Hereditary monarchy means that the line has to drop once for Bad Things to start happening; we, as opposed to it, have never had a succession crisis IIRC.
We're not a primogeniture monarchy though, we're elective. So the pool is limited to everyone inside the House of Magwyna, so what? That's still going to be a sizeable pool to elect from.
 
I don't know, I am split on the issue. There's merit to multiple approaches.

I am leaning towards listening to Attrikwyn here. He seems to know what he's talking about and he kinda deserves a bone fo-
AN: The last time you had a definitely Heroic Admin was actually Gwygoytha, and she took over the main turn.
Okay, that settles it!

[X] Magwyna should marry them personally (Secures alliance with Highlands Kingdom while Magwyna lives, has a small chance of triggering conflict with the nomads)
I ain't stopping before all our Admin Heroes are in same-sex relationships, whether they want to or not!
 
[X] Take Attrikwyn's advice (+2 Diplomacy, secures enduring alliance with Highlands Kingdom, ensures no attacks from nomads for at least next turn)
[X] Remind people along trade routes that the People don't suffer the blue plague (-1 Stability, chance of further loss, +4-5 Econ)

I want to go with this for a couple reasons. First off, remember what AN said about how heroes in this age are almost assured to become gods in the People's mythos? And how Magwyna shares parallels with Tuultox? If she marries them all, not only would the alliances be temporary, but it would only add to her mythos. Also in regards to creating greater equality among women having one woman leader and multiple "wives" who are objectified and seen as lesser would only emphasis the idea that while some women are exceptions their place is just to be married to a great leader.
 
the provinces are not, only peripheral states are.

Provinces: Valleyhome (split into lower and upper; one province); Redcoast, Sacred Forest, Stonepen, Northshore, Southshore, March, Blackriver, Eastern Hills (regrettably not yet shortened).

Total = 9 but March is semi-independent, so functionally 8.
8/2 = 4 provincial actions.
Adding one more province = 9/2 = 4.5 rounded up to 5 provincial actions.

Expected new province availability: East of EH; West and/or North of BR; East of March.
Huh, neat. How do we look compared to the front page map now? I assume Southshore is us cutting off the HK from the coast, for example.
 
Because all of the competent ones already have positions. This is really simple.

Family first means family over society.
Worst case that means someone incompetent becomes chief of a village, fails at his job, and gets replaced with someone else who can actually do the job! We're not throwing out any part of system with this, stop strawmannirg!
 
[X] Magwyna should marry them personally (Secures alliance with Highlands Kingdom while Magwyna lives, has a small chance of triggering conflict with the nomads)
[X] Remind people along trade routes that the People don't suffer the blue plague (-1 Stability, chance of further loss, +4-5 Econ)
 
[X] Magwyna should marry them personally (Secures alliance with Highlands Kingdom while Magwyna lives, has a small chance of triggering conflict with the nomads)
[X] Remind people along trade routes that the People don't suffer the blue plague (-1 Stability, chance of further loss, +4-5 Econ)
 
Why would the incompetent son (or daughter) get picked over a competent one? This would actually reduce the likelihood of people plotting assassinations or doing shady things to cut someone off from power, because while they would benefit they'd be damaging the system our country runs on.

Because it's the only son (infant mortality ho!). Currently, incompetents are not even viable candidates for the kingship by definition; hereditary monarchy can easily create cases where (almost) all heirs are dead and the remaining one is either a moron or asshat.

We're not a primogeniture monarchy though, we're elective. So the pool is limited to everyone inside the House of Magwyna, so what? That's still going to be a sizeable pool to elect from.

Not sizeable enough to be even remotely comparable with our current pool of 'every chief'; which, incidentally, ensures lack of succession crises because all kids of King are dead and ensures that incompetents are not allowed to even be in the running.
 
Okay, that settles it!

[X] Magwyna should marry them personally (Secures alliance with Highlands Kingdom while Magwyna lives, has a small chance of triggering conflict with the nomads)
I ain't stopping before all our Admin Heroes are in same-sex relationships, whether they want to or not!
Well if you put it that way ...
[X] Magwyna should marry them personally (Secures alliance with Highlands Kingdom while Magwyna lives, has a small chance of triggering conflict with the nomads)
 
Actually, his embarrassment came from the implication that would get back that he couldn't and thus his wives would tease him that he was losing his touch.

To paraphrase Order of the Stick "I've always wondered what Heroic Diplomacy looks like under the hood."
Man.

Very good with the tongue huh?
God, I love our people.

*Lowlands get hit by plague we already told them how to prevent*
Us:"Dammit, guys... *sigh* Come over here if you don't want to get killed by a plague again."
More like:
*Lowlands get hit by plague we already told them how to prevent*
Us: "Hey guys, we brought lots of the expensive salt you need for the healing potion, for free!"

@bluefur87 , here you go:

1. We have unfilled Honour value slot.
2. Family First is an Honour value.

*looks at the votes*
*horrified screaming*
Based on the update I think we can update the trait name to Ancestral Honor. Though it's not as catchy as a slogan.
Why would the incompetent son (or daughter) get picked over a competent one? This would actually reduce the likelihood of people plotting assassinations or doing shady things to cut someone off from power, because while they would benefit they'd be damaging the system our country runs on.
Because it's already happened? See our previous Chariot Chief incident, who only had the one son, for whom he'd hear no wrongs or lacks, willing to push for his election even if he had to fight everyone else for it.

That was without a trait reinforcing the value of family.
 
[X] Take Attrikwyn's advice (+2 Diplomacy, secures enduring alliance with Highlands Kingdom, ensures no attacks from nomads for at least next turn)
 
1) Marry the majority of them to her son.
2) Marry the Nomad princesses to Northern chiefs instead
3) Marry all the chief families to each other(this is most effectively done by having a chief marry the daughters of his fellows to maximize number of interconnections, and the only way to meaningfully do this in less than 4 generations)

So you are saying both marriage options increases harem value in our society? I find no flaw in these points and accept your argument.

Now we just need to find ways of supplying partners for the young men who can't find partners.

Slavery and raiding are right out. Exporting those men to fight for glory and ladies? Massive mega project that is high in human costs? Artwork and idols?
 
[X] Magwyna should marry them personally (Secures alliance with Highlands Kingdom while Magwyna lives, has a small chance of triggering conflict with the nomads)
[X] Remind people along trade routes that the People don't suffer the blue plague (-1 Stability, chance of further loss, +4-5 Econ)

Welp, made a good faith argument for hereditary, but I can't resist maggie finding out she's secretly bisexual and didn't know it :p
 
[X] Magwyna should marry them personally (Secures alliance with Highlands Kingdom while Magwyna lives, has a small chance of triggering conflict with the nomads)
[X] The People always let in those that come to them (Chance of stability loss, +2 Econ)

We spent a lot of effort to not go hereditary leadership.
If we take Attrikwyn's advice we will get hereditary leadership.

Let's avoid that.
 
Because it's the only son (infant mortality ho!). Currently, incompetents are not even viable candidates for the kingship by definition; hereditary monarchy can easily create cases where (almost) all heirs are dead and the remaining one is either a moron or asshat.

Not sizeable enough to be even remotely comparable with our current pool of 'every chief'; which, incidentally, ensures lack of succession crises because all kids of King are dead and ensures that incompetents are not allowed to even be in the running.

Actually, it's not only sons that could run, but daughters.

We probably have women chiefs, but they are fast disappearing due to the bias for male chiefs.
 
[X] Take Attrikwyn's advice (+2 Diplomacy, secures enduring alliance with Highlands Kingdom, ensures no attacks from nomads for at least next turn)
[X] Remind people along trade routes that the People don't suffer the blue plague (-1 Stability, chance of further loss, +4-5 Econ)
 
Ugh, what am I doing, I'm getting caught up in these debates. I'm going to pull another Sightseer and step away for a day or so. Have some cute animal pics


source

source
 
Huh, neat. How do we look compared to the front page map now? I assume Southshore is us cutting off the HK from the coast, for example.
Southshore is like.... maybe half of that little square of hills below our territory that the HK could have colonized. The other half was grabbed by the SHP.

The March is presumably a hat on top of Northshore and Stonepen due to its ability to provide protection, though in reality the actual positioning of settlements may be skewed by the projective power that chariots on the steppes would enable.
Black River is off to the side, but the March might still be umbrella-ing it. It depends on whether the River BR is built on -and which the ST's capitol is also built on- goes straight up or curves over above Northshore.

My personal, no-basis bet is that it curves over so that the ST capital is above the dividing line between Northshore and Stonepen. But that's just because it would be prettier.
 
Last edited:
Inserted tally
Adhoc vote count started by DocMatoi on May 12, 2017 at 3:53 PM, finished with 31978 posts and 46 votes.
 
I want to go with this for a couple reasons. First off, remember what AN said about how heroes in this age are almost assured to become gods in the People's mythos? And how Magwyna shares parallels with Tuultox? If she marries them all, not only would the alliances be temporary, but it would only add to her mythos. Also in regards to creating greater equality among women having one woman leader and multiple "wives" who are objectified and seen as lesser would only emphasis the idea that while some women are exceptions their place is just to be married to a great leader.
Actually, we'd marry all of them anyway in both the leading options. But as we've seen with Gwygotha, a woman King and her wives tend to be conflated together.

I'd not be too surprised if they started telling stories of how she had a dozen arms and heads so that she could organize everything by herself.
 
Back
Top