...

Point is!

Yeomen are elite warriors.

Partricians are elite warriors.

More of one, means less political power for the other.

vote Harmysyn Reforms Event Chain

*confetti*
We can certainly hope, though I personally doubt, for reasons I have already covered, that the Harmysyn reforms event chain will have as much impact on Second Son once it is complete as the Myranyn, instead focusing its energies to an entirely different problem.

*shrug* For now we will keep on living so its really just a case of wait and see.
 
Last edited:
...

Point is!

Yeomen are elite warriors.

Patricians are elite warriors.

More of one, means less political power for the other.

vote Harmysyn Reforms Event Chain

*confetti*
I think you lost me again. Yeomen are decent warriors, but they aren't elites. At least not in the way that a Patricians who has been trained his whole life to fight and command armies is.

Yeomen still spend a good chunk of their time farming, after all. It's just that they also have time and money to train and equip themselves, unlike most other factions.

But the yeomen aren't training to lead, they are training to fight. The Patricians are the ones who learn how to lead armies, and thus they become the officers of the armies. The yeomen are our archers, our reliable fighters that help strengthen our armies.

Yeomen are good fighters in general, and have great advantages with specific tech like longbows, but that doesn't mean that they know how to lead something like a shield wall, or how and when to call up their reserves. The Patricians, on the other hand, would have likely been taught how to do so as part of their childhood training.
 
Last edited:
Here's my view: the most important thing for human progress in general is continuity. Very few goals outweigh that consideration.

If you want to free slaves, give women more right, etc, survival of our civilization against collapse should be on top of our list.

Because if we collapse, it will takes centuries, if not thousand of years to recover what we had lost.

And so long as we're implementing social improvements to risk losing, I agree with that. The problem is that the history of human society is not a steady march toward ever more perfected states of being, and in fact, giving entrenched power structures more time in which to calcify makes it increasingly harder to dismantle them. Obviously other factors (chiefly technology) prohibit the immediate implementation of modern social norms, but if we're not at least making strides in that direction I'm not sure continuity is the best thing for progress.

Note again that this is specifically a rebuttal to the "do nothing, survival at all costs" school of thought and that my opposition to the not!Marian reforms is both less stringent and based in more subjective risk analysis.
 
I think you lost me again. Yeomen are decent warriors, but they aren't elites. At least not in the way that a Patricians who has been trained his whole life to fight and command armies is.

Yeomen still spend a good chunk of their time farming, after all. It's just that they also have time and money to train and equip themselves, unlike most other factions.

But the yeomen aren't training to lead, they are training to fight. The Patricians are the ones who learn how to lead armies, and thus they become the officers of the armies. The yeomen are our archers, our reliable fighters that help strengthen our armies.

Yeomen are good fighters in general, and have great advantages with specific tech like longbows, but that doesn't mean that they know how to lead something like a shield wall, or how and when to call up their reserves. The Patricians, on the other hand, would have likely been taught how to do so as part of their childhood training.
Here's how I see the current factions relation with our military:

Urban Poor:
-Time: None, busy with jobs
-Money: haha, you're kidding, right?
Result: No way to advance into the army currently, barring desperate wars

Poor Farmers:
-Time: A fair bit, as long as the fields don't need tending to
-Money: Nope
Result: Some chances to join the military, but only at the very bottom. Need a shitload of talent and luck to advance

Yeomen:
-Time: Same as poor farmers, maybe slightly more if they can hire poor farmers to work some of their land
-Money: Yep, they've got some. Are middle class, so can afford to equip themselves somewhat
Result: Pretty good chance to join the military, and start off middling level, as they don't need as much rudimentary training. Good chance to move up the ranks when there is an opportunity.

Patricians:
-Time: As much as needed.
-Money: ALL TEH MONEY
Result: They can put a shitload of time and effort into improving themselves before they join up with the military, and have resources to equip themselves with the best of the best. Start high, and smooth sailing from there if they are any good.

So yeomen can do alright right now, but compared to the Patricians? Nope. No competition.
 
We can certainly hope, though I personally doubt, for reasons I have already covered, that the Harmysyn reforms event chain will have as much impact on Second Son once it is complete as the Myranyn, instead focusing its energies to an entirely different problem.

*shrug* For now we will keep on living so its really just a case of wait and see.

I think you lost me again. Yeomen are decent warriors, but they aren't elites. At least not in the way that a Patricians who has been trained his whole life to fight and command armies is.

Yeomen still spend a good chunk of their time farming, after all. It's just that they also have time and money to train and equip themselves, unlike most other factions.

But the yeomen aren't training to lead, they are training to fight. The Patricians are the ones who learn how to lead armies, and thus they become the officers of the armies. The yeomen are our archers, our reliable fighters that help strengthen our armies.

Yeomen are good fighters in general, and have great advantages with specific tech like longbows, but that doesn't mean that they know how to lead something like a shield wall, or how and when to call up their reserves. The Patricians, on the other hand, would have likely been taught how to do so as part of their childhood training.

Okay let me try again.

Patricians.
First and Second Son. Heir and Spare. Adminstrators, Leaders, Commanders
Third and Fourth Son. Elite Warriors

Yes the Patricians are the ones that learn how to lead armies, but third and fourth sons are also trained as warriors and archers. Yeomanry have something similar with the first son being heir and the second being a warrior.

Harmysyn Reform increases the number of "sons" a Patrician has and thus increases the number of Elite Warriors i.e. the Archers and Chariot Archers. Those are the same as the Yeomen archers you are talking about.

Patricians have a monopoly on leading, there is no doubt. But the very top of our armed forces on the ground are elite warriors which are the ones that have the time to spend full time in their profession. Those are a mix between Partrician third and fourth sons and Yeomanry second sons+

Harmysyn Reform pushes the ratios closer to the Patricians and thus gives the Yeomen less power.
 
I can see where you are coming from, but mercenary companies and higher-end military positions do exist.

But converting the current yeoman warriors model into Urban Poor Army with Partisan as leaders will not make the Yeoman prospects any more attractive, because the conversion removes existing Yeoman positions and puts Yeoman to compete against Urban Poor with the same minor leadership position. Steps backward for Yeoman faction in every way.
That is the point. The Yeoman faction currently has enough military, economic and social power to independently wage war and WIN.

This isn't the poor abused pre-serf farmer here. This is the proto-feudal petty lord attacking someone else so he has more land. Remember the feudal lords and serfdom more or less was the descendant of the current yeoman and their subordinate farmers.
True, true.

But a collapse is not just a casualty figure. It is a direct quality-of-life decrease, as our civilization loses legacies, values, and possibly even infrastructure and knowledge. If our polity fractures, our successors will split everything in our character sheet among themselves, and while some things will go to many or even all of our successors, others are not getting split up. This means that any successor we play as gets to keep only a fraction of what we've accumulated so far.

Even if you take the long-term-view and can tolerate the moral cost of all the misery and death that such a thing would cost, a breakup is still a massive set-back from the view of trying to optimize quality-of-life for the long term.
And the important part here is that social collapses always moves towards:
-Martial elite. When civil authority and bureaucracy collapses order comes at the point of a sword. This is why warrior elite leaderships are so common, its the natural state for a post-collapse environment.

-Loss of womens' rights and social status. Post collapse civilizations need to greatly increase the birthrate, and the normal civil protections are gone. While at the same time available work becomes much more physically oriented. All this works to push women towards a role revolving around producing lots of children and little else.

-Slavery. So you can't pay people to work because the system is gone, work needs to be done anyway. Just force them.
The way I see it, recruiting the poor into our armies is a massive military advantage. Women officers, on the other hand, significantly improves our social fabric and economic competitiveness.

For me, what it comes down to is that I don't think we'll get another chance for woman officers until the early modern era (I don't really understand how we got this opportunity in the first place). Whereas I find it very easy to believe that we'll get numerous opportunities to recruit the poor.
We got the opportunity pretty much because the Patricians want to replace Yeomen officers with Patrician children officers, but there aren't enough Patrician sons who could be made officers.

While it helps pull military power out of the Yeomens' hands, it also make the Patricians much more militarisitic than they are, since we basically doubled the value of military accomplishments for social advancement.

You know, the part of Rome where the system made it so that if you wanted to get elected you'd best have conquered SOMETHING? Yeah, that. We created that for the Yeomen, and we're now moving our Patricians into the same group
Would maxing our centralization cause problems? I mean our military stat is currently low. When we had a max centralization on the turn the military caused problems, the military stat was gold if I remember correctly.
According to AN:
-Overly high Centralization leads to civilization paralysis. Nothing gets done, period
-Our economic model doubles the penalty.

Basically, pray for an Admin Hero, because only they can keep the country running while in that mode.
It's very bad, only our warriors attacking anything they please is even worse.
Though I have to admit, I'm not quite sure how this reform will actually affect the army's layout. I assume that we have some sort of plan to use our surplus of crossbowmen effectively, but I'm not quite sure how.

I know a lot of people have been making roman legion references, so I wonder if the crossbow would work to replace the javelin? Like, have a shield wall based army like the romans, but instead of having the legion throw a javelin as they approach the enemy, instead have them unleash a hail of crossbow bolts?
Not too complex.

Shieldwall or pike hedge forms the front ranks. These would be drawn from the existing Yeomen and low patricians.
Back ranks would be massed crossbowmen firing over the shieldwall. Typically ordered in sets of three, the front row will fire, then crouch to reload, while the next rank cycles.

Basically enemies are faced with a constant rain of missiles at volumes exceeding the yeoman archery volleys, using crossbows which have enough power to punch through the heaviest armor available at the time...and then you have to break through the shieldwall while your back ranks are dying from steel rain.

Rejoice!
For the Cartographer has returned!



Now with %100 less Trelli!​
Theres also a pirate kingdom in there. It used to be within range of Gulvalley but they "went west"

Looks like Trelli on the map.
Also, is the everyone's favorite feudalistic Sheep still playing?
He went and created his own quest.
 
Last edited:
Vote is still open or no?
Still open.

...

Something something let's actually deal with the crisis. Vote for Myranyn Reforms!

I am too tired to beat the drum for support.
Adhoc vote count started by 8bitBob on Oct 7, 2017 at 2:26 AM, finished with 112646 posts and 89 votes.

Adhoc vote count started by 8bitBob on Oct 7, 2017 at 3:02 AM, finished with 112647 posts and 89 votes.
 
Assuming he conquers Trelli next turn we need to remember to send their king a trade mission. He seems to be a Naval hero?
Martial/Naval probably.

Smart one too, since he went for Trell, if he could take the docks intact the next 2 turns would be him reconquesting the Trelli splinter states.

But I doubt we have the actions to spare to care
 
Martial/Naval probably.

Smart one too, since he went for Trell, if he could take the docks intact the next 2 turns would be him reconquesting the Trelli splinter states.

But I doubt we have the actions to spare to care
I honestly do not think we have to do much.

Everyone remember the Lowlands?

This is the new Lowlands and we are going to keep it that way until we can eat it.
 
That is the point. The Yeoman faction currently has enough military, economic and social power to independently wage war and WIN.

This isn't the poor abused pre-serf farmer here. This is the proto-feudal petty lord attacking someone else so he has more land. Remember the feudal lords and serfdom more or less was the descendant of the current yeoman and their subordinate farmers.

So you are going to put more tangible military power into hands of Partisan and Priests? I can't see any downside with this at all.:V
----
Interesting development in the armor tech, was it always there?

Wonder if hand sized iron plates are possible add-on to our leather armor. Must be less time consuming to make and replace. Lighter too if on the chest area needs covering.
 
[X] [Reform] Begin Harmysyn Reforms Event Chain
[X] [PiA] Khemetri (Probably a Spiritual Value, hard to tell compatibility with new religion)
[X] [GA] Subordinate reform (-10 Prestige)
[X] [Iron] Upgrade Iron Blooded to Steel Blooded
 
So you are going to put more tangible military power into hands of Partisan and Priests? I can't see any downside with this at all.:V
The patricians were always going to get more power out of this:
-Harmysyn means the Patrician optimal course of action is to go out there, get military victories to raise the standing of their family. This will produce stronger military ties and make for more military adventures in our elites. This is more or less why the Second Sons are invading our neighbors to begin with. We'd just add the Patricians to them.

-Myranyn means the Patrician optimal course of action is to make sure they control the food, wealth and media, so they control the urban poor, so they control the military. This will produce stronger trade and administrative ties, and make for more politics and bureaucracy in our elites. Which is the current status quo to begin with.

So, which do you prefer to encourage?
 
The patricians were always going to get more power out of this:
-Harmysyn means the Patrician optimal course of action is to go out there, get military victories to raise the standing of their family. This will produce stronger military ties and make for more military adventures in our elites. This is more or less why the Second Sons are invading our neighbors to begin with. We'd just add the Patricians to them.

-Myranyn means the Patrician optimal course of action is to make sure they control the food, wealth and media, so they control the urban poor, so they control the military. This will produce stronger trade and administrative ties, and make for more politics and bureaucracy in our elites. Which is the current status quo to begin with.

So, which do you prefer to encourage?

Anything that stops arming the poor. But the only viable contender is Harmysyn which has fallen out of favor. Do nothing option was dead before it left the drawing board.
 
The optimal course is to raise centralization and then rearranged everything after we get more information on what needs fixing.
Sadly the thread is currently in shiny chase mode.
The optimal course requires breaking the power of the Yeomen, and the VERY SAME people are objecting to trying to do so as well.
The Yeomen, the rural low nobility, are constantly considered the beleaguered farmers who would become serfs, rather than the landlords who become knights.
Anything that stops arming the poor. But the only viable contender is Harmysyn which has fallen out of favor. Do nothing option was dead before it left the drawing board.

The Harmysyn makes the problem worse by making going out to conquer people the best choice for the rich and powerful.
That's how you get Rome expanding until it just dissolved.
 
The Harmysyn makes the problem worse by making going out to conquer people the best choice for the rich and powerful.That's how you get Rome expanding until it just dissolved.

And the rich and powerful will still want to conquer people because none of these changes cost to them. The Urban Poor will want to advance their career and the viable course is via war. So your point of people want to conquer is moot since it changes nothing at all.
 
We literally do not have enough information on the problems we face to know how to best go about fixing them.
But we do:
Second Son Crisis - Lesser warriors are flowing outward, attacking outsiders and risk bringing retribution to the rest of the People. They must be reined in, but once the seed of the frontier has been planted it is hard to uproot. Causes trouble each turn, may end on its own but can be definitively ended with: Max Legitimacy? and 2 of (Max Cent?, Martial Less than 3?, Yeomen Power 0?); or a Civil War
-Martial <3 cannot be achieved without destroying our Blackbirds, OR the provinces/cities helpfully raising it.
-Max cent we're already trying for.

Which means we're left with either the Myranyn reforms making one of the conditions easier to meet by moving to a less likely to run off to stab people army, destroying the Yeomen as a political power, or a civil war while we have Martial nothing,
 
And the rich and powerful will still want to conquer people because none of these changes cost to them. The Urban Poor will want to advance their career and the viable course is via war. So your point of people want to conquer is moot since it changes nothing at all.
Wrong, on every level:
-The rich and powerful are disincentivized to wage war. Mobilizing the Urban Poor costs them money! Keeping the Urban Poor in training/civil jobs makes money.
-The Urban Poor do not advance career in war. Armies comprised of the urban poor gain nothing in war, they don't get land, they get paid, but this means they don't get paid doing their normal jobs and if they get maimed...well good luck with that.
-The Military elite(full time soldiers, yeomen, elite units) do advance career in war.

As such this is a false equivalency being presented without basis.
At least do some basic google lookup. The urbanites never like war. Only people who gain power from land, which is to say the rural landholders and the military elite, push for military adventurism. Bureaucratic elite dislike war because it makes the logistics complicated and wastes money paying the poor to kill people instead of paying the poor to make more money.
So basically we lose nothing of value? got it.

Which you know they did last turn.
Which means it's an impossible target. Either the provinces will actively work to undo our progress or we destroy something the playerbase wants to keep.

Burning the Yeomen political power works.
 
But we do:

-Martial <3 cannot be achieved without destroying our Blackbirds, OR the provinces/cities helpfully raising it.
-Max cent we're already trying for.

Which means we're left with either the Myranyn reforms making one of the conditions easier to meet by moving to a less likely to run off to stab people army, destroying the Yeomen as a political power, or a civil war while we have Martial nothing,

Orrr we can sacrifice Blackbirds for the sake of better military complex and rediscover better scouts + police force instead of a bit outdated folks.
Like, the more I think about it, the more it seems than Mar-whoever's reform is designed to be almost what we need - mass conscript army - but designed in a way which gives control over it not to the state, in a nod to historical Marius' reform and its problems.
Granted, we are not giving away land to poor just yet. We probably will give them land of yeomen once we move to break them, because somebody needs to own the niche.
 
Back
Top