-wiggles hand-

Will far away provinces notice?

And the local chiefs using this as a precedent is bad, Since of course their own children are all just competent and best for the job!
I mean, yeah. They'll definitely notice. Look at our last heroic admin. She knew exactly what the biggest problems in our society were and took all the right steps in countering them.

The outward effects of a hypercompetent leader are impossible not to notice, even in our more remote provinces. They'll notice that they're getting all the supplies they need, that their concerns are being addressed, etc.
 
Your quotes are obviously misleading people. I suggest you stop that as it's disingenuous to the discussion.

If we don't support him there is a 30-40% chance that he's available.
How are they misleading people? I am responding to the misleading claims of others.

That is irrelevant.

Edit: Also, btw, the nepotism from earlier wasn't referring to this particular case, but rather to the idea that not opposing the idea of nepotism is thus supporting nepotism. It probably is still nepotism in this case, however: regardless of how good he is, his victory is not assured unless his mother uses her sway over the council to support him.
 
Last edited:
No, but I am pretty sure that it was something to the effect of the Ymaryn commenting on the low crime rate of USA, particularly a town in Missouri?

It was the murder rate in Flint Missouri. Around page 1000 if I remember rightly.

Ahha, found it, thanks Bungie for pointing the way. Here's what he said:

They don't get sad, they get extremely violent. Like, holy shit violent, especially when their social models are "Well, dad shanked mom's father and first husband to get her, seems like a successful strategy", which also drives social isolation as people go "Oh crap, there's a large group of young men over there, better kill them before they kill us. Also, we'll take their stuff while we're at it..."

Also, while remarkably peaceful compared to their neighbours, overall the People would still remark upon the low murder rates of Flint, MI.

It (mostly) gets punished, but even among the People there tends to be a lot of 'moment of passion' type violence. Stabbing your brother and your wife because you caught them sleeping together is something that happens, or getting into an argument over a cow and throwing a punch that lands harder than you thought. Also, there are a lot of 'mysterious disappearances' that are blamed on animals or bad weather but are straight up luring someone into an isolated area and killing them out of greed or jealousy or what have you.

Also, as a note, it is written into the law that if you can get witnesses to testify that someone called you a coward right before a fight, that is sufficiently mitigating to downgrade punishment from execution or exile to half-exile, and potentially even entirely mitigating punishment if sufficiently egregious, because calling someone a coward in their environment is basically saying "You'll just sit there and let your family die if something goes wrong". While not nearly as macho and honour culture as the nomads or Highlanders, there is an extensive list of fighting words, as well as breaches of etiquette that can result in fights due to the fact that they are seen as insults to the spirits, so committing these breaches is seen of as a form of assault, because you are endangering the well being of those around you.

So I think you conflated a couple of things Kiba. He never said that "stabbing your brother and your wife because you caught them sleeping together" is enough to downgrade punishment for the murder, just that it does happen. Not surprising; although The People's culture isn't strictly monogamous and clearly doesn't care about young people messing around, people are still going to be jealous. Fighting words, on the other hand, ARE written into the law to be mitigating.
 
where is the undisputed in this?
:jackiechan::facepalm:
Umi-san, I honestly don't know how I could make this more clear.
Basically the issue is that he is such a good candidate that even going "I'm recusing myself to avoid bias" makes everyone go "Huh, must be something wrong with him we haven't seen, there is literally no reason other than him being her son not to vote for him".
Basically the issue is that he is such a good candidate that even going "I'm recusing myself to avoid bias" makes everyone go "Huh, must be something wrong with him we haven't seen, there is literally no reason other than him being her son not to vote for him".
Basically the issue is that he is such a good candidate that even going "I'm recusing myself to avoid bias" makes everyone go "Huh, must be something wrong with him we haven't seen, there is literally no reason other than him being her son not to vote for him".

They've already singled him out as the most qualified candidate--all on his own merits.
 
[X] Send an envoy to request the Thunder Speakers rein in youths (-2 Diplomacy, chance of TS king actually complying, small chance of triggering war)
[x] Support son (chance of -1 Legitimacy, heir becomes Yehlmyn [Mediocre Martial, Good Diplomacy, Heroic Admin])

Yeesh. I don't have the eneregy to fight the anti-heredity fanatics again right now. GL y'all!
 
what a fucking shitshow

YeeeeeeeeP.

Why I went back to my hobby of Planning for !!Fun!!
Adhoc vote count started by BungieONI on May 13, 2017 at 11:50 PM, finished with 33121 posts and 79 votes.
 
[X] Send an envoy to request the Thunder Speakers rein in youths (-2 Diplomacy, chance of TS king actually complying, small chance of triggering war)
[x] Support son (chance of -1 Legitimacy, heir becomes Yehlmyn [Mediocre Martial, Good Diplomacy, Heroic Admin])
 
People seem to be confusing nepotism and using family networks. One is the hiring of family members first and foremost solely duo to them being family. The other is using family connections to find suitable employment with it being a given that he can adequately perform.

The first is seen as bad. The second is fucking normal and exists universaly and up to this day.
 
@Umi-san I hate to say this but a lot of people are getting very annoyed at what seems to be you either missing the point repeatedly or actively trolling

this, for example, is making me think you may just be trying to get a rise out of us to discredit our arguments.

Please stop.
Please stop saying things that inherently* true and offering unsatisfactory quotes as support. This has been resolved by Duesal's shifted emphasis; not by you.
 
Last edited:
[X] Send an envoy to request the Thunder Speakers rein in youths (-2 Diplomacy, chance of TS king actually complying, small chance of triggering war)
[x] Support son (chance of -1 Legitimacy, heir becomes Yehlmyn [Mediocre Martial, Good Diplomacy, Heroic Admin])

Yeesh. I don't have the eneregy to fight the anti-heredity fanatics again right now. GL y'all!
I guess take comfort in the idea that your vote is winning?

I dunno if it's even worth it to think that way, because oooooh boooooy this is getting slimy in here.

*walks right the frack out again*
 
Last edited:
And also noted that the only reason why she wouldn't support him is that he's her son.
They won't know that. They'll assume that there must be something else wrong with him, probably something really bad if it cancels out his administrative skills. They'll trust the judgement of their king and name someone else the heir.
 
Yea it indicates that he IS the best candidate that the only reason he would lose is his own mother discrediting him.
k*
They won't know that. They'll assume that there must be something else wrong with him, probably something really bad if it cancels out his administrative skills. They'll trust the judgement of their king and name someone else the heir.
I mean... it literally says it in your* quote, which is why I pointed it out.

But I am inclined to say that there is a chance that they will take his mother's lack of support on faith as an indication of a deep-rooted internal flaw rather than her attempting to maintain neutrality. This is all dependent on a die-roll, after all.
 
How are they misleading people? I am responding to the misleading claims of others.

That is irrelevant.

Edit: Also, btw, the nepotism from earlier wasn't referring to this particular case, but rather to the idea that not opposing the idea of nepotism is thus supporting nepotism. It probably is still nepotism in this case, however: regardless of how good he is, his victory is not assured unless his mother uses her sway over the council to support him.
Ah, misread your post...my bad.

Basically the issue is that he is such a good candidate that even going "I'm recusing myself to avoid bias" makes everyone go "Huh, must be something wrong with him we haven't seen, there is literally no reason other than him being her son not to vote for him".

However, he is undisputed the best guy for the job.

Again, not supporting him actively hurts his chances. Not because we're not providing him with our support-bonus, but because the lack of support would actively cause people to invent possible faults in his character that are non-existent. Like unintentionally spreading propaganda.

Not supporting him creates the roll that gives him a 30-40% chance of becoming king. His chances being low aren't because he's not good enough (he's a hero admin with no serious negative attributes), but because the roll is random and independent of his actual abilities...basically, not supporting him carries an automatic 60-70% chance of taking him out of the running.
 
Please stop saying things that aren't true and offering unsatisfactory quotes as support. This has been resolved by Duesal's shifted emphasis; not by you.
The 'misleading claims of others' are backed up by quotes and facts mate.

I'm just getting annoyed with how constantly disingenuous you're being. And the lack of sleep

Also Duesal had to try very hard to make things clearer to you for you, only for you to then reveal that you already had knowledge of the subject and understanding, having an example Duesal didn't have ready.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top