How are they oathbreakers? This is a serious accusation to level on the Seventh Path and not one that IMO is supported by evidence.Sense of honour: the Akatsuki, honourless oathbreakers who turned their backs on their packs, killed Kakashi. Avenge him.
Our contributions are on this front are minor at best and probably not particularly worthy of comment.Sense of practicality: our seals shred Leopards. If we die, the supply dries up. If we win, we can focus on the Leopards and Great Seal
For the love of God, don't tell them about runes.We are Goketsu Hazo - Dog Summoner, runemaster, forger of the Conclave, and Dragonslayer. We need their help
They're all missing-nin. I'm pretty sure when you graduate the Academy they make you promise to stay loyal until death.How are they oathbreakers? This is a serious accusation to level on the Seventh Path and not one that IMO is supported by evidence.
Fair enough, I'll pare it down to the Great Seal stuff.Our contributions are on this front are minor at best and probably not particularly worthy of comment.
So, if we're going to tell them that we're going to fix the Great Seal they're going to know that we can do something with 3D seals. Best to just leave it at that, I guess?
We went missing too. This is going to get us laughed out of the conversation.They're all missing-nin. I'm pretty sure when you graduate the Academy they make you promise to stay loyal until death.
Arguably this is null and void as they did die but not in service of their villages
Mist? We were tricked. If our Alpha (Yagura) had any honour, he would have accepted that and welcomed us back with open arms, but he didn't, so we had to run.We went missing too. This is going to get us laughed out of the conversation.
1) We tell them that Akatsuki are oathbreakers
2) The Dogs ask us what oaths they broke
3) We say "oh they went missing"
4) The Dogs say "didn't you go missing?"
5) Hazou: Ummmmm uhhhhhh ....shit
It's a weak argument, oathbreaking is oathbreaking and extenuating circumstances don't count.Mist? We were tricked. If our Alpha (Yagura) had any honour, he would have accepted that and welcomed us back with open arms, but he didn't, so we had to run
Do...you think we're going to succeed? It feels like there's been a tonal mismatch between how the players are modelling the situation and how we perceive the QMs to be (which I don't think is news at this point), but I'd like to ask you straightforwardly: Do you think we've got anything more likely than a snowball's chance in hell at a happy ending? I don't mean to parse into QM secrets about the upcoming difficulty of our opponents, I mean this question purely on the vibes. I feel like more straightforward conversations between players and QMs would be a great thing. Heck, EJ asking for somebody to make a statement in the Discord is what kicked off everything now, and everyone seems to appreciate the different perspectives on offer.I fully acknowledge that the characters should be seriously depressed right now, having lost everything they loved, powerless to influence their fates while Hazō has all the agency, and kept going only by his promises that somehow it'll all work out in the end because Leaf will be so impressed by Hazō's runes. In a vacuum, that is what I'd write. But I feel like if I do write them that way, nobody will be happy. Nobody wants to read update after update of everyone being miserable, much less when the players, like Hazō, are seemingly convinced that all this is only temporary and therefore everyone should suck it up until the inevitable triumphant return to Leaf.
Eh, it saves me some words for elsewhere so I guess.It's a weak argument, oathbreaking is oathbreaking and extenuating circumstances don't count.
This is a terrible argument to make to Dogs as to why they should oppose Akatsuki. Just don't make it.
Talk about avenging Kakashi instead, this will just distract and confuse the Dogs and muddles our overall message.
I think recruiting dogs is likely to be mechanically meaningful because it's not going to just happen off-screen. I agree that I'd like to get to the big stuff but we really need the deck stacked here.Spending screentime criticizing Noburi or recruiting dogs just feels so... like grinding minor side-quests with useless rewards for that 100% competition score before the final boss fight. It doesn't feel like it'll actually change anything.
Vibes-wise, I'm pretty sure this battle will be impossible to call in advance, just like the Battle of the Gods (which, if you'll recall, had 50/50 odds in the simulated battles), simply because of how many different kinds of esoteric craziness will be in play. At least, unless there's some particular bit of craziness that obviates the entire battle (e.g. Hazō going, "Screw it" and just Superchilling the entirety of O'Uzu before anyone can stop him, and the Akatsuki onsite not having effective counters).Do...you think we're going to succeed? It feels like there's been a tonal mismatch between how the players are modelling the situation and how we perceive the QMs to be (which I don't think is news at this point), but I'd like to ask you straightforwardly: Do you think we've got anything more likely than a snowball's chance in hell at a happy ending? I don't mean to parse into QM secrets about the upcoming difficulty of our opponents, I mean this question purely on the vibes. I feel like more straightforward conversations between players and QMs would be a great thing. Heck, EJ asking for somebody to make a statement in the Discord is what kicked off everything now, and everyone seems to appreciate the different perspectives on offer.
[X] EM Nuke Rune O'UzuVibes-wise, I'm pretty sure this battle will be impossible to call in advance, just like the Battle of the Gods (which, if you'll recall, had 50/50 odds in the simulated battles), simply because of how many different kinds of esoteric craziness will be in play. At least, unless there's some particular bit of craziness that obviates the entire battle (e.g. Hazō going, "Screw it" and just Superchilling the entirety of O'Uzu before anyone can stop him, and the Akatsuki onsite not having effective counters).
@FaintlySorcerous I think your plan may benefit from the suggestion I made to Sir Stompy's original plan:Noburi:
- We really wanted him in that tent. Instead, he put his foot in his mouth.
- We're no hypocrite, so we're skipping the dressing-down.
- Advice: treat Orochimaru like Tsunade before her coffee.
- He managed her, he can manage Orochimaru.
- Joking: welcome to the 'I-pissed-off-all-three-Sannin-and-survived' club.
Might I suggest we emphasize their actions against the world since going missing? Like their mass mind-control ritual? Calling them "honourless oathbreakers who turned their backs on their packs" is a bit redundant, but saying "honourless oathbreakers who attempted to mind-control the packs they betrayed" is more concrete.Sense of honour: the Akatsuki, honourless oathbreakers who turned their backs on their packs, killed Kakashi. Avenge him.
If we want to go for practicality, might I suggest that if we fail here, Akatsuki takes over the Human Path, and since none of their Summoners are devout sealmasters (Itachi is at best Chunin-level at the art) the Great Seal can never be fixed?Sense of practicality: our seals shred Leopards. If we die, the supply dries up. If we win, we can focus on the Leopards and Great Seal.
If we're going to be using EM Nuke Runes, we shouldn't be bothering with complex deceptions. Just run over and do it. EM Nuke Rune the lot.Seriously though, I think we should consider running the Superchiller idea by Orochimaru, using the framing my totally-a-meme-plan-hahaha suggested. I. e., Hazou starts off with an incredibly lossy but not-incorrect summary of "a rune that creates a highly destructive effect if deployed within a Force Dome due to an esoteric interaction" to prime Orochimaru, then honestly describes what they're doing, but in an overly obtuse runecrafting language.
The intent is that this would provoke a Primordial Sealing check (untangling the terminology to understand the nature of the effect Hazou is describing, and that the destructive effect part has nothing to do with "deployed within a Force Dome"), not a Deception check. And we can win the PS check.
The motivation is to convince Orochimaru that the Superchillers only work within a Force Dome and wouldn't have an effect if deployed outside it, which would simultaneously (1) ensure that Orochimaru doesn't try to research these WMDs immediately, (2) ensure Orochimaru doesn't reconsider putting Hazou on his to-kill list.
@Velorien, @eaglejarl, @Paperclipped, any PONWOG on whether you'd actually rule the mechanics this way? On one hand, arguably it should still be a Deception check, just because Hazou is doing Shenanigans and knows it. On the other hand, the narrative justification is that Hazou wouldn't be giving off "I'm being deceptive" signals when explaining any of this, because he'd be earnestly explaining his genuine understanding of how they work – except in a researcher mindset that accesses models of reality which Orochimaru doesn't understand. (Imagine a quantum field theorist excitedly babbling about how the nuclear bomb works, but using QFT language and never bothering to transate the concepts he's using into intuitive macro-scale terms such as "a big explosion", and he's talking to a classical-mechanics physicist who'd only recently studied Quantum Mechanics 101.)
It may not kill all of them. We want our S-rankers waiting around the Force Dome looking at Ninja Radars and intercepting people who'd manage to escape. Same logic as Mari outline here.If we're going to be using EM Nuke Runes, we shouldn't be bothering with complex deceptions. Just run over and do it. EM Nuke Rune the lot.
So make more nukes.It may not kill all of them. We want our S-rankers waiting around the Force Dome looking at Ninja Radars and intercepting people who'd manage to escape.
We tried and it's our only one? And if you mean "stack more Superchillers", IMO that's not how it works. Someone who has a way to survive one Superchiller is unlikely to be killed by a second one, because they have some trick that lets them efficiently evade or no-sell them. (It's possible that they'd spend scarce resources to evade Superchiller 1 and won't have them again for evading Superchiller 2, sure, but it's a pretty brittle plan that fails gracelessly and I wouldn't want to rely on it. If they have the resources to evade one, why think they have enough only for one, and not for ten?)
I would argue that if we put the whole world under a Superchiller they'll die, or at worst be forced permanently into the Seventh Path. Everyone's chakra runs out eventually, even monsters like Kisame.We tried and it's our only one? And if you mean "stack more Superchillers", IMO that's not how it works. Someone who has a way to survive one Superchiller is unlikely to be killed by a second one, because they have some trick that lets them efficiently evade or no-sell them. (It's possible that they'd spend scarce resources to evade Superchiller 1 and won't have them again for evading Superchiller 2, but it's a pretty brittle plan that fails gracelessly and I wouldn't want to rely on it.)