Or it means that a closer relationship between Malekith and the Dwarfs, means the Karaz Ankor gets embroiled in the Elf civil war early. Or something equally bad.
I don't like, nor trust, Malekith and I'm not convinced that he was a good guy who would have been the best ruler ever if only things hadn't gone wrong or if only the elves had elected the correct person or if only etc etc. It's only because we don't know how Malekith is likely to be in this quest, as opposed to canon, that I'm not just writing the whole business off entirely.
As is, though? I'm still expecting him to somehow bring down the two superpowers of the world. I'm not super-enthused about Malekith, basically.
And I'm not convinced that "And therefore, we should make sure to involve ourselves as much as possible, so that we could try to prevent him from falling!" is the 'obvious/natural conclusion'...
Because, actually, y'know what would be an
equally obvious way to avoid the War of Vengeance and Time of Woes?
If the Elves and Dwarfs never grow as close as they did OTL! Yeah. Isolationism would also be a way to avoid that, technically speaking.
... Actually, hypothethically, you could make the argument "We've got
both the North
and the East Dwarfs as part of the Karaz Ankor this time --
and we
already have a magical ally -- the Griffons. We don't need Ulthuan to become as great as the original golden age dwarfs did, so we should just try to avoid the whole thing."
Because, y'know, that's actually a legitimate argument to make? "We are stronger this time, and already have a cool ally and who has proven themselves in a dramatic fashion, and so we can do just fine like this."
If we were to decide to not go all-in on friendship with the Elves, and instead were to decide to focus on Karaz Ankor stuff with Norsca and the Skull Lands Dwarfs instead and proven Griffon allies?
That, too, would be a perfectly legitimate playstyle and path to take! Dwarfs and Griffons, adventuring and thriving throughout the ancient age of Warhammer. There's a story there, too. And as I think about it, I grow more interested.
Bringing up Malekith and acting like it's a done-deal that we
must get involved, it's our duty to the future, and to do otherwise is to accept the canon outcome of disasters... That to choose otherwise is to be complicit in accepting the War of Vengeance and catastrophe... It's doing a lot to douse my enthusiasm of seeing Elf and Dwarf history and stories, you know? Like... If I wanted to just see a story that was Karaz Ankor-only, with Griffons, that would be a perfectly viable path to take and would not lead to disaster or anything like that if I just voted for that, y'know?
I don't want that, of course. Well, yet, anyway. But I don't want to treat it as a given that we
must get involved in the Malekith storyline and that it's our moral obligation and etc.