Professor Vesca
Good News Everyone!
I know that, your getting uppity over nothing. I never said anything against that so how about you screw off with the insults. I said that Democracy... Well kind of a democracy since most of the population couldn't actually vote, but anyways is that Greece and Rome were pretty much the only Democracy and for good reason, Rome couldn't maintain its democracy and Greece eventually lost any influence it once had.
I am not insulting anything, I am merely pointing out how you are speaking from a position of ignorance on how and why Athens formed a democracy.
Rome couldnt maintain its democracy due to a variety of complex factors from how they ran their republican institutions to how they raised and maintained their legions, allowing their generals to nurture loyalty to them personally, rather than to the concept of Rome as a whole. Whereas Athenian democracy was brought about due to the instability of aristocratic families constantly feuding with each other. Neither the Roman republic nor the Athenian democracy were particularly representative compared to modern democracies, but neither were they particularly repressive for the time period.
However, the Roman Republic lasted for over 500 years, before being turned into an empire which continued on for another 500. This doesnt even count the eastern half which continued on for another thousand years. This speaks instead to the resiliency of the states individual political institutions, rather than a failing of democracies or monarchies in particular.