And now China is rising up in the world.
Rising in a bubble of massive proportions. Their government just isn't prepped to deal with the society they are turning into and has no idea how to properly regulate the markets emerging in their economy. The west isn't much better, but we've been dealing with modern market economies a bit longer.

If that bubble bursts it's gonna be insane.
 
those existed in Babylon which was like 1k ago...


This was intentional, at least on my part.


Deeds and contracts involve notions of ownership or the passing thereof. Which I assume is unlikely to develop in a society of nonexistent non Kingly ownership.

As for age, spread and development can vary wildly.
 
Both of you have had those for centuries in one former or another.

And the Trelli are aggressively mercantile and like paying their warriors in land and slaves, while having a very mercenary foreign policy with the intent of 'helping' those around them until they help their way to control.
So their aggressively expansionist and need to be constantly fighting or conquering something to supply their ever increasing armies?
 
And how shall we achieve that when they have the advantages of numbers, logistics (just look at where that location *is*), and boats?
Because the numbers can easily be changed given our immense material and population advantage, because everything we've seen suggests that their forces are deployed on the opposite side of the known world, and because we're some of the greatest innovators in the world.
Then how do we expect to win?
I'm going to assume you simply misunderstood me- we might have allies in fighting the Trelli. Namely, local Tin Tribes auxilliaries.

May I refer you to the update, pointing out that the reason the Trelli are making pirates is because they figure, Why give anything in exchange when you can just take everything? If they think their mercs can take our trading post by force, they likely will try.
I'm talking about the Tin Tribes here dude. And those rumors of piracy are likely to drive the Tin Tribes into our arms if anything. They're a lot more at risk of a Trelli merc invasion/piracy campaign than we are.

The ones loyal to them they hire out to make money, the ones loyal to club they keep under more direct control to secure the local area and raid for slaves.
So the least loyal and dedicated mercs are the ones they'd deploy to take our TP first given the other ones are really distant/under contract? Compare this to the Red Banner which has exhibited extraordinary discipline and professionalism over the course of its existence.

Any ways, AN- can you comment on the viability on leveraging our coin and trade goods along with the rumors of Trelli piracy to acquire TT auxiliaries over there?

We are not going to be alone? What gives? Trelli can pretty much intercept any our bribe and sell it as their to the natives.
Not really, anything shipped from GS to this new TP is nigh untouchable, our longships hug the coast in shallow waters their galleys would beach themselves on, and worst case our longships land and prepare for the Trelli galley to assault them on land- they might have to wait a few days but the galley won't have the endurance to wait them out.

Moreover, if we heard this rumor that the Trelli are aggressively pirating and conquering for valuable goods- what the fuck do you think the response of the neighbors with the incredibly valuable strategic good is? Because it's not
'fuck over our would be benefactors and pray the Trelli are merciful'.

I don't know if AN simply hasn't clarified the issue here, but if we hug the coast and there's land we can beach on- the Trelli are pretty much SOL- especially if our longships travel in numbers.
 
Last edited:
For a LONG time, China was THE leading civilization in the world. Meanwhile, Europe was a backward place.
Think about how Late Bronze Age civilizations were set up. 5% absolutely tyrannical, micromanaging bureaucracy. 90% illiterate farmers. 5% artisans, traders and priests.

The great tech developments of massive irrigation systems and crop rotation managed to increase food production by ~10%, and that was enough. Enough to support a bureaucracy of clerks to implement that tech, and get the tech ball rolling by supporting concentrations of experts and artisans in a handful of cities.

China got that FOR FREE. Rice paddies produced 10%+ more calories per acre than equivalent wheat fields in the west. Of course they out performed most of the west for a long time. At this stage, Econ = spare food. And they have twice the spare food we do at the same tech level.
 
And what exactly constitutes 'the end'? We do not have any claim whatsoever to living at the end of times when the points scored are counted.
For all we know, in 100 years China will rule the world. They certainly are moving in vaguely that direction.

It no longer matters who in the end win. It's an irrelevant question of who's top dog now. Climate change concerns us all, as so do over-fishing and the WMD game we are playing.

Do you think our descendants are going to give a damn about who's on top when they're combating climate change and other global issues?
Rising in a bubble of massive proportions. Their government just isn't prepped to deal with the society they are turning into and has no idea how to properly regulate the markets emerging in their economy. The west isn't much better, but we've been dealing with modern market economies a bit longer.

If that bubble bursts it's gonna be insane.

It's going to affect us badly, not just China. China's problem became the West's problem due to the sheer level of interconnection and trade.
 
Boat economics in a war they can cut us off of literally the western and northern parts of the not-black sea and eat them.
Hahahhahahahahahhahahahah.

Oh god that's funny, you think they can eat our Northern Black Sea costal territories? They couldn't even take Greenshore, it's too large and established for that!

They could take the Eastern Trade Post with a rough fight, but you seem to be vastly overestimating them, the only reason they have a chance against us is because they will basically be fighting a newborn Trade Post and a Red Banner Company with minor support, get an actual Royal army as back up and they will get fucked.

They control Trade to the south, but that is not as important as we need it less than them. They cannot take anything other than the Eastern Trading Post from us and even then it would be a tough fight for them.

Overall they have the potential to be really, really dangerous later on, but right now? Now is the time to kill them.
 
Last edited:
For a LONG time, China was THE leading civilization in the world. Meanwhile, Europe was a backward place.


One must Define backwards and the context of it.

The two had more differences than similarities, and a straight up comparison of backwardness is hard, since they operated on some identical principles and other opposing ones. If tis the similarities we compare, then it's a difference of scale and abundance rather than system lag.
 
It's going to affect us badly, not just China. China's problem became the West's problem due to the sheer level of interconnection and trade.
Ya. Welcome to globalized society.

This sort of collapse is one of the biggest reason everyone is always digging at China for manipulating their currency to keep it deflated relative to the rest of the world. It's a manufactured value that will collapse when they can't manage it anymore.
 
Last edited:
Like the original Lowlanders, they're mashing a button, and it's scary and effective in the short term, but it's fragile and will break them in the long run. We just need to keep our heads down.
The original lowlanders died because someone took offense to them and decided to break their civ before they emerged as an even greater threat.

In that analogy, The People are what breaks Trelli for pushing this button. And if we decide not to, I'm much less clear about them being broken in general.
 
because we rise and fall together as globalized civilization.
*wipes tear*

Beautiful and true <3

Deeds and contracts involve notions of ownership or the passing thereof. Which I assume is unlikely to develop in a society of nonexistent non Kingly ownership.

As for age, spread and development can vary wildly.
...???

The notion of ownership or the passing thereof is not contingent upon a King existing or not. Ownership is avowedly a fairly fundamental mindset, considering how mine-y young children are.

Deeds & Contracts require a formal acknowledgment of right to ownership or the passing thereof, which mostly just requires a formal system within which this acknowledgment can take place. This doesn't require something as formal as law, it can be as simple as a communal acknowledgement of stated intent (i.e. wills) or communal recognition of ownership typically for the purpose of being supplied to an uninformed outside e.g. certificates, deeds.

Law, however, helps extricate ownership from local community politics (e.g. the black sheep of the family inherits a ranch, town is mad but must acknowledge the law). The Trell have currency and thus have formal systems and thus can be assumed to have some form of law.
 
Last edited:
Think about how Late Bronze Age civilizations were set up. 5% absolutely tyrannical, micromanaging bureaucracy. 90% illiterate farmers. 5% artisans, traders and priests.

The great tech developments of massive irrigation systems and crop rotation managed to increase food production by ~10%, and that was enough. Enough to support a bureaucracy of clerks to implement that tech, and get the tech ball rolling by supporting concentrations of experts and artisans in a handful of cities.

China got that FOR FREE. Rice paddies produced 10%+ more calories per acre than equivalent wheat fields in the west. Of course they out performed most of the west for a long time. At this stage, Econ = spare food. And they have twice the spare food we do at the same tech level.

Actually, it was the West that was top dog for quite a time(in that we're talking about the Fertile Crescent). Then it reversed as civilizations fall, as they all do.
 
No their basically going to side with the trellis because of the you know long time trading partners of value?
'I'm a conquering Venice/Roman hybrid with an ever expanding mercenary army increasingly convinced seizing goods is better than trading for them'

'I'm a nearby civ with valuable strategic resources and I am totally unconcerned with these new developments'

Come back when you have a better argument than that.
 
Hahahhahahahahahhahahahah.

Oh god that funny, you think they can eat our Northern Black Sea costal territories? They couldn't even take Greenshore, it's too large and established for that!

They could take the Eastern Trade Post with a rough fight, but you seem to be vastly overestimating them, the only reason they have a chance against us is because they will basically be fighting a newborn Trade Post and a Red Banner Company with minor support, get an actual Royal army as back up and they will get fucked.

They control Trade to the south, but that is not as important as we need it less than them. They cannot take anything other than the Eastern Trading Post from us and even then it would be a tough fight for them.

Overall they have the potential to be really, really dangerous later on, but right now? Now is the time to kill them.
You are underestimating someone who we have never even seen fight before.
 
Ya. Welcome to globalize society.

This sort of collapse is one of the biggest reason everyone is always digging at China for manipulating their currency to keep it deflated relative to the rest of the world. It's a manufactured value that will collapse when they can't manage it anymore.

You mean because China is doing the same thing that USA is doing with their dollar to petroleum?

Both sides have bubbles and both side can't live without the other. Unless people think great depression is sunshine and flowers.
 
The original lowlanders died because someone took offense to them and decided to break their civ before they emerged as an even greater threat.

In that analogy, The People are what breaks Trelli for pushing this button. And if we decide not to, I'm much less clear about them being broken in general.

Hm? What?
It was the drought, we did not lift a finger.
 
The original lowlanders died because someone took offense to them and decided to break their civ before they emerged as an even greater threat.

In that analogy, The People are what breaks Trelli for pushing this button. And if we decide not to, I'm much less clear about them being broken in general.

It was the weather that broke the lowlanders.
 
'I'm a conquering Venice/Roman hybrid with an ever expanding mercenary army increasingly convinced seizing goods is better than trading for them'

'I'm a nearby civ with valuable strategic resources and I am totally unconcerned with these new developments'

Come back when you have a better argument than that.
People with valuable goods are the people they been cozying up to when it comes to were their getting their mercs.
 
You are underestimating someone who we have never even seen fight before.
Continue to believe that the people AN has said would struggle to take on an isolated Red Banner could attack our kingdom directly.

I'm usually paranoid but that's just ridiculous, especially as West Wall can supply armies directly to Green Shore as they did during the second to last Great Nomad War when they sent aid to the Metal Workers in the form of armies.
 
Back
Top