And you lost me. Strawmen tend to do that. I don't care if you've come up with a viable cure to world hunger, but if you can't do me the courtesy of actually contemplating my argument, I don't see any need to do the same.
Ah, nice excuse not to get confronted with actual arguments. Tell me then, why should I even bother with you instead of just writing you off as obviously not being interested in arguments at all?

Also, what strawman? What else is "We sleep safely in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would harm us." than "HARD MEN MAKING HARD DECISIONS"? Tell me, where's the difference? That is no strawman. The two are literally the same.
 
Strawman implies that is not exactly what you said. Otherwise you vastly misrepresented your point as now multiple people are taking this view of what you just said.
My point was that there's a reason every civilization has had their share of monstrous acts, and it's not because every civilization is monstrous- and that assuming we can remain entirely above such acts is arrogant.

If that's dismissed as 'Hard men making hard decisions while hard' than that's on them. At this point, I don't really care enough to try and further explain my position here, especially when I tried to go out of my way to state this wasn't just a 'hard men have to make hard decisions' argument.
 
Many Ymaryn would disagree with you Phygriff broke the xoh and gave us siege engines his descendants gave us shield wall and tactical phases and are protecting our north eastern territory which is why the nomads are not really a problem anymore, voting him in also made it so that Rulwynna the second become an intrigue hero rather than a puppet which resulted in us getting a clearer image on the problems at hand Phygriff was a lot of things but a black mark he is not.

People are judging him on moral and ethical ground. In that sense, he IS a black mark on our history. It doesn't matter if he crushed the Xoh, subjugated the HK, TS, and cowed the TH and the SF, and give us the biggest empire on the planet.

He is also the wrong choice in the first place. If we didn't get the rolls that we needed, we are absolutely screwed.
 
Actually, does anyone remember if we got some WoG on the True City tax being applied at a specific point in the turn? I seem to recall something like that, but I can't find it. Maybe when we had a Heroic Admin?

If it is at the end of the turn then the Festival plan is fine, but I don't remember if it was at the start, end, or an admin roll (adjusted by hero)

Admin roll. Province actions assume it happens at the start of turn.
Economy failure is irrelevant because no combination of actions reaches negative Econ(0 is not a crisis).

Trelli are our only rivals in the salt trade, so they are.

Two that we know of from a single short expedition. There is no way an entirely different region only has two trade goods to offer. Not to mention the massive boon that the trees would be for us.

And those five boosted goods aren't all going to be dominated goods, unless I missed something, so that increase is not all that valuable. Compare that to being the only supplier of furs and amber to the civs to our east.
Actually looking to the trade goods chart:
-Amber
--North - Available, but quantity is low. Should bring us to Leading as it's a Precious Stone good, but takes time setting up local operations or contacts to become Dominant.
--Trelli - N/A

-Fine Dye
--North - No immediate source, though access to northern wood will expand alchemy down the line as their reagents hit the market.
--Trelli - Secures Dominance further as we buy up the Saffron hitting the market. No immediate impact however.

-Fine Textiles
--North - No source.
--Trelli - None becomes Trading. Boosted value from Dye dominance as well.

-Furs
--North - Available, but quantity is low. Should bring us to Leading as it's a Fabric good, but takes time setting up local operations or contacts to become Dominant.
--Trelli - No source.

-Gems
--North - No source
--Trelli - Imported Gems. A Trelli Trade Post would allow us to buy them out better, taking us from Significant to Leading.

-Gold
--North - No source
--Trelli - Imported Gold. A Trelli Trade Post would allow us to buy them more cheaply from the Khemtri, moving from Lesser Trading to full Trading.

-Incense
--North - No source
--Trelli - Imported Incense. A Trelli Trade Post would allow us to acquire some of these before they're sold out, taking us to Minor Trading.

-Silver
--North - No source
--Trelli - Imported Silver. A Trelli Trade post would allow us to buy it more aggressively to take us to Dominant(but at no profit because it's consumed internally). Considering we're Leading and STILL don't have enough...this is to relieve stress on the economy.

-Spices
--North - No source
--Trelli - Imported Spices. A Trelli Trade Post would allow us to acquire some of these before they're sold out, taking us to Minor Trading.

-Wine
--North - No source
--Trelli - Secures Dominance further as we buy up the Wine hitting the market from the Trelli. No immediate impact however.

-Copper
--North - No source
--Trelli - Imported Copper. Leading becomes Dominant as we buy out the traders before they sell it.

-Bronze
--North - No source
--Trelli - Minor becomes Minor + Minor Trading. Not significant.

-Tin
--North - No source
--Trelli - Minor + Trading becomes Minor + major trading. Would probably yoink away the Trelli lead.

Short version:
-North
--Do this if you want novelties, more things to study or the very long term benefits.
--Main risk is breakaway, economic crisis from weather, and difficulty of meeting Lord's Loyalty

-Trelli
--Do this if you want to Dominate Copper, and increase our Silver and Gold supply to meet the needs of our economy.
--Main risk is military intervention from the Trelli, though it would become double suicide if they fight us since they depend heavily upon controlling access to Ymaryn trade goods.


If the Trelli Trade Post is the river east of them, then I'd more readily support it being built rather than the Northern Trade Post, as it would be much easier to expand up to there and integrate it.

One concern about the Northern Trade Post is that with all the hunter-gatherers around there, it could potentially become the nucleation site for settled peoples, which might make it more prone to breaking away because they would have ready-made vassals of their own.

Worth noting that AN had mentioned at present we are the most likely origin of the Vikings. A breakaway Ymaryn North trade post would probably become just that over time.

I don't believe we can steal dominance of Trelli-sourced goods without blockading the Trelli.

Otherwise, people will just bypass us to get the goods cheaper.

Trelli produced goods, certainly, but as far as we can tell the Trelli don't actually gain dominance by production in anything but wine and bronze. They don't have the land for it. It's ALL imported, so it's uniquely fragile.

So for instance like in the interlude, we can steal Tin dominance from them by simply buying up all the Tin for better prices than they can offer.
My point was that a trading post doesn't really make it easier to buy from the Trelli. It helped with the MW because they are far inland, and a trade post could stockpile goods for trade without having the MW traders remain at the sea. The Trelli city is literally a trade post.

Their trade post. Warehouses storing their goods. Their docks which get fees from docking, port operations and other sundries. Having our own set of docks and warehouses nearby means that we don't need to lose money for being in port with a fleet without trading.

Which means we can exploit timing better. Large fleets or ships unloading a lot of goods at once causes the value of your goods to crash, meaning you get less than you could if you had the means to send 1 small ship every day.
That's how relative advantage works.
We can't easily integrate the Stallions without shedding Martial first. And the best way to do that is with a mercenary company (eats 5 Martial and lets us maintain our borders). And to safely maintain mercenaries, we need reliable Wealth, which means salterns not markets. And by far the fastest and cheapest way to get more saltern Wealth is to build a second trading post to boost the second saltern.
Raise Stability so we can tolerate temporary Red Martial. Then just found a Trelli Trade Post and take a Main Support Subordinate twice, which gives them a large local garrison and plenty of Econ to build docks with.
Siphon*

But, that would make sense if the Tin Tribes were on the east side of the Trelli. They're not, they're north, closer to the MW. We likely already get a significant chunk of their tin through Greenshore. In either case, putting a TP between Greenshore and Trelli makes little sense for unloading bulk goods, given that we are already doing that at greenshore. If I had to guess, it would be placed on the eastern side of Trelli, closer to Hatriver. It's a more direct route back to the core.
It's actually a pretty major improvement.

The Greenshore and Trelli round trip might take 2 weeks for instance, while the Trelli trade post means that we'd actually have our own docks and warehouses within a 2 day round trip.

What does this mean for our trade?

Current process:
-Greenshore loads up the shipments in a generic spread based on normal demand in their monthly routine.
-They arrive at Trelli 2 weeks later, and discover that the Saffron Islanders have a ship in port which depresses the Saffron prices causing them to drop. The Saffron Islanders are looking for wine, but we only brought our regular stock, so the Trelli snaps up all the Saffron.
-We could send a ship back to Greenshore to bring more wine, but by the time they make the trip the Saffron Islanders are long gone, and the Trellie are doling out the Saffron slowly to keep prices high.

Trelli Trade Post process:
-TTP agent in Trelli learns about the Saffron Islanders arriving. They send a ship back to the trade post.
-Trade post loads up a ship with nothing but wine.
-Ship arrives and begins competing with the Trelli to buy out the Saffron stock.
-We ship the Saffron over to the trade post, where part of it is sent to Greenshore or Hathatyn as part of regular shipments, while the rest is warehoused for when the Tin Hills show up and compete with the Trelli again for their Tin. Rinse and repeat.
-Over time, what this means is that traders from distant places know that if they wait a few days the Ymaryn traders will be able to give them a better deal overall, so they can. The Trelli are forced to either play along, or deliberately undercut the trade by buying below market value to screw us.

As with the roads, with trade, turnaround time is critical.
And you can probably see why the Trelli would be annoyed...but they have to deal because it makes them a more popular trade center, because you can be assured that if you are looking for Tyrian Purple, Salt or Wine, it's always available within a few days, which means the Trelli make mad bank in docking fees...but lose the docking fees from the Ymaryn, who could just leave one small boat in port for messenger purposes and their traders only need to dock for long enough to unload and load goods.

Disclaimer: I do not support starting up additional Trade Posts until we resolve the tax crisis. They'd greatly complicate things. But the facts must be laid out.
No we don't need slaves. I am talking about trade income. We don't trade iron, ergo we don't get trading bonuses for dominating it.

Trading dominance in a strategic good likely pays more wealth (or diplomacy?) than a luxury good. That means that the Trelli are have a higher income, and more influence, than many are assuming.

And no, I'm not advocating getting into the slave trade.
I don't think dominating strategic goods actually pays out more wealth(because strategic goods are often volume based commodities, raising the price is a threat big enough to trigger military action if it rises above their utility value), but it does give non-wealth benefits, see for instance the Khemtri offering to give up a major concession in exchange for releasing our temporary Tin dominance.
 
We need to start integrating the lands that we've already colonized, conquered, and made marches of before we even really think about further conquest. Plus the infrastructure. Plus the lowlands. Plus the tax thing.

I don't think conquering the Trelli will happen any time soon if at all. On the other hand, there are probably some avenues for trade such as the Danube and Volga we haven't really met yet- the Thunder Speakers may be trading with people along the Caspian Sea right now just as we're trading with the Trelli. We could probably be doing a lot more with trade.

Which isn't to say we can or should ignore military adventurism- if nothing else we have to bleed off martial stat, but I think the lowlands and defensive war can handle that nicely.
 
Last edited:
"Something I don't like won the vote, now I have to vote to fuck it up as payback!" Nice attitude guys.
What? No. We're talking future plans here anyway, not lost votes that have already happened. I just want to to avoid Ymarr getting imperialist. And that by any means necessary.

and that assuming we can remain entirely above such acts is arrogant.
We can try.

The only arrogance is your attitude that we just HAVE to become a world power.

especially when I tried to go out of my way to state this wasn't just a 'hard men have to make hard decisions' argument.
Just because you stated so doesn't make it true. Your argument still essentially was Hard Men Making Hard Decisions. The attitude you displayed is exactly what we mean with Hard Men Making Hard Decisions. And it is an attitude that rightfully gets derided here.
 
Last edited:
We need to start integrating the lands that we've already colonized, conquered, and made marches of before we even really think about further conquest. Plus the infrastructure. Plus the lowlands. Plus the tax thing.
This is what I agree with.
We're already successful enough.
This I don't, there is no such thing as 'successful enough' this sort of thinking is why people shouldn't try because they 'clearly' done enough.
 
Setting up stuff in the north is not going to be a fun experience for the Ymaryn. :V
A good learning one though. That's half the reason I wanted to set it up as here is a lot of potential there to gain some knowledge about different farming practices, different forests, new materials. The trade goods are only part of that, but a part that pays for the mercenary company and future influence/support subordinate actions.
 
Last edited:
People are judging him on moral and ethical ground. In that sense, he IS a black mark on our history. It doesn't matter if he crushed the Xoh, subjugated the HK, TS, and cowed the TH and the SF, and give us the biggest empire on the planet.

He is also the wrong choice in the first place. If we didn't get the rolls that we needed, we are absolutely screwed.
But he did and that's all that matters history does not judge you on what you could have done but what you did and what he did was bring victory after victory so dwelling on what ifs is pointless. Plus while yes he did burn xohyr to the ground it would have caused us a lot more problems due to it's distance so he may not have made the most moral choice but he made the one that would have resulted in less problems in the long term.
 
Raise Stability so we can tolerate temporary Red Martial. Then just found a Trelli Trade Post and take a Main Support Subordinate twice, which gives them a large local garrison and plenty of Econ to build docks with.
Not a bad plan. It would take a bunch more actions than just trading post + mercs, and I'm dubious about being over the Martial cap even when stable; I suspect there will still be effects. But workable.

OTOH, if we'll have the extra income, why not go for the mercs? That way, we don't lose any coverage of the north while we're digesting the Stallions, and all future war missions in any direction will be able to add two mains to whatever we throw. With full king effort but not provinces, that's 4.5 main war actions.
 
Ah, nice excuse not to get confronted with actual arguments. Tell me then, why should I even bother with you instead of just writing you off as obviously not being interested in arguments at all?

Also, what strawman? What else is "We sleep safely in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would harm us." than "HARD MEN MAKING HARD DECISIONS"? Tell me, where's the difference? That is no strawman. The two are literally the same.
HARD MEN MAKING HARD DECISIONS is all about reveling in it. That man making said decision is to the right, or noble, or just for making that call. I'm not lionizing my view, I'm not stating it's the noble road, or just, or right. I'm simply saying, don't just condemn all the myriad crimes civilizations have committed, assume we can avoid the same, or that the attempt won't cause enormous issues.

When Phygrif sacked Xohyr, innocents were slaughtered, men tortured, women raped, children hauled off to be not!slaves- there's nothing 'good' about that, there's nothing noble or wholesome in it. But the fall of Xohyr was definitely to the benefit of the Ymaryn- and that's my primary concern, I dare say it's the primary concern of a lot of people in power today.

I'm not going to sit here and pretend that dealing with the Trelli is morally right, but it is beneficial to the Ymaryn- and while I prefer to tread the most moral path to get there, I care most about resolving it in the Ymaryn's favor.
 
How is it not? To my knowledge the US has taken every possible opportunity that would've resulted in harm to others but advantages for themselves. It's not evil for evil's sake, but that excuse what the country has done.

It is not good or neutral to do evil for the sake of profit. It is evil.
Ok, by that logic every nation ever is evil. Let's not kid ourselves. We take things using relative comparisons and also accounting for differences in time.

Is America now the same place that killed hundreds of thousands of Native Americans? Is America more evil than Nazi Germany?

Yeah. Let's not argue that way, like this, or about this. It will only lead to people getting mad.
 
This is what I agree with.

This I don't, there is no such thing as 'successful enough' this sort of thinking is why people shouldn't try because they 'clearly' done enough.
I do indeed thing that people shouldn't be assholes to gain success because they are 'clearly' successful enough, yes.

I don't see a point in compromising on our morals and ethics in order to gain a nebulous increase in 'success', especially when this means of increased success can be achieved without being an asshole, such as by increasing our industrialization so that we can do more with less, or by increasing the infrastructure of the land we already have instead of rushing to take someone else's.
 
Which means you'd happily fuck us up and have us lose a war if it was over something you dislike. You're coming in loud and clear.
If it is a war that would fuck over what we stand for, then yes. So best don't start such wars. Why do you treat this as if it is somehow worse than starting imperialist wars of conquest in the first place?

But he did and that's all that matters history does not judge
But I do. All this moral-nihilist crap about "History is written by the winners" and "good guys lose in the end" is really beginning to grate on me.
 
I don't think dominating strategic goods actually pays out more wealth(because strategic goods are often volume based commodities, raising the price is a threat big enough to trigger military action if it rises above their utility value), but it does give non-wealth benefits, see for instance the Khemtri offering to give up a major concession in exchange for releasing our temporary Tin dominance.
When you grab somebody by the balls they tend to get cooperative right quick.

I think that is most of the point of strategic goods, like you say here, and as an addition I would rate Tin as the most powerful of these goods with slaves right behind because Tin in this age is like oil in the modern age.
 
But I do. All this moral-nihilist crap about "History is written by the winners" and "good guys lose in the end" is really beginning to grate on me.
The first is true the second is not, the good guys always win it is why they are considered good, and when they lose they become bad, that is the way of things. After all good and bad are human concepts not laws of nature.
 
But he did and that's all that matters history does not judge you on what you could have done but what you did and what he did was bring victory after victory so dwelling on what ifs is pointless. Plus while yes he did burn xohyr to the ground it would have caused us a lot more problems due to it's distance so he may not have made the most moral choice but he made the one that would have resulted in less problems in the long term.

I am pretty sure that history would have also judged him as a monster, if they care to acknowledge him at all. And it wasn't strictly necessary to conquer the Xoh. They were a strategic counterweight to the HK and other polities. Now, we *are* that counterweight.
 
Speaking as an american, manifest destiny was a mistake. Let's not do it here.
 
When you grab somebody by the balls they tend to get cooperative right quick.

I think that is most of the point of strategic goods, like you say here, and as an addition I would rate Tin as the most powerful of these goods with slaves right behind because Tin in this age is like oil in the modern age.
Yes. This is also why we are pretty much insulated from that sort of problem. Even when iron is developed elsewhere we shouldn't have a problem. It's pretty common stuff and we have a huge native supply.

Gotta love those elements that are fused in g-type stars during their main and late stages, they're common as dirt.
 
Last edited:
Okay, I'm really not going to touch this- but if you honestly think it's that black and white I envy you ( or at the very least if you refuse to realize there's a reason for such behaviour)
As far as I can tell the only reasons for those evil actions were out of selfishness and the desire to be on top.

I can also judge the Ymaryn and the other civilisations because even when we were suffering from famine, we not only didn't attack others, we helped others, so my threshold for when an evil becomes necessary is very high. If we could be such good people during such hard times, even when being good people only hurt us more, I expect and want us to be good people when the worst that can happen to us from choosing to be good people is not becoming exceptionally wealthy and powerful.
 
Back
Top