That's more of a jealousy /passiveness thing I would hazard
Fidelity of the females is universal yes, but the expectations of male fidelity is distinctly abrahamic.Abrahamic? These marriage values exist nearly everywhere people exists. From Japan to China to Europe to Native Americans. In Patriachial, Matriarchial or neutral societies. In republics, theocracies and monarchies. Whether monogamous or polygamous. Please don't go with the tendency of major faith adherents to assume that their religions are the root of all good and evil.
This is a simple matter of trust and human nature. Jealousy and anger exists. We know for a fact that crimes of passion exist and specifically have a mitigating circumstance in the law for their punishments.
Thus, while people might do open marriages, having affairs without the approval of the spouse leads to strife, which leads to disharmony, which is Unjust.
Which would be a lot more reassuring were the Xohyssiri not currently under the thumb of the Thunderjerks*, and might not be able to control who they fight.I'd highlight this. While it makes us look EXTREMELY sweet as a target, the Xohyssiri have their payback trait which puts them in our debt. I suspect attacking us might cause them to lose Stability as the people get extremely upset.
I dunno, a human refinding love on their deathbed is a pretty common romantic plot. It could happen.She's getting near death in age, it's a bit late for a fresh new romance.
Even when the person near death is already married, in love, completely faithful and the person they are falling in love with is much younger? (Please remember that Mag was in her fourties when she was elected in, this turn happened after half a generation after that and the brides are young enough to take her son as a lover, so unless you like wrinkled old ladies having sex with twenty or so year olds I'd try not to push for it anymore)I dunno, a human refinding love on their deathbed is a pretty common romantic plot. It could happen
A person moving on from their lover who died thirty years prior with a new relationship? Heck yeah I run into that. Less common with a same-sex couple and an age gap, but I've seen weirder.Even when the person near death is already married, in love, completely faithful and the person they are falling in love with is much younger? (Please remember that Mag was in her fourties when she was elected in, this turn happened after half a generation after that and the brides are young enough to take her son as a lover, so unless you like wrinkled old ladies having sex with twenty or so year olds I'd try not to push for it anymore)
Her husband hasn't been dead for thirty years, where did you get that from?A person moving on from their lover who died thirty years prior with a new relationship? Heck yeah I run into that. Less common with a same-sex couple and an age gap, but I've seen weirder
Every logical piece of evidence has pointed towards it not happening.Remember, lack of proof that something happened is not proof that something didn't happen.
I would be amazed if you had any, though, given that we haven't even reached the neccesary "deathbed" stage yet.
I don't think you understand how evidence works, Lack of evidence means that it didn't happen, you have to PROVE that it does, The burden of evidence lies on you, not mcluvinA person moving on from their lover who died thirty years prior with a new relationship? Heck yeah I run into that. Less common with a same-sex couple and an age gap, but I've seen weirder.
Remember, lack of proof that something happened is not proof that something didn't happen.
I would be amazed if you had any, though, given that we haven't even reached the neccesary "deathbed" stage yet.
Were not, only the fringe groups far away from our core will think it was nepotism because our core KNOWS it wasn't because they think him competent, they are only waiting for the mother to endorse like they always do before the vote.I disagree. I think we're speaking of two different things when we're talking perception. You're talking about how it will be seen in the immediate sense, by the people who are there. I'm talking about how it will be seen by people who weren't immediately there, either by the common person in the street, or the political successors who want their children promoted and use the tacit legitimacy this gives the nepotistic bent that already exists to do so.
It's extremely unlikely, and by the update its far more likely that she did not, as she doesn't care that her own son is getting it in with em. Especially since its unlikely that shes homosexual or bi.A reminder that this conversation started with Omegahugger asking AN whether Mags fell in love with one of her wives, before they got jumped by people telling them it was totally impossible.
Yes, that's the specific definition being made there. Polyamorous relationships are unusual, but not forbidden, because while it's hard to juggle to everyone's happiness, it can be done. Cheating in a relationship is forbidden because it spawns strife.That only matters if its cheating and the other people don't know or are against it. Cheating in a relationship is the bad thing, the details past that are largely malignant icing. Making a trade deal on a trade mission would have the same strife problems. Having other/outside sexual relationships aren't bad on their own. Its the unilaternal nature of things that is causing the problems there. Particularly, when one party can't convince the other that what happened was a good thing.
Actually odds are the very next time we have an opportunity for a megaproject the long pent up Dam voters are going to release their frustrations in a single great surge, damn the consequences. We're reaching the point where they won't even buy "one more turn is the best timing" anymore.Well the problem is that many thread participants would rather like to finally give a Great Dam. Only, circumstances keep making that a risky, temporally unviable option, or people want to build wonders they think are prerequisites first. Now things once again got to the point that they could give a Great Dam... only to have things once against make another Wonder the better options.
The Great Dam was the first megaproject and once again its become a better option to delay giving a Great Dam once again.
Taxation efficiency, manpower application efficiency, corruption resistance and law enforcement are all elements here. A census makes resources significantly more available than usual, as normally you'd need to lowball things significantly to account for inefficiencies.I am assuming that this will be for taxation and economic efficiency? Would also give us a population number on a civilizational level.
Silver is the color your hair gets when you have black hair and are greying over time.Magwyna is an old woman now with hair of white rather than silver which is interesting is silver hair a natural pigmentation? I digress what you desire is now impossible at most magwyna will see the girls as daughters or nieces.
It's a trust thing. Betrayal of trust is a major problem in every functional society.
Well...Stability drops and refugees...Which would be a lot more reassuring were the Xohyssiri not currently under the thumb of the Thunderjerks*, and might not be able to control who they fight.
*Not to be confused with the Thunderfriends, who are also under control of Thunderjerks.
If the update'd mentioned anything about it, Omegahugger wouldn't have had to ask, now would they?It's extremely unlikely, and by the update its far more likely that she did not, as she doesn't care that her own son is getting it in with em. Especially since its unlikely that shes homosexual or bi.
I mean, her own son having sex with her wives Heavily implies that she doesn't care or isn't in love with themIf the update'd mentioned anything about it, Omegahugger wouldn't have had to ask, now would they?
Because it was an unnecessary question that answers itself.It's extremely unlikely, and by the update its far more likely that she did not, as she doesn't care that her own son is getting it in with em. Especially since its unlikely that shes homosexual or bi.
It would be fine if he just said he'd ship it, but hes trying to prove that shes lesbian or bi when evidence points the other way... other wise I wouldn't say anything because shipping happens, people shipBecause it was an unnecessary question that answers itself.
It's been jumped because it's basically just him trying to ship and screw with a nice part of a good character because of 'ma lesbian'
And with the fact that we right on clay tablets, we are literally cooking the booksHuh, while mechanically this Grand Sacrifice was useless, narratively she got them to do a reset on the records by burning everything.
Bet most tax assessors wish they could do that.
Nope, Heroic Admin. We don't get to choose and he will make pushes toward what he is good at. So more econ and expansionOk so next turn are we going to switch to defensive policy and start on the place to the stars mega project or the dam mega project?
NoooooooooThat only matters if its cheating and the other people don't know or are against it. Cheating in a relationship is the bad thing, the details past that are largely malignant icing. Making a trade deal on a trade mission would have the same strife problems. Having other/outside sexual relationships aren't bad on their own. Its the unilaternal nature of things that is causing the problems there. Particularly, when one party can't convince the other that what happened was a good thing.
Okay, I could've sworn her husband died alongside her children in the initial update, but I cannot find any mention of that now, and therefore publically retract everything (since it was pretty much the crutch everything I said relied on).Her husband hasn't been dead for thirty years, where did you get that from?
She's still married to her husdand in the last update and is happy with him, she loves only one person in her life, her husband who is alive.
"X hasn't happened" is a positive claim, and therefore one that needs proof.I don't think you understand how evidence works, Lack of evidence means that it didn't happen, you have to PROVE that it does, The burden of evidence lies on you, not mcluvin
What's with you people and wanting the girls to have sex with each other? You realise that you don't need that for a romantic relationship, right?From you, because we don't have to prove straight women are not having lesbian sex
I wasn't even the one who asked, I just saw something remotely shipping-related and stuck my nose in on reflex...A reminder that this conversation started with Omegahugger asking AN whether Mags fell in love with one of her wives, before they got jumped by people telling them it was totally impossible.
Correction: I am very keen on our Admin heroes being in same-sex marriages rather than them being homosexual or bi. Slight but very important difference.I mean, her own son having sex with her wives Heavily implies that she doesn't care or isn't in love with them
But I don't think it'd matter because Omega seems to be.... VERY VERY keen on our leader being homosexual or bi.
This is really a minor point by now, but I have never argued that either Magwytha or Gwygoytha would be lesbian. Because they are clearly not.It would be fine if he just said he'd ship it, but hes trying to prove that shes lesbian or bi when evidence points the other way... other wise I wouldn't say anything because shipping happens, people ship
You being intent in turning this into a lame debate is way more annoying than someone asking the QM an innocent question.Because it was an unnecessary question that answers itself.
It's been jumped because it's basically just him trying to ship and screw with a nice part of a good character because of 'ma lesbian'
Correction: I am very keen on our Admin heroes being in same-sex marriages rather than them being homosexual or bi. Slight but very important difference.
Keep in mind she suddenly married 12 other women. While I do not think she fell in love with all of them, there is still the possibility she liked one of themI mean, her own son having sex with her wives Heavily implies that she doesn't care or isn't in love with them
But I don't think it'd matter because Omega seems to be.... VERY VERY keen on our leader being homosexual or bi.
Did we also get an exact number on the wives?Keep in mind she suddenly married 12 other women. While I do not think she fell in love with all of them, there is still the possibility she liked one of them
*shrug*
First off not it is not a claim, we have heavy indication that she is straight, We don't have to prove a denial of her being gay or bi, You have to prove your claim that her political marriage is more than just that"X hasn't happened" is a positive claim, and therefore one that needs proof.
If I had said that she had or would fall in love with a girl half her age, that would be a positive claim that needed proof. But merely saying that something could happen does not.
Of course, @McLuvin kindly pointed out that I had entirely misread a key piece of evidence, which, while technically not making the other developments impossible, certainly makes them approximately 100 times more unlikely.
And they weren't ever likely to begin with.
What's with you people and wanting the girls to have sex with each other? You realise that you don't need that for a romantic relationship, right?
I wasn't even the one who asked, I just saw something remotely shipping-related and stuck my nose in on reflex...
Correction: I am very keen on our Admin heroes being in same-sex marriages rather than them being homosexual or bi. Slight but very important difference.
The reason I reacted to this is because people seem to assume that because some of the wives-of-an-unknown-number decided to have children, it means that they all must be straight, which really bugs me.
This is really a minor point by now, but I have never argued that either Magwytha or Gwygoytha would be lesbian. Because they are clearly not.
And I've also never tried to prove anything, merely pointed that we don't actually know... Unless we assume that bisexuals actually do get magical powers, which Maggy lacks, but I've yet to see anyone use that argument.