All this talk of "a sealmaster in his own home" has me puzzled. Isn't our home full of civilians? Do we really have lethal traps and defenses everywhere? I'd assumed that we had lots of them around the compound, and then around certain areas like our office and perhaps main meeting rooms (Kagome's bedroom being canonically the most heavily defended place we have). I'd assumed that Ami was counting on that during the first meeting. Us needing to actually take out a seal and throw it at her is the same as us not having a seal when fighting an older ninja.
Well, I can't speak for the others, but I was referring to the main building which only has the Goketsu ninja, plus Gaku. I read it as the main building is pretty much always mostly empty (Team Uplift, plus Haru and maybe Yuno), with other buildings hosting things like the meals for civilians and whatnot.
And if you're a sealmaster who's been trained by Kagome, then I'd assume that your internal security is at
least a few notches higher than your average ninja (who are a paranoid demographic by default), and maybe a step or two above any other non-Kagome-trained sealmaster.
Edit: ninja-ed by Vel, himself.
Her view of our relationship is obviously based on self-interest rather than trust (as it is with most other relations she has, I imagine). No, she didn't care about our emotions, other than to trigger amusing reactions. That she didn't have to do it (it's clearly an annoyance when she needs to do it) and we didn't shun/avoid her as much as we could was probably some of the appeal.
I'd say that Ami's relationship with Hazou isn't based on self-interest, but rather
forced connection. They're both loved by Keiko, and they both love Keiko in turn. So they can't lash out at each other, because doing so would hurt Keiko, whom they both love and do not wish to see hurt --let alone hurt her, themselves. However, Ami has many traits that make Hazou respect her and hope for her aid in Uplift. Up until this last chapter, I thought that Hazou had qualities that made Ami respect Hazou as well. But maybe respect doesn't factor into Ami's actions here?
I wonder how Ami would've reacted if Hazou had been perceptive enough to say "Ami, I recognize that you're trying to tell me to be gentle with Snowflake since she's as new to her individuality as a newborn child is, but the manner in which you did so is abhorrent. Such cruel methods, however efficient they might be in delivering their message across the gap of qualia, cannot exist between you and I. I value my family too highly to be wholly rational when such methods are used, much as you would be if I had used your own love for Keiko in a similar manner. Please leave the Goketsu Compound, because I find myself desiring to say and do things in anger that will make our working relationship, going forward, more difficult than it needs to be. I will find you once I have calmed down sufficiently enough to have a conversation worthy of its participants."
Was Ami's ire drawn at that Hazou had an emotional reaction and didn't see the content of her message, or was Ami's ire invoked because Hazou tried to dictate how she should act? On one hand, Ami is annoyed that "normies" will act self-destructively during emotional moments and do things that are ill-considered. On the other hand, Ami also values her freedom enough that asking her to consider Hazou's emotions when planning her actions might be enough to draw her ire.
...I'm struck by the thought that Ami dislikes the emotionality of other people because it infringes upon her freedom, pressuring her to act in a way that she may not feel inclined. I suspect that the mere
presence of that pressure makes Ami want to act out in childish defiance of it, even if she were already inclined to act in that way. This is hypocritical of Ami, because Ami also demands that the world bend and contort itself to
her own emotions. For example, Ami adores Keiko, so anyone that would seek to hurt or harm Keiko must be reduced to ash, without mercy or quarter.
For as much as Ami lauds her perceptive skills, her introspective capabilities need
far more work.