If you value opsec so much, it can be converted into a different risk. Replace one of the chakra batteries with Nara. Same amount of people. Less than 1 fewer chakra battery (Nara has chakra, even if will be less since selected for smarts). So the question is do you consider the marginal intellectual value of a Nara to be worth less than the marginal chakra value of another battery (And I think we are getting 40 or 50 batteries)?Not worth the OpSec risk. More people = more opsec risks. We should only bring people if the gain is significant.
I also think that the way the QMs model smart advisors mean we don't actually need a dozen of them. We need one good one with Nara training, and we already have that. Her name is Kei.
By QM modeling, do you mean spoon shortages making them just think of what's smart and saying that as long as we have one good advisor? Even if that were true, letting that knowledge influence our actions goes against the spirit of simulationism.