No, this was not the case. It was voting to ignore gunpowder and had 5-10x the voter weight, so it was much more likely to happen.
No, this was not the case. It was voting to ignore gunpowder and had 5-10x the voter weight, so it was much more likely to happen.
One assumes particular individuals have advantages or disadvantages. The other says that individual options have advantages or disadvantages in the voting.
ah. That would be kinda bad.No, this was not the case. It was voting to ignore gunpowder and had 5-10x the voter weight, so it was much more likely to happen.
One assumes particular individuals have advantages or disadvantages. The other says that individual options have advantages or disadvantages in the voting.
It is the same difference as there is between noting that doctors get paid more than teachers, and saying that some people are discriminated against in their pay.
They aren't because they can always switch their votes... The votes are being counted differently, not the voters...Except that is false comparison because doctors and teachers have different skill sets and job requirements while there is no such thing for an SV voter. Why should one voter get treated as being superior to another voter?
What is this discord you speak of?So, AN has been (well, had by the time this post goes up) quite active in Discord on answering some miscellaneous questions. Assume these informations only working so far as this current Second Lightning Round, except those that can be considered as more 'permanent'.
They aren't because they can always switch their votes... The votes are being counted differently, not the voters...
No, it means that some options are more likely to occur, due to one thing or other, which means there's a need for consensus to choose the less likely option.And that particular mechanic means some kind of discrimination is going on, especially when the votes are weighted that one voter can matters more than nine other voters. Those two possibilities you presented aren't mutually exclusive.
No, it means that some options are more likely to occur, due to one thing or other, which means there's a need for consensus to choose the less likely option.
Different jobs have different skill requirements and job descriptions. Similarly, different votes have different support among layers of Ymaryn society and vote effects. It is a perfectly valid comparison.Except that is false comparison because doctors and teachers have different skill sets and job requirements while there is no such thing for an SV voter.
The premise of a weighted vote is that votes are guiding forces acting upon a society pushing a chaotic machine in one direction or another. The inertia of that machine means that it requires more or less force in order to get it to do one thing as opposed to another. It is thus the choice of what you want it to do that is penalized or promoted.And so? Why shouldn't you be allowed to fairly vote for the option that you want to pick? It is discriminating so say that you count as much as another voter, but only if you want for a certain option that the other voter is also voting for.
It's a Discord Server, a sort of a mix between IRC and Skype Group Chat. Created by our most feudalist-inclined of sheeps, Maximillian, in order to reduce the clutter in the thread during it's more active moments
Players aren't discriminated against; choices are. Some things are easier or more likely to succeed; that is a fact of life. A weighted vote merely simulates that. Hell, there are some choices that aren't even offered at all; those effectively have weight x0, and are infinitely more uneven than what we have now. I don't see you complaining against that.How does that make it so that in the out-of-universe certain players aren't being discriminated against?
Because their votes weight less not because it's their opinion or because it's their votes, but because they push against the tide. It's harder for a angry character to calm down, and it's harder for an elitist society to not be elitist.And that is the in-universe explanation. How does that make it so that in the out-of-universe certain players aren't being discriminated against? Again, just because you have an in-universe explanation doesn't mean that you get to ignore the out of universe effects.
Different jobs have different skill requirements and job descriptions. Similarly, different votes have different support among layers of Ymaryn society and vote effects. It is a perfectly valid comparison.
Lemmie give you another real life comparison. Passing an amendment to the U.S. constitution is a difficult process that requires a superiority supporting it to actual go through. Representatives voting for that IRL don't have their own votes counted equally: you need multiple "yes" votes to overcome one "no" vote. Do you think that is wrong, too?
The premise of a weighted vote is that votes are guiding forces acting upon a society pushing a chaotic machine in one direction or another. The inertia of that machine means that it requires more or less force in order to get it to do one thing as opposed to another. It is thus the choice of what you want it to do that is penalized or promoted.
Do you have an argument that isn't fundamentally "I'm unhappy with this system and don't understand the rationale behind it"?Does anybody have an argument that doesn't reply upon justifying it in-universe or comparing to examples where the participtions aren't equal in those scenarios or an argument that SV voters aren't equal to each other?