I think as long as they don't get into serious conflicts that require either backing down or fighting (e.g. territory or trade disputes), that might be possible?Can King of the Hill nations coexist peacefully without either side losing KotH?
Can King of the Hill nations coexist peacefully without either side losing KotH?
If a secondary is enough to build the Arsenal then I would go with the second option just for the increased chance of nabbing steel but since AN said to build more then one Arsenal. I'm thinking something along the lines of new trails and double arsenals which would have bigger effects (concentrated talent) then a singular study metal.So how would you do the plan New Arms to the Front?
[main] Trails
[secondary] Arsenal
[secondary] Study Metal,
or
[main] Study Metal
[secondary] Arsenal
[secondary] Trails?
More centralization to burn for Wildcat would probably be nice, but better odds of steel are pretty important, too.
Yes.
Would be weird if the war ends with us concluding treaty and "let be friend" like the Egyptians did with the Hittite.
Reminder that AN had said before that the Hathatyn and Highlanders had better road networks than we do. Though that's not a difficult feat.If a secondary is enough to build the Arsenal then I would go with the second option just for the increased chance of nabbing steel but since AN said to build more then one Arsenal. I'm thinking something along the lines of new trails and double arsenals which would have bigger effects (concentrated talent) then a singular study metal.
[Main] Trails
[Secondary] Arsenal
[Secondary] Arsenalx2
If thats possible to do, if not then,
[Main] New Trails
[Secondary] Arsenal
[Secondary] Study Metal
The syngery would be the central government handling the logistics, setting up the industry and organizing the war effort while the provinces raise local troops which the War Chief leads.
Don't we need at least a secondary War mission for Lords loyality, or would Gulvalley say 'Okay, Offence Policy and all the mercenaries counts well enough'.
OTOH, AN stated that neither side is winning, so we might want to up the game some more. The Khemetri are probably doing the same.
We have done just Offense policy before and it was sufficient.Don't we need at least a secondary War mission for Lords loyality, or would Gulvalley say 'Okay, Offence Policy and all the mercenaries counts well enough'.
OTOH, AN stated that neither side is winning, so we might want to up the game some more. The Khemetri are probably doing the same.
Yeah, ouch. The Khemri specced for massive expansion and then took the traits that let them do this, but it means they have to keep expanding or they implode.
Meanwhile, we're more built for a 'Build Tall' style civ, but we have a problem in that we haven't had a chance to build as tall as we'd like because of how much territory we've swallowed in the last little while. Basically, if they came at us at a better time, I wouldn't be worried. But as things are, they basically have to make this a war to the knife--because it is one to them, their society literally cannot survive the hit that losing King of the Hill would cause given their apparent level of overextension.
I suspect if they knew of the existence of Great Power Thunderdome, they probably wouldn't have expanded north as much as they did since they knew we were the Big Man on the Hill here unless they had their ears plugged.
I think, statistically speaking, we have a modest logistical advantage here, as they're at the end of a long trail of colonies, while we're basically trying to stop them from encroaching on our own frontier. Couple that with our great riverboating capacity, and I think we have an edge. I suspect that Khemri can throw some staggering numbers into the grinder though.
Normally a Great Power War gets resolved quickly while the new equilibrium is settled and the new Big Man is determined, but they don't have a choice, they have to win or they risk imploding (Given how if we conceded, we'd have lost ground, while if we don't concede, we don't gain any clay--I suspect that they're effectively the aggressor here, just that we're taking an aggressive posture out the gate). And while we can win, it'll likely leave us vulnerable to the Trelli trying something.
Yeah, this is going to get ugly, but we don't really have much of a choice. Their build is such that they have to keep pushing or they risk falling apart. They're basically a victim of their own advantages here, and once the fighting starts and they find out that "Oh shit the Ymaryn are both closer to home, and actually pretty fucking good at this war thing", they're going to be doubly fucked because they'll be vulnerable to a civil war, so it'll become a full out "Any price is acceptable to win this conflict because we explode otherwise"
Well hello there extremely judgmental and diverged-from-reality blaming machine.I'm out, btw. Don't want to watch the People get pounded into the dirt by the Khemetri and then everyone else who's been scared of them if they lose. Don't want to watch them become highly militarised and trigger a bloody civil war among a nation of millions if they win, which would eclipse even the fall of Xohyr.
Maybe I'll check back in a few weeks and see if you guys pulled a rabbit out of your hat and somehow resolved things peacefully. You'll get bonus Stability if you do.
Bye.
Well hello there extremely judgmental and diverged-from-reality blaming machine.
I'm out, btw. Don't want to watch the People get pounded into the dirt by the Khemetri and then everyone else who's been scared of them if they lose. Don't want to watch them become highly militarised and trigger a bloody civil war among a nation of millions if they win, which would eclipse even the fall of Xohyr.
Maybe I'll check back in a few weeks and see if you guys pulled a rabbit out of your hat and somehow resolved things peacefully. You'll get bonus Stability if you do.
Bye.
Seriously, calm down and stop being so rude.Well hello there extremely judgmental and diverged-from-reality blaming machine.