[x] Kaizuki
If the vote really needs to specify things that happen up to the point where we might potentially get dragged into combat with Iowa via accidentally leaving timestop or pulling someone in somehow, then yes, you are right to specify these things. I grant this appears to be the case, but, like, it's a lot to vote on at once. To interact meaningfully with such a large vote is substantially more difficult. I will have to use higher-quality thought on it, etc.If I had to point to one big thing, if we take the abeyance and end up at Iowa it's not going to be clear to anyone what level of lethality is acceptable and Mika at minimum has expressed serious concerns about Iowa getting away and being able to retaliate, so there is a big potential conflict point there that we stand to walk into with the abeyance.
If the vote really needs to specify things that happen up to the point where we might potentially get dragged into combat with Iowa via accidentally leaving timestop or pulling someone in somehow, then yes, you are right to specify these things. I grant this appears to be the case, but, like, it's a lot to vote on at once. To interact meaningfully with such a large vote is substantially more difficult. I will have to use higher-quality thought on it, etc.
And before that, if we don't pratfall out of timestop, I'd greatly prefer to reconnoiter first. We don't know what we're going to find, beyond "Almost certainly there is some subset of the Iowa group present". If the vote ends up needing to be applicable to a situation that we fall into without such an opportunity... so be it.
So the thing I have in effect described is that we should do basic coordination (such as ROE) amongst our meguca, with the intention of flying over and starting to scope out the situation, with the intention that we'll be able to respond effectively in such a problematic case as that we get dragged into combat by the act of starting to scope out the situation. And some of it will be useful anyway, so we might as well get it out of the way. However, ideally we don't actually get into combat yet. And later on, ideally we make a plan to resolve the whole thing without ever doing something that can really be described as getting into a fight.
-[X] Establish clear objectives:
--[X] Primary objectives are, in order of importance:
---[X] Everybody on our side walks out of here alive at the end of the day.
---[X] The neutralization of Iowa Group's ability to conduct operations against anyone remotely associated with any of us.
... (omitted less necessary section)
-[X] Establish loose but clear ROE:
--[X] If abiding by ROE means death or capture, don't die or get captured.
--[X] Directly acting to harm non-hostiles is absolutely contraindicated.
--[X] We're fighting this nonlethally for now. If and only if that ends up conflicting with primary objectives, escalation by anyone willing is on the table considering who we're up against. We should be capable of holding them securely via collaboration with Yuki. Sayaka can copy their powers, verify what they're capable of, and worst comes to worst we keep them incapacitated and go hit up Niko to help come up with some way to be sure they're not going to be a problem. We will not give Iowa a chance to take a second shot at anyone here.
The Onion: General Catgirl Decides Planning Just Not Worthwhile, Claims "Everything Will Work Out Somehow If Madoka Wills It"Breaking News: Catgirl General Explains the Importance of Proper Planning. Details at 11.
No. My attitude is "We're currently in timestop and have broad freedom to act in ways they can't respond to at all. Take advantage of it while it lasts." Somehow managing to not even go over and have a look without dropping out of timestop into a brawl would be at best embarrassing.YEaaaaaah so this is, IMO, basically a mindset difference.
You're approaching this from the "maybe we won't have to fight" angle. I'm very much taking a "the odds of us wiping these people from timestop are nil" approach.
Okay @The Phoenixian I want you to explain to me, in words, how this:
Is "before we meet with the Pleiades Saints," given that the next post is supposed to take us all the fucking way to SEA:
Like, dude, it's not like I didn't say this at the top of the vote post. I get that you must have missed it, but getting yelled at by someone who is completely missing the entire point is sorta bad, and that's leaving out you writing a whole post not recognizing that we're supposed to be voting the length to SEA.
If you have issues with the ROE now's the time to talk about them, and bluntly, any issue you have with that is an awful lot more critical than anything you've been saying so far.
Here's the thing. I very much did see the label on your vote. I just didn't agree it was a good idea, and perhaps editing late into the night made me word my thoughts poorly. By the same token, however, I'm mad at you for just going off on me and glossing over my own fundamental points in turn. I'm trying to keep in the vein of pointing out instead of lashing out, but we'll see how well I actually do.One of my big goals atm is to tamp down on the anger that shows up in my posts far too often. Unless you're actually talking to a bona-fide genetic sociopath who gets endorphin rushes from lying convincingly, there's always some kind of reason for disagreements. In this case it's that Phoen didn't get the label on the vote as "goes to SEA", which, yes it's irritating for me given that he then went on to write all this stuff attacking my position, but come on, we've all missed a label before. It's understandable, and getting angry about it only makes productive discussion harder.
As someone who's been on Kaizuki's side on the general "we need to move now" vs "we need to wait and gather more information" debate, I will say you aren't the only one who holds their position due to fear. I have been terrified that if we don't grab hold of this opportunity with both hands, the next time we are able to figure out where Iowa is will be after we find Hitomi's corpse laid out for us as a message.Throughout this entire affair, I have wanted to take it slower than you because I am afraid. We were planning to talk to people and get details on Iowa today. All of that was abandoned when we rushed in and now we're hoping our allies can pick up the slack. And so I am afraid that this plan of rushing in is arrogant, based on our imagination of our own strength, and could well get our friends and allies hurt or killed if we're wrong about that. I am afraid of hitting Iowa and discovering they have another antimagic-grade trump card that we don't know about, but could have.
By this I mean "Go to their previous target in time stop and abduct the first meguca we find. Ask her if she'd like to help put down the raiders that came through a few days ago."I mean, if we really want to seriously scout the situation we can take a detour to Iowa's previous target and see if we can find anyone to ask about their roster and abilities. I was under the impression no one else was interested in that particular option (and I might be missing pertinent information), but I'm happy to do it if there is interest.
It's your last line that's the thing for me here. I acknowledge that what we plan will be smashed against a wall called reality, even as I also fear that, and even as I realize the necessity. 'swhy my argument is about "too soon" rather than "don't."To put it bluntly:
Plans are worthless. We know far too little about Iowa to put together a silver bullet plan that deals with them, and any plan that tries to account for all possibilities will swiftly balloon into an unwieldy behemoth of if-then statements.
Having planned is priceless. If our allies know each other's abilities, know our general aims and goals, know what the others are going to be doing, and know where the fallback/regroup points are, then they'll be far better equipped to make smart decisions on their own initiative.
Plans don't survive contact with the enemy, sure, but that's a terrible excuse not to plan.
E: And yes, to put it bluntly, we should not be reaching our destination in the next vote. I don't care if that's what Firn wants - we flatly cannot cover the necessary material to prepare for Iowa in a single vote at the moment. Period.
And if that's the way, so be it! I'm fine with that, too: I'm only preferring to write to getting there because I'm eager to do the big reveal, and writing-wise, well... a long flight isn't the most interesting thing in the world to write. There's not much to describe.And yes, to put it bluntly, we should not be reaching our destination in the next vote. I don't care if that's what Firn wants - we flatly cannot cover the necessary material to prepare for Iowa in a single vote at the moment. Period.
...is there any particular reason why we have to plan on the way over? We could just spend the hours-long trip to SEA getting everyone familiarized with each other's capabilities and approaches, and then start planning once we're on-site and thus able to get some idea of what's going on in the area?
Like @Nerevar , I want to start taking down Iowa in as little wallclock time as possible because I think it's the less risky time. I would add that I think this approach is less risky for the actual combat part, because showing up and acting under conditions when they only just learned that we could maybe reach them is ideal. They haven't had more than a few minutes to make react. Their ability to learn about our capabilities at a distance is probably limited in significant ways, or else they wouldn't bother with the storm thing.It's your last line that's the thing for me here. I acknowledge that what we plan will be smashed against a wall called reality, even as I also fear that, and even as I realize the necessity. 'swhy my argument is about "too soon" rather than "don't."
Question. Has Firn ever put us in a situation that we clearly weren't ready for?
So what you're saying is that we should make a barrier in timestop and use that so that we do have plenty to describe. Like the barrier curious extra, and the Feathers and the crashing and the burning as it all goes up in smoke.And if that's the way, so be it! I'm fine with that, too: I'm only preferring to write to getting there because I'm eager to do the big reveal, and writing-wise, well... a long flight isn't the most interesting thing in the world to write. There's not much to describe.
Well, Firn has moved us out of a situation we weren't prepared for, back when we were talking about preemptively potentialbombing Homura.Question. Has Firn ever put us in a situation that we clearly weren't ready for?
Question. Has Firn ever put us in a situation that we clearly weren't ready for?