maximillian
Civilised Sheep
- Location
- Ranch
Not quite sure I get the joke.We have inoculation, I am sure we can learn to spell terrorism.
Not quite sure I get the joke.We have inoculation, I am sure we can learn to spell terrorism.
Ok, wtf. Really? Really? Please explain what he was supposed to do with a 1 year travel time. He literally could not expect help, and the info was there for the vote.Strange, I do not remember any vote about that...
It is as if he declared the new province a "march" and the government could not do anything against it due to the crisis...
This went as well as could be expected, the province wasn't him rebelling.although there were some questions of how well it might actually work given that the new province would be rather far away.
Point.Actually AN has stated his lowest score is "mediocre." Given we have a strong system of advisors, I don't think he'll be rolling particularly poorly.
Ok, then if he wanted to be loyal like you wanted, what should he have done?
Eh, military skill doesn't necessitate war. We could just leverage his heroics in peace, expanding towers or chariots again using his excellent stats for bonus effects.This vote is a little split focus. If we elect Cwriid heir, there's no need to be conservative about the trading vote. He covers us militarily and we can either stay with one or just outright declare on the Highlanders.
Still no concrete proof that he'll magically institute a hereditary kingdom. Regardless of if he even wants to, we have previous proof that we can control whether or not we allow such a dramatic change. We got lucky with the meathead in the past, but ultimately we did have the ability to deny his son the spot (and following the son's death, traditions were instituted that prevented familial inheritance of the kingdom without evidence of competence).I'm not worried about him. I'm worried about his descendants and the precedent he sets.
Not illegitimate, a March is even specified in the update as being easier to integrate than a vassal state. He's closer to us than even the HK is to their own predecessors in the lowlands.This was literally him trying to legitimate an illegal action.
It is also called lying.
This is completely wrong.
Reread the update.
He has one main and two secondary actions, own military, Econ, mysticism...
Hell, AN even outright said that we later may try to reintegrate the march, because right now? They are not integrated.
He's saying since we have the idea of inoculation, we can learn the idea of identity politics enough to be able to declare the guy a terrorist. Which makes so little goddamn sense I feel like I lost 500 IQ points parsing it.
[] Appoint him chief of the tribes he conquered (New province?)Strange, I do not remember any vote about that...
It is as if he declared the new province a "march" and the government could not do anything against it due to the crisis...
...You mean like he did?Be a regular new province and work on better communication in his secondary action?
Like chariot post?
He built boats, which were supposed to help communication like you wanted.Stallion Tribes - [M] New Settlement, [Sec] Build Wall, [Sec] More Boats
Be a regular new province and work on better communication in his secondary action?
Like chariot post?
Ok, wtf. Really? Really? Please explain what he was supposed to do with a 1 year travel time. He literally could not expect help, and the info was there for the vote.
This went as well as could be expected, the province wasn't him rebelling.
He's specifically doing more boats for communication. Damn, dude, read the post.Be a regular new province and work on better communication in his secondary action?
Like chariot post?
It was outright stated that the chiefs and king had no clue how well the new province would work. Should he have just said, 'sorry, you're too far, I can't do it.'?Half an year.
And improving logistics.
This said?
Had he asked, we, myself included, would have probably voted for a march.
But he did not.
He literally pretty much declared himself a local king.
Don't bother. Rather than simply not wanting him king(something I can understand), @tenchifew is for some goddamned unexplained reason dead set on demonizing the guy, which is something that makes no goddamn sense and makes me not respect him or his arguments.He's specifically doing more boats for communication. Damn, dude, read the post.
Don't bother. Rather than simply not wanting him king(something I can understand), @tenchifew is for some goddamned unexplained reason dead set on demonizing the guy, which is something that makes no goddamn sense and makes me not respect him or his arguments.
He's saying since we have the idea of inoculation, we can learn the idea of identity politics enough to be able to declare the guy a terrorist. Which makes so little goddamn sense I feel like I lost 500 IQ points parsing it.
But there is literally no basis in fact for that opinion.I am not demonizing him.
I see his action last turn as nearly an open rebellion, with his reasoning at best questionable.
He wanted to be a king, and he became at least a local one.
Given the character as is, I figure he's literally just too similar to Trump's presented 'golden years' politics for some people to even consider doing anything but snubbing him.Don't bother. Rather than simply not wanting him king(something I can understand), @tenchifew is for some goddamned unexplained reason dead set on demonizing the guy, which is something that makes no goddamn sense and makes me not respect him or his arguments.
FOR FUCKS SAKE, WE HAVE ALREADY EXPLAINED THIS. HE IS SIMPLY TOO FAR AWAY TO EXERT ENOUGH INFLUENCE AND OR AID FOR HIM TO ACT LIKE A PROPER GOVERNOR, HE NEEDS TO ACT LIKE THE WAY HE IS FOR A PROVINCE THAT FAR TO EVEN WORK.I am not demonizing him.
I see his action last turn as nearly an open rebellion, with his reasoning at best questionable.
He wanted to be a king, and he became at least a local one.
...no
We authorized a new province.
Which magically became independent.
No, he isn't.
I see his actions of last turn as close to open rebellion as can be.
People who want to destroy current state structures are called terrorists and are ineligible to be elected as its leaders.
Yes, the "province", that through some curious magic became independent.
This was literally him trying to legitimate an illegal action.
It is also called lying.
This is completely wrong.
Reread the update.
He has one main and two secondary actions, own military, Econ, mysticism...
Hell, AN even outright said that we later may try to reintegrate the march, because right now? They are not integrated.
Strange, I do not remember any vote about that...
It is as if he declared the new province a "march" and the government could not do anything against it due to the crisis...
Be a regular new province and work on better communication in his secondary action?
Like chariot post?
I asked this of AN a while ago:Half an year.
And improving logistics.
This said?
Had he asked, we, myself included, would have probably voted for a march.
But he did not.
He literally pretty much declared himself a local king.
Officially, as far as our People are concerned, he's a provincial chief--he even has the speaking stick that specifically signifies this. The great distance and to a lesser extent the cultural differences from his province being started by way of "i beat up a radically different society until they decided to swear fealty to me and by extension the People" mean that mechanically we have a march.It's seen of as another province, but a very distant and different one.
I asked this of AN a while ago:
Officially, as far as our People are concerned, he's a provincial chief--he even has the speaking stick that specifically signifies this. The great distance and to a lesser extent the cultural differences from his province being started by way of "i beat up a radically different society until they decided to swear fealty to me and by extension the People" mean that mechanically we have a march.