I am surprised there is not more discussion on the possibilities of capturing the wild chakra koi that we've encountered here. Yes, it would be difficult and (likely) deadly, but therein lies the spoons, the experience and the potential for major future benefits! I would expect it to be a long term endeavor, not something completed on this journey, but I would like to see us give it a honest try.
[/QUOTE]
To elaborate on the Wakahisa koi, Noburi has this to say:

The Wakahisa koi were once a terrifying marine predator, a hivemind that wielded ridiculous levels of chakra to overcome and devour even the greatest prey. Only the Wakahisa stood a chance against them, being able to combine AoE chakra drain with powerful Water Element ninjutsu. After the final battle, they took a few surviving individuals home with them, and since then the clan has spent centuries breeding the chakra koi to be as stupid and "nutritious" as possible.

Some say that a few koi survived uncaptured, and that somewhere in the depths of the ocean breeds a new and deadlier hivemind waiting to take its revenge on humanity. But surely that's just baseless speculation.
It's something that would have to be done over the course of centuries*, assuming Noburi was being truthful about things. I don't think it's worth it because assuming we did put the resources in to getting things to work, we would have attained godhood and could just take koi from the Wakahisa Clan by the time the wild koi were tamed.
 
It's something that would have to be done over the course of centuries*, assuming Noburi was being truthful about things.
I think this is the point where we're splitting off. I agree that capturing wild koi as chakra beasts would likely be ineffective for the purposes of breeding our own supply of Wakahisa koi as chakra batteries* (under the assumption that Noburi was truthful about the subject, informed about the subject and that the people informing him of the subject have correct records, and under the assumption that medical-nin or bio-sealing would not provide pathways to either accelerate the breeding process of wild koi->Wakahisa koi or enable the larger koi to be used as chakra batteries. I think that most of these ideas are likely dead-ends and that Noburi's explanation is the clearest way forward, but I don't think that so strongly as to dismiss exploring the options). I don't agree that striking that possibility makes capturing the wild koi useless.

The "hive mind" component of the koi is something that strikes me as immediately interesting. I'd like to see how that interacts with the domesticated koi. Do the domesticated koi by sheer scale relative to the wild koi subjugate the wild koi to their will, potentially enabling a route of domestic war chakra-animal? Does the wild koi have a force of will that allows it to dominant the domesticated koi, potentially enabling us to sabotage traditional Wakahisa Clan koi storage? Do the hive minds of these koi not interact at all due to the generational drift and evolutionary divergences that we've seen between them? The characterization of the koi as outright intelligent is also something that's interesting to me and worth a bit more poking, even if it's just flavor.

If we can figure out how the hive mind of the koi functions, we might be able to influence its goals and motivations. Imagine a future potentiality where we're able to remove and re-insert koi into the hivemind to push it towards goals more beneficial to us than "be the apex marine predator in XX region;" even if it is as small as "be the apex marine predator in XY region," getting the koi collectives to reposition in areas advantageous to us and harmful to our opposition would be a big stick to move around and one that is very hard for other shinobi nations to pin blame on us for. We're sorry that your trade has been decimated over the past six months by a wild koi collective; it is truly a shame that these malfortunes have come on you after you offended Leaf. Perhaps the Fish Kami disapprove of your actions?
 

It's something that would have to be done over the course of centuries*, assuming Noburi was being truthful about things. I don't think it's worth it because assuming we did put the resources in to getting things to work, we would have attained godhood and could just take koi from the Wakahisa Clan by the time the wild koi were tamed.
[/QUOTE]
Or Wakahisa without barrels register like harmless humans and through a series of lucky accidents and unlikely coincidences, a Wakahisa found some koi isolated from the hivemind.

Feels like keeping wild chakra beasts is not that hard if seals fortify the enclosure. Drain from a distance. Do not resist the hivemind. Do not resist.
 
I think this is the point where we're splitting off. I agree that capturing wild koi as chakra beasts would likely be ineffective for the purposes of breeding our own supply of Wakahisa koi as chakra batteries* (under the assumption that Noburi was truthful about the subject, informed about the subject and that the people informing him of the subject have correct records, and under the assumption that medical-nin or bio-sealing would not provide pathways to either accelerate the breeding process of wild koi->Wakahisa koi or enable the larger koi to be used as chakra batteries. I think that most of these ideas are likely dead-ends and that Noburi's explanation is the clearest way forward, but I don't think that so strongly as to dismiss exploring the options). I don't agree that striking that possibility makes capturing the wild koi useless.

The "hive mind" component of the koi is something that strikes me as immediately interesting. I'd like to see how that interacts with the domesticated koi. Do the domesticated koi by sheer scale relative to the wild koi subjugate the wild koi to their will, potentially enabling a route of domestic war chakra-animal? Does the wild koi have a force of will that allows it to dominant the domesticated koi, potentially enabling us to sabotage traditional Wakahisa Clan koi storage? Do the hive minds of these koi not interact at all due to the generational drift and evolutionary divergences that we've seen between them? The characterization of the koi as outright intelligent is also something that's interesting to me and worth a bit more poking, even if it's just flavor.

If we can figure out how the hive mind of the koi functions, we might be able to influence its goals and motivations. Imagine a future potentiality where we're able to remove and re-insert koi into the hivemind to push it towards goals more beneficial to us than "be the apex marine predator in XX region;" even if it is as small as "be the apex marine predator in XY region," getting the koi collectives to reposition in areas advantageous to us and harmful to our opposition would be a big stick to move around and one that is very hard for other shinobi nations to pin blame on us for. We're sorry that your trade has been decimated over the past six months by a wild koi collective; it is truly a shame that these malfortunes have come on you after you offended Leaf. Perhaps the Fish Kami disapprove of your actions?
If you are interested in exploring slaving hivemind animals to our will, might I suggest animals that would not carry the risk of affecting our koi, especially since we'd have to bring these koi into Leaf? Like, say, the millipede swarm?
 
If you are interested in exploring slaving hivemind animals to our will, might I suggest animals that would not carry the risk of affecting our koi, especially since we'd have to bring these koi into Leaf? Like, say, the millipede swarm?
I don't think that I agree with the characterization of my intent here, or the characterization of animal husbandry in general as slavery, but that aside, no. I think that the interaction between wild and domesticated koi is one of the largest points of interest here.

Do you think that we lack the ability to create holding areas outside of Leaf proper for this sort of experimentation? I recall us having properties spread out across the Land of Fire, but I am unsure as to how many we still own.
 
The statement that I don't think any of your ideas are viable is almost certainly intended as hyperbole but it's a little frustrating in light of the fact that there's a recent and clear counterexample: we're asking Mareo if it makes sense to invoke his name/claim he sent us on a mission. This was a suggestion you made that I put in my plan. Not to get your vote, but because it seemed fun, viable, and potentially valuable. Maybe you don't view that as the adoption of your idea because I'm asking instead of just doing it, but that we're asking period is because I thought it was possible that we'd get a 'yes' which is indisputably an affirmative answer to the question of viability.
This is one of the places where text over the internet separated by hours can be a bad means of communication. For me the lets see if we can evoke Mareo's name was just a suggestion and not an idea. I hadn't but any real thought or effort into it. It wasn't a building block to something larger or in anyway important to me. So I think a better way to phrase my post to make it more clear would have been to say you don't think any of my plans are viable. (plans in the broad sense not the action plan sort of way)
I disagree with some of your ideas. I'd be happy to discuss exactly why this is the case, both on a case by case basis and as an overall pattern, although I don't think I'd be saying anything I haven't said already. That disagreement is based entirely on the merits of the ideas as I understand them as opposed to some bugbear I have with you particularly. If you do feel like it's a personal thing, I can see where you'd be getting that on the basis that it isn't clear to me where you draw the line between someone's aggregate beliefs and their person, and I credibly take issue with your beliefs insofar as I disagree with the ideas that seem to stem from them, but I draw a line between the two and place myself on the 'I take issue with this person's ideas' side of that line in this instance.
Once again another failure on my end. I don't think you have anything personally against me. It's just that we fundamentally disagree with each other about the realities of the situation. Each of our assessments about my plans are going to wildly diverge. This leads to these long loops where we both keep hitting our points but, neither one of us is going to move a significant amount towards agreeing with the others points. The pattern of our discussions have been firmly set and I don't see them changing. So I just think we can both save time, effort and, frustration by not having the discussions and basically stay at the same positions we would if we did have them.
 
I don't think that I agree with the characterization of my intent here, or the characterization of animal husbandry in general as slavery, but that aside, no. I think that the interaction between wild and domesticated koi is one of the largest points of interest here.

Do you think that we lack the ability to create holding areas outside of Leaf proper for this sort of experimentation? I recall us having properties spread out across the Land of Fire, but I am unsure as to how many we still own.
I think wild/domesticated koi interactions is something we want to ACTIVELY AVOID given that a very possible result of the interaction is that our domesticated koi become part of the wild koi hivemind, making them unusable to us and setting us back for however long it takes for us become god.
 
I think wild/domesticated koi interactions is something we want to ACTIVELY AVOID given that a very possible result of the interaction is that our domesticated koi become part of the wild koi hivemind, making them unusable to us and setting us back for however long it takes for us become god.
That doesn't make sense as an outcome unless the koi hiveminds and individual koi genetics work vastly different than we can expect.

The koi hiveminds appear to be based off of proximity. The wild koi interacting with a domesticated koi is not going to introduce the domesticated koi into the wild koi's hivemind unless we are drastically misunderstanding how koi hiveminds work (hence why I want to study how they work). If anything, the wild koi might become a dominant partner in the hivemind over the domesticated koi in that moment, but removal of the koi from the hiveminding proximity should solve that situation by itself.

The domesticated koi are specifically bred for "stupidity," presumably meaning docile traits, and interactions with a koi of a different genebase is unlikely to change their genetic makeup and undo that breeding for "stupidity." It is possible that it will undo that breeding, sure, chakra is weird and does funky things, but it is a major step to expect to happen. In order for introducing wild koi to our domesticated koi to 'turn our domesticated koi into a part of the wild koi hivemind,' we would have to dismiss the proximity aspect of the koi hiveminds (in which case, why are our domesticated koi not already subsumed into the hivemind?). If by 'turn our domesticated koi into part of the wild koi hivemind,' you mean undo the breeding of the koi for docile traits/stupidity, we would need to start modeling the koi hiveminds... differently. Potentially not as a hivemind created by proximity or a different underlying factor that appears on the surface to be proximity but some sort of chakra-virus that binds the koi together?

If the wild koi hivemind is capable of overwriting genetic drift in the domesticated koi to return them to wild-koi genetic predispositions towards behaviors, it starts to discredit Noburi's story on how the Wakahisa koi came to be. Selective breeding doesn't make sense as an option if the mere presence of koi outside of the bred trait group is capable of rewriting the genetics of the other koi. If we think it's likely that Noburi's telling the truth, which again I do, then I think that's a soft support for wild koi not permanently turning domestic koi into wild koi.
 
It's something that would have to be done over the course of centuries*, assuming Noburi was being truthful about things. I don't think it's worth it because assuming we did put the resources in to getting things to work, we would have attained godhood and could just take koi from the Wakahisa Clan by the time the wild koi were tamed.
Maybe the Wakahisa just made that shit up
 
Last edited:
That doesn't make sense as an outcome unless the koi hiveminds and individual koi genetics work vastly different than we can expect.

The koi hiveminds appear to be based off of proximity. The wild koi interacting with a domesticated koi is not going to introduce the domesticated koi into the wild koi's hivemind unless we are drastically misunderstanding how koi hiveminds work (hence why I want to study how they work). If anything, the wild koi might become a dominant partner in the hivemind over the domesticated koi in that moment, but removal of the koi from the hiveminding proximity should solve that situation by itself.

The domesticated koi are specifically bred for "stupidity," presumably meaning docile traits, and interactions with a koi of a different genebase is unlikely to change their genetic makeup and undo that breeding for "stupidity." It is possible that it will undo that breeding, sure, chakra is weird and does funky things, but it is a major step to expect to happen. In order for introducing wild koi to our domesticated koi to 'turn our domesticated koi into a part of the wild koi hivemind,' we would have to dismiss the proximity aspect of the koi hiveminds (in which case, why are our domesticated koi not already subsumed into the hivemind?). If by 'turn our domesticated koi into part of the wild koi hivemind,' you mean undo the breeding of the koi for docile traits/stupidity, we would need to start modeling the koi hiveminds... differently. Potentially not as a hivemind created by proximity or a different underlying factor that appears on the surface to be proximity but some sort of chakra-virus that binds the koi together?

If the wild koi hivemind is capable of overwriting genetic drift in the domesticated koi to return them to wild-koi genetic predispositions towards behaviors, it starts to discredit Noburi's story on how the Wakahisa koi came to be. Selective breeding doesn't make sense as an option if the mere presence of koi outside of the bred trait group is capable of rewriting the genetics of the other koi. If we think it's likely that Noburi's telling the truth, which again I do, then I think that's a soft support for wild koi not permanently turning domestic koi into wild koi.
I am confused. I had been previously operating under the impression that you wanted wild koi and domesticated koi to interact, specifically in the context of subverting the Wakahisa Clan's supply or to generate combat koi. Now you are arguing that the various koi hiveminds...aren't? Or are proximity-focused, with the underlying assumption that letting them interact and then separating them won't have any long-term effects (and that we would recognize the issue and separate them before it would happen)?

I notice that I am confused. I will attempt to state clearly: I have significant reservations about our ability to capture, store, and transport wild koi to Leaf; about our ability to locate a OPSEC-secure (especially from the Wakahisa taking care of our domesticated koi), safe, and habitable location for said koi; and about the risks of introducing said koi to our current (domesticated) koi supply in any capacity. I expect that successful experimentation of 'domesticating' these koi, and gaining tangible value from these koi (combat koi, sabotaging the Wakahisa Clan's koi) are likely to take the work of decades, if not centuries. I therefore conclude that this endeavor is not of sufficient value given the costs and associated risks when compared to the benefits, and is not worth pursuing at this time.
 
I notice that I am confused. I will attempt to state clearly: I have significant reservations about our ability to capture, store, and transport wild koi to Leaf; about our ability to locate a OPSEC-secure (especially from the Wakahisa taking care of our domesticated koi), safe, and habitable location for said koi; and about the risks of introducing said koi to our current (domesticated) koi supply in any capacity. I expect that successful experimentation of 'domesticating' these koi, and gaining tangible value from these koi (combat koi, sabotaging the Wakahisa Clan's koi) are likely to take the work of decades, if not centuries. I therefore conclude that this endeavor is not of sufficient value given the costs and associated risks when compared to the benefits, and is not worth pursuing at this time.
Thank you for being clear. If the wild koi can be captured, it will probably be nonviolently by civilians. For a discounted price because other jobs pay poorly and asking for too much gets them killed. If this step is too costly, efforts can stop here. Having a wild koi farm away from Konoha is less valuable, but still valuable. Transport to Konoha will have to wait for Noburi to get permission to leave. He can drain fish to harmless levels and for safety fish can be transported one by one. Wakahisa have no legal justification to be upset about wild koi. If they are still upset, it creates leverage to ask for something in exchange for stopping. Wild koi do not need to be domesticated to be valuable. Not too attached to the idea of combat koi or interactions between wild koi and domesticated koi, but precautions are available. Only introduce one wild koi to one domesticated koi at a time. Only introduce koi to each other that have never connected to the minds of any koi but their parents.
 
7th Path chakra farm has not been conscientiously ruled out. If the farm is incredibly valuable, more effort deserves to be put in. 7th Path chakra beasts have not been investigated. Seal research to protect living seeds traveling between Paths has not been tried. If it is worth doing it is worth failing at. Getting Jiraiya back will demystify Sage Mode.
I'd be down to throw a line in a plan asking Ma/Pa/Cannai/etc. about how many chakra beasts exist on the 7th Path. That said, the ROI on this is highly uncertain as it's unclear whether or not we can actually drain them safely.

Can you clarify what you mean by 'living seeds'? Moving plants between paths (...can you move potted plants in storage seals?) is a curiosity but it's not useful. The tech required to move living things feels fairly prohibitive and we have a bunch of seal research projects that have clearer ROIs, give continuous returns, and are more within our grasp.
Things are brought up again when resolvable uncertainty remains unresolved.
I don't have a problem with it being brought up periodically; my issue is that when it's brought up, it's brought up without what I see as sufficient context/caveats and I view not providing those as adjacent to perpetuating misinformation. Making sure those are added is important to me, especially if the ideas are to be discussed.
So I think a better way to phrase my post to make it more clear would have been to say you don't think any of my plans are viable. (plans in the broad sense not the action plan sort of way)
That's fair enough. I think you're being hyperbolic depending on how we're defining 'my' here; we probably agree on some plans implemented e.g. going on this scroll hunt. If you want to say something like 'when I've brought up larger ideas, I can't recall a time you supported them' that seems fair.
It's just that we fundamentally disagree with each other about the realities of the situation. Each of our assessments about my plans are going to wildly diverge. This leads to these long loops where we both keep hitting our points but, neither one of us is going to move a significant amount towards agreeing with the others points. The pattern of our discussions have been firmly set and I don't see them changing. So I just think we can both save time, effort and, frustration by not having the discussions and basically stay at the same positions we would if we did have them.
While I don't feel like I understand how you view the realities of the situation we do definitely disagree, and you're saying you don't find value in the conversations, so that's that.

However, as noted above, I'm going to continue to comment on the ideas etc. My goal isn't - and indeed, in this case, wasn't - to move your personal needle, but to participate in whatever broader conversation was happening. I'll do my best to be clear that what I'm saying isn't directed towards you but to the thread as a whole.
If a patrol wants to fight us one option is simply…running away
If we're seen by a patrol and we just leg it, then I think we're opening ourselves up to a whole world of pain. Any patrol that we can run away from is likely a patrol that we could have taken out, and I think it sends a clearer message to be discovered, kick some ass, and let them live either with an offer to come to Leaf or strict instructions to leave the scary missing-nin alone. If we just run, that's a manhunt in the making - I can't imagine a village that's going to shrug and say 'welp, that's unlikely to be a problem' if a patrol comes back and reports a half-dozen unidentified shinobi.
 
I think wild/domesticated koi interactions is something we want to ACTIVELY AVOID given that a very possible result of the interaction is that our domesticated koi become part of the wild koi hivemind, making them unusable to us and setting us back for however long it takes for us become god.
All I'm getting from this koi discussion is that some people want to enslave a hivemind, and some other people are worried that would restore enough sentience to the slave inbred race we already own so that they are no longer useful to us.

[X] Action plan: by your reward functions combined, I am

Contract 4th path sharks as negotiators. Reach an alliance with the wild koi. Plan the reintegration of captured koi into their natural habitat. Negotiate chakra exchange with the koi for fair wages. Become single successful human maritime power.

Then do the same with dogs.
 
If we do decide to mess with the wild Koi we should give some to Uncle Oro to get him to help us out with some fun projects
 
Er... Orochimaru really? He only cooperates when he is forced to cooperate.
Last time we saw him he showed that he was pro-social enough to do business. We would have some cool hivemind beast that he'd be interested in . Plus he's already promised not to murder us and Oro is a man of his word
"Really, Tsunade? A bit underspecified, don't you—yes, yes, fine. I, Orochimaru of the Sannin, promise that I will never kidnap a Leaf ninja, nor cause a Leaf ninja harm for reasons the Hokage would disapprove of. Are we done here?"

I'd like to pull an @eaglejarl and say that, without any comment on whether it's a good idea, that would be awesome and I thoroughly endorse it.

I know it would be super great!
 
Expecting collaborative research is probably a bit much. Throwing him a koi or three might get us some interesting results, as it will with the Dragonbits when that becomes relevant.

I do worry about it spiking his interest in our koi or Noburi's bloodline. My assumption would be that he knows about the koi (wild ones at least, but if he didn't torture the piscatologist he captured for clan secrets etc. I'd be shocked) and declined to research them, but who knows?

Sidebar: what do we put the collective odds on Orochimaru having Sage Mode at? Thought process went from draining chakra via bloodline to draining it from nature. Does every clan have the ability to teach Sage Mode?
 
Last time we saw him he showed that he was pro-social enough to do business. We would have some cool hivemind beast that he'd be interested in . Plus he's already promised not to murder us and Oro is a man of his word

TBF with the Dragonpart deal he wasn't really forced all that much.
I need to stop you two and remember you we had both the monopoly on the dragon parts, and would blow it up if he tried something. It was both easier less a problem to pay us whit his pocket change than other alternatives.
If he ever know of the koi his snek brain will go:
"Hum good to know, i will get some myself then"
 
Sidebar: what do we put the collective odds on Orochimaru having Sage Mode at? Thought process went from draining chakra via bloodline to draining it from nature. Does every clan have the ability to teach Sage Mode?
In canon its stated that both toads and snakes have it, it is the basis for the curse mark, i see no reason that the snakes would not have it we mfd if the toads have.
 
Thought process went from draining chakra via bloodline to draining it from nature. Does every clan have the ability to teach Sage Mode?
I think we only know that the Toads aren't the only ones with it. Hiruzen and Jiraiya sorta discussed it in a letter with Hiruzen telling him to shut up because it's secret. It did also sound to me like it's not universal knowledge, but I don't think it was explicitly stated

Notably, Oro didn't pull out Sage Mode for BOTG whereas Jiraiya did.
 
Last edited:
Fish could be chakra fish, but they could also just be...fish.

Pretty sure all living things have some chakra.

And if animals on the 7th Path had no chakra or not enough to matter than there wouldn't be any dangers to almost all 7th Path people.

Hm, Kagome was probably almost right, it's just that Humanity is imprisoned and not the friendly animal people.

But I don't really care about the chakra farm.
 
Back
Top