You know, there is an easy way of securing our flank against the Thunder Horse. We could just ask them for the unclaimed part of the Lowlands in exchange for an alliance. The only reason I had such a violent reaction to the Nomads was the fact that they had killed a ton of our people. The TH haven't actually done anything to us yet though.
 
You're the one arguing for an absurdly high surplus
I want enough forests so that expansion doesn't run us up against the edge of disaster, Umi-san. We don't get multi-turn warnings for many of the things we'd want wood for.

That forests also increase our econ cap and defensive bonuses means that we're not even picking a poor action without valuing that surplus, in any case.
 
You know, there is an easy way of securing our flank against the Thunder Horse. We could just ask them for the unclaimed part of the Lowlands in exchange for an alliance. The only reason I had such a violent reaction to the Nomads was the fact that they had killed a ton of our people. The TH haven't actually done anything to us yet though.
didn't stop the TS raids, but that's not a big deal.

Still, an alliance would hurt our ability to defend the HK which gains us safety in the short term but gains us danger in the long, if the TH conquer the HK.

I want enough forests so that expansion doesn't run us up against the edge of disaster, Umi-san. We don't get multi-turn warnings for many of the things we'd want wood for.

That forests also increase our econ cap and defensive bonuses means that we're not even picking a poor action without valuing that surplus, in any case.
We get enough warning to matter; we have enough forests that a deficit will only hurt if we don't treat it; provinces; 2-3 untapped forests is a large surplus versus the cost of a mine (2) or shipbuilding (<2). Defenses are nice for Marches, which is why they'll be making forests themselves. It doesn't expand our econ cap, as far as I am aware.

We have now entered a circle. Ciao.
 
Addressing imperialism (because I'm young and foolhardy):

One of the reasons Kipling should be required reading is because he's an apologist for imperialism. He's not non-critical, but he's a voice for an idea that has none in the current culture.

I'm sure some people would LIKE imperialism to not have a voice, but that's foolishness. History that picks good guys and bad guys, and then only tells the bad of the bad guys and the good of the good guys isn't history. It's a children's tale.

@Vocalend (in between moral grandstanding) listed quite few of the negative results of imperialism:
.....Really?

I am sorry, but you have to be quite a) ignorant or b) lucky to never know what is wrong with imperialism. The South Americas are a clusterfuck due to Imperialism imposed by the nations there by themselves and the colonial overlords before them. The Middle East is a clusterfuck now due to Sykes-Picot agreement to divvy up lands without care nor respect. The clusterfuck that was and is Vietnam and Afganistan happened due to imperialism. My own nation was and still is a clusterfuck because of damned imperialism.

Each and everytime, Imperialism is the major causes of why the world is a mess. Advocating Imperialism of all things, makes me want to shout in rage at you for it.

On the flip side, if you look at developing or entirely undeveloped countries in the eighteenth century, the best predictor for success in the twenty-first is spending time as a british colony or possession. There are a few exceptions (Zimbabwe, for instance). But five of the G20 nations were British colonies or possessions.

Imperialism shaped our current world. Understanding its good and bad aspects helps understand the current world and predict and shape the future.

(Also, screw Imperialism. It's not Crowish.)

England's Answer

Truly ye come of The Blood; slower to bless than to ban;
Little used to lie down at the bidding of any man.
Flesh of the flesh that I bred, bone of the bone that I bare;
Stark as your sons shall be -- stern as your fathers were.
Deeper than speech our love, stronger than life our tether,
But we do not fall on the neck nor kiss when we come together.
My arm is nothing weak, my strength is not gone by;
Sons, I have borne many sons, but my dugs are not dry.
Look, I have made ye a place and opened wide the doors,
That ye may talk together, your Barons and Councillors --
Wards of the Outer March, Lords of the Lower Seas,
Ay, talk to your gray mother that bore you on her knees! --
That ye may talk together, brother to brother's face --
Thus for the good of your peoples -- thus for the Pride of the Race.
Also, we will make promise. So long as The Blood endures,
I shall know that your good is mine: ye shall feel that my strength is yours:
In the day of Armageddon, at the last great fight of all,
That Our House stand together and the pillars do not fall.
Draw now the threefold knot firm on the ninefold bands,
And the Law that ye make shall be law after the rule of your lands.
This for the waxen Heath, and that for the Wattle-bloom,
This for the Maple-leaf, and that for the southern Broom.
The Law that ye make shall be law and I do not press my will,
Because ye are Sons of The Blood and call me Mother still.
Now must ye speak to your kinsmen and they must speak to you,
After the use of the English, in straight-flung words and few.
Go to your work and be strong, halting not in your ways,
Balking the end half-won for an instant dole of praise.
Stand to your work and be wise -- certain of sword and pen,
Who are neither children nor Gods, but men in a world of men!
 
Last edited:
But the repercussions!!!

The cold weather, harsh winter and flinsing winds is what made the area a living nightmare for invaders. Without it we are not invincible.
As for the rest of the world, it must be a in a period of considerable warming, civilisation will be far more limited, and disease more spread. Pine forests must be rare as fuck, and the wood a rare luxury. So no massive ships for us. The fur trade would also be more limited.


On the bright side, we are prime land for making high quality malmsey wine.


Edit : the region is shifted not the global temperature.
 
Last edited:
Really, the whole issue with imperalism is acting like jackasses, not establishing colonies, trade posts, or outright diplo-annexation.
 
this stuff -> Double trails -> Forest/Hathatyn -> Hathatyn/Forest -> Dam -> Library -> temples? PttS?

this stuff -> Double trails -> upgrade LV + SF to true cities (mostly in order to prepare for the next refugee wave & place them where our culture is strong enough that they get integrated quickly) -> Forest+ defence policy/Hathatyn -> Hathatyn/Forest + defence policy (mostly cause we need to prepare for the TH and might unlock auto defense for future settlements & can be payed for via foresting our entire region, which also brings our people culturally closer to trees again)

One of the changes AN made to the world is making our area hotter than it is in real life.
Or he just screwed with it and we are placed where it is naturally hotter, for example by moving the entire continent further south

Good.
Expansion Policy + Main Forests when?

Probably never, or at least not until the lowlands have blown up again as we won't expand into the north cause nomads, many people have issues with conquering the southern hill billys and east is to dry to go all expansion + main forest without increasing the production of the black soil every time until we hit the TS & build a dam there, something which nobody will go for as it ties up our action pool just for econ generation
 
Really, the whole issue with imperalism is acting like jackasses, not establishing colonies, trade posts, or outright diplo-annexation.

It's more like not establishing proper infrastructure & refusing to integrate the people as equals or at least near equals into the society, if we avoid that we should be should also avoid most problems associated with imperalism
 
There are two rivers running through the middle of it, right where we're settling. So long as we aren't discussing conquering the whole steppe (which we aren't; that's getting ahead of ourselves) there should be enough water for a few provinces.
Do you really think that a massive aqueduct network through an area the size of Britain won't be a massive undertaking? Or that those rivers can cover all the other territory we'd need to claim to adequately protect said rivers? Or the risk of nomads fucking up our aqueduct networks since it's going to be incredibly hard to cover all the river and fouling/filling in aqueducts just requires manpower?

1. I never argued this, though it would be cool if the land was good.
2. We don't lack for water in the ST lands, though westward expansion would be slower due to this. But access to the sea would be incredibly useful to offset this a bit.
3. Foriegn nations can be negotiated with for a time, but they change over time as well. While the nomads change much more quickly, a nation won't be convinced to never attack us either. Look at the TSs, we had decent ties with them for quite a while, and yet they were the only group to actually attack us besides the nomads.
4. If I had suggested yoloing into the steppes and gobbling up land like a fat kid in a candy store, sure, these would be major problems. But that was specifically not what I wanted. We'd have plenty of time to deal with these issues before we ever needed to expand further, and the nomad threat plus Lords Loyalty will help keep a sense of unity among our people.
5. Water routes OP. Literally nobody desires to go into the steppes proper right now. Mostly, the expansion would be westward, so we'd have the black sea to cut down travel times to an absurd degree.
6. Water routes OP.
7. You mean like the immense amounts of effort that we already put in automatically into making all of our farms work? We already do step farms, black soil, irrigation and who knows what else automatically. I'm pretty sure that over the course of ten-twenty generations, our people could make any claimed land pretty decent without much help from us, especially if we expanded black soil again, which we'd want to do anyways really just because of how useful that stuff is.
8. No arguments here, but unless we find a solution to the nomads, marches in the north are our best answer to them.

  1. Yeah, it would be, but it isn't
  2. Access to the sea doesn't necessarily mean fresh water, and the only major freshwater sources we've encountered require us to pretty much at least double our presence on the steppes.
  3. We had minor familial ties. There's a hell of a difference between that and 'they genocided everyone in a thousand kilometers refusing to countenance backing down'- there's a reason that Attila earned the epithet 'scourge of God' and that people are absolutely terrified of major steppe warlords, because they leave major long lasting scars on a civ's psyche. Had we turned the Lowlands into a similiar bottomless manpower hole the TH would have almost certainly pulled out or become vastly more wary of the hill monsters who fight without regard for life or limb.
  4. Except distance won't magically become significantly less of an issue. Holding together a densely populated civ of any large size is more liable to devolve into feudalism/increasing decentralization. As for the concepts to promote Unity? They're nowhere near enough. The fact is, race and culture as unifying concepts are essentially only ~300 years old if that in the modern sense. The only way to hold such a large region is to become an empire. Because the cultural drift is far too immense when you can't even reliably send taxes back for a few fairly nascent cultural traits to prevent.
  5. That's still not bad, but coastline for the sake of coastline isn't necessarily all that useful. The city of Redshore is well positioned to become a major trade port and ship production center, more access to the coast is only really useful in specific trade goods we can only find there like snails and salterns. And we've already got room to expand both that we haven't bothered to. I dislike the desire to expand along the coast without a more coherent reason than 'because it touches a body of water we touch' if we want to create a mid point between us and the metal workers? Cool, but that's essentially what this new march already does.
  6. Water routes are OP in how they facilitate things. Easier comms, easier shipping, easier trade, (possibly easier) food production. That only matters if a) there's something worth talking to b) there's something worth shipping to and fro c) there's people and goods worth trading d) there's a pressing need for more food to enable any of these others. Water routes are awesome. But they're awesome in achieving a goal, settling land solely because it has water routes that make it easier to settle isn't a solid plan. Especially when it presents a really long narrow front for the nomads to attack and we don't have the capacity to ship major armies by sea right now
  7. Black soil isn't truly automatic. We have the action for a reason. Forests aren't automatic. Aqueducts aren't automatic. Assuming that it'll just get done eventually is a stretch considering we're still not fully forested. But that's all ignoring the opportunity costs if we have to devote so much time and effort just to make said land productive.
  8. Fair enough, but even if your less ambitious coastal expansion plan goes forward (And I do find that far more reasonable) we're going to need more marches to protect that.
The coastal plan is more reasonable, and I don't mind it as much. But let's not pretend there aren't people claiming it's our manifest destiny to bring life to the steppes. Even pushing to the rivers extends are borders and is relying on the natural barrier least able to actually keep nomads out (besides something like actual desert). This was intended to less be a rant about why the steppe proponents are all fools, and more to try and highlight that it's not going to be anywhere near as easy as people think- and that even if they're inclined to balk at going to war in the lowlands its liable to cost less in the long term even if it seems less decisive in the short term.
 
On the subject of Expand Forests and why I think it gives economy slots.

We know forests do useful things to soil and rainfall patterns - see the entire arguments we've just had about the steppes and how we could invest to make them good for farming.

Economy slots indicate that there's things we could do to get more out of our territory - that some of it is going unused, or used inefficiently.

That more forests could thus increase the fertility or the amount of land we can cultivate -> more econ slots is an obvious conjecture.

And here's the thing: we've had anomalous extra econ slots show up before, after an Expand Forest.

So there is a very real possibility that Expand Forest, or at least the Main version of it, can give us additional econ slots.
 
In all honesty one of the most effective strategies against nomads would be desertification of nearby steppe. And water hole poisoning. Yeah, walls are nice.
 
Last edited:
Do you really think that a massive aqueduct network through an area the size of Britain won't be a massive undertaking? Or that those rivers can cover all the other territory we'd need to claim to adequately protect said rivers? Or the risk of nomads fucking up our aqueduct networks since it's going to be incredibly hard to cover all the river and fouling/filling in aqueducts just requires manpower?



  1. Yeah, it would be, but it isn't
  2. Access to the sea doesn't necessarily mean fresh water, and the only major freshwater sources we've encountered require us to pretty much at least double our presence on the steppes.
  3. We had minor familial ties. There's a hell of a difference between that and 'they genocided everyone in a thousand kilometers refusing to countenance backing down'- there's a reason that Attila earned the epithet 'scourge of God' and that people are absolutely terrified of major steppe warlords, because they leave major long lasting scars on a civ's psyche. Had we turned the Lowlands into a similiar bottomless manpower hole the TH would have almost certainly pulled out or become vastly more wary of the hill monsters who fight without regard for life or limb.
  4. Except distance won't magically become significantly less of an issue. Holding together a densely populated civ of any large size is more liable to devolve into feudalism/increasing decentralization. As for the concepts to promote Unity? They're nowhere near enough. The fact is, race and culture as unifying concepts are essentially only ~300 years old if that in the modern sense. The only way to hold such a large region is to become an empire. Because the cultural drift is far too immense when you can't even reliably send taxes back for a few fairly nascent cultural traits to prevent.
  5. That's still not bad, but coastline for the sake of coastline isn't necessarily all that useful. The city of Redshore is well positioned to become a major trade port and ship production center, more access to the coast is only really useful in specific trade goods we can only find there like snails and salterns. And we've already got room to expand both that we haven't bothered to. I dislike the desire to expand along the coast without a more coherent reason than 'because it touches a body of water we touch' if we want to create a mid point between us and the metal workers? Cool, but that's essentially what this new march already does.
  6. Water routes are OP in how they facilitate things. Easier comms, easier shipping, easier trade, (possibly easier) food production. That only matters if a) there's something worth talking to b) there's something worth shipping to and fro c) there's people and goods worth trading d) there's a pressing need for more food to enable any of these others. Water routes are awesome. But they're awesome in achieving a goal, settling land solely because it has water routes that make it easier to settle isn't a solid plan. Especially when it presents a really long narrow front for the nomads to attack and we don't have the capacity to ship major armies by sea right now
  7. Black soil isn't truly automatic. We have the action for a reason. Forests aren't automatic. Aqueducts aren't automatic. Assuming that it'll just get done eventually is a stretch considering we're still not fully forested. But that's all ignoring the opportunity costs if we have to devote so much time and effort just to make said land productive.
  8. Fair enough, but even if your less ambitious coastal expansion plan goes forward (And I do find that far more reasonable) we're going to need more marches to protect that.
The coastal plan is more reasonable, and I don't mind it as much. But let's not pretend there aren't people claiming it's our manifest destiny to bring life to the steppes. Even pushing to the rivers extends are borders and is relying on the natural barrier least able to actually keep nomads out (besides something like actual desert). This was intended to less be a rant about why the steppe proponents are all fools, and more to try and highlight that it's not going to be anywhere near as easy as people think- and that even if they're inclined to balk at going to war in the lowlands its liable to cost less in the long term even if it seems less decisive in the short term.
The Dead Sea expansion is what I've been discussing too...

It's the low-risk strategy, because we'll be dealing with known problems.
 
.....Really?

I am sorry, but you have to be quite a) ignorant or b) lucky to never know what is wrong with imperialism. The South Americas are a clusterfuck due to Imperialism imposed by the nations there by themselves and the colonial overlords before them. The Middle East is a clusterfuck now due to Sykes-Picot agreement to divvy up lands without care nor respect. The clusterfuck that was and is Vietnam and Afganistan happened due to imperialism. My own nation was and still is a clusterfuck because of damned imperialism.

Each and everytime, Imperialism is the major causes of why the world is a mess. Advocating Imperialism of all things, makes me want to shout in rage at you for it.
You forgot Africa. That's probably where imperialism screwed up the most.
 
I too am from America.


..... Am not American, and by client state I meant an independent collection of Tribal chiefdoms and petty kingdoms, until the British showed up, burned a few cities made a few deals and declared us a unified administrative region that is client to the empire.
Not a colonial settlement with delusions of granduer.







That last part is sarcastic if it aient obvious.
 
Black Soil is automatic. Every little hamlet and every settlements produce them.

What isn't automatic is expanding the production so that we can grow bigger forests and more food.
 
Back
Top