Yes, but she had a foreign nation state actively sabotaging her and the head of the FBI helping. Also, I don't think you can say the media was entirely on her side -- if it was, her coverage would have gone like this:
"Today, Donald Trump and <names> accused Hillary of an email scandal. <details> The FBI evaluated it and said that she had been extremely careless but there was nothing criminal involved. Now, let's talk about her policies and never bother to mention this again."
(Later)
"Today, Donald Trump and <names> accused Hillary Clinton of a scandal related to Benghazi. <details> A thorough investigation occurred and it was determined that she actually had nothing to do with it since all the decisions happened at a lower level. Furthermore, two Republican Congresspeople have admitted that the Benghazi Commision was explicitly intended to target Hillary with the goal of reducing her polls. Now, let's talk about her policies and never bother to mention this again."
...repeat for WallStreetGate and whatever other bizarre fantasies Trump et al made up after the first three failed...
Instead, the media spent ridiculous numbers of hours keeping two scandals at the forefront of every voter's mind. Scandals which were either largely or complete fabrications by her political enemies.