To clarify, the Hagoromo did not say something mean about Keiko in their latest statement. They said that the Gōketsu having a Hagoromo marry her was a violation of their faith. Of course, since that faith is the official religion of Leaf, saying that is equivalent to an accusation of heresy.
Well obviously because Jiraiya had the oomph to squash them and at the very least personally survive the consequences.
Eaglejarl tends to close voting when he gets around to it as opposed to a set time.
Voting doesn't close on an EJ cycle until EJ shows up and posts the tally.
Or combines both plans
Summons
Huh, maybe today's an exception then. I guess we'll find out when he posts about it.
Uhhhhh, exactly how bad is heresy in Leaf? Are we talking a Warhammer 40k/Spanish Inquisition type response, or more like modern America?
On reflection, heresy is a strong word. An act of sacrilege, maybe? If there was going to be a witch hunt over the Nara wedding, it would have happened already. The point is more that the Hagoromo are establishing that the wedding was not merely immoral but actively went against the Will of Fire.
That sounds like a problem. Worse, by using a non-Leaf wedding style we would be confirming that we are acting outside of the Will of Fire.
By the very nature of the situation, you would have access to one or two of the most powerful people in the world via Kagome, and they would have nowhere to run while you preached Uplift at them. In fact, love can work great changes on the human heart.
That makes no sense. Clearly, we know that they are against Keiko and Shikamaru's polygonic relationship, but their public reason a) blames Hazo for arranging it when Jiraiya and Shikaku did? and b) the issue isn't about Keiko but, again, due to intermarriage between two Clan Council clans? Why didn't this come up during the wedding?
