Remove ads

Paths of Civilization

Reader mode
Abby Normal said:
Oops, i missed the "free" part *facepalm*
And province actions round up, so going to 7 gets us a fourth province action.
yeah, the policy gain is going to be amazing; i'm pretty sure we'll have four true cities sooner rather than later, since that reaction action choice the other turn suggests lower valleyhome is getting crowded too. And we should have 3 true cities next turn, at which point we'd be able to push for +9 infrastructure progress/turn (4 policies on infrastructure, plus the +1 from Law), and the defense. Or we could be more varied, and grab forestry/vassal/city support, or the like? (if nothing else, we'll probably want one city support, because -4 econ a turn is bad if baby boom ends...
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
One policy to forest, please.
We use way too many forests, and getting one every other turn will help us immensely in the long run.
 
Abby Normal said:
Oops, i missed the "free" part *facepalm*
And province actions round up, so going to 7 gets us a fourth province action.
yeah, the policy gain is going to be amazing; i'm pretty sure we'll have four true cities sooner rather than later, since that reaction action choice the other turn suggests lower valleyhome is getting crowded too. And we should have 3 true cities next turn, at which point we'd be able to push for +9 infrastructure progress/turn (4 policies on infrastructure, plus the +1 from Law), and the defense. Or we could be more varied, and grab forestry/vassal/city support, or the like? (if nothing else, we'll probably want one city support, because -4 econ a turn is bad if baby boom ends...
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
I would put at least 3 policies on infrastructure, if only to build all of the aqueducts needed to maintain the True Cities.
We might also need to start integrating subordinates soon and making Free Cities.

Getting +6 infrastructure a turn would mean that we could build 2 smaller projects a turn (Saltern, Temple, Library, most aqueducts), or 1 larger extended project a turn (Sacred Forest Temple, Redshore Aqueduct).
 
Last edited:
[x] [WB] Gain the The King Still Stands Legacy
[x] [Hero] Gain a Genius general
[X] [War] Western Lowlands (Highlanders + Thunder Horse)
We have reserves is a damn close second.
 
Raichu1972 said:
I would put at least 3 policies on infrastructure, if only to build all of the aqueducts needed to maintain the True Cities.
We might also need to start integrating subordinates soon and making Free Cities.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
I actually have a theory that if we aqueduct up everywhere the multiple options will actually dampen our True City generation rate as people have more options to choose from(theoretically).

But yes when Lower Valleyhome becomes a True City I want it to be made into a Free City so we can test those out.
 
Raichu1972 said:
I would put at least 3 policies on infrastructure, if only to build all of the aqueducts needed to maintain the True Cities.
We might also need to start integrating subordinates soon and making Free Cities.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
We'd want either 1 (3 progress) or 4 (9 progress) on infrastructure, imo, since all our infrastructure projects require multiples of 3 progress (aside from maybe the palace annexes). And i'd be fine with 4 or 5 true cities, with 1-3 free cities, personally. But i do definitely want lower valleyhome as a free city.
 
[x] [WB] Gain the The King Still Stands Legacy
[x] [Hero] Gain a Genius general
[X] [War] Txolla (Thunder Horse)
[x] [Kick] 1 Stability
 
BungieONI said:
Welp our War Goddess will certainly appreciate it.

(Our War God is a girl and this is my headcannon, and NO ONE CAN TAKE IT FROM ME!)
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

H͍̳a̢͎͍̼̻̦͎̘ͅh̻̤͉̕͢a̸̫̱̬̜͡h̫̯̖͙͖͕͡h̸̞̙͙́h̶̦̹̼̥̱̦̱̟͜a̵͔͈͠h̡͔̟̟̘͉ͅẖ̵̞̠ẖ̨̥͎́à̮̙h̶̯̜͔͚̼̪͎͙͚a͇͇h͍͎͞h̦̣͞a̴̲̫̼̞a̸͕͚͍̫̙͉͔ͅ


Would you like to see how I imagine it?













You had your chances! Now face our wrath!
 
gosh that vote sure closed quick. Guess wartime will do that to us
 
Sivantic said:
H͍̳a̢͎͍̼̻̦͎̘ͅh̻̤͉̕͢a̸̫̱̬̜͡h̫̯̖͙͖͕͡h̸̞̙͙́h̶̦̹̼̥̱̦̱̟͜a̵͔͈͠h̡͔̟̟̘͉ͅẖ̵̞̠ẖ̨̥͎́à̮̙h̶̯̜͔͚̼̪͎͙͚a͇͇h͍͎͞h̦̣͞a̴̲̫̼̞a̸͕͚͍̫̙͉͔ͅ


Would you like to see how I imagine it?













You had your chances! Now face our wrath!
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
The only thing i know about her is her name is ava ire and she's a cutie.
So our goddess of war will also be our goddess of plays and drama - war is, after all, the greatest tragedy ever written. and after war comes the comedy of 'we lived!'
 
Susano said:
Nah, let's go full Jeanne d'Arc.

Which for a start means she can't come from Ymarryn (Jeanne came from the Duchy of Lorraine, HRE, at that time outside the Kingdom of France). HK or TH raid some unimportant, unaligned lowlander village. Jeanne receives a vision from "Crow", and goes to the Ymarryn to lead their army...
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Having thought of this more, i like this, so long as she comes from the Txolla, being an abused half-exile descended from one from their conquest refugees like Nahachaphuria. That also would fit well with the war choice; our war missions to relieve Txolla can be surprised when they find a surprisingly well armed army that our new General rallied together and used to free the eastern section of Txolla while our main forces were fighting through the western forces of the TH.

(@Academia Nut <3)
 
Reader mode
You must login or register to reply here.
Remove ads
Back
Top