Could someone fill me in on the lore here? Why is the Merlinian better for Xanatos' son than the Morgana?
because Xanatos' son, Alexander, is likely still very young and has magical talent inherited from his mother's side of the family. The Morganian Encantus has damaged training sections, so it's more dangerous to Alex, and if Xanatos has only a single redeeming quality, he does love his family. The Merlinian version is therefore safer to have his kid learn from, while still being effective.
 
Update: I have gotten the go-ahead to tell you why Doom seems to have a problem with toons to the point of seemingly genocidal hatred.

He doesn't. The readers who think that, like some people in-universe, have come to the conclusion that he "hates toons" based on the identity he has constructed as a human and the actions he commits as that character. Even though you know he's a toon in truth.

Judge Doom is a psychopath who has murdered humans in addition to toons in order to achieve his actual plans in the movie, which were to amass a ton of money, use that money to start a major business and obtain political power, and then use those amasses resources to create a freeway. The identity of Judge Doom and his extremely banal agenda against toons were a means to an end that he is still exploiting to pull the wool over the eyes of people who already have a bias against toons, not knowing that a very crazy toon is the one pulling the strings.

Don't get suckered. Doom would kill anyone to keep control of his power, and he invented Dip to make sure he could kill other toons when they got in his way too.
I... don't think I like that

It's basically dismissing one of the most defining aspects of his character as "he's faking it" and means that at any moment when it becomes convenient for him to just stop being prejudiced against Toons he can and would do so

Plus it kinda makes the scene where he taps out the Shave and a Haircut theme to find out if Toffee is secretly a Toon make less sense because it wouldn't matter if he was since Doom wouldn't actually give a shit and would only have to do something about it if his constituents found out the truth
 
Last edited:
I... don't think I like that

It's basically dismissing one of the most defining characteristics of his character as "he's faking it" and means that at any moment when it becomes convenient for him to just being prejudiced against Toons he can and would do so

Plus it kinda makes the scene where he taps out the Shave and a Haircut theme to find out if Toffee is secretly a Toon makes less sense because it wouldn't matter if he was since Doom wouldn't actually give a shit and would only have to do something about it if his constituents found out the truth
It's not "faking it" so much as "willing to use anything and anyone to get what he wants". On the one hand, it does remove a lot of depth from the character's backstory, makes it less significant. On the other hand, it plays up the fact that there IS no reason at all, no sympathetic backstory, no trauma. He's just that petty, a violent sociopath that believes in nothing and cares for nothing.
 
It's not "faking it" so much as "willing to use anything and anyone to get what he wants". On the one hand, it does remove a lot of depth from the character's backstory, makes it less significant. On the other hand, it plays up the fact that there IS no reason at all, no sympathetic backstory, no trauma. He's just that petty, a violent sociopath that believes in nothing and cares for nothing.
But it means that he's literally faking it, the thing his character is most famous for and apparently if we were to magically make Toons popular enough tomorrow he would turn around and change his genocidal stance on them in order to stay in power

That's like if it turned out that Doof made up all of his backstories!

And you don't need to give him a sympathetic backstory or trauma to explain why he hates Toons either, sometimes people just hate other groups because they do and for absolutely no reason

To me the idea of Doom possessing a near genocidal hatred of his own species just because he's a psychopath is way more impactful and scary than him being a stereotypical politician that used fear of a minority to achieve power

Hell, that basically makes him the exact same as Bellweather!
 
Calling the vote now, the leading vote is winning by a sizeable margin.
Adhoc vote count started by Torgamous on Sep 20, 2020 at 7:51 PM, finished with 519 posts and 109 votes.
 
But it means that he's literally faking it, the thing his character is most famous for and apparently if we were to magically make Toons popular enough tomorrow he would turn around and change his genocidal stance on them in order to stay in power

That's like if it turned out that Doof made up all of his backstories!

And you don't need to give him a sympathetic backstory or trauma to explain why he hates Toons either, sometimes people just hate other groups because they do and for absolutely no reason

To me the idea of Doom possessing a near genocidal hatred of his own species just because he's a psychopath is way more impactful and scary than him being a stereotypical politician that used fear of a minority to achieve power

Hell, that basically makes him the exact same as Bellweather!
I'm sorry, but I can't agree. The movie doesn't really support his toon hate being legitimate when everything else about Judge Doom's human persona was an act. If he hated only toons, then he wouldn't have killed Eddie's brother with a piano after robbing the Toontown bank. He needed to rob the bank to get the money for his plot of removing the trams and making the freeway, not for a larger campaign against toons in particular.
 
Alrighty then, looks like we're going all in on the Talisman. Time to see if our spending has left us enough money to be able to purchase this unique artifact, or if some of the other bidders are able and/or willing to out-bid us.
 
Last edited:
I'm sorry, but I can't agree. The movie doesn't really support his toon hate being legitimate when everything else about Judge Doom's human persona was an act. If he hated only toons, then he wouldn't have killed Eddie's brother with a piano after robbing the Toontown bank. He needed to rob the bank to get the money for his plot of removing the trams and making the freeway, not for a larger campaign against toons in particular.
I'm not saying that he doesn't also dislike humans or isn't willing to kill them but this is the man that invented the first possible way to kill Toons, luxuriated in doing so, completely destroyed the animation industry and is constantly tapping out a tune to try and catch out other Toons

It just takes so much away from him to reduce him to having such a basic and boring motivation and outlook and makes him seem so much less threatening while also making him much harder to deal with because if we make Toons look good enough he can just say "Syke! I liked Toons all along!"
 
I... don't think I like that

It's basically dismissing one of the most defining aspects of his character as "he's faking it" and means that at any moment when it becomes convenient for him to just stop being prejudiced against Toons he can and would do so

Plus it kinda makes the scene where he taps out the Shave and a Haircut theme to find out if Toffee is secretly a Toon make less sense because it wouldn't matter if he was since Doom wouldn't actually give a shit and would only have to do something about it if his constituents found out the truth
Doom is a toon. He murders Toons because they're a minority group that people don't like, and, thus, easy to use as a scapegoat as a prelude to legally murdering them. Doom is a SADIST, and he's a Toon: He murders because it's funny, and he'd keep doing it, whether or not toons are popular, because he likes murdering people, for the same reason some psycho kid like ripping the legs off ants and watching them stumble: Because, to him, it's FUNNY. Plus, he got a lot of money out of the deal, which helps. Certain humans would certainly be willing to commit genocide for a quick buck, it's just that those guys wouldn't dress in all black and call themselves "Mr. Evil", which is how you know he's a Toon.
 
Last edited:
Plus it kinda makes the scene where he taps out the Shave and a Haircut theme to find out if Toffee is secretly a Toon make less sense
Actually, Shave and a Haircut is still quite valid - If Toffee's a toon, then DIP is the weapon of choice, and explains his apparent immortality. If he's not, then, well, oh well. But remember. He's confused on that bit, after Russ messed with him a bit.

EDIT: Oh, right. Did we want to troll Xanatos a little by casually mentioning we met some Gargoyles?
 
Last edited:
Actually, Shave and a Haircut is still quite valid - If Toffee's a toon, then DIP is the weapon of choice, and explains his apparent immortality. If he's not, then, well, oh well. But remember. He's confused on that bit, after Russ messed with him a bit.

EDIT: Oh, right. Did we want to troll Xanatos a little by casually mentioning we met some Gargoyles?
Not much shock factor to get. He already thinks we know about Gargoyles, which wasn't true then but is now.
 
But it means that he's literally faking it, the thing his character is most famous for and apparently if we were to magically make Toons popular enough tomorrow he would turn around and change his genocidal stance on them in order to stay in power
I don't think he'd change his stance, no. I think he'd fight tooth and nail for his little slice of insanity, because he's cultivated that for years and years on end, and he would never quite get around to admitting defeat.

Petty tyrants like that don't like having to change their narrative, they consider anyone trying to change the status quo (that they enjoy) as attacking them directly, and when they start losing ground they just get stubborn out of spite .

I'm not saying that he doesn't also dislike humans or isn't willing to kill them but this is the man that invented the first possible way to kill Toons, luxuriated in doing so, completely destroyed the animation industry and is constantly tapping out a tune to try and catch out other Toons

It just takes so much away from him to reduce him to having such a basic and boring motivation and outlook and makes him seem so much less threatening while also making him much harder to deal with because if we make Toons look good enough he can just say "Syke! I liked Toons all along!"
I don't doubt at this point he's developed an appreciation for murdering and torturing toons just because he can get away with it more often than not. In the end, the kind of cold-blooded, violent psychopath that it takes to do stuff like that enjoys hurting other people. It's not that he doesn't hate Toons. It's that he hates everything. Toons are just the most convenient target.

There are psychopaths that are alright people, productive members of society and whatnot. Doom is not that kind.
 
Last edited:
Doom is a toon. He murders Toons because they're a minority group that people don't like, and, thus, easy to use as a scapegoat as a prelude to legally murdering them. Doom is a SADIST, and he's a Toon: He murders because it's funny, and he'd keep doing it, whether or not toons are popular, because he likes murdering people, for the same reason some psycho kid like ripping the legs off ants and watching them stumble: Because, to him, it's FUNNY. Plus, he got a lot of money out of the deal, which helps. Certain humans would certainly be willing to commit genocide for a quick buck, it's just that those guys wouldn't dress in all black and call themselves "Mr. Evil", which is how you know he's a Toon.
Actually, Shave and a Haircut is still quite valid - If Toffee's a toon, then DIP is the weapon of choice, and explains his apparent immortality. If he's not, then, well, oh well. But remember. He's confused on that bit, after Russ messed with him a bit.

EDIT: Oh, right. Did we want to troll Xanatos a little by casually mentioning we met some Gargoyles?
I don't think he'd change his stance, no. I think he'd fight tooth and nail for his little slice of insanity, because he's cultivated that for years and years on end, and he would never quite get around to admitting defeat.

Petty tyrants like that don't like having to change their narrative, they consider anyone trying to change the status quo (that they enjoy) as attacking them directly, and when they start losing ground they just get stubborn out of spite .


I don't doubt at this point he's developed an appreciation for murdering and torturing toons just because he can get away with it more often than not. In the end, the kind of cold-blooded, violent psychopath that it takes to do stuff like that enjoys hurting other people. It's not that he doesn't hate Toons. It's that he hates everything. Toons are just the most convenient target.

There are psychopaths that are alright people, productive members of society and whatnot. Doom is not that kind.
That's all fair enough I suppose, I just feel like it makes him a way less interesting and intimidating character as a whole

It basically makes him Bellweather 2.0
 
Update: I have gotten the go-ahead to tell you why Doom seems to have a problem with toons to the point of seemingly genocidal hatred.

He doesn't. The readers who think that, like some people in-universe, have come to the conclusion that he "hates toons" based on the identity he has constructed as a human and the actions he commits as that character. Even though you know he's a toon in truth.

Judge Doom is a psychopath who has murdered humans in addition to toons in order to achieve his actual plans in the movie, which were to amass a ton of money, use that money to start a major business and obtain political power, and then use those amasses resources to create a freeway. The identity of Judge Doom and his extremely banal agenda against toons were a means to an end that he is still exploiting to pull the wool over the eyes of people who already have a bias against toons, not knowing that a very crazy toon is the one pulling the strings.

Don't get suckered. Doom would kill anyone to keep control of his power, and he invented Dip to make sure he could kill other toons when they got in his way too.
*Looks at the Flying Cars we invented and have started pushing out*

Hah! We've done more damage to what he actually cares about, with that one action by accident, then we have with any other action we've taken targeting him so far on purpose.
 
Last edited:
Eh bellweather actually personally hates predators though and is a bit of a zealot. Also doom came first.
Does she? I've always felt that Doom hated Toons more than Bellweather hated Predators

Also if Doom inventing the worlds first way to kill a Toon and planning on spraying the most heavily Toon populated area with it isn't zealotry I don't know what is
 
Can we make a copy of the Scrolls of Jo Lan and trade them for a copy of the Cookbook? I remember that Xanatos wanted them both and it seems pretty harmless and is a good show of "trust" to an "ally". The items seem to be valuable due to the info inside and not anything intrinsic.
Yeah, just photocopying the scrolls and exchanging that for a photocopy of the Cookbook seems like a fair trade to me.
Okay people are sleeping on the talisman here.

First off it's A part of a set of it doesn't combo with other Talisman I'll eat someone else's hat.

secondly the ability of astral projection is some high grade magic

thirdly RUSS suggested we get it. He doesn't do impulse buys he believes that thing is extremely useful and valuable.

Forthly it gives the user the ability to enter DREAMS and fight POSSESSION. That's extremely important considering a certain Triangle in our future.

and finaly we have low key goal to collect them all and complete the set. There's no way there isn't a magical effect there
It seems like an obvious hint the Dream Queen is after Russ too.
[ ] Plan: Expert Advice
-[ ] Spend points on the Yáng Talisman
--[ ] 17

It's part of a set we have, and it's good enough that not only is everyone else interested, even Russ reccomends we go for it. Ordinarily, I'd be down for the encantus, but we already have Janna's knowledge of the Mewni Spellbook and Felldrake and Malifishmirtz's spellbook and the scroll; we aren't hurting on sources of mystical knowledge.
Yeah, plus, if Xanatos doesn't get the book then
Okay.

Final thought.

So far, David Xanatos has mostly been doing impulse purchases, since our Intrigue rolls have been providing us with information about how he reacts to stuff.

Owen Burnett is his expert in all things Occult, whose loyalty is just about absolute and whom Xanatos trusts implicitly in all matters, including the wellfare of his son. Owen has, by design, a wooden persona with strict self-control.

This has gotten a reaction out of him.

In conclusion, I think that Xanatos is going to go for the Encantus, on Owen's advice, and I think that it is going to be the Merlinian one. If I am right about his motivations, this would be about his son and beating him here may genuinely upset him.

Of course, it is possible that all this also applies to the Talisman thanks to our poor Intrigue roll there, but I think this interpretation best fits the clues we have regarding the Encantus.

If Xanatos does go for the Encantus, we could try and work out an exchange of information deal with him. Photocopy the Encantus for us and we'll give him our personal attention on a project of his for one turn, with only minimal questions asked.

[ ] Plan No Risk, No Reward (Morgana edition)
Is what I want to vote.

You now have a good idea of what a relative cost is when someone has a 'passing interest' and is 'fairly interested'. It's up to you how you think you should extrapolate that out for the big ticket items.

We got told to consider how much people are betting point wise on items based on level of interest in the previous rounds. Now, mentioning this is an obvious hint to not dump all our points into one object under the understandable logic of wanting to secure it. However! Take notice that we only have enough points to spend on two items max at base bid of 7.

Now consider this, why bother mentioning to us or hint to us to not spend all our points on one item if that was infact the only way to be sure we get an item? This implies to me that going for two items is infact a perfectly viable strategy. Take into account that Xanatos was interested in the Cookbook and Scrolls, which we had at 1 point above the minimum and only got the scrolls due to a roll. I'd go further to postulate that fairly interested would be 2 above the minimum, which we would still beat at 10.

............... Also, I have an idea although I don't know if it'd work as an write in.

[X] Plan If The Glooms Can Pool Their Money Then We Can Too
-[X] Let Xanatos know that you noticed Owen was the only person other than Janna looking at the Encantus and how much Xanatos was spending in general.
--[X] Propose pooling together your points at a 3-4 point split to buy the Morganian Encantus at the base 7 price, as no other groups seem interested besides theirs, so working together eliminates the competition anyway. Doof and Xanatos would share ownership of the book and treat deciphering/learning from it as a joint project, with whoever contributed more points to buying it keeping it while the other gets a photocopy. It has the least interest out of the two Encantus', but it will also be the more dangerous one to learn from since it's safety features are removed. So pooling their resources to make sure no accidents occur when learning from it may be wise.
---[X] "Hey, Xanay, only our groups are interested in the Morganian Encantus, so do you wanna pool our money and study it together to mitigate the danger? Contribute at least 3 points and I'll cover the rest, but whoever contributes more keeps the original copy in their territory. "
----[X] If Xanatos rejects the deal Spend all 17 points on the Yáng Talisman.
-----[X] If Xanatos accepts the deal then spend 1-4 points on the Morganian Encantus with Xanatos chipping in the other 3-6 points to make a bid of 7, which should be enough as Owen was the only other person besides Janna interested in the Morganian Encantus. Spend the remaining 13-16 points on the Yáng Talisman.

Hey, Magica never said we couldn't work together and pool our resources to buy something. I mean, the Glooms are doing it, and they sure as heck aren't one person. Plus, if it's not explicitly in the rules then it's not against the rules! All it would take is a quick 2 sentences to ask too. For example: "Hey, Xanay, only our groups are interested in the Morganian Encantus, so do you wanna pool our money and study it together to mitigate the danger? Contribute at least 3 points and I'll cover the rest, but whoever contributes more keeps the original copy in their territory. " Doesn't have to be this verbatim, just get the idea across in the least amount of time possible. Xanatos is a smart man, he can extrapolate that by our groups we mean Owen and Janna and that by original copy we're implying that we'll make a photocopy of the book or at least notes.

Xanatos is being a loot goblin right now, and probably doesn't have too many points left, but we know he has a minimum of 5 points left as we beat him on a coin toss at getting the scrolls. So he might have been planning to bow out this turn anyway due to lacking the remaining 2 points he needs to bet on anything. Or, even if he is planning on betting this turn, then he probably would have considered betting on the Morganian Encantus since Owen is interested in Enantus' and the Morganian one is going to be the cheaper bet. But we can make him able to shift funds around to put more points on other items while still getting the Morganian one. Plus, unless he only has 7 points left and wants to risk them on the Salem book or something, this deal ensures he'll walk out of the auction with one of the big items.

So to Xanatos Logic it out.

If Xanatos has only 5 points left, then he has no reason not to contribute those 5 points in helping us buy the Morgana Encantus. We'd then be spending 2 points to make the base 7 bid and spend a comfortable 15 points on the Talisman.... or even 16 if Xanatos has more than the 5 points we know he has at 6 points. Xanatos gets a win in essentially an extra auction/loot item he gets to keep in his territory as well as help studying it.

If Xanatos only has 7 points left, then if he was planning on going for the Manuel he may turn us down. We spend all 17 points in a guaranteed win for the Talisman.

If Xanatos only has 7 points left and he was going for the Morganian Encantus, then he will cover most of the cost for it at 6 poijnts, as we imply we have enough to out bid him anyway, so he might as well ensure access to it. We get to bid a comfortable 16 on the Talisman.

If Xanatos has far more than 7 points left, and is not interested in the Morganian Encantus, then he may reject us if he plans to bid on one of the higher contenders, like the Merlinian or Talisman.

If Xanatos has way more than 7 points left and plans to go for the Morganian Encantus and something else already, then he may accept our offer in order to spend more money on ensuring he gets the higher bid item. He accepts the offer and we bet 13-16 points on the Yang Talisman; both of which are good bids.

In 3/5 of the scenarios above Xanatos accepts our deal and we walk away with at least joint custody of one item and the Yang Talisman and joint custody of the Morganian Encantus with our ally.

In 1/5 of the scenarios the lowest we bet on the Yang Talisman is 13, but we're still likely to walk away with it or at worst just joint custody of the Morganian Encantus with Xanatos.

In only 1/5 of the scenarios does Xanatos have reason to reject the offer, as in all 4/5 scenarios he benefits.

I like those odds.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, just photocopying the scrolls and exchanging that for a photocopy of the Cookbook seems like a fair trade to me.

It seems like an obvious hint the Dream Queen is after Russ too.

Yeah, plus, if Xanatos doesn't get the book then


If Xanatos does go for the Encantus, we could try and work out an exchange of information deal with him. Photocopy the Encantus for us and we'll give him our personal attention on a project of his for one turn, with only minimal questions asked.

[ ] Plan No Risk, No Reward (Morgana edition)
Is what I want to vote.



We got told to consider how much people are betting point wise on items based on level of interest in the previous rounds. Now, mentioning this is an obvious hint to not dump all our points into one object under the understandable logic of wanting to secure it. However! Take notice that we only have enough points to spend on two items max at base bid of 7.

Now consider this, why bother mentioning to us or hint to us to not spend all our points on one item if that was infact the only way to be sure we get an item? This implies to me that going for two items is infact a perfectly viable strategy. Take into account that Xanatos was interested in the Cookbook and Scrolls, which we had at 1 point above the minimum and only got the scrolls due to a roll. I'd go further to postulate that fairly interested would be 2 above the minimum, which we would still beat at 10.

............... Also, I have an idea although I don't know if it'd work as an write in.

[X] Plan If The Glooms Can Pool Their Money Then We Can Too
-[X] Let Xanatos know that you noticed Owen was the only person other than Janna looking at the Encantus and how much Xanatos was spending in general.
--[X] Propose pooling together your points at a 3-4 point split to buy the Morganian Encantus at the base 7 price, as no other groups seem interested besides theirs, so working together eliminates the competition anyway. Doof and Xanatos would share ownership of the book and treat deciphering/learning from it as a joint project, with whoever contributed more points to buying it keeping it while the other gets a photocopy. It has the least interest out of the two Encantus', but it will also be the more dangerous one to learn from since it's safety features are removed. So pooling their resources to make sure no accidents occur when learning from it may be wise.
---[X] "Hey, Xanay, only our groups are interested in the Morganian Encantus, so do you wanna pool our money and study it together to mitigate the danger? Contribute at least 3 points and I'll cover the rest, but whoever contributes more keeps the original copy in their territory. "
----[X] If Xanatos rejects the deal Spend all 17 points on the Yáng Talisman.
-----[X] If Xanatos accepts the deal then spend 1-4 points on the Morganian Encantus with Xanatos chipping in the other 3-6 points to make a bid of 7, which should be enough as Owen was the only other person besides Janna interested in the Morganian Encantus. Spend the remaining 13-16 points on the Yáng Talisman.

Hey, Magica never said we couldn't work together and pool our resources to buy something. I mean, the Glooms are doing it, and they sure as heck aren't one person. Plus, if it's not explicitly in the rules then it's not against the rules! All it would take is a quick 2 sentences to ask too. For example: "Hey, Xanay, only our groups are interested in the Morganian Encantus, so do you wanna pool our money and study it together to mitigate the danger? Contribute at least 3 points and I'll cover the rest, but whoever contributes more keeps the original copy in their territory. " Doesn't have to be this verbatim, just get the idea across in the least amount of time possible. Xanatos is a smart man, he can extrapolate that by our groups we mean Owen and Janna and that by original copy we're implying that we'll make a photocopy of the book or at least notes.

Xanatos is being a loot goblin right now, and probably doesn't have too many points left, but we know he has a minimum of 5 points left as we beat him on a coin toss at getting the scrolls. So he might have been planning to bow out this turn anyway due to lacking the remaining 2 points he needs to bet on anything. Or, even if he is planning on betting this turn, then he probably would have considered betting on the Morganian Encantus since Owen is interested in Enantus' and the Morganian one is going to be the cheaper bet. But we can make him able to shift funds around to put more points on other items while still getting the Morganian one. Plus, unless he only has 7 points left and wants to risk them on the Salem book or something, this deal ensures he'll walk out of the auction with one of the big items.

So to Xanatos Logic it out.

If Xanatos has only 5 points left, then he has no reason not to contribute those 5 points in helping us buy the Morgana Encantus. We'd then be spending 2 points to make the base 7 bid and spend a comfortable 15 points on the Talisman.... or even 16 if Xanatos has more than the 5 points we know he has at 6 points. Xanatos gets a win in essentially an extra auction/loot item he gets to keep in his territory as well as help studying it.

If Xanatos only has 7 points left, then if he was planning on going for the Manuel he may turn us down. We spend all 17 points in a guaranteed win for the Talisman.

If Xanatos only has 7 points left and he was going for the Morganian Encantus, then he will cover most of the cost for it at 6 poijnts, as we imply we have enough to out bid him anyway, so he might as well ensure access to it. We get to bid a comfortable 16 on the Talisman.

If Xanatos has far more than 7 points left, and is not interested in the Morganian Encantus, then he may reject us if he plans to bid on one of the higher contenders, like the Merlinian or Talisman.

If Xanatos has way more than 7 points left and plans to go for the Morganian Encantus and something else already, then he may accept our offer in order to spend more money on ensuring he gets the higher bid item. He accepts the offer and we bet 13-16 points on the Yang Talisman; both of which are good bids.

In 3/5 of the scenarios above Xanatos accepts our deal and we walk away with at least joint custody of one item and the Yang Talisman and joint custody of the Morganian Encantus with our ally.

In 1/5 of the scenarios the lowest we bet on the Yang Talisman is 13, but we're still likely to walk away with it or at worst just joint custody of the Morganian Encantus with Xanatos.

In only 1/5 of the scenarios does Xanatos have reason to reject the offer, as in all 4/5 scenarios he benefits.

I like those odds.
To late. Vote was called. We went all in on the Talisman.
 
Somehow your post duplicated itself inside the post itself. I don't know how.

Also, voting closed with 17 on the Talisman. I would have been liable to vote for this plan if it had been in time.

FUN FACT! SV didn't like me quoting the full quote! I... didn't know that was a thing.
 
Does she? I've always felt that Doom hated Toons more than Bellweather hated Predators

Also if Doom inventing the worlds first way to kill a Toon and planning on spraying the most heavily Toon populated area with it isn't zealotry I don't know what is
bellweather I am fairly sure is far better at intrigue than doom. She doesn't show her hate at all. But, she is perfectly willing to sacrifice prey to kill predators.
 
Somehow your post duplicated itself inside the post itself. I don't know how.

Also, voting closed with 17 on the Talisman. I would have been liable to vote for this plan if it had been in time.

FUN FACT! SV didn't like me quoting the full quote! I... didn't know that was a thing.
not that it changes anything. But,17 is the bid number the voting number was 62.
 
Somehow your post duplicated itself inside the post itself. I don't know how.

Also, voting closed with 17 on the Talisman. I would have been liable to vote for this plan if it had been in time.

FUN FACT! SV didn't like me quoting the full quote! I... didn't know that was a thing.
Ah dang. I didn't see the vote close. My bad.
 
Back
Top