First, in a land grab scenario, I think y'all are really underestimating how important the quicker quarter of deployment would be.
"Far more likely." Do we know there won't be more events overall? You are basing opposition to the T'Mir on some very shaky grounds. Also +2 over the other ships can and will make a significant difference in terms of event success, as we have seen even in home sectors.The T'Mir is far more likely to end up doing nothing useful in the GBZ, due to the multiple Excelsiors being placed there and the high number of ships in general. Usually she will end up being a secondary responder to science events that would have been succeeded on anyway, with the +7 instead of a +3 or +5 not making any difference.
[Space Ameoba Corpse +20rp]The Rigellians dealing with it wouldn't earn us any rp though,
"Is likely," I'm looking directly at survivability. Sure she's slow but that keeps her from responding to combat events; and she's more survivable if she gets jumped in any case, assuming she doesn't get an escort. I'm also not proposing her to skirmish, but to stay just behind the lines. I know there's stuff about escort roles, but I think @OneirosTheWriter can make an exception for a ship that is completely unique in terms of how it is utilized.She is inferior in the likely most important stat for skirmishing, defense, (which seems to be important both for successfully intercepting their ships in favorable circumstances and avoiding/escaping them in unfavorable ones) and too valuable to leave behind, so she could end up actually being a liability. Even assuming that wasn't a problem using her for skirmishing as a slightly better Miranda would be extremely wasteful.
That is not actually what I said. I would envision such a policy, if it was possible, to be that if given the choice between a Connie-B responding to an event and the T'Mir, you send the T'Mir [and maybe a Miranda].The event system so far doesn't work that way, and while we were told we will be able to set engagement rules per ship role eventually that was universally, not per sector. Even if it was per sector that would still require setting the rule that the other ships in the sector do not respond to science events in general, whether the T'Mir actually can make it to the event or not.
They are not in the same category. You can interpret that as an and/or.
We are skirmishing but also mapping and claiming. Why do you seem to be ignoring the latter part so much? This applies to getting the ships there a quarter earlier as well. Like, am I missing something in the mechanics that says skirmish mode means 'go out and hunt' with zero exceptions? If so, it's probably better to put T'Mir into the CBZ.And while that would help somewhat with claiming mining colonies and the like (though less than spreading out science capability would, and due to supply route issues mining colonies in the GBZ are significantly less valuable than in core sectors) the deciding factor on whether we can make good of our claim is almost certainly how successful we are in skirmishes (i. e. which is able to sustain their losses longer). A slow ship that is too valuable to lose is an active liability there.
Yet.The special characteristic of the Gabriel Expanse is that its empty, so there are no installations to do SIGINT against.
Which do you think is more likely: finding BR and SR in Andor, or finding them in the area of space specifically noted as being resource-rich?Different sectors have different event tables, but we've had mineral extraction rewards in all sectors. Why, I remember once where we found some SR in Sol system itself.
You could deploy T'Mir to the CBZ instead easily under the current plan, you'd have to lose Calypso still but you'd keep the fact you're having an additional Connie-B arrive in Q-1. I don't know if people are voting specifically to put T'Mir into GBZ or just get it in the action, though.I'd be happier with IronWolf's plan if he had T'Mir in the CBZ or Apinae, rather than right there in the GBZ.