That's a bit too literal of a reading of my statement, we don't need to vassalize ourselves to the Black Sheep to assimilate them.We can't, unless you think we'll be able to just up and decide to become their vassal without extraordinarily severe consequences.
I am confused about what we would disagree on, then? What I previously described was what I figured converting the Black Sheep would involve assuming we don't become their vassal.That's a bit too literal of a reading of my statement, we don't need to vassalize ourselves to the Black Sheep to assimilate them.
The unnecessary extra land is a bit of a price, but it's a price I'm willing to pay to not try and crack a nut whose shell we grew.We don't need or want the Kus portions of the Black Sheep, just the western portion where the Ymar-splinter is. I'm all for partitioning the Black Sheep between ourselves and a third power.
If it's any consolation I think the super low modifier is because the only people pushing for supporting the republicans are our intellectuals and idealogues, not because power is super concentrated in a few elites. This doesn't seem to be a repeat of the Genghis Khan vote.EDIT: Oh, wait. There's only 5.2 votes for support, vs 64 for neutrality.
Oh Dear.
Intellectuals and Peasants, according to AN I believe.If it's any consolation I think the super low modifier is because the only people pushing for supporting the republicans are our intellectuals. This doesn't seem to be a repeat of the Genghis Khan vote.
Wait the peasants want to enter the war?
Hm, didn't remember the quote right, so no clue about the peasantry actually.Wait the peasants want to enter the war?
...Why? Do our peasants have that much consciousness? Because if so that's remarkable for this age.
@Academia Nut
If supporting the republicans gets the most votes but another option wins because of the multipliers, does this mean there will be a significant amount of support for the republicans among our population?
Also, how are the Black Sheep currently doing? Same as the last time we heard about them?
Yes, there will be considerable internal support, but the king and nobility aren't interested.
Its the degree of unity that the term you used, convert, implies and goal you expressed, or I should say the lack thereof, on the other hand I am aiming for a full Act of Union with them to fully realize our former boarders from before the fall.I am confused about what we would disagree on, then? What I previously described was what I figured converting the Black Sheep would involve assuming we don't become their vassal.
I mean, yeah, an Act of Union would be due eventually but I hope that you're not planning on just foisting the idea on them all of sudden without plenty of run up time for our cultures to converge in-fact before we try to become one in-law.Its the degree of unity that the term you used, convert, implies and goal you expressed, or I should say the lack thereof, on the other hand I am aiming for a full Act of Union with them to fully realize our former boarders from before the fall.
Where the hell are you getting these conclusions? I never specified a path to take to get us to an Act of Union with the Black Sheep, just that was my end goal, I am fully on board with your 'eventually' and it will take work, definitely more then just proposing legislation, which I believe is all that I said.I mean, yeah, an Act of Union would be due eventually but I hope that you're not planning on just foisting the idea on them all of sudden without plenty of run up time for our cultures to converge in-fact before we try to become one in-law.
Sorry for the confusion on my part, then.Where the hell are you getting these conclusions? I never specified a path to take to get us to an Act of Union with the Black Sheep, just that was my end goal, I am fully on board with your 'eventually' and it will take work, definitely more then just proposing legislation, which I believe is all that I said.
I don't want to join the war. Well, I do, but that's not the main reason why I'm voting for it. It's because I want to spread revolutionary fervor throughout the People.I don't see the point of voting to support the Republicans. It's just throwing away your vote.
Even if there are a hundred votes, it only takes 5 neutral votes to match them.
If you want to join the war, vote for supporting the monarchists. That has a better chance of winning.
I dunno about you dawg but my goal is never "to join a war". Joining wars is one way to accomplish goals, not a goal in itself.If you want to join the war, vote for supporting the monarchists. That has a better chance of winning.
I dunno about you dawg but my goal is never "to join a war". Joining wars is one way to accomplish goals, not a goal in itself.
@Academia Nut
Can Launch Espionage Mission get us military observers to that war? Ostensibly to act as neutral go-between and mediators, observing that treaties are upheld like cease-fires and give assurance that no war crimes (or as close as we know the concept) are committed by either side?
And all the while stealing military innovations and striking arms deals (or less offensive but critical supplies like food, tents, uniforms etc)?
Maybe offer the rebells/monarchists to buy a colony or two...
We should get a foothold in the Americas before its too late.
Hopefully we can push east and gobble up Not!Alaska or something.