- Location
- Hell
That scared the bejezzus out of me -_-;
That scared the bejezzus out of me -_-;
Metal, lumber, art, military aid, etc. Let's not pretend all we're interested in is simply exploiting the Lowlands.Our other provinces get a lot of value out of Divine Stewards and the communistic society we've put together - food insurance, etc. I wouldn't expect the same to be true in the lowlands (the entire reason we're interested in them is the wealth they produce without significant investment), especially if we're treating them as a breadbasket - they'd be seeing a lot of combat, and a lot of sending food and manpower back to the rest of our kingdom, and over the long term I'd expect that to result in cultural friction if they're not perceiving much coming back the other way.
Mutual defense, better quality of life, cultural assimilation (something we're damn good at), trade, and cultural inertia.
The better question to ask is- 'what part of being a province in our kingdom is so onerous military rebellion is preferable'. Persia ruled most the known world (at the time)* with a system not dissimilar to ours, and unless this region is much larger than I thought it was, ancient civilizations conquered and dominated the fertile crescent- which presumably is of similar size.
*Frankly, our provincial system seems better than the Satrapy system if only because each of our 'satraps' can potentially win the crown and is thus personally invested in supporting the state. Why rebel to seize the throne when it can be one through political acumen?
He's more like the Roman emperor thank anything else.We have a fairly strong central republician form of government. Our "king" isn't really a king.
Regarding "sending food and manpower back..." The generally accepted truism is that our hills and forest produce as much or more food than the lowlands currently do. Therefore, if the lowland province is a) not benefiting from DS because they're b) not using our techniques so as to produce more crops then c) they're not going to be a breadbasket sending back a lot of food. Because there is a lot of land to be worked, they will not be sending manpower back to the rest of our kingdom except in the form of refugees, bureaucrats, artisans desiring to work with rarer materials, and students.Our other provinces get a lot of value out of Divine Stewards and the communistic society we've put together - food insurance, etc. I wouldn't expect the same to be true in the lowlands (the entire reason we're interested in them is the wealth they produce without significant investment), especially if we're treating them as a breadbasket - they'd be seeing a lot of combat, and a lot of sending food and manpower back to the rest of our kingdom, and over the long term I'd expect that to result in cultural friction if they're not perceiving much coming back the other way.
Ecept actions is province/2, which appears to be rounded up. So we already have 2 actions, adding another province doesn't help.I am of the opinion that we should [Main] New Settlement: Eastern Hills
New Province = More Actions = Faster Growth = Win
Well if we never expand then were stuck at those actionsEcept actions is province/2, which appears to be rounded up. So we already have 2 actions, adding another province doesn't help.
We literally just expanded with the Fishing Minors.
Yes, but it also means we're not pressed to expand this turn.
"literally just" my gay ass.
Except that we got 3 actions this turn and 2 actions the previous, indicating that we have 5 provinces not 3 and no, it is not rounded up but carried over.Ecept actions is province/2, which appears to be rounded up. So we already have 2 actions, adding another province doesn't help.
So? we could do another expansion, more action economy
Were always pressed to expand!
That doesn't change the premise of my equation.Ecept actions is province/2, which appears to be rounded up. So we already have 2 actions, adding another province doesn't help.
Police crackdown. It works.
"literally just" my gay ass.
Except that we got 3 actions this turn and 2 actions the previous, indicating that we have 5 provinces not 3 and no, it is not rounded up but carried over.
*scowls* I hate when I go to find quotes and they prove me wrong.Ecept actions is province/2, which appears to be rounded up. So we already have 2 actions, adding another province doesn't help.
[X] Dead Priests (One compatible value: The Greater Good)
[X][Main] Expand Forest - Fishing Minors
[X][Secondary] Annex Fishing Minors
[X][Secondary] Establish Annual Festival
Study Stars - Valleyhome
New Settlement, Southern Coast - Redshore
[X] [Main] More Blackbirds
[X] [Main] Restore Order
Valleyhome - Study Stars
Northshore - Expand Economy
Sacred Forest - Study Forest
Most definitely.[X] Reinforce Northshore
[X] Send additional resources to assist (-1 Centralization, allows Northshore to spend Econ on defensive measures while being attacked)
[X] The People always welcome the needy (-1 Stability, +2 Econ)
If we ever do move into the badlands do people think turning them into a truly fertile area would be a mega project we could pull off?
Yeah, we don't have proof either way, but if you think about it mechanically it makes a lot more sense for it to average to 2.5 (be it due to rolls or due to alternating) since that way every province gets 0.5 actions per turn. From a narrative perspective, rounding up just doesn't really make sense IMO.So I'm assuming it's rounded up, but I could be wrong since this is the first turn of having Northshore take an action after being created.
The DPs might not die- last time we thought they were near dead, it turned out they were just losing econ to their megaproject. They might just be doing another megaproject.for all the rumours of major victories against the Dead Priests, the chiefs are all warning us to not act like they're gone yet, or that the people currently killing them are going to immediately turn around and attack us."