- Location
- Austin, TX
The thing about the Sydraxians is that they want their pound of flesh for our supposed actions. Why not follow the Amarkian way, and offer an honor duel?
Mostly the fact that we're pretty sure that it's not just a ceremonial duel where everyone goes home at the end of the war games.The thing about the Sydraxians is that they want their pound of flesh for our supposed actions. Why not follow the Amarkian way, and offer an honor duel?
*A Klingon pokes his head around the door*The thing about the Sydraxians is that they want their pound of flesh for our supposed actions. Why not follow the Amarkian way, and offer an honor duel?
My point is that I don't want to alienate their voterbase. I don't want the civilian population to think that they cannot rely on Starfleet to defend them, that they have to vote for a Hawkish councilor to ensure that the Federation council at least sees to their defense.Could you please decide if you support or oppose the hawks? You're saying you don't want to alienate them, then you condemn a sting operation?
No, the Apatia didn't do a damn thing to provoke the cardassians. Civilian/support ships operating without an escort in neutral space isn't provocation. The Jaldun saw a non combat vessel in neutral space and decided to attack it. This is generally known as piracy when done outside a state of war. Then the Jaldun ran into an EC Excelsior followed by three Stingers and had a pucker moment.
The thing is, you're proposing to limit Hawk power in the Council by pursuing Hawk actions in Starfleet. As far as I can tell, your criticism of McAdams is that:
1) She didn't spontaneously attack the Cardassians when she saw that the Apiata were doing the same, and
2) She criticized an Apiata queen (one of many) for keeping her in the dark about an aggressive action that arguably endangered McAdams' command.
This isn't you moving to reassure voters that the Hawks aren't their only option. No, you're proposing to behave as if the Hawks already won the election, and to do what they'd ask you to do anyway.
Okay, but exactly how do we make you happy here?
You criticize our captains for being restrained. Or for publicly dissenting from the Apiata 'loose cannon' faction that is currently headed in the direction of unilaterally drawing us into a war with Cardassia. It's honestly not clear what you want our policy to be regarding the Sydraxians. And on the one hand you seem to be pro-Pacifist, but on the other hand you want to push harder and act more aggressively on our borders so that the Hawks "don't win," even though that is exactly the kind of policy the Hawks have been arguing for.
Could you please outline exactly:
1) What you think we should do,
2) How you think we should do it,
3) WHY you think we should do it, and
4) What you think the likely consequences of the actions you advocate would be?
If you want, you can even backdate and answer those questions in the context of the encounter between the Apiata and Courageous. It would be nice to know what you really think McAdams should have done.
There are rules we live under imposed by the Council. One of them is likely an escalation of force protocol. If you want to have a good argument to go in and defend the Gretarians with lethal force from a possible Syndraxi takeover, you need to have exhausted some other options first. What you propose is a good next step after a show of force operation. It is not a good first step because we have to consider our political maneuvering from both sides; not just the Syndraxi, but the Council as well.
And despite your outright dismissal, there is really no reason not to believe that they won't get the message we can scrape a third of their fleet off the kitchen sink and we don't even consider this a real war yet, so think carefully.
Scraping together a warfleet is the response the Council will only allow after escalation. Look at what we had to do to put together a task force bigger than two ships against the Syndicate. Look at the conditions that needed to exist to deploy fleets under the two crises we've managed. You are proposing the nuclear option, where I am couching the more acceptable options in terms the Pacifists will accept, like defense treaties, inspections, and humanitarian interventions.
Let me be clear. Our current crop of Pacifists are interventionists who have proposed such items as sector-wide wiretapping, deploying peacekeepers equipped with bunker busters, and the literal thought police. If the situation with the Gretarians is what we suspect, the biggest howls of outage will not come from the Hawks. Your mistake is thinking that the actions we must take are military. I am proposing to take up and wield the ideals of the Federation to achieve the same goals.
The right way to do things is to up and take things from them, like the Gretarians, and force them into the open where we defeat them on our chosen battlefields. You want an insult that cannot be ignored? Take on the Gretarians as a willing protectorate. Establish well-defended colonies near their borders. Build outposts right in their face. Do "arms inspections" on their trade coming in from Cardassia. Then when you detect their response thanks to superior intelligence, mass your battle fleet.
What we are trying to get across is that this is not a trivial or easy thing. We should not assume our ships can operate freely in and around Sydraxian space. A force too large for the Sydraxians to have a chance of defeating it... Such a force is going to be, by our standards, A LARGE FORCE. Enough that we ourselves would be worried about it. If a Combat 70 or 80 fleet came after us, some bricks would be deposited in the restrooms of Starfleet Command. We could whittle it down and beat it, or even mass to meet it in a single decisive battle. But it wouldn't be easy or simple or safe.You do realize that Sydraxians can't actually take us, right? You do realize that to match the combat rating of two EC explorers, two Connie-Bs, a Riala and three centaur-A's the Sydraxians would have to commit more that half their fleet? To do it safely they'd have to commit everything?
Everyone is assuming total superiority because if decide we want that on a strike op, we have it and they can't do a thing about it. We can, if we so chose, hit them with 70 odd points of Combat of our own and 45+ from member fleets. If they commit literally everything they have they still get curbstomped because we just hit them with half again as much combat power and there's an exponential term favoring the larger C score in the engine. And that's deploying well less than half our forces to curbstomp them literally no matter what they do.
There are reasons why forming a strike group of Starfleet forces backed by units from the members bordering them, driving up to Kar Akar, burning away all their military/dual-use orbital infrastructure and then dictating terms is not an option at the present. They are NOT military or logistical reasons. They are political reasons. We have the military ability to just decide that the war is over, the Sydraxians lost, and not give them a vote. That it's politically non-viable to actually USE our absurd superiority like that for now doesn't mean it's arrogance to assume that we possess it.
Look at the incident that sparked this: Sydraxians had to commit something like a third of their fighting power to go after Endurance, and they ran the minute reinforcements showed up anyway.
There is no realistic way we can deal with the Sydraxians that quickly. In that case, we should simply reroute the Kadeshi around Sydraxian space. It might add a few months to their journey, but avoiding a known threat is worth it.… oh, I just realized something. If we assume that the Pride is moving in a straight line from their gardens to their origional homeworld, and said route passes through Earth, than it is likely that said trajectory takes them perilously close to Syndraxian space. If their goal was to destroy the greatest possible amount of tonnage of Federation and affiliate vessels, then the Pride would be a very attractive target for them. We need to deal with the Syndraxian situation rapidly else they may end up wiping out the Kaddesh people.
This.Mostly the fact that we're pretty sure that it's not just a ceremonial duel where everyone goes home at the end of the war games.
If all they wanted was a dance, that'd be cool. Instead it looks like they want explosions, casualty reports and funerals.
Agreed. Though incidentally, if we go by my omakes, Constitution herself is also thus saved. In her case, because the warp core just doesn't have that many hours left on it. Enough for one last dance, not enough for years or decades of service.We've saved the Potemkin out of the mothballed Connie-As just in case the chance comes up for us to do that with a ship we can (mostly) afford to lose, but... *shrugs*
They are very angry, show no signs of calming down, and their emotional release is not worth our ships or the lives of our crews.
Ah. Well you must admit that the Potemkin does stick in the mind for this particular sort of shell game. Sometimes there is an urge to be cute.Agreed. Though incidentally, if we go by my omakes, Constitution herself is also thus saved. In her case, because the warp core just doesn't have that many hours left on it. Enough for one last dance, not enough for years or decades of service.
I've been thinking that the best way to 'stabilize' the Enterprise-A for a life as a museum ship would be to strip it down to the bare metal and build the universe's largest Sintering furnace around it, heating it to near but not quite the melting point of it's structure. Leave it to bake for an extended period and all those microfractures will anneal back together. The process would be lengthy and expensive, but it wouldn't require any fancy technology, just some very large hardware and maybe a year in a berth.I figured on Enterprise-A being saved for potential stabilization and use as a museum ship, because her nacelles weren't in good enough shape to be worth salvaging, though they may have pulled the Enterprise-A's warp core if that wasn't too badly damaged in the Battle of Khitomer.
1. Make the Gretarians a protectorate/affiliate - A long term project and probably a difficult sell. It certainly isn't going to happen in a timeframe of less than years. To tell the truth, if I were a Gretarian with full omniscient knowledge of the situation, I'd probably turn the Federation down unless the Sydraxian demands got really intolerable.
3. Build outposts right in their faces - I don't know what this means.
4. Do "arms inspections" on their trade coming in from Cardassia. - Does this mean commerce raiding? If not, what exactly does it mean? What would we be inspecting for and what would we do if we found it?
5. Then when you detect their response thanks to superior intelligence, mass your battle fleet. - Does that mean that the intent of all this is to provoke them to attack us with a massed fleet? Will this end goal be included in the brief to the Council about where all this is supposed to go?
Don't forget the context the post was made in, which was arguing with the proposal that we mass a battle fleet and cruise into their space looking for action. What I'm saying here is that military force is impossible except under specific circumstances that do not currently exist.
Seeking to build upon the success of Rigel, the Consortium began further exploration of the surrounding space. Their ships discovered significant resource deposits in neighbouring systems, along with several more non-spacefaring native species. With a hunger in their hearts the executives of the Consortium began another wave of expansion, seeding mining and industrial construction facilities across the sector. It was their dream that Rigel and its surroundings would become a new hub for the Empire, with them as its proprietors. To this end their rebranded their hypercorporation the 'Rigel Consortium'. Some within the Empire even began to whisper that the Consortium might become a true rival for the Orion Syndicate.
It would be good not to make arguments that are specifically denied by the argument you're responding to.
Just a comment on your Orion history, but my take is that the relationship between the modern day "Orion Syndicate" criminal organization and the Orion Syndicate of history is heavily disputed by experts. Basically the modern day Orion Syndicate took on a famous name and pretends to be a direct descendant of the old Empire's organization, but there's not a good case for any kind of continuity.
Modern Orion Syndicate = Old Empire Orion Syndicate about as much as Holy Roman Empire = Roman Empire.
[Chief of Staff NB: After further investigations, his bondmate Lieutenant Commander T'Pirit, Chief Medical Officer on the Courageous, who took leave and went to the Sarek]
[Admiral's NB: Strange for such an arid planet to have romance like the tides.]
[Gain +10rp, gain T'Pirit - 50% chance to void 1st crew casualty in an incident]
Personal Log, Admiral Valentina Sousa, Stardate 24698.3
Just came from a meeting with Madame President, who asked me if, in my opinion, war was imminent. My response that we've been in a low-level state of war for years now annoyed President sh'Arrath, but it's the truth. As far as outright war goes, well, I don't think we're there yet, but if things go up between Apinae and Cardassia then we are all in trouble. The word going out to everyone at the moment is to avoid escalating anything until the elections are complete. No one on the Council wants to tie the incoming Council's hands at the 11th hour.
Captain's Log, USS Salnas, Stardate 24698.9 - Captain T'Leea
Following on from the Syndicate slave raid in Amarkian space, we have been rendering aid to the affected settlement. During the course of these exercises, my science officer has noticed unusual energy signatures in trailing orbit of the colony world. After further investigation, we have found an unauthorised observation satellite that we believe was put into place using probes by the Syndicate to conduct surveillance on the colony. By taking this satellite apart, we have traced part of the signal back to what I must admit is a cunningly hidden listening post in the Alamaede system. By cautious approach, we were able to capture the listening post before it could be self-destructed, and was able to recover some data that had not been wiped. We have forwarded information to Admiral Toor's task force.
[+3 Impact]
Investigations have been ... complicated, however. A shuttle has arrived from the Courageous bearing an ... acquaintance of mine who is dealing with a matter of Vulcan biology.
[Chief of Staff NB: After further investigations, his bondmate Lieutenant Commander T'Pirit, Chief Medical Officer on the Courageous, who took leave and went to the Sarek]
[Admiral's NB: Strange for such an arid planet to have romance like the tides.]
[Gain +10rp, gain T'Pirit - 50% chance to void 1st crew casualty in an incident]
Captain's Log, USS Gale, Stardate 24701.2
A complete success, despite a number of very hair moments! I am ensuring that Commander Petrovich is commended for his actions, somehow keeping everything out of public sight. Also, I saw his footage of the chase through the sewers to catch the lead agent.
No one deserves to have to be in a place like that. We had to completely replace the transporter's biofilter when we beamed them back up.
On the plus side, we have been able to get very good tricorder readings of the energy effect that creates the bonding effect, and believe we can duplicate it!
[+15rp, +10sr/turn]
That's actually fairly plausible.I've been thinking that the best way to 'stabilize' the Enterprise-A for a life as a museum ship would be to strip it down to the bare metal and build the universe's largest Sintering furnace around it, heating it to near but not quite the melting point of it's structure. Leave it to bake for an extended period and all those microfractures will anneal back together. The process would be lengthy and expensive, but it wouldn't require any fancy technology, just some very large hardware and maybe a year in a berth.
The big problem here is that the method used will destroy the micro-scale structure of the Duranium alloy, to say nothing of any nano-scale properties it might have. This will probably be the death-kneel for the Enterprise-A as a starship, since the hull may be strong enough to be towed around, but probably won't stand up to even Warp 1 or impulse power anymore. In any case, the decomisioning for the museum would neccessarily involve removing all the weapons, the warp core, and maybe the deflectors and more-classified sensors.
Oh, absolutely. But when the plan was originally discussed we talked about committing multiple Constitution-A derelicts, so I made sure to leave omake-space for multiple hulls to be committed.Ah. Well you must admit that the Potemkin does stick in the mind for this particular sort of shell game. Sometimes there is an urge to be cute.
Then what do you think happened?As for the Op itself: I'm not so sure it's a straightforward sting op. The Apiata queen was trying to get the Courageous to leave quickly. This was rather suspicious. Space is huge, how did it know so far in advance that an enemy was approaching when a S 5 Excelsior didn't? Those suspicions only gain weight when a Jaldun arrives. Now, the Jaldun attacking regardless of an Excelsior's presence isn't anything new, though the fact that it kept fighting after two Stingers appear. It was a suicidal move to do so. The Stingers alone outgun it, why stay when there's the risk of an Excelsior joining? We've seen some really reckless things from the Cardassians, but throwing ships to a death without gain is not one of them.
The Vegans don't have reason to do so, the Amarki have already done so, and the Apiata won't be joining the Federation Council as long as they're participating in an active war against the Cardassian Union, any more than the Caitians could join while they were fighting the Dawiar.I guess that's one way to say it. I don't want to give the Amarki and the Apiata, once they join, and possibly Vega any reason to go full Hawk.
You don't know what McAdams actually said.To specify on the criticism
1) I would have preferred for McAdams to have made a statement of unity in face of the enemy once the Jaldun started firing.
2) My whole issue here is the tone in which she spoke to the Queen. Again, I'm probably making a mountain out of a molehill here, but I don't want them to feel as if we don't recognize their plight, that McAdams complains be interpreted as Starfleet washing their hands of them.
The problem is that you're mostly talking about purely political actions that are totally outside the control of the playerbase. We don't really have much influence over how Starfleet talks to Amarki angry over slave raids, and we have virtually none over how the Federation at large talks to the Apiata.1) This year, I don't want us alienate those Apiata and Amarki who feel justice isn't being served.
2) Don't outright dismiss or reprimand the aggressive queens or the angry Amarkians. Instead, talk to them in their language, in a way that they will be more receptive to. To the queens, tell them how these raids were a result of Starfleet being at a low-point; forced to spread itself thin due to the rapid integration of new members. Explain how with 6 new Connies we can cover our bases safely. Mention that the Rennie is finishing its trials soon, which will lead to another power-spike as a wave of superior ships enters service. And they're not Explorers, so no fear of long build time or being sent away beyond the borders! Starting straight away with how their actions are counterproductive is only going to make them close themselves up and stop listening.
Get the Amarki close if not outright integrate them into the Anti-Slavery Task Force. Point them at the enemy and let them have their fill. Letting them marauder on their own is just asking for an innocent Union ship ending up as collateral.
3) I don't want us to lose/be forced to expend political will to deal with the fallout of the actions of these vengeful groups. Deal with their issues in a way that doesn't make the feel as if we're just pushing it under the rug or ignore them.
4) Hopefully it will cause the Apiata queens to stop further aggressive actions, or at least limit them to purely defensive ones. No more commerce raiding or baiting others into attacking. As these groups are likely the figureheads for Hawkish politics, I hope it will temper them somewhat as a whole.
It's good stuff!A/N: I didn't think there would be that much of this, but I kind of got into it.
I wouldn't say it's really inaccurate to say the actual continuity is kinda tenuous, as the Empire's Syndicate at its eight was Space-X meets East India Trading Company meets Maersk shipping and then transformed into something much, much different. Also, I imagine any historical record from the time has a fair bit of guesswork in it, due to both the distance in history and the occasional employ of high-energy weapons during any number of conflicts in the time since.Just a comment on your Orion history, but my take is that the relationship between the modern day "Orion Syndicate" criminal organization and the Orion Syndicate of history is heavily disputed by experts. Basically the modern day Orion Syndicate took on a famous name and pretends to be a direct descendant of the old Empire's organization, but there's not a good case for any kind of continuity.
Modern Orion Syndicate = Old Empire Orion Syndicate about as much as Holy Roman Empire = Roman Empire.
Straak having a wife? Even better. also, this juxtaposition makes me go snrksnrksnrk.Captain's Log, USS Sarek, Stardate 24700.3
On the surface of Casio VI we have discovered an artifact that is, by our preliminary dating, of at least Precursor age. We are not yet positive as to its function, but it does emit a subspace 'wave' of sorts. It is currently very weak, but we posit that when it was originally created, it was powerful enough to be detected as far away as Romulus.
Investigations have been ... complicated, however. A shuttle has arrived from the Courageous bearing an ... acquaintance of mine who is dealing with a matter of Vulcan biology.
-
Captain's Log, USS Gale, Stardate 24700.6
This will be very, very delicate. There is a peculiar energy effect in a geological structure on the planet's surface that allows for immensely strong bonding between a few normally disparate elements...