You'd let her sacrifice a bunch of genin to Jashin-sama? Shit, man.I would very much like to allow Ren to cover it up. On the other hand, given the choice between letting her cover it up, and a bunch of genin dying, the choice is obvious to me.
ETA Incidentally, Mist will not like being told about their mistake. Who wants to be known as the village that almost wiped out the world with a record-breaking mass seal failure, because they didn't check their sealcrafters' work?
You'd let her sacrifice a bunch of genin to Jashin-sama? Shit, man.
Nice.
There is definitely a nonzero number of genin I'd be ok with dying to help fulfill our political ambitions
Yeah, assuming that we're only going to be made chuunin is too much. The Tsuchikage, Raikage, and Kazekage will obviously give up their hats to us.[X] Action Plan: Gotta Catch 'Em All
(just in case)
e: nvm doesn't matter anyway
e2: My inner Velorien model looks at "Action Plan: We prevented Armageddon and all we got was this stupid Chunin vest" and says "This is highly presumptuous in many ways, even for you lot."
Told discreetly, maybe. To save lives, though, that can't happen; the warning needs to spread as far as possible.
Told discreetly, maybe. To save lives, though, that can't happen; the warning needs to spread as far as possible.
The only way Mist gets through this without several facefuls of egg is if no one finds out about the danger, which requires that a) it doesn't get advertised too widely, and Cthulthu doesn't show up, or b) Hazou was completely wrong about the danger level, eg if the proctor gave him a different seal to everyone else.
But that's how we get Kurosawa cousins!
Man. I hope Ren doesn't get screwed too much.
The thing is, I can't really think of a better plan.
Not as far as I (in my full capacity as obsessed with this quest) am aware.
Ambiguous....I would very much like to allow Ren to cover it up. On the other hand, given the choice between letting her cover it up, and a bunch of genin dying, the choice is obvious to me.
Yes.Ambiguous....
Are you saying that the choice is obviously to save the lives of (some fraction of) the ~300 genin who are here to participate in this year's Exams?
Or are you saying that the choice is obviously to let her cover it up because that will help keep Mist and Leaf allied and the EN at peace, thereby saving more than 300 lives in the future?
Or is it something else?
Yeah, I'm thinking that in a serious cascading breach with this many seals in play, the "some fraction of" genin would be upwards of 3000%. Wiping Mist completely out is one way to ensure peace, but Team Uplift is just a little too close to ground zero.in this context I'd go with saving the genin, simply because of the danger sealing failures are.
For the record, wiping large fractions of ninja society out is a great idea and we should pursue it post-haste. So, anyone wanna prep some implosion seals in our next action plan?Yeah, I'm thinking that in a serious cascading breach with this many seals in play, the "some fraction of" genin would be upwards of 3000%. Wiping Mist completely out is one way to ensure peace, but Team Uplift is just a little too close to ground zero.
I don't think we can make those?For the record, wiping large fractions of ninja society out is a great idea and we should pursue it post-haste. So, anyone wanna prep some implosion seals in our next action plan?
No need to, we have 30.
For the record, wiping large fractions of ninja society out is a great idea and we should pursue it post-haste. So, anyone wanna prep some implosion seals in our next action plan?
No worries, I'm consistent. To quote my previous response:To add to the record, when you did start to endorse mass murder without explicitly stating that it had to be done through explosive ordinances of some kind?
I thought you were all about the explosions first and the expected death tolls second. Did your love of boom turn into primarily a love of gloom with a dash of doom?
What changed, why did it change, and when did this happen?
It's like you're a completely different type of psychopath and change scares me, especially unexpected, drastic change.
Who are you and what happened to the real @Radvic ?
So, while sealing doom and mass destruction may not fulfill criteria 1, it does fulfill criteria 4. Not to mention, my proposed doom method in the post you quoted is implosion nuke - a physics exploit.Here's a brief listing of things in games like Marked for Death which I enjoy:
1) Watching/reading about physics exploits
2) Working on concrete, difficult, but possible challenges
3) Reading about complex characters dealing with real problems
4) Watching/reading about fictional suffering
So, while sealing doom and mass destruction may not fulfill criteria 1, it does fulfill criteria 4. Not to mention, my proposed doom method in the post you quoted is implosion nuke - a physics exploit.
Your consistent psychopath,
Radvic
Ah good, consistency is wonderful trait, highly underappreciated, in my humble opinion.
I would suggest, though, linking your own quoted post in your sig. It would help to assuage more people's quibbles with your own enjoyment of the quest and it helps plan makers design plans in such a way that tries to win your vote by intentionally adding in extra amounts of your favored traits of said quest. Rather than remembering each regular's most likely most important deciding factors in voting for a plan, simply having a list of each person's most desired preferences for a plan should make voting easier on both of you. It should certainly help with all of the pandering we tend to do as we edit our plans before the votes...
Hmm.
There's no reason why we shouldn't all do this and compile a list on a google doc for easy future reference. Since anyone should not be trusted with the power to misrepresent anyone else in the thread (or at least be tempted by it) we could have mandatory hyperlinks to posts in this thread to make sure everything on the document gets posted verbatim. If we all plainly state what it is exactly we want out of this entertainment as you did planning should be simplified down to creating a plan that you know will directly incorporate as many people's non-conflicting desires as possible. We'd still have to make it logically consistent, but that's what voting is for anyway in the face of fundamental disagreements. It would certainly take most of the guesswork out of plan-making with regards to 'are people actually going to vote for this?'. There will probably be some miscommunication if the plan-maker does not fulfill enough of what the regular truly wants in said regular's preferred type of plan, but all of the future plans shouldn't be so controversial to the point of being appalling (or at least being so controversial without a very good explanation).
This wouldn't replace the need to actually vote for something, but provisional... heuristic voting (name and patent pending further review) might make us more efficient with using our time in our voting time-frames in the long run.
I think it's worth a shot. Now to think of what I consider to be most important when it comes to this quest, specifically so that it can be kept in mind for plan-makers so they can count on my vote, but also what I will use to distinguish between two or more similar yet competing plans even with approval voting...
This is going to take some thought.