Remove ads

DoofQuest- a Disney Villains Victorious CK2-Style Quest

Reader mode
BurnBright said:
See, this is why Doof isn't a King. I agree with the occasional bout of pettiness, but we need to be cautious. Right now, it seems like we might want to use our Martial action to get the codes. And as for the person saying the pirates might not have it... on the one hand, yes, that makes objective sense, but on the other hand, I doubt the QMs would offer an option with 0 benefit.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Doof...is a King though. Like officially, he is one. He isn't a Prince. I don't know where you got the idea he wasn't. He is one of the weaker ones by sheer fact that he's playing Crusader Kings while everyone else is playing Shadowrun or Shin Megami Tensei, but he is still a King regardless.
 
Torgamous said:
I agree with your outrage, but I would rather we not put off code retrieval. The sooner we do that, the sooner Khan can drive our enemies from DoofOS and march on Waddle, the sooner Doof can meet Coffee Java in person, and all sorts of other fun stuff.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
I'm okay with attempting to make the code as well, but I'm just saying I would prefer upgrading Norm instead of attacking Mark Beaks.
 
PyrrosWarrior said:
Doof...is a King though. Like officially, he is one. He isn't a Prince. I don't know where you got the idea he wasn't. He is one of the weaker ones by sheer fact that he's playing Crusader Kings while everyone else is playing Shadowrun or Shin Megami Tensei, but he is still a King regardless.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Yeah, I know, it was meant as more of a rhetorical piece, but then I didn't follow through. What I meant, basically, was that he has the resources of a king, but he certainly doesn't have the influence of one. Heck, he doesn't even really have full power within DEI, in some senses.

Because we're known to spend ridiculous amounts of money on somewhat silly things, our Income doesn't represent our actual income, but rather just whatever we can shake out of the couch cushions, so to speak (except for the buyouts, I'm kind of unclear on how that gels with this). Now while I'm sure mechanically, we'll likely never have access to the full resources of the company to put on our absurd tasks, I do suspect that Xanatos or Glomgold, for instance, don't have to worry about that stuff, narratively speaking.

So effectively what I'm trying to say is that yes we're a king, but we don't really stand as an equal among them.
 
BurnBright said:
Yeah, I know, it was meant as more of a rhetorical piece, but then I didn't follow through. What I meant, basically, was that he has the resources of a king, but he certainly doesn't have the influence of one. Heck, he doesn't even really have full power within DEI, in some senses.

Because we're known to spend ridiculous amounts of money on somewhat silly things, our Income doesn't represent our actual income, but rather just whatever we can shake out of the couch cushions, so to speak (except for the buyouts, I'm kind of unclear on how that gels with this). Now while I'm sure mechanically, we'll likely never have access to the full resources of the company to put on our absurd tasks, I do suspect that Xanatos or Glomgold, for instance, don't have to worry about that stuff, narratively speaking.

So effectively what I'm trying to say is that yes we're a king, but we don't really stand as an equal among them.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Ah, gotcha. In that case, you would be right for the "CK to everyone's Shadowrun (for the cunning) and SMT (for the powerful)" comparison that I made. I mean, I don't particularly care that we may use resources inefficiently since efficiency is kinda boring to me, but you are correct nonetheless.
 
I GET IT!! IT WAS A BAD IDEA!!! CAN Y'ALL LET IT GO?! I GOT ENOUGH OF THE STABBING AND KIFE-TWISTING FROM HOBBIT!!!!!!!!!!!

EDIT: Also, I just realized something: one, no one reacted to this, so I'll make it obvious.

RUSS. HAD. BOTH. TALISMANS. WHAT DOES THIS MEAN?! DO WE NO LONGER HAVE THEM?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

Two, depending on how the Dance Magic Interlude goes, we could have Juniper team up with Janna so that the coven is formed easier. Heeheeheehee

Dammit, forgot about the Working Relationship restriction. Welp, so much for that idea...
 
Last edited:
Double Trouble-Inator

Good: Your inator has created a temporary double of you! For one action of your choice, your double will apply a bonus modifier equivalent to your stat necessary for that to that roll.

Bad: Your inator has created a temporary double of you, unfortunately it looks like it came out wrong... For one randomly selected action, your double will apply a negative equivalent to your stat necessary for that roll.
 
When was the last time we got a unambiguously good for us inator? One with out any bad side effects or anything?

It feels like it's been a long time.
 
TheGleeman said:
Pretty sure that Litwak´s Arcade is all but done for, now that Cybug!KingCandy/Turbo has been set lose and is infecting every system he can get his hands on.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
That depends entirely on the QM's discretion. Sometimes Litwak's Arcade has been wiped of any data thanks to the bugs, other times the remaining characters have a compromise with the maddened King Candy. Almost all the time, Vanellope exists in some capacity. There is no true canon to DVV beyond who is King, so we can never truly know until we discover it for ourselves.
 
For the most part, video game characters' personas seem to be like how wrestlers have Kayfabe. Sephiroth might be a totally chill guy when he isn't in-character.
 
Reader mode
You must login or register to reply here.
Remove ads
Back
Top