He already did that. Any more will have diminishing returns, especially since she is still visiting off-camera (as most of our people do).So, anyone in favor for putting Technor on psycho-analysing Janna next turn?
No? Janna is perfectly fine. This is just her being, well, Janna. We have other hero units needing psychoanalysis COUGH LOVEMUFFIN COUGH more than her.So, anyone in favor for putting Technor on psycho-analysing Janna next turn?
Therapy isn't a button to make people do what we want. Maybe the best thing for LOVEMUFFIN would be to find smaller workplaces where their contributions will be proportionally greater and they'll be appreciated more, because while they may be annoying to us, therapy isn't about us and feeling underappreciated is a valid human emotion. Francis and Max have legitimate grievances, and moving past them will require Doofenshmirtz talking to them like people, not sending them to therapy. Alan's loyalty malus is just about us not having the kind of work environment he prefers, which isn't a thing therapy will fix and might not even be solvable by talking to him.
I don't think that's the case. I presume they've had to at least be somewhat successful so far, and it would have been simpler to break the masquerade by displaying a corpse or something.Don't the Huntsclan really want the veil to fall so that people will join them in murdering "monsters"?
I agree, but that doesn't mean that addressing those issues will make them more loyal to us.I would argue LOVEMUFFIN definitely has issues that need therapy.
Eh, it really would. As I said, those issues are the root cause of what is preventing us from doing anything that COULD make them respect or be more loyal to Heinz.I agree, but that doesn't mean that addressing those issues will make them more loyal to us.
Speaking of whom, I've come to realize that we have a diplomatic benefit when dealing with the other Kings: the extent of our territorial ambition is well known. Doof wants the TriState Area and that's all.
It's a detriment. All the other Kings want to be Shadowrun Dragons, owning megacorps and exercising Economic power without actually "ruling" the country, just controlling how it's ruled.Speaking of whom, I've come to realize that we have a diplomatic benefit when dealing with the other Kings: the extent of our territorial ambition is well known. Doof wants the TriState Area and that's all.
We have a lot more issues than Loyalty from LOVEMUFFIN. Like competence. And everything. Getting LOVEMUFFIN's issues dealt with should make reorganizing them easier.I agree, but that doesn't mean that addressing those issues will make them more loyal to us.
The huntsclan being able to openly recruit will also mean it can be publicly fought and breaking the masquerade would draw a lot of attention. Government investigations into the huntsclan's criminal activities are unlikely to end well for the huntsclan. The general population are also not genocidal fanatics and will likely try to derive sustainable economic and military benefits from magical creatures instead of driving them to extinction.Don't the Huntsclan really want the veil to fall so that people will join them in murdering "monsters"?
Truthfully speaking I don't want to deal with Lovemuffin's issues if it means therapizing them so they let go of their pettiness and overblown sense of self-importance, because that's pretty much all the characterization they have. Letting go of that would just kind of make them... There.Eh, it really would. As I said, those issues are the root cause of what is preventing us from doing anything that COULD make them respect or be more loyal to Heinz.
It's called character development. It would mean a lot more for them to actually grow as people. You can't keep on doing the same joke over and over before the status quo becomes annoying. It's completely shortsighted to discard potential character growth simply because they won't seem like the character from the show.Truthfully speaking I don't want to deal with Lovemuffin's issues if it means therapizing them so they let go of their pettiness and overblown sense of self-importance, because that's pretty much all the characterization they have. Letting go of that would just kind of make them... There.
From a mechanical point of view, I understand that their free action is way too valuable. From a narrative point of view, I'd rather attach them to Von Drake so she becomes their nominal leader (though they're more like lab assistants than anything), and they can actually be happy doing important mad science with Von Drake while making themselves useful.
"How could I-Little does she know that gargoyles have depended on the nutrients derived from crap-to-stone contact since time immemorial, thus dooming many-a young garg to the famine
All avians... Huh."How could I-
How could the pigeons have done this! I declare a second war of extermination on all avians for the sins of Pigeonkind!!!!"
Wait what? Are they descended from ancients like in from Stargate Andromeda? Why do they need a gene to be murderous racists?Huntsclan are, in canon, only able to recruit from those with the same recessive gene trait.
Wait what? Are they descended from ancients like in from Stargate Andromeda? Why do they need a gene to be murderous racists?
It goes on to discuss how they steal babies who bear the mark. So...presumably it isn't linked to anything too hazardous and they're not too picky about where they pull their people from.TheDisneyWiki said:Each member of the Huntsclan has a dragon birthmark somewhere on their body, otherwise known as the "Mark of the Huntsclan", commonly on their right palm and arm. The Huntsman's dragon birthmark is round his chest and face on the left hand side. The mark apparently is a recessive genetic trait.
Yep they kidnap babies and brainwash them into genocidal maniacs, such pleasant company we've gained for this battle.It goes on to discuss how they steal babies who bear the mark. So...presumably it isn't linked to anything too hazardous and they're not too picky about where they pull their people from.