorming process.
Take the whole "Rechargable seals are probably super hard" thing.
We don't actually know that yet and we have incredibly cheap tests, in the form of asking Kagome or Jiraiya their thoughts, that actually allow us to get in-game evidence for or against that hypothesis.
For sealing research specifically, the thread finds reasons that things might not work and forgets/forgoes actually asking. It's a problem for a few reasons.
First is that it promotes the idea that we know what sealing can and cannot do, when a lot of that built up 'knowledge' is just thread conjecture based on highly limited canon information. We can replace the conjecture with canon estimates from experts (at minimal costs) and yet we keep shooting ideas down too early.
Next, this pattern of discussion means that most people in the thread pick up a specific model of sealing that is probably wrong in many of the specifics. Even worse, other players get the impression this model of sealing is canon and then reinforce it. Over time this means that unverified ideas like "all seals expire", become part of implicit accepted truth.1
Finally, it makes brainstorming much less fun, at least for me, since I just get to expect any idea will be vetoed as "too hard/impossible" before we do any substantive filtering (i.e. getting a canon estimate from an expert). I suspect I'm not the only one who actively enjoys fleshing out ideas, and an immediate response of "____ is too hard" asserted as if it's a known fact makes the process less fun.
Ideally, we should strive to point out the implicit assumptions in an idea without explicitly rejecting it, unless there is explicit canon evidence. Say "Hmm, that assumes there won't be issues with the lifetime of the seals. If there are ... " instead of "The seals won't last long enough to be useful.".
Admittedly there is a spectrum of actual responses between the two examples I gave, but I'd like the thread to err towards the nicer side of the spectrum when we discuss sealing. Sealing is a lot more ambiguous than our tone tends to imply.
1: I've got actual thoughts about the specific question of seal lifetime, but that's not the point of this post. I'll make another one with those thoughts in a bit.
A quick meta note: I tend to find it annoying when we reject general ideas about sealing early in the brainstorming process.
Take the whole "Rechargable seals are probably super hard" thing.
We don't actually know that yet and we have incredibly cheap tests, in the form of asking Kagome or Jiraiya their thoughts, that actually allow us to get in-game evidence for or against that hypothesis.
For sealing research specifically, the thread finds reasons that things might not work and forgets/forgoes actually asking. It's a problem for a few reasons.
First is that it promotes the idea that we know what sealing can and cannot do, when a lot of that built up 'knowledge' is just thread conjecture based on highly limited canon information. We can replace the conjecture with canon estimates from experts (at minimal costs) and yet we keep shooting ideas down too early.
Next, this pattern of discussion means that most people in the thread pick up a specific model of sealing that is probably wrong in many of the specifics. Even worse, other players get the impression this model of sealing is canon and then reinforce it. Over time this means that unverified ideas like "all seals expire", become part of implicit accepted truth.1
Finally, it makes brainstorming much less fun, at least for me, since I just get to expect any idea will be vetoed as "too hard/impossible" before we do any substantive filtering (i.e. getting a canon estimate from an expert). I suspect I'm not the only one who actively enjoys fleshing out ideas, and an immediate response of "____ is too hard" asserted as if it's a known fact makes the process less fun.
Ideally, we should strive to point out the implicit assumptions in an idea without explicitly rejecting it, unless there is explicit canon evidence. Say "Hmm, that assumes there won't be issues with the lifetime of the seals. If there are ... " instead of "The seals won't last long enough to be useful.".
Admittedly there is a spectrum of actual responses between the two examples I gave, but I'd like the thread to err towards the nicer side of the spectrum when we discuss sealing. Sealing is a lot more ambiguous than our tone tends to imply.
1: I've got actual thoughts about the specific question of seal lifetime, but that's not the point of this post. I'll make another one with those thoughts in a bit.