We can not afford to make an enemy out of Xanatos, and considering that he's thrown his lot in with the government as part of a plan of his, we're going to have to bite the bullet and start improving our relationship with the American government so that we can stay in the good graces of David Xanatos. Putting Russ in charge of our spy network is one step in that direction.
 
We can not afford to make an enemy out of Xanatos, and considering that he's thrown his lot in with the government as part of a plan of his, we're going to have to bite the bullet and start improving our relationship with the American government so that we can stay in the good graces of David Xanatos. Putting Russ in charge of our spy network is one step in that direction.
There's a lot better you can do to improve relations with the government than basically giving up our de facto independence. We don't need to be buddies with them. We only need to be cordial. There's a huge difference there.
 
There's a lot better you can do to improve relations with the government than basically giving up our de facto independence. We don't need to be buddies with them. We only need to be cordial. There's a huge difference there.

Yeah, I´d rather not give D. C. (and once he finishes puppeting them, Xanatos) any more in on our dealings than needed. That being said, I wouldn´t mind cozying up to them in less self-harming ways.
 
There's a lot better you can do to improve relations with the government than basically giving up our de facto independence. We don't need to be buddies with them. We only need to be cordial. There's a huge difference there.
In real world multiple countries doing exactly that, and even let America allocate military bases on their territory. It does not mean that they surrender their independence, they just let Pentagon to spend its money on irrelevant force projections. As long as we gain more than we loss its acceptable trade, and if down road we find itself overly restricted with this arrangement, we just overturn table, boot Russ from his position and rebuild network again.

Also maybe we can put Russ on Spy Network action, and later consider placing Mirage in council position, since it will probably be in separate voting. Like I more or less trust her to manage things between us and government, but not on laying initial groundwork, which she most likely fail.
 
I'm really starting to get sick of the fear-mongering regarding Russ and the spy network. There's NO basis for these accusations but sheer bloody paranoia.
 
I'm really starting to get sick of the fear-mongering regarding Russ and the spy network. There's NO basis for these accusations but sheer bloody paranoia.

Even if there was, we should still go forward with it. Yes, purging our spy network would likely take a high-intrigue hero a few actions, but so what? We aren't planning to break away from the US at present. And the advantage of getting a double-spy network and councilor position now more than makes up for a payout later. The entire principle of interest shows that bonuses early on are far, far more valuable then bonuses later.

Edit: I'm probably going to to throw my vote in for the most popular plan with a combination of admin/spy/think tank. Unless it has no chance of winning and I have a major preference between the top two plans.

Edit, Edit: The best reason for spy network now is that we don't have any crisises right now. I don't want to wait to upgrade until we can't because we have a 100% NEEDED action every turn.
 
Last edited:
Any chance of getting 626 back from whatever asteroid he was stranded on? He would fit right in with the rest of us.

Also, what happened to Lilo?
 
I'm really starting to get sick of the fear-mongering regarding Russ and the spy network. There's NO basis for these accusations but sheer bloody paranoia.
Well, we don't suspect Mirage anymore (not about working for Kronos and not about hypnosis thing). We were preempted by author regarding Felldrake staff. Obviously paranoia is local state of existence and at this point Russ the only acceptable target. I am just saying, that even if this time our fears valid, we can deal with it and even extract short term benefits. And who really knows maybe in couple of turns we will roll 1 on global events and there won't be government to worry about.
 
In real world multiple countries doing exactly that, and even let America allocate military bases on their territory. It does not mean that they surrender their independence, they just let Pentagon to spend its money on irrelevant force projections. As long as we gain more than we loss its acceptable trade, and if down road we find itself overly restricted with this arrangement, we just overturn table, boot Russ from his position and rebuild network again.

Also maybe we can put Russ on Spy Network action, and later consider placing Mirage in council position, since it will probably be in separate voting. Like I more or less trust her to manage things between us and government, but not on laying initial groundwork, which she most likely fail.
In the real world the countries that said "no" got couped by the FBI or were threatened with economic destruction. We aren't a real country at the moment and our position is still too tenuous to do something so stupid.

Edit: To clarify, not saying the FBI could coup us right now. More saying that is a faulty comparison and we're not in a position to "overturn the tables" after them literally building our infrastructure. "Overturning the tables" is more a thing when you merge infrastructure and use your own to corrupt the other party's from the inside-out. We have literally no basis for doing that.
I'm really starting to get sick of the fear-mongering regarding Russ and the spy network. There's NO basis for these accusations but sheer bloody paranoia.
Yeah no. You haven't even been part of this conversation. You don't get to accuse people of fear-mongering when neither you nor anyone else here has actually made an argument for why it is unrealistic. Fear-mongering is seeing valid points and discarding them for your own gain. NONE of you have actually questioned the validity of said point about putting the spook in charge of our spy network. Literally the only person who has taken the time to argue the point at all has conceded that it is what I've said but is pushing it as a good thing.
 
Last edited:
In the real world the countries that said "no" got couped by the FBI or were threatened with economic destruction. We aren't a real country at the moment and our position is still too tenuous to do something so stupid.
Current setting government too paper tiger for it, unless Xanatos really reinforce it, and at this point coup will be us against Xanatos confrontation, which I was led to believe we are trying avoid
Edit: To clarify, not saying the FBI could coup us right now. More saying that is a faulty comparison and we're not in a position to "overturn the tables" after them literally building our infrastructure. "Overturning the tables" is more a thing when you merge infrastructure and use your own to corrupt the other party's from the inside-out. We have literally no basis for doing that.
We have subvert Hawk option who is not even our hero unit. Why can't we subvert our own low level staff as long as we have loyal high intrigue hero.
NONE of you have actually questioned the validity of said point about putting the spook in charge of our spy network. Literally the only person who has taken the time to argue the point at all has conceded that it is what I've said but is pushing it as a good thing.
Not exactly a good thing, more like thing that if needed we can turn to our advantage.
 
Current setting government too paper tiger for it, unless Xanatos really reinforce it, and at this point coup will be us against Xanatos confrontation, which I was led to believe we are trying avoid
I did say that I wasn't trying to imply there would be a coup, so much as pointing out that those weren't nearly as willing or benevolent as you portray, outside of maybe Eastern Europe and Japan whom are, to my knowledge, completely open to the US military at this point each for their own reasons.
We have subvert Hawk option who is not even our hero unit. Why can't we subvert our own low level staff as long as we have loyal high intrigue hero.
Because having the government in control of our incoming information for years on end kinda means "a year or two from now when circumstances change" will be a far different situation than now.
Burden of proof is on you, not me.
You are accusing me of bad faith when you have no proof of such thing. The burden of proof for bad faith is on you. You guys made no opposing arguments against the point, so you can't exactly go around claiming that I am "fear-mongering" since that implies that I have more refused to listen to your rationale against it with no realistic or good counterpoints.

That is a heavy charge, and one you have done NOTHING to show for.
 
Last edited:
The "rationale" is based on the assumption that MiH is hitting us with trap options. So it's bad faith in regards to trust in the QM.
 
Why would it be a trap? I don't think anyone is thinking that.

It's just that russ is rather explicitly NOT loyal to us in the end but to the government.

He would probably work out fine but why have the extra hassle of having everything reported to the government as well?
 
The "rationale" is based on the assumption that MiH is hitting us with trap options. So it's bad faith in regards to trust in the QM.
No, no it's not. You also hadn't said anything regarding that up to this point. You made baseless accusations out of the blue while previously being a lurker the whole time and then suddenly coming out as if you had been making some big and "obvious" argument the whole time.

It was already said that Russ sends what information he knows based on what we assign him to. I wasn't one of the people saying he knows everything. That was Alex, before they were corrected. We also know that the narrative does play a part depending on who we use for actions, how we approach said actions, and what synergy we take with other actions. Finally, we know that Russ is loyal to the Federal Government first and foremost and will likely always stay that way barring mind control or the government being completely and openly subverted.

A "trap" option is when a QM doesn't give any information, or only gives incredibly obscure and hidden information, to the extent that the audience couldn't reasonably expect the effects that may come. By all accounts, putting Russ in charge of our information when the agreement for him being here is explicitly for him to act as a government liasion is by no means some kind of "hidden" effect. It's no more a hidden effect than putting the musical guys in a musical being synergetic was for positive effects, in that we don't know for ABSOLUTE certain but we can reasonably ascertain there will be something to that effect.
 
Because having the government in control of our incoming information for years on end kinda means "a year or two from now when circumstances change" will be a far different situation than now.
But until now we always dispatched Russ on every important intrigue action, so for us nothing will change. Let's say Russ will have some amount of control on which intrigue action we take and which not. But it's not like we are now free in choosing any action, since it's decided by DC and available heroes. And if he says that some action we can't take and we really want it, it just means we need to put additional preparation for it, like gaining goverment clearance, subverting agent network, or creating independent from spy network black ops team. Meanwhile we can enjoy improved relations with government and Xanatos, possible easer time at recruiting heroes and other benefits.
 
Last edited:
Small scale stuff like Doof taking a trip to New York and seeing every show on Broadway can happen without Xanatos knowing and/or caring.
I mean, he'll know, because, uh... Xanatos, and he's fairly likely to integrate it into a plot, because, again, Xanatos. But that's just Xanatos personally being Xanatos; you're still right about the general principles.

Here's the inator roll from last turn, I simply forgot to do it with the chaos of two quests and the company retreat.

The Army-Summon-Inator! You manage to summon a hoard of Mongols that immediately swear fealty to Temujin and join your PMC! The malus that your enemies receive for attacking Doofania has been increased by 1!
Yaaaay my inator idea got through! :)

So basically, this happened, but with a happy ending:

 
Last edited:
I mean, we could just make Russ loyal enough that it wouldn't be that bad as people against it describe it. Plus we need to focus on improving loyalty of our heroes anyway since we have forshadowing from Hallucination Zebra about danger.
 
I really, really love what you've got goin' here OP, I want in on it.
Inexorably, your head turns to look behind you. And, of course, you are being followed by a massive boulder.

The four of you scream in unison before redoubling your speed.

"Wait." Dennis asks. "We're going uphill. Why is the boulder…"


Not gonna vote just yet, haven't done this before.
 
But until now we always dispatched Russ on every important intrigue action, so for us nothing will change. Let's say Russ will have some amount of control on which intrigue action we take and which not. But it's not like we are now free in choosing any action, since it's decided by DC and available heroes. And if he says that some action we can't take and we really want it, it just means we need to put additional preparation for it, like gaining goverment clearance, subverting agent network, or creating independent from spy network black ops team. Meanwhile we can enjoy early doable action, improved relations with government and Xanatos, possible easer time at recruiting heroes and other benefits.
None of those actions were on building infrastructure. They were short-term things with immediate effects, not something we would have to rely on for a long-time going forward. I don't care about if he bugs our network; or rather, I don't care enough to argue. I care that our network and the government's network are one and the same.

For that matter, I also already said earlier that I have an end-goal for a completely independent Doofania. We don't need to integrate back in to the government apparatus more than necessary. I'm not worried at all about the government saying "no" to operations. I simply wish to work towards greater independence until the day comes that we can negotiate full recognition of independence, preferably from a high ground. Your whole plan is to basically make Doofania another arm for enforcement of the Masquerade, which is neat but more something I'd want to do as Xanatos or Shere Khan rather than Dr. Doof.

Your plan also relies on your assumption that Xanatos supporting Richard means that a President Martinez government would hold a Xanatos shadow-government, which isn't a guess I really buy. I've watched Cory in the House (best anime ever :V) and Martinez is more childish to the extent that a sitcom would require for jokes. He's not really corrupt or even that incompetent. I see it more as Xanatos buying influence in the legal way most lobbyists and companies try to push for a political in, not as him being Martinez's puppet-master. Xanatos won't have nearly as much control over the government as you postulate, and letting the government agent create our spy network is too big a sacrifice to make.

Also, genuinely sorry for being a bit pedantic, but you probably shouldn't put "double action" as one of the benefits of your plan. If you recall, I also support the spy ring, just not one created by Russ.
 
Current setting government too paper tiger for it, unless Xanatos really reinforce it, and at this point coup will be us against Xanatos confrontation, which I was led to believe we are trying avoid

Er, uh, I mean, they did try to decrease Kronos' control of certain areas last turn, so it's entirely possible that they're just waiting for our "Syndrome Moment" so they can throw us in jail or retake the Tri-State area.

The "rationale" is based on the assumption that MiH is hitting us with trap options. So it's bad faith in regards to trust in the QM.

Eh, I mean, we have been warned before about Russ, and have been told that, if we assign him to an action that goes against the U.S. and the Masquerade... he just won't do it, even if it's a success. And... well, building a spy network that could end up being used against the U.S. and it's goverment... yeah. I mean, it's possible Russ would just make it super loyal to the U.S. Gov instead of us, which will still let us use it for ourselves.
 
I don't care about if he bugs our network; or rather, I don't care enough to argue. I care that our network and the government's network are one and the same.
And again, you have no proof that he'd do that. It's all based on the supposition that it's a trap option that the QM will smack us with down the line. It is paranoia, with no actual basis that I can see anywhere. Hell,Russ is aware that his own agency is splintered. Further, Russ' greatest loyalty isn't to the government, it's to "The Ideals of America". It literally says that on his sheet!

Edit: Your entire argument is based on an appeal to ignorance from what I can tell. We don't know so it must be so.
 
Last edited:
And again, you have no proof that he'd do that. It's all based on the supposition that it's a trap option that the QM will smack us with down the line. It is paranoia, with no actual basis that I can see anywhere. Hell,Russ is aware that his own agency is splintered. Further, Russ' greatest loyalty isn't to the government, it's to "The Ideals of America". It literally says that on his sheet!

Notably, as the only person who is actually doing something about toons, we get a 25 pt loyalty bonus, which is worth his dislike of us for our anti-govt stance and then some.

Edit: Also this entire issue is solvable by just running Goofy for president.
 
Back
Top