Seems so. It goes back on the list....
@veekie , IIRC you've argued that we already have enough literacy. Well, seems like we don't.
Seems so. It goes back on the list....
@veekie , IIRC you've argued that we already have enough literacy. Well, seems like we don't.
I'm willing to try it with normal actions, but not with policy. Policy is more for implementing what we already have than experimenting, and the Defence policy also includes the building of walls, which is less useful than the watch towers. Let the policies handle general improvements while we use the normal actions for this kind of thing.Watchtowers have significant utility that even the chiefs in the provinces that have never seen war want some. You know why? They help with everything. Bandits cannot prey on people where there is oversight. Fires are swiftly spotted so they can be doused. Watchtowers help with learning about flooding and landslides at a distance and getting help sent, which happen with some regularity even with all the care we put to avoiding them. Refugees can be seen from greater distances rather than wander until Blackbirds find their tracks.
All told, it makes the chiefs more responsive to crisis by the power of early warning systems.
The thing is, building lots of watchtowers is cheap. As a Main action it costs as much Economy, but you get a lot more towers. We could get sufficient towers to cover 5 Provinces with a Main action dedicated to each, which we have two of per Policy turn.
As such, this is a good Policy investment with a useful tech behind it.
The thing is, building lots of watchtowers is cheap. As a Main action it costs as much Economy, but you get a lot more towers. We could get sufficient towers to cover 5 Provinces with a Main action dedicated to each, which we have two of per Policy turn.
As such, this is a good Policy investment with a useful tech behind it.
I'm willing to try it with normal actions, but not with policy. Policy is more for implementing what we already have than experimenting, and the Defence policy also includes the building of walls, which is less useful than the watch towers. Let the policies handle general improvements while we use the normal actions for this kind of thing.
While we do watch towers, the provinces can go back to doing Expand Holy Sites. Despite what you said, we have not done it enough.
Spirit policy is exactly as narrow as it should be to be worthwhile, as it focuses on doing the one thing we want it to do, which is expand holy sites enough to meet the literacy requirements of our kingdom. It's either that or do it ourselves, and if we do it ourselves we can't do the things covered under Trade/Province/Expansion in the specific ways we want them done.Spirit policy is too narrow to be worthwhile, I think; Trade or Progress or Expansion make more sense to me, honestly.
Wat. Why? We're at like mysticism 8 right now, and have far more pressing needs in terms of a) expansion b) trade and c) teching up.While we do watch towers, the provinces can go back to doing Expand Holy Sites. Despite what you said, we have not done it enough.
Spirit policy is exactly as narrow as it should be to be worthwhile, as it focuses on doing the one thing we want it to do, which is expand holy sites enough to meet the literacy requirements of our kingdom. It's either that or do it ourselves, and if we do it ourselves we can't do the things covered under Trade/Province/Expansion in the specific ways we want them done.
Wat. Why? We're at like mysticism 8 right now, and have far more pressing needs in terms of a) expansion b) trade and c) teching up.
We got around the literacy issue by having simpler and more straightforward tax protocol and law- there's very little reason to spam more holy sites right now.
Provinces will do walls instead, about which we do not really care; better to manually build watchtowers while provinces do something else. Like maybe Progress for Surveys and the like.
We did not get around the literacy issue. It doesn't matter how complex or simple the law is, if a farmer cannot read the law or get the law read to him, he will get screwed. Besides that, there is more to the law than taxation, and increasing our people's ability to follow the law by actually knowing what the law is is a good thing.We got around the literacy issue by having simpler and more straightforward tax protocol and law- there's very little reason to spam more holy sites right now.
To be fair, literacy would help out greatly in teching up. I think Art Patronage would be much more to the point, though.Wat. Why? We're at like mysticism 8 right now, and have far more pressing needs in terms of a) expansion b) trade and c) teching up.
We got around the literacy issue by having simpler and more straightforward tax protocol and law- there's very little reason to spam more holy sites right now.
I thought Art Patronage would help too, but I was wrong. AN clarified that only Expand Holy Sites matters in terms of increasing literacy.To be fair, literacy would help out greatly in teching up. I think Art Patronage would be much more to the point, though.
Yes, the simpler the laws, the easier it is to read. Our old tax code was so complex we were basically going to invent pseudo-lawyers just to ensure everyone knew what they could or couldn't do.We did not get around the literacy issue. It doesn't matter how complex or simple the law is, if a farmer cannot read the law or get the law read to him, he will get screwed. Besides that, there is more to the law than taxation, and increasing our people's ability to follow the law by actually knowing what the law is will be a good thing.
No, I mean in teching up in general.I thought Art Patronage would help too, but I was wrong. AN clarified that only Expand Holy Sites matters in terms of increasing literacy.
So basically since it would cost us an action via the Law not triggering, we'd most likely be better off using one of our actions to switch the policy manuallyThis is correct, if you went a turn without having a megaproject active and did not switch during the main phase, the provinces would bulk up on Econ but wouldn't gain any benefits from the Law and you would get a chance to switch during the midterm.
That's true, but making the law easier to read doesn't matter if there aren't enough people who can read at all.
They are not operating "perfectly fine". It's working well enough to function and our society is indeed prospering, but it's not working as well as it could or should be, and our society has room to prosper even more. The sooner we start, the more used to following the law our people will be.Our people for the most part are operating perfectly fine with the Law as is- hence why our society is more prosperous than ever.
Also, @Academia Nut , sorry, I have not seen it answered, so: are there any policies that include building boats? I presume Trade and maybe Expansion do, is it correct?
Do we need 2+ Main Expand Holy Sites? Remember, bigger Shaman caste will make them more 'normal' and political,
That's true, but making the law easier to read doesn't matter if there aren't enough people who can read at all.
They are not operating "perfectly fine". It's working well enough to function and our society is indeed prospering, but it's not working as well as it could or should be, and our society has room to prosper even more. The sooner we start, the more used to following the law our people will be.
The last two times this happened we raised our Centralization cap and changed to a more advanced form of government after taking events that cost us...1 Stability.
But there are. Because the simple fact we haven't had trouble with our Law indicates that for the most part. The easier the law is to understand, the less time literates have to spend explaining it to the illiterates. That's just basic common sense. It's easier to teach simple concepts and systems than complicated ones.That's true, but making the law easier to read doesn't matter if there aren't enough people who can read at all.
The problem is you're pursuing this in the face of the actual issues we're seeing. Technological development, ideological drift, improving infrastructure to improve quality of life, trade for medical knowledge. Even if this is technically a problem we haven't fully resolved, it's a problem we've at least partially addressed.They are not operating "perfectly fine". It's working well enough to function and our society is indeed prospering, but it's not working as well as it could or should be, and our society has room to prosper even more.
Hmmm... not sure where to put Boat Building at this point. It may simply fall through the cracks for some time.
I agree. Since we simplified the tax code, we don't need to press for super high literacy at this point. doing so is just chasing shinies rather than addressing actually, real, PRESSING issues.But there are. Because the simple fact we haven't had trouble with our Law indicates that for the most part. The easier the law is to understand, the less time literates have to spend explaining it to the illiterates. That's just basic common sense. It's easier to teach simple concepts and systems than complicated ones.
The problem is you're pursuing this in the face of the actual issues we're seeing. Technological development, ideological drift, improving infrastructure to improve quality of life, trade for medical knowledge. Even if this is technically a problem we haven't fully resolved, it's a problem we've at least partially addressed.
This raises the question: If a regular Salt Gift is strolling up and dumping a few hundred kilos of gold on their lawn what would it look like if we kicked it? Or spent 10 Diplomacy on Salt Gifts in one turn? Or both?
This raises the question: If a regular Salt Gift is strolling up and dumping a few hundred kilos of gold on their lawn what would it look like if we kicked it? Or spent 10 Diplomacy on Salt Gifts in one turn? Or both?