Should we consider bringing up dragon war as an existential crisis that we should at least call a truce for now over? Until we can show evidence to akatsuki's summoners? Should we separately note that we really need itatchi to come to arachnid to discuss dragon War? We could prolly use new help on that front, now that the whole monkey thing is likely falling through

I don't think we should bring up the dragon war as a reason to avoid or delay punishment as there is considerable opportunity for Itachi to ask for terrible punishments that don't meaningfully impact Konoha's ability to contribute. It would be easy for Itachi to twist the argument back on Hazo by presenting such a punishment and then placing him in the position of arguing in favor of it to Konoha. Any reason for why Akatsuki should foreswear justice / deterrence could just as easily be applied to Konoha accepting any punishment that doesn't jeopardize the capabilities of the few elites who will be contributing to the dragon war.
 
Last edited:
Vote for something else, it's getting kind of tiresome seeing people act like I must not be serious. I would be fine with Armageddon Initiative. If you aren't that's fair and cool but just vote for something else or at least try to convince me not to or something.
It's a funny joke, sure, but it's functionally "end the quest" as a vote. Do you see a future for the story here beyond the point where we make that vote? Something beyond the inevitable bad end for us and whoever we managed to take down with us? Something that continues pulling on the threads that have been laid all this time? I honestly don't. Best case scenario, we get an epilogue-style view of the fallout and then start over from scratch with a new character, and even that throws the vast majority of what we've built here out the window.

I like this quest. I want to see it keep going, I want the stuff it's set up to pay off. It's only natural that I would be upset at other players trying to unceremoniously end it all, laughing all the while. It's just not funny when someone points a gun at something you love, and says they'd actually be fine with pulling the trigger. Call me a killjoy, call it 'tiresome', I'm not going to just keep my feelings to myself when you're threatening something I care so much about.
 
Here is my suggestion for how to handle the punishment: My suggestion for a plan name "Akatsuki may die but will rise again harder and stronger"

Hazo is forced to leave Konoha and replace Kakuza by becoming a new member of the Akatsuki. This would represent an ideal punishment for Akatsuki as they gain a replacement member who is both approaching the power of an S-rank ninja and has extremely useful contacts in Konoha, Mist, and the Seventh Path. The synergy Hazo's unique skill at seal innovation has with several of their members is also something they would highly value. I expect that many of them would also consider forcing Hazo to become the new Hidan handler to be a poetic punishment that fits his crime of setting Hidan on the path that led to the death of Kakuza.

Gaining a replacement member is something Akatsuki can be expected to value over any punishment to Konoha. The reason is that their greatest weaknesses are limited numbers and extreme difficulty recruiting new members. They must be aware that gradually reducing their numbers through "accidents" (as just happened) would be the ideal way for the villages to remove the existential threat posed by Akatsuki without paying the cost of direct conflict. This awareness will give them a strong reason to deliver a terrible punishment for Kakuza's death as a means of deterrence but it also means they might be willing to accept gaining a replacement member as an alternative.

Leaving Konoha and working with Hidan on a semi-permanent basis is something that Hazo would hate but I don't think he could reject the offer when the alternative is Konoha paying a great cost (likely in the lives of elite ninja) as punishment. It would be viewed as a sign of selfishness and cowardice that would permanently damage the reputation of Hazo and the Goteksu.

OOC This is mainly because I like the idea of seeing how the story would progress after such a sudden disruption and am interested in learning more about the Akatsuki. It would move the narrative away from the repetitive challenge of social conflict in Konoha while still allowing Hazo to maintain his relationships through regular visits and meetings on the Seventh Path. The fate of the Goteksu in Konoha would also stand to improve with the removal of Hazo's unique take on diplomacy and public relations. Mari or Nobori could easily step up to fulfill Hazo's role as clan head now that the central mythos and resources of the clan have been reasonably well-developed.

It's a funny joke, sure, but it's functionally "end the quest" as a vote. Do you see a future for the story here beyond the point where we make that vote? Something beyond the inevitable bad end for us and whoever we managed to take down with us? Something that continues pulling on the threads that have been laid all this time? I honestly don't. Best case scenario, we get an epilogue-style view of the fallout and then start over from scratch with a new character, and even that throws the vast majority of what we've built here out the window.

I like this quest. I want to see it keep going, I want the stuff it's set up to pay off. It's only natural that I would be upset at other players trying to unceremoniously end it all, laughing all the while. It's just not funny when someone points a gun at something you love, and says they'd actually be fine with pulling the trigger. Call me a killjoy, call it 'tiresome', I'm not going to just keep my feelings to myself when you're threatening something I care so much about.

Inferno Vulpix raises a good point. I wouldn't put it beyond the writers to go with Armageddon Initiative if it wins.

I am putting my vote here in the hope of warding off Armageddon Initiative. Someone else will have to write it up formally if there is a structure requirement.

[X] Akatsuki may die but will rise again harder and stronger
 
Last edited:
I have faith in the QMs' ability to write something disastrous and give the next character something to do if it comes to that. I don't think it'd end the quest and as time goes by I become less attached to Leaf. With that said if the QMs explicitly don't like the Armageddon Initiative and don't want to write it then I'll put it aside and think of something else to do.
 
I like this quest. I want to see it keep going, I want the stuff it's set up to pay off. It's only natural that I would be upset at other players trying to unceremoniously end it all, laughing all the while. It's just not funny when someone points a gun at something you love, and says they'd actually be fine with pulling the trigger. Call me a killjoy, call it 'tiresome', I'm not going to just keep my feelings to myself when you're threatening something I care so much about.
Yeah uh... that's understandable. For what it's worth, I also care about the quest but I think in an entirely different way—I like it as a fun story, and sometimes as a puzzle/challenge. I've given up on relating to it as a thing to take fully seriously and become strongly invested in specific outcomes.
 
We have a variety of cards we can play, none of them slam-dunk successes but plenty of options worth a non-zero amount in various possible outcomes here. Let's look at some overall strategies we might employ and how that affects what cards we can play.

Minimalist: we keep our head down and let the others among the council handle things (especially Tsunade, acting Hokage). We keep our contributions inoffensive and minimize our involvement.
  • The main card we can play here is contributing to material reparations. We have a bunch of money, goods, and means to obtain both that we could likely make a sizeable contribution.
  • Scrutiny may come upon us no matter how much we keep our head down, though, given our role in inventing skyslicers and funding the Akane mission in the first place. If this happens, we need to be prepared to defend ourself and/or play other cards that arise from us being in the spotlight like this.
    • EM stays secret, no matter what.
Moderate: we're more proactive here, and when a suitable opportunity arises we make a case for something or another, trying to better the bargaining position of Leaf's side with our actions.
  • We should have Something to Say if we go down this route, because we're drawing the spotlight onto us specifically, at least for a moment.
  • This is where we'd be able to directly converse with Itachi and, potentially, leverage our past conversation with him to some degree or another.
    • More broadly, this is where we might bring out a speech, try to reframe some crucial aspect of the situation, or something along those lines.
  • We may still have to face scrutiny about our role in skyslicers/the mission, and the context in which we respond to that will differ if we're proactively in the spotlight as opposed to being dragged into it.
    • EM stays secret, no matter what.
  • Our contributions here should aim towards mollifying Akatsuki and making the price the rest of Leaf has to pay smaller. Tsunade is still in control of the meeting and doing her darndest to keep Leaf intact, we're just supporting her.
Maximalist: we try to wrench control of the narrative away from both Itachi and Tsunade, and try to press our own angle. Very bold, most likely plays virtually all of our cards, but is the most likely of the three to result in us getting shut down.
  • Invoking the dragonwar is a must here. It's an X-risk threat that the Akatsuki are relevant to and which Asuma is relevant to and if you squint there's a case there that might fly, to convince the other parties here to give us a chance to speechify.
  • This also likely involves drawing the focus onto ourselves for the skyslicer and Akane mission side of the question, which means we'd have to avoid being branded culpable and possibly being executed as punishment.
  • Further revelations like lithosealing or necromancy might be necessary to shore up whatever direction we want to take this. This strategy is the place where such a move would be even conceivable.
    • EM stays secret, no matter what.
These aren't hard boundaries, but we have a lot of options to juggle and we need a way to figure out what approach we use for cramming them into a coherent plan that adeptly navigates the upcoming negotiation. These three modes of approach I think fully describe the ways we could involve ourselves here, each with their pros and cons and each playing to a different selection of our options.

Incidentally, some things I expect to happen outside of Hazou's control:
  • A currently outstanding question is what the Akatsuki want out of this. Are there specific demands from the various other members? How much does Leaf need to be punished, as a separate requirement from what Akatsuki gains in return? What are the Akatsuki planning with respect to AMITY?
    • Not coached in as many words, of course, but I expect Tsunade, Shikamaru, et al. to be probing for that information in the opening stages.
  • No matter what the middle of the negotiation is packed with, at the end of it the clan council will have to vote. Itachi Uchiha leaning over our shoulders is a good incentive for everyone to cooperate with the group consensus, but we should still remain aware of it. The last thing we need is for Ritsuo to doom us all in a fit of transcendental spite.
 
Just offer to give them money/iron ore/gold/gems. Lots of it. We can churn that out easily. Of course, we want to to tell Tsunade to do this so...

And we shouldn't even think of touching 3D sealing here.
 
Just offer to give them money/iron ore/gold/gems. Lots of it. We can churn that out easily. Of course, we want to to tell Tsunade to do this so...

I don't think that there is any level of material resources that can compensate Akatsuki for the loss of combat power and precedent of killing Akatsuki members through "accidents". This is even before getting into the anger Akatsuki will feel once it inevitably comes out that Konoha tricked them and avoided any real punishment through the use of Hazo's new Earth Shaping trick.
 
I think we should suggest a tithe of goods, confer with Tsunade if possible, explain our capabilities, and let her handle negotiations. As for being pressed about the seals... emphasize that all of this resulted from Hidan's choices and let Tsunade or another social press that angle of attack, I guess?


I don't think that there is any level of material resources that can compensate Akatsuki for the loss of combat power and precedent of killing Akatsuki members through "accidents". This is even before getting into the anger Akatsuki will feel once it inevitably comes out that Konoha tricked them and avoided any real punishment through the use of Hazo's new Earth Shaping trick.

Itachi very directly told us that he was willing to discuss material reparations. I suspect things being Hidan's fault mitigated the circumstances significantly enough for that. I don't think too many people really care about Konoha being punished. The image of Konoha being punished and the wealth in their hands is already significant.
 
Last edited:
I don't think that there is any level of material resources that can compensate Akatsuki for the loss of combat power and precedent of killing Akatsuki members through "accidents".

Itachi says they'll take money.

This is even before getting into the anger Akatsuki will feel once it inevitably comes out that Konoha tricked them and avoided any real punishment through the use of Hazo's new Earth Shaping trick.

This is just something no one should ever know or should ever let them be privy to. Just Goketsu producing the gems/ore/gold to the Hokage. No questions asked.
 
True, but for curiosity's sake what do you think his purpose in choosing to quote Kakuzu that specific way at that specific time was?

v Edit: asking you the same question.
 
Last edited:
Itachi very directly told us that he was willing to discuss material reparations. I suspect things being Hidan's fault mitigated the circumstances significantly enough for that. I don't think too many people really care about Konoha being punished. The image of Konoha being punished and the wealth in their hands is already significant.

Can you provide to a link to where he says this? My understandings that Itachi justs says that Konoho must pay a price with no indication of it being limited to material goods. I was thinking something more along the lines of an epic biblical punishment like death of the first born or the extermination of the Sarutobi clan. This would fit the need for Akatsuki to deter any future "accidents" as the absence of such deterrence means it is only a matter of time until the Villages seek to repeat the feat.

Here are the exact words.

"Because," he said, "I do not wish for Leaf to die today. By sundown, we could level this city to within a meter. Yet, it would be wasteful. Kakuzu, of all people, would acknowledge that we would not be so wrong to put a price on death. So, let us discuss whether there is a way that you can provide recompense for what you have wrought."


@eaglejarl @Paperclipped @Velorien

Is there a cultural concept of weregild in the EN? Some way that countries usually do things when someone got killed, but they want to descalate?

For example, the US paid ~62 million dollars to the families of Iran Air Flight 655. So this is a useful tool for countries to have.

It stands to reason that this situation has occurred in the past and there is precedent.

I like the concept of weregild in fiction and real history, but it isn't really applicable in this situation. The death of innocent civilians is something considerably different from the elimination of a major portion of your total military power. This would be something more akin to an accidental nuclear strike destroying a major port city and the accompanying fleet.

There is also the issue of a difference in power. Iran had no real way to demand recompse from the United States other than relying on international public opinion and war guilt. The overwhelming impalance of power meant they had to accept whatever recompose the U.S was willing to offer. It is fundamentally different from the paradigm here where Akatsuki is quite capable of destroying Konoha and has no reason to hold back other than moral concern for innocents, world stability, and the dragon war.
 
No he didn't. He's negotiating for whatever Akatsuki believes "recompense" is. He quotes noted money-lover Kazuku when talking about putting a price on death, but doesn't actually specify himself.
Why would he bring up Kakuzu loving money then? So Tsunade can offer them money and he can be like "no, actually we want Hazou's head on a spike" it's a dumb way to negotiate. Weakens his position.
I like the concept of weregild in fiction and real history, but it isn't really applicable in this situation. The death of innocent civilians is something considerably different from the elimination of a major portion of your total military power. This would be something more akin to an accidental nuclear strike destroying a major port city and the accompanying fleet
There aren't really IRL analogies, because one person is never such a high proportion of an entire countrie's military power, but this is more akin to a mutual aircraft shootdown or a border incident.

Perhaps you could argue it's more like a deescalation after the first nukes have been exchanged. But there's still fault on both sides.
There is also the issue of a difference in power. Iran had no real way to demand recompse from the United States other than relying on international public opinion and war guilt. The overwhelming impalance of power meant they had to accept whatever recompose the U.S was willing to offer. It is fundamentally different from the paradigm here where Akatsuki is quite capable of destroying Konoha and has no reason to hold back other than moral concern for innocents, world stability, and the dragon war.
It's just an example of when a government would find it useful to have it as a tool.

Regardless the power differential is almost irrelevant, Akatsuki is quite literally here asking for recompense rather than attacking, I'm just trying to figure out what to offer.
 
Last edited:
True, but for curiosity's sake what do you think his purpose in choosing to quote Kakuzu that specific way at that specific time was?

v Edit: asking you the same question.
Because someone as money motivated as Kazuku would've been willing to negotiate payment over a death, even a very significant one. Itachi is bringing that up as a way to explain why Akatsuki is willing to open talks. It doesn't mean they're here asking for strictly cash and currency exchangeable equivalents.
 
Last edited:
Why would he bring up Kakuzu loving money then? So Tsunade can offer them money and he can be like "no, actually we want Hazou's head on a spike" it's a dumb way to negotiate. Weakens his position.

I interpreted this a poetical means of saying they are willing to negotiate on a punishment rather than treating it as a declaration of or attacking to unilaterally deliver whatever punishment they feel is appropriate.

Regardless the power differential is almost irrelevant, Akatsuki is quite literally here asking for recompense rather than attacking, I'm just trying to figure out what to offer.

I agree that Akatsuki is showing a remarkable willingness to negotiate when considering the significance of their loss. My point is that Itachi will still need demand a truly harsh punishment if he is to satisfy the grievance of his comrades and deter future attempts to mastermind "accidents".

PS: I was thinking about more about your comparison and realized that there actually was a reasonably close example of weregild in canon. It was Konoha turning over Hizashi Hyguuga for execution as recompense for the death of the Kumo ambassador.
 
Last edited:
I agree that harshness is desired. That's why the plan hinges on them not knowing just how much wealth Hazo can produce- if we offer an amount that seems debilitating enough for Leaf to remove it from play for a while as it focuses on rebuilding, that might work.
 
What if we just, didn't though. We should probably be purely reactive in this case and avoid making any points. We should trust the social specs to social. It seems unlikely they'll go after Hazō specifically anyway.
 
Important to note: almost all of this council was NOT initially onboard for appealing for peace, let alone paying for it.
I would like the winning plan to instruct Hazou to actively interrupt other Leaf parties if their discussion turns against paying for peace for more than a sentence or two, and to vehemently argue for finding terms the Akatsuki will accept.

it would really suck for Hazou to sit by while Leaf tells Itatchi "Nuh-uh", then gets exploded.
 
ITACHI: let us discuss whether there is a way that you can provide recompense for what you have wrought.
HAZOU: 10,000 tons of iron ore, delivered every year to Rain
ITACHI: What?
HAZOU: Apologies, I misspoke. 100,000 tons of iron ore, delivered every year to Rain, for 5 years. And a further 5 tons of valuable gemstones. Is that worth enough for Kakuzu's life?
ITACHI: You know what, fine. *leaves*
I was thinking that but unironically
[X] Akatsuki may die but will rise again harder and stronger
MARI: *snerk*
HAZOU: *Unkills kakuzu* see now he is back, give me back my cash.

Kakuzo *looks at the bill* : Nope, not paying taxes, kill me again.
Death and taxes, he's not having both
Should we consider bringing up dragon war as an existential crisis that we should at least call a truce for now over? Until we can show evidence to akatsuki's summoners?
Do we want Sasori to be aware of headache stones 3D sealing?
I would be fine with Armageddon Initiative.
I don't care that this gets us killed instantly, but I do care that this will vindicate Hagoromo Ritsuo. Please, let's not give this idiot a foot to stand on. Let's not die before we have a chance to remind everyone he officially branded the current Hokage a heretic.
Is there a cultural concept of weregild in the EN?
There is, we were told to pay some for destroying Hagoromo's knife with the same trick that killed Kakuzu.
Itachi says they'll take money.
Does he?

Here's a proto-plan, but I hope others who are more used to plan-making and thinking this through can improve on it rather than anyone voting for it (unless you must)

(Word count: 298)
[X] Inaction Plan (But Be Prepared)
  • Main basis is trust Tsunade and the jōnin to handle it better than us. Unless asked, say nothing. Right now they're talking and that's good.
  • If asked, be useful. Provide what information on the situation we can if Clans are asked anything. For instance, "Hidan struck first" if relevant.
    • Keep OPSEC if at all possible. If the cat's out of the bag on our Dragon-/Kakuzu-killing trap, still don't give specifics or everyone can + will recreate it everywhere - it's deadly but purely defensive.
  • Actively analyse if things risk going south (heated speech, pissed Itachi), if a resolution seems possible, or if they're getting stuck with no resolution.
    • Anything looks bad: we intervene constructively, not defensively.
    • Anything looks good: we're proactive in trying to help peace along.
    • They're getting stuck: offer gems and/or iron ore. We have ridiculous amounts of those. We can "do our part" (invites others to participate, makes us look good)
  • In case of intervention:
    • Stance with Itachi: slightly-modified Summer Lake. Add only factual information, no affect of our own, he wants to solve it through peace and we're going to let him.
      • If there was any finger-pointing, say we designed the trap that killed Kakuzu, not to trap Hidan and Kakuzu here, but for general Tower protection. If no one said "he died to a trap," it sounds much better than "we killed him."
    • Stance with other Clans: Melding Streams. We have a lot to offer and strongly believe in snatching peace from the jaws of war, like Amori. We do respect their seniority as ninja, as Leaf ninja, and as Clan Heads, and whatever they can add to the discussion, especially as regards politics. We can solve this, together.
    • Stance with Tsunade: Incoming Tide wherein she leads. Anything she says, goes.
 
Last edited:
They fully believed that just asking for peace would be an uphill battle and that we'd need to grovel before we could even begin to talk, though. Itachi already being there and talking is a big thing.

Still might be a good idea to cut down the number of people in the room before getting into the negotiations. Maybe just Tsunade, Naruto, Shikamaru, Hazo, and Kurenai? I think that would include all the relevant experts and representatives of the aggrieved while still allowing for compromise without as much concern for reputation or disruptions from the more simplistic (Hagoromo in particular) council members.
 
Back
Top