Yeah, I was rereading the quest and saw the name Fthgoya, and thought, wait a minute that sounds familiar, when she also oversaw the beginning of the fight against the blight it clicked.
Pretty much, yeah. It's still a lot of fun though.Honestly the history buffs are probably rolling their eyes at me for making you too egalitarian.
Yeah but genius got 89 votes and nearly all of which wanted to specify. Which specification doesn't matter, as there are two tiers of vote here and you can consider No Specification as a specification of its own.
It makes sense when you think about it. I mean, let's assume that people were really split on the options, but generally wanted to specify. Neither side gets half, but one choice eventually wins. So we get:Well there is my mistake, I figured that if none of the specifications got 50% it would be random.
Just remembered, what do you guys think of also colonizing Australia?
It makes sense when you think about it. I mean, let's assume that people were really split on the options, but generally wanted to specify. Neither side gets half, but one choice eventually wins. So we get:
100 total votes:
100 Votes Genius
-49 Votes Admin
-48 Votes Diplo
-3 Votes Random
If it was required that a single subvote needed 50% otherwise it would default to random, that would mean that in the above scenario, Random would somehow win despite only getting 3 total votes.
I can already imagine the salt in that case.
In which case those 49 people would be pissed. And since the general sentiment was 'We want to specify', the diplo voters would come across as sore losers trying to snatch a victory out of their defeat through a technicality.I figure 51 people wouldn't mind, since diplo didn't win but with random they could still get diplo
Think of it this way, someone earlier mentioned that there were 2 tiers of voting, but in reality you are voting for 3 tiers.The diffrence here is that I put less weight on the specify and more on the genius.
As long as we work peacefully with the natives instead of killing them to steal their land. Trade could be interesting.
Colonialism was bad on too many levels to describe in a reasonable essay let alone a comment on a quest forum.
Well, theories are that dinosaurs might have been feathered instead, or maybe it's SOME dinosaurs."Crow's like a sort of demon-thing, right?"
"Sort of, yeah."
"So demons might have Crow-like features?"
"Some, probably."
"Only, like, more awesome because they're demons and shit?"
"Obviously."
"So, like demons should have like obsidian feathers, right?"
"A reasonable proposition. Statues of Crow certainly do."
"Sweet."
Stained glass feathers?
Really even with modern science the study of fossils is a VERY large extent educated guesses because too much data had been lost in the process of fossilizationNot really. It is called working with incomplete information and primitive understanding of biology.
You would not call modern science theories bull**** just because they are not a hundred percent certain.
we're gonna be mad spoiled once we have neitherSo, not sure if anyone has noticed yet, since I only did just now, but this Golden Age is getting us +5 Wealth a turn from True Cities alone.
Golden Age: Converting +1 EE to Econ a turn, True Cities produce +1 Wealth/turn, special innovations
Wealth 14 [+(3+1+4+5)-3]
We also now have a net increase of 10 Wealth a turn so long as the Golden Age continues, which is almost as crazy a stat increase as the Population Explosion was.
If I had any idea where to start, I would make her the One True Goddess, Monotheism 4 teh win
The FC choice is a pretty good example of what AN usually does. You only need to be in the top two slots to get in.This is not something I had considered, but does a vote with more than two options require 50% of the votes to pass? There's usually a landslide victory, so I had not thought to pay attention to it.
include magic and then write a Kate Daniels novel where the Americas was populated by various empires with superior magic, superior gods, and a great desire for blood, books, and gold who committed viking-esque raiding parties against the impoverish Europeans until they got hit with a meteor and collapsed.I've been spending an unjustifiable amount of time thinking about the situation in the Americas. (because I live there)(and am given to extreme flights of fancy.)
It was kinda a combination of factors that screwed them over in reality, like a mass extinction of nearly every domesticatible animal on those continents and a near complete lack of idea, tool, and crop diffusion both among the major local civilisations and between them and the rest of the world, and a late start both on agriculture, and on when they managed to breed certain critical crops into easy growability.
So this would be easy to change, have the domesticable animals survive, set up the central Mesoamerican civilisations as enthusiasic seaborne raiders/traders/colonisers to facilitate idea diffusion, juggle the positions of the Pacific Islands so the Polynesian waves of expansion don't peter out before reaching the Americas, and/or just do what is implied right now(what with the existence of the mediterranean black sea) and make Greenland warmer and better able to support a European style population, agriculture and trees so the Not!Vikings, or their equivalent can support early colonization efforts towards North America. (which either succeed or at least cause idea diffusion)
Honesty even only one of these things would leave existing cultures of the area in a better position to be politically relevant.
Also clearly Terror Birds must survive to be domesticated as hunting, then riding beasts in South America, whimsy demands it.(and maybe some of South America's other bizarre fauna with them)
I'm imagining it now, the Incan empire's or Amazon river civilisation's quick responding terror bird cavalry lined up to charge against the hordes of viking raiders and drive them back into the sea.
I am pretty sure our priests have petrified all the things for science already
Conquest is a combination of theft and murder, in that it involves killing a group of people and then stealing their land.
Sorry, let me clarify: more than two options, but only one possible victor.The FC choice is a pretty good example of what AN usually does. You only need to be in the top two slots to get in.
Technically, the Spanish conquests of the Americas was actually more akin to a coup than theft. I mean, the spanish just usually replaced the various empire's leadership caste with their own people, so for a lot of people the changes were fairly small for quite a long time (besides the whole 'smallpox wiping out vast portions of the population' thing).Conquest is a combination of theft and murder, in that it involves killing a group of people and then stealing their land.
I guess it's technically not theft if you don't consider taking the belongings of dead people to be theft, but even then their things should go to their next of kin, not their murderer.