We'd need to store them on the Seventh Path (and tell them all that we did) so that they don't think they can just knock us out and rifle through our stuff to get their word-halves back in round 2, but I suppose that's possible.
More importantly, why do we want non-aggression in the first place? We need to be out to DQ them, and mass non-aggression means we can't.
This is something that really needs to be settled. It depends on a couple of factors. I'm thinking it might be a good idea to just crush blue in both rounds. If we destroy the documents opposing red teams cannot gain ANY points (but can still lose them). If we put huge negatives on blues and prevent reds from getting any points in both rounds and earn max points in both rounds then...
Round One (r1):
Our red team will get +185 points
Other red teams get 0 (MAX, can still go up to -495 negative)
Our blue teams get -300
Other blue teams get -225
Round Two (r2):
Our blue team will get +140 points
Other blue teams will get -225
Our red team will get -495 negative
Other red teams will get +0 (MAX, can still go up to -495 negative)
Which totals at worst a +365 relative net for us in our same-color cohort (+325 total for us over both rounds, +185 for our r1 teamates, -225 for our r1 teammates if they're not on our matching blue team in r2), and at best a +550 margin (+325 for us both rounds, +0 for folk in our color cohort that are NOT in our r1 team, and -225 for them in r2).
For the opposite-color cohort that's at worst a +550 relative net (+325 for us over both rounds, -225 for nonmatching r1 blue teams, 0 if they're nonmatching red teams r2 as well). At best a +1120 relative net for us (+325 total for us over both rounds, -300 for our matching r1 blue team, and -495 if someone faces us again as red in r2). A