- Pronouns
- He/Him
Is Fyth still married to Crow? Is Hynryn still the guardian of the underworld? Is Math a man or woman?
Never was. Yes. Both and neither, depending on region: the one in the palace is male.
Is Fyth still married to Crow? Is Hynryn still the guardian of the underworld? Is Math a man or woman?
I think
Because people are talking about two different meanings of the word independent.It is hypocrisy because they are accepting help despite being "fiercely independent"
Why was that so difficult for you to understand
....wait what? I'm pretty sure they were connected via the temple thing.
Yes, cool. He is quite the badass
Wait we never got that standardised? That's surprising considering how long ago that was an issue.
....wait what? I'm pretty sure they were connected via the temple thing.
Wait we never got that standardised? That's surprising considering how long ago that was an issue.
That's burst my bubble....Yes, but they were never married. It's much more of a mentor-student relationship for the most part.
Damn it!!!
We've never really built more temples, so I'm assuming locals just came to their own conclusions about the Gods.....wait what? I'm pretty sure they were connected via the temple thing.
Yes, cool. He is quite the badass
Wait we never got that standardised? That's surprising considering how long ago that was an issue.
Which incidentally would make it more susceptible to outside influences should the perceived authority of the priests falter.We've never really built more temples, so I'm assuming locals just came to their own conclusions about the Gods.
Everyone shared the same framework, but without the core institution spreading around people kinda did their own thing.
Yep.Which incidentally would make it more susceptible to outside influences should the perceived authority of the priests falter.
*whistles*
...I am not asking to build one, I am saying we had one that did not take an action for some reasonIf the place is occupied I don't think a tradepost can be put their...
It is hypocrisy because they are accepting help despite being "fiercely independent"
Why was that so difficult for you to understand
Considering the fact that we can in fact supress them through multiple channels? Are you really going to get prissy at any faction just because they have a stick attached? All that stubborness just means we spite ourselves to death.
I have only been able to skim the past 20-30 pages, but anyway, locking in as
[X][SR] Food (Colonies and vassals transfer 1 Econ/turn each)
[X][Policy] Special: Vassal Support (+1 Subordinate while active, increases Loyalty while active at less than full subordinates)
[X][HS] Increase Professionalism (Found Mercenary Company, Reforms advance)
[X][Attack] Hire out mercenary company
-[X][Attack] Both
--[X][Attack] To Freehills
Update hopefully within about eight hours
Sure. I agree with all that.But as of now, I would put the Dam/Canal over Roads, if only because of how much of our empire we cannot feasibly access without the Canal.
The food tax is a solution to our ever expanding econ problems, but it's only a temporary one.
The canal would be a step towards solving our econ problems in the Mid to Long term, which will let us shiny chase to our hearts content.
While not something to be done immediately, I say the Dam/Canal should be done as soon as it is feasible to do so.
Sure. I agree with all that.
Except the part about the lowlands canal letting us shiny chase to our hearts content. There will ALWAYS be more shinies to chase than we have actions for, canal or no canal.
By the way, do we know if we are going to continue sending all of our tech to the Western Ymaryn after they get vassalized?
That is more of a point about keeping our RA high than building temples. And in any case, the reason we can't build more temples in the first place is because our RA is already high.We should really build some more temples, since the new religion was just stated to have no problems with Slavery.
Our anti slavery stance is now running off of just cultural inertia, so we have to solidify it before some traders ask why slavery is really so bad and we'll have no priests to smack them upside the head for it.
That has been a problem on occasion, but much often than that it is just a case of not having actions to spare.Our problem, is that by going for shines our stats tend to high, thus making it impossible for building of regular backbone buildings needed to keep our nation stable, temples couldn't be built because of our high religious authority, roads earlier on weren't built because fear of high centralization, meanwhile... it means our nation cant keep up with what is needed to stable. high wealth? no more salt farms built.
To be fair, I think this had a decent amount to do with our SS crisis being ongoing. Notice how the Civil War would have included the same regions that an SS civil war would be fought with."Just"?
There is a regular stick, and then there is threatening with rebellion. Over the offensive war. Threatening with rebellion if we were, like, killing them or doing something like debasing currency down to 0.01% precious metals then "we are gonna rebel" would at least be somewhat understanable. But blackmailing king into offensive war via threat of rebellion is a step too far.
Yes, this.
Hm...now that the vote's been called, @Academia Nut, can you tell us what would have happened if it had been a tie? Curious how much of the concern surrounding that possibility was warranted versus overblown.
For something like that, I would have eventually just gone "Sudden death,
Governor: "So... you want us to just build roads? Nothing else?"I wish there is a roadbuilding policy or a watchtower policy. *grumble*