In some sense, our view of the Tokyo Council will come down to an assessment of different qualities that matter. "Useful" to all involved, "Good" of moral actions, and "Fair" as regards to quality of life. Useful, as defined by the intended operation of their system under healthy conditions. For goodness, I suggest we learn more about the treatment of the lowest social classes. Fairness has a personal definition, from our outsider perspective or any citizen's experience, as well as a technical measure from theory.
If we consider theory, game theory, we can try to liken the Council to existing concepts. Which game are they playing? Is it :
Pirate game - Wikipedia
In a prescriptive model, are we joining their game, or playing a different game of our own with them, more like :
Ultimatum game - Wikipedia
TL;DR, we find out the limiting conditions of enough groups, and make communications more perfect, we might be able to act sooner in the best way. Interview, get contacts, move, repeat.
I'll accept our goal is to create maximal safe survivorship, and that political concerns should be viewed only through that lens initially.
This city has done interesting things, which have almost no future relevance in our proposed world.
It is much like Yuki predicted on her own behalf, so here we are going to navigate a similar set of disincentives. This time, without a framework that easily lets the leader of the other group pivot. If we eliminate scarcity in Tokyo, and the number of violent criminals is essentially finite, at some point they have a Council which has few if any reasons to exist. Unless they are already in operation above the military level?
We need to find out what else the Council is involved in, as the critical determinant of the motivations of the ruling coalitions. In our world, the modern UN is not very significant as a military organization. They have a huge impact in other areas, by creating programs that make policies ending with support for human goals reach out across national boundaries in a more stable way. How does the Council provide any services that aren't related to defense? How do they think of their own organization?
I want us to continue the interview, with some carefully chosen interests. At the same time, we would be wise to pay some attention to the Psychology Department, and see what our new contacts might offer us.
We also need, NEED a primer as to the laws / rules / culture propagated under the Council. The whole "what type of visit?" issue denotes a formalized treatment. Remaining ignorant would hamper us badly, as we cannot predict or understand what reactions any groups might have.
Our future course of action may require us to get other first-hand accounts around Tokyo, so finding out what our options are is important, too. Fill out our Tokyo address book.
Would we also want to signal Kurenai that she should test us for our Infohazzard status? That would convey enough, unless we are going to do the Privacy sphere deal.
Our "souvenir" for them should be a talk about Enchanting? Do they know about Soul Snuggles? Actually, does Yuri have any practical advice regarding magic with her muggle partner? Does this make you think of any reason we need to bring that knowledge back with us?
If that's the case, then it's possible Sayaka that when Sayaka checks our Soul Gem and gets the 404 Power Not Found error, it's because...there really is no power there.
Perhaps that is a necessary feature of our existence? Developing our Hope meditation may be a prudent investment for the future?
I'd suggest thinking of the Tokyo Council as more of a
thing, not because the norms are necessarily identical but more because a bunch of Vikings getting together
As the stranger in their community, how much "Thirteenth Warrior" is in our immediate future?