- Location
- USA
- Pronouns
- He/They
@Rihaku:
So, the major thing I was unaware of was that Hunter-nin would go after missing-nin of other villages, not just their own. That puts a fairly large damper on my analysis, since you lose the major benefit of being known for only killing Mist missing-nin. Still, he could have similarly developed a reputation for never having killed anyone who wasn't a missing-nin, regardless of village.
That was why I assumed the alpha-strike potential for Zabuza would not be utilized, since it is literally a singular possibility - if he's never killed a non-missing-nin (or non-Mist ninja at all, in my original assumption) who wasn't actively attacking him, then it only takes a single event to lose that claim, and any other Hunter-nin from Mist would similarly lose that advantage. Thus, it would be to the village's benefit not to use him in that manner. Likewise, this "free pass" would only really apply to other Major villages with enough reputation to lose from violating their precedent to allow their travels.
Additionally, allowing one Hunter with a basically pristine reputation from an enemy village into your territory for one purpose alone also likely means that Leaf would similarly be able to develop their own Hunter with similar free-reign to cross borders relatively unmolested. Perhaps Jiraiya?
Essentially, I'm not yet fully convinced that this is a massive vulnerability to Leaf.
Your points about Mist not wanting any info to spread all still are on point to me, so I can still see them proceeding with extreme caution.
@eaglejarl:
Just to verify, is this assumption correct? That most/all Hunter-nin (and Zabuza in particular) go after all villages' missing-nin, not just their own? And does Zabuza and possibly a corresponding Leaf Hunter have a similarly impeccable (as far as we know publicly) record when it comes to hunting missing-nin only, even when he was in position and could have been used on other ops?
Most of Rihaku's post makes sense to me, but we've already been burned once by making assumptions that were incorrect and this is a verifiable piece of data.
So, the major thing I was unaware of was that Hunter-nin would go after missing-nin of other villages, not just their own. That puts a fairly large damper on my analysis, since you lose the major benefit of being known for only killing Mist missing-nin. Still, he could have similarly developed a reputation for never having killed anyone who wasn't a missing-nin, regardless of village.
That was why I assumed the alpha-strike potential for Zabuza would not be utilized, since it is literally a singular possibility - if he's never killed a non-missing-nin (or non-Mist ninja at all, in my original assumption) who wasn't actively attacking him, then it only takes a single event to lose that claim, and any other Hunter-nin from Mist would similarly lose that advantage. Thus, it would be to the village's benefit not to use him in that manner. Likewise, this "free pass" would only really apply to other Major villages with enough reputation to lose from violating their precedent to allow their travels.
Additionally, allowing one Hunter with a basically pristine reputation from an enemy village into your territory for one purpose alone also likely means that Leaf would similarly be able to develop their own Hunter with similar free-reign to cross borders relatively unmolested. Perhaps Jiraiya?
Essentially, I'm not yet fully convinced that this is a massive vulnerability to Leaf.
Your points about Mist not wanting any info to spread all still are on point to me, so I can still see them proceeding with extreme caution.
@eaglejarl:
Just to verify, is this assumption correct? That most/all Hunter-nin (and Zabuza in particular) go after all villages' missing-nin, not just their own? And does Zabuza and possibly a corresponding Leaf Hunter have a similarly impeccable (as far as we know publicly) record when it comes to hunting missing-nin only, even when he was in position and could have been used on other ops?
Most of Rihaku's post makes sense to me, but we've already been burned once by making assumptions that were incorrect and this is a verifiable piece of data.