My objection is to the usage of Capital.

Besides, Starfleet should never have a heavy cruiser that isn't an Explorer.
Under the current system the Romulan Heavy Warbird is called an Explorer, as are Megatortoises, Rialas etc. Starfleet never choosing to build large ships that fall under some other role doesn't mean we should consider all large ships to be Explorers automatically, regardless of who built them. Furthermore there is the akwardness of the former category of long range explorer referring to Escort sized ships with an explorer-like role, and the Cardassians using Jaldun Cruisers in a very explorer-like role. It's simply not the case that size aligns with role very well in general.
 
Last edited:
2313.Q4 Captains Log and MoO
+60 BR
+25 PP
SR Colony 20 base
+25 Seyek
+10 Qolath
+10 RP
Romulans coming to negotiate non-aggression pact
New Race Laio 50/100
+25 Impact
+10 Cost

So more PP this quarter, also by my math end cost should be 61 so we get 39% of our PP income, or 37 PP.

We were at 135, 25 for the quarter and 37 for EOY puts us at 197 PP with one quarter left.
RP wise
9 left over, 10 for this quarter, 161 for end of year 25 for Q3, gives us 205 and we need 224 for all our current tech teams, so 19 more RP over two quarters.
 
Under the current system the Romulan Heavy Warbird is called an Explorer, as are Megatortoises, Rialas etc. Starfleet never choosing to build large ships that fall under some other role doesn't mean we should consider all large ships to be Explorers automatically, regardless of who built them. Furthermore there is the akwardness of the former category of long range explorer referring to Escort sized ships with an explorer like role, and the Cardassians using Jaldun Cruisers in a very explorer-like role.
Then why not Corvette/Frigate/Cruiser?

We call our own ships Explorers, and warships Heavy Cruisers right now. I don't see why that has to change.
 
Last edited:
Under TBG-Starfleet, we would still keep sending them on FYMs.
Assuming a relative capability spread between TBG-Galaxy and TBG-Sovvie equivalent to the front page ones, no we wouldn't, because a refit Galaxy would be a better explorer.

Unless we actually build a Sovvie-alike they'll in practice be called explorers, because that's the mission profile.
 
Assuming a relative capability spread between TBG-Galaxy and TBG-Sovvie equivalent to the front page ones, no we wouldn't, because a refit Galaxy would be a better explorer.

Unless we actually build a Sovvie-alike they'll in practice be called explorers, because that's the mission profile.
Assuming a relative capability spread between TBG-Galaxy and TBG-Sovvie equivalent to the front page ones, no we wouldn't, because a refit Galaxy would be a better explorer.

Unless we actually build a Sovvie-alike they'll in practice be called explorers, because that's the mission profile.
Whynotboth.jpg

We're going to be exploring the other quadrants, so sending Sovereigns out on missions isn't a bad idea
 
Assuming a relative capability spread between TBG-Galaxy and TBG-Sovvie equivalent to the front page ones, no we wouldn't, because a refit Galaxy would be a better explorer.

Thankfully, we are definitely going to be doing the stat lines on those designs differently. There's literally no point to the "canon" Sovereign stat line, and the Galaxy's will need to be better too in order for us to bother with replacing the Ambassador.
 
The new system gets rid of a lot of the stupid ambiguity when we say "Explorer"

Are we talking about a ship in the Explorer Corps? A ship that's big? what about a smaller ship that goes on long range missions? Or the proposed "pocket-explorer" class?

Dividing size and function can make things a whole lot less confusing.
 
Last edited:
Depends on the device...

Please be considerate.

Or the age of the computer.

Vehrec, I respect you enough to know that you know the difference between "try and keep a bunch of neutrals neutral" and "get a spy report on how strong they are." They're not the same thing.

Look, the Cardassians picked up the Dawiar more or less entirely because we ignored them for years. We basically forgot they existed until they up and attacked us and got into a war with one of our affiliates, by which time they were firmly in the Cardassian sphere in a way we haven't been able to crack. Now they've maneuvered us into a position where we can't even engage in diplomatic conduct with a species we first met in 2302, before we even encountered the Cardassians!

This is exactly the kind of thing we do not want to see repeated over and over on our coreward and rimward flanks. Which means we really do need to at least maintain active diplomatic relations with foreign powers we're not planning to recruit. Not just pretend they don't exist, and not just covertly spy on them while otherwise making no approaches and hoping our enemies don't beat us to the punch.

Hopefully we'll see more of that kind of activity out of the FDS, because I get that it's not our job, but it's definitely a job someone ought to be doing, and one that has gone largely undone from game start up through 2312 or so.

Agreed. @OneirosTheWriter, if we have such a diplomacy system in place for the Romulans & Klingons then why can't we use it on smaller powers?

[Amarkia Syndicate Event - No responders available]
[Ferasa Syndicate Event - Stalwart unable to pass]

Captain's Log, CAS Perciar, Stardate 25298.4

A small Amarkian colony established in the Gamma Iridia system near Selindra has gone missing. About four thousand souls were present, and have now disappeared. Nearby was a great unearthed cavern.

We are still attempting to discover exactly what transpired here.

Ok then. I finally realize how necessary it is to keep the Constellations in service with a 'garrison cruiser' overhaul.

Captain's Log, USS Hawking, Stardate 25300.5

Well, how about that. Romulan warp signature coming in, uncloaked. One of those heavy warbirds, the IRW Devoras, with an Admiral Velin in command. They have asked for passage through to Sol. All sorts of turmoil is gripping the brass, but the Council has overridden Starfleet, and the Devoras is on its way. They will be ushered to Sol IV, Mars, rather than Sol III, but the Romulans believe that is good enough. Apparently, they have some Senators on board, and actually importantly, members of the Continuing Committee.

[The Council of the United Federation of Planets and the Romulan Star Empire have entered negotiations for a non-aggression pact]



It's time to pop the champagne bottles everyone!

This is why I want to redesign the given Constellation refit to be more garrison focused. The given cruiser variant refit, although a lot better, makes it more of a combat cruiser rather than garrison cruiser, which is not what we want since it competes with the Renaissance's use space and poorly at that.

Agreed. Someone stat it up and I'll vote for it.

Hey now! What do the Romulans get to look at during these negotiations? *pokes at the ship building spreadsheet*

That'd be up to three Excelsiors, two Miranda Refits and the Renaissance, depending on where the windows are for the conference room. The Romulans are going to get seats that look out a window at some of these little wonders, yes? I mean, maybe put a tarp over the Rennie, but still.

That will merely impress upon the Romulans that they're making the right choice.

That New York conference can go play hopscotch in a minefield. I am voting against it. With fire.

Agreed. The TNG/DS9/Voyager scale is just bad.

Also, the redesignation system is tragic. I LOVE the idea of our capital ships being called 'explorers,' it is soooo Federation-ey to do that. It's us. And it's likely that our only heavy designs of the next decade or two are going to continue to be the Excelsior and Ambassador, both of which were originally intended as 'explorers' in the literal sense.

My desire for our light ships to be called frigates is weaker than my desire for the Enterprise to be called an explorer. So since there's no option to redesignate escorts without redesignating explorers...

[sighs]

Double Agreed. We're not playing the goddam Imperial Navy, we're playing Starfleet! People need to respect that!
 
I just don't like the sound of Capital Ship. Especially when calling them 'Explorers' is distinctive and says a lot about Starfleet.
While we will probably not build Capital Ships that aren't Explorers, we may well want to build Explorers that aren't Capital Ships. The Oberth and Intrepid classes are called Long-range Explorers on the front page.
 
Then why not Corvette/Frigate/Cruiser?
1mt ships are already a bit big to be called Frigates IMO, calling 2mt ships Frigates and 1mt ships Corvettes is taking it too far. Most powers wouldn't have any ships larger than Frigates at all. Corvettes should be ships just a bit too large to be classed as runabouts, or Apiata stingers at a stretch.
We call our own ships Explorers, and warships Heavy Cruisers.
That was the original intention, but hasn't been happening for a long time, shortly after the category that was originally called "light cruiser" started to be called cruisers, and going back would make no sense considering that it would mean calling the various Cardassian designs above 1mt light cruisers. Informally calling the top end of the cruiser weight range heavy cruisers makes much more sense.
 
Objections to Frigate/Cruiser/Capital Ship and the notion of largest ships having to always be explorers is silly and Starfleet-centric. Keep in mind, this is a system we'll be using to describe the ships of ALL nations. Our largest ships remain explorers by dint of their ship role - nothing is changed there. We're just not going to be calling them "Explorer-sized Explorers" anymore.

[X][ACADEMY] Custom - shift 1 Tech to Officers
[X][EXPLORER] Custom - shift .25 from Tech to Officer
[X][WARP] Keep to the old system.
[X][SHIP] Adopt the new Frigate/Cruiser/Capital system
 
Thankfully, we are definitely going to be doing the stat lines on those designs differently. There's literally no point to the "canon" Sovereign stat line, and the Galaxy's will need to be better too in order for us to bother with replacing the Ambassador.
Thematically, the Soveriegn is clearly meant as an actual battleship vs the Galaxies's capital science ship.
Double Agreed. We're not playing the goddam Imperial Navy, we're playing Starfleet! People need to respect that!
It's a terminology cleanup that separates Explorer (scale) from Explorer (Role).
 
[X][ACADEMY] Custom - shift 1 Tech to Officers
[X][EXPLORER] Custom - shift .25 from Tech to Officer
[X][WARP] Keep to the old system
[X][SHIP] Keep to the existing Escort/Cruiser/Explorer system

Wolf appears to have finally ended up in SpecOps where he appeared destined to be.
I am endlessly amused that this mild mannered XenoPoli-science expert thay awkwardly gave briefings to Nash has somehow drifted over into special ops over time. It is quite amusing
And you may find yourself
In command of a large special forces team
And you may find yourself on a distant battlefield
With a phaser rifle
And you may ask yourself, well
How did I get here?
LETTING THE DAYS GO BY
[...]
And you may tell yourself
This is not political analysis!
And you may tell yourself
This is not my beautiful report!
LETTING THE DAYS GO BY~


Honestly this isn't what I expected or planned, and I'm sure Wolfe didn't either :V
 
Last edited:
[X][WARP] Keep to the old system.
[X][SHIP] Adopt the new Frigate/Cruiser/Capital system
 
I'd be okay with Capital Ship being what we use for other species' 'Explorers,' but I think it says a lot about Starfleet that we use Explorer.
 
Then give me something just as flavorful for scale. 'Capital ship' has no flavor. It's so generic.
That's because it's a term used only when you're discussing multiple types of capital ships. Since our only capital ships are Explorers, and our only explorers are capital ships, it won't get used much.

It's more relevant in giving us a coherent term for other people's battlecruisers/battleships/carriers.

Also it's attached to the escort->frigate change, which is the important one, because it properly divides light ship from light warship in terminology.
I'd be okay with Capital Ship being what we use for other species' 'Explorers,' but I think it says a lot about Starfleet that we use Explorer.
They're still Explorers. Calling an Excelsior or Amby a capital scale Explorer is not magically going to change the nature of Starfleet.
 
Thematically, the Soveriegn is clearly meant as an actual battleship vs the Galaxies's capital science ship.

The stat line just makes no sense though, especially not anymore.

Then give me something just as flavorful for scale. 'Capital ship' has no flavor. It's so generic.

Then come up with a name yourself that doesn't make me want to snort in amusement.

I mean, seriously? Calling the Lorgot or the Heavy Warbird explorers is just ridiculous, and I dare you to tell me that the theoretical Klingon Battleship is intended to be an explorer with a straight face.
 
Working on map update, I feel like there's be something with a clearly stated location I forgot. Does anything stand out to anyone?

Ariel-V8 still has that "]" typo.

Arguable whether that Cardassian listening outpost next to Themis still exists. I would just remove the listening post layer, since it's hard to say how up-to-date the info is, and we know that listening outposts are scattered throughout all of Federation and border zones, so it's far too incomplete.

Surveyors for these, perhaps?

If the explorer ship role was expanded to eliminate the "need Explorer Frame, Medium/Large Operations Frame" requirements and instead just stick to stats and "FYM-capable" requirements, then that would allow Intrepid-class explorers ("frigate-sized explorers" or "explorer frigates").

Oberth still won't meet such requirements, which makes sense since it never should have belonged in "long-range explorer". It's a science corvette. Kepler should be a science frigate.

Then give me something just as flavorful for scale. 'Capital ship' has no flavor. It's so generic.

You want flavor?

Battleship :V
 
Last edited:
Okay I'mma be straight with all of you.

USS Excelsior isn't an Explorer. Nor is USS Thirishar, nor USS Salnas, nor Endurance, Kumari, or Avandar. No more than literally any other ship in our fleet, and far less than the likes of Enterprise or Stargazer. It's honestly kind of silly that we call them that.

If you object to naming them Capital ships instead, come up with some third name that's better and I'll be first to vote for it, but I refuse to keep calling them Explorers unless they're in the Explorer Corps.
 
Back
Top