- Location
- UK
- Pronouns
- He/Him
I'm pretty sure nothing like that has happened in the beta timeline.
I'm pretty sure nothing like that has happened in the beta timeline.
something something time travelI'm pretty sure nothing like that has happened in the beta timeline.
The two recent examples off the top of my head are this and this (specifically the lack of pushback on us asking if we could get the Clan Council to do X and her answering with the reasons why KEI wouldn't like X, and the lack of pushback on her giving us shit for putting our love life over political convenience after she happily let the Nara and Gōketsu enter a Clan War so she can have a legal relationship with Tenten), plus her 'advice' on the Hagoromo that was delivered offscreen.Could you both please link me to the most recent example of this so I can get a sense of what you are referring to?
"You know," he said, "we wouldn't have to worry about any of this if we could just close this legal loophole altogether. Is there some reason why we can't just get the Clan Council to vote to allow legal protection of secrets known to ex-clan ninja and capital punishment for those who disclose them?"
"A number," Kei said with sudden coolness, "of which the most obvious to my mind is that in exchange, assassinations must cease completely. Any other condition is unacceptable.
Kei suggests you reject Mikijirō's plan, on account of not wanting to spread the taint of Hagoromo religious authority any farther than it has already spread.
You've said this before and I already corrected you then. The clan war had nothing to do with Kei's relationship with Tenten. It started because the Hagoromo refused to marry Noburi and Yuno. Nor do the Gōketsu have any relationship to the Concubine Laws beyond the fact that Hazō supported them during the Clan Council meeting where they were presented.and the lack of pushback on her giving us shit for putting our love life over political convince after she happily let the Nara and Gōketsu enter a Clan War so she can have a legal relationship with Tenten)
I'm not too concerned becuase I asked this in thread and got a wildly different answer from Mari, but it's still a great example of why it would be best to leave her out of issues where she has an extreme conflict of interest.Come on, "no pushback" to a summarised discussion is pushing it.
@Velorien @eaglejarl
May I inquire what our other sanity checkers said? This one seems (understandably) quite biased and I was more hoping to hear cost/benefit with regards to involving the Hagoromo and their legitimacy in MARI, odds of being able to censor certain parts of the ideology we dislike, the effect on the relationship between our clans, etc.
The Clan War against the Hagoromo was always about their treatment of Kei and "Tintin"'s relationship.You've said this before and I already corrected you then. The clan war had nothing to do with Kei's relationship with Tenten. It started because the Hagoromo refused to marry Noburi and Yuno. Nor do the Gōketsu have any relationship to the Concubine Laws beyond the fact that Hazō supported them during the Clan Council meeting where they were presented.
"If I can clarify one thing," the big man said in an unexpectedly soft voice, "Lord Hagoromo, is your objection to the laws as a whole or to the… pairings they allow?"
Lord Hagoromo hesitated. He was being forced to choose between his overall objections (and the notorious conservative was bound to have plenty of those) and his impromptu moral crusade, which would become meaningless if he rejected the laws on their wider merits. So what kind of man was Lord Hagoromo?
"The laws can stand," Lord Hagoromo snapped. "They need but one very simple change."
MIO: am I a joke to you?Nor do the Gōketsu have any relationship to the Concubine Laws
Looks like I got ninja'd but yeah Chapter 607 Part 1 qualifies.Could you both please link me to the most recent example of this so I can get a sense of what you are referring to?
I don't mind the actual solution (at least, not compared to), the core of my discontent is that Kei, who is supremely protective of her own agency, neglected to respect Hazou's.I didn't mind Mio that much and I think Kei's solution was a pretty reasonable way to move past the plotline players didn't want to deal with anymore anyways
Yes. It was at that point when Kei should have mercifully allowed Mio to marry someone she would have bargained to.Wasn't the reason Kei got Hazou specifically named as Mio's concubine was because she expected Mio to get her to bargain down but ended up having too high Intimidation?
What happened there?Looks like I got ninja'd but yeah Chapter 607 Part 1 qualifies.
Yeah, but could you imagine the reverse situation, wherein Hazou leverages Kei's Concubine Slot for a political maneuver, [without her permission or her knowledge]? Kei would be apoplectic.Wasn't the reason Kei got Hazou specifically named as Mio's concubine was because she expected Mio to get her to bargain down but ended up having too high Intimidation?
I've always read Kei as having a pathological need to not be under someone else's authority (I wonder what her parents did), more so than her viewing the right to decide for oneself as a moral imperative.Yeah, but could you imagine the reverse situation, wherein Hazou leverages Kei's Concubine Slot for a political maneuver, [without her permission or her knowledge]? Kei would be apoplectic.
That does not sound plausible, based on my reread of how the chapter went. Kei expected Mio to have a strong reaction to being Hazou's concubine (and would counteroffer accordingly), and so she went with the plan of pusing Hazou in her scenario, with explanations of why Mio being a Goketsu's concubine would be necessary. That she underestimated her own skills is not aYes. It was at that point when Kei should have mercifully allowed Mio to marry someone she would have bargained to.
I disagree. Kei's actions re: Mio have been within the boundaries of what I would expect her to do in this situation. Specifically, she went to Hazou before having finalized the agreement. The entire opening scene of Chapter 622 has Hazou try to find an alternative, which would not be possible if Kei had actually gone through with it; that Kei had no real objections to finding someone else indicates that this was not finalized.Yeah, but could you imagine the reverse situation, wherein Hazou leverages Kei's Concubine Slot for a political maneuver, [without her permission or her knowledge]? Kei would be apoplectic.
New Condor name just dropped.
On the contrary. The clan war didn't start after that meeting. No action was taken until the Hagoromo refused to officiate Noburi and Yuno's wedding, at which point the players immediately voted in the first act of the clan war.The Clan War against the Hagoromo was always about their treatment of Kei and "Tintin"'s relationship.
You're still talking as if the Concubine Laws were a Gōketsu project which the Gōketsu chose not to adjust because Kei's welfare mattered more than good relations with the Hagoromo. This was not the case. The Concubine Laws were invented by Shikamaru and then developed and presented by him and Kei. The Gōketsu had nothing to do with them until the final moment.All we had to do to remain on good terms with the Hagoromo was to make one minor adjustment to the Concubine Laws.
There would have been absolutely no problem with marrying Yuno and Noburi had we done that.
The proposal was presented in bad faith, but no burning of capital was intended--it's not as if Shikamaru planned to get caught red-handed and have Asuma reject the proposal. As for the attacks, those certainly had nothing to do with protecting Kei's relationship, the status of which was settled by that point. They were straightforwardly revenge for the Hagoromo insulting Kei's and thereby the Nara's honour.Besides, even if you want to split hairs about the Gōketsu, there is no denying that the Nara burned enormous political capital by submitting that legal proposal in bad faith, let alone by the attacks they made again the Hagoromo's interests following the council.
Was Kei never planning on marrying Tenten using this law? My understanding was that this was always intended to come out, at which point Asuma was going to be furious and conflict with the conservative clans would errupt.The proposal was presented in bad faith, but no burning of capital was intended--it's not as if Shikamaru planned to get caught red-handed and have Asuma reject the proposal.
This being Ami, surely the correct move would not be so simple as proving your loyalty? Now creating the appearance of betraying Ami in order to exploit her enemies, only to set them up for a catastrophic fall when she returns and reveals your ongoing alliance...
This is getting into "you should be having this conversation in-character" territory, but to Asuma, the matter would look quite different if the laws took effect, a bunch of concubine relationships were created and proved beneficial to Leaf as per the presentation, and then it emerged that a small percentage of those relationships were homosexual.Was Kei never planning on marrying Tenten using this law? My understanding was that this was always intended to come out, at which point Asuma was going to be furious and conflict with the conservative clans would errupt.
[Kei] could very realistically choose Tenten, go back to the Gōketsu, and leave him with no alliance, a hostile Gōketsu [...]